Fetterman - Oz Debate — anyone keeping tabs on this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Experts on strokes have repeatedly noted that what his stroke did was result in an auditory processing disorder that will get better over time, and that his cognitive abilities, i.e. intelligence, are in tact. The media is stoking this fear that he's somehow "dumber" since experiencing a stroke, when the experts, albeit buried at the bottom of most articles, state otherwise.

Adding that Dr. Oz had the opportunity to be a decent human being and explain that as a medical professional, to say, hey, I'm not going to medically gaslight him or anyone else, these are the facts, let's be decent humans and debate the issues and give him the needed accommodations in this moment. But of course he didn't do that because he's a POS snake oil salesman.

Nonsense. He got the accommodations he requested, as well as only one debate that should have occurred much sooner than it did.

You Dems basically just want Republican candidates to bend over for your flawed candidates. This is not some football game where the opposing team will step aside so a disabled kid can score a touchdown.

You're just repeating the lie that he is flawed b/c of his stroke. He is not. (See above). You, sir or ma'am, are an awful person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Experts on strokes have repeatedly noted that what his stroke did was result in an auditory processing disorder that will get better over time, and that his cognitive abilities, i.e. intelligence, are in tact. The media is stoking this fear that he's somehow "dumber" since experiencing a stroke, when the experts, albeit buried at the bottom of most articles, state otherwise.

Adding that Dr. Oz had the opportunity to be a decent human being and explain that as a medical professional, to say, hey, I'm not going to medically gaslight him or anyone else, these are the facts, let's be decent humans and debate the issues and give him the needed accommodations in this moment. But of course he didn't do that because he's a POS snake oil salesman.

Oz was a decent human being and just pretended that everything was OK. He didn’t question Fetterman on his physical ability, just his policies as appropriate. Unfortunately for Fetterman, he didn’t have to. It was in plain sight.

Oz made a few cracks at the debate about it and talked WAY faster than he usually does to make it hard for the closed captioning to work.

Perhaps that has something to do with time limits on answers at a debate.

[Anonymous]

Covefee

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Covefee

This is about Dr. Oz. That should be green Covefee beans.

[Anonymous]

At least fetterman didn't reference Frederick Douglas like he is still alive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:At least fetterman didn't reference Frederick Douglas like he is still alive.

Fetterman doesn’t even know who Frederick Douglas was.

[Anonymous]

Nobody can point to a single accomplishment of Fetteman’s that justify his candidacy. He’s failed upwards whilst living off of his parents until he was 49 years old. Quite a role model for our youth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nobody can point to a single accomplishment of Fetteman’s that justify his candidacy. He’s failed upwards whilst living off of his parents until he was 49 years old. Quite a role model for our youth.

He seems so much more qualified and decent than the other guy, who is a TV charlatan best known for selling snake oil and doesn't even live in PA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody can point to a single accomplishment of Fetteman’s that justify his candidacy. He’s failed upwards whilst living off of his parents until he was 49 years old. Quite a role model for our youth.

He seems so much more qualified and decent than the other guy, who is a TV charlatan best known for selling snake oil and doesn't even live in PA.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody can point to a single accomplishment of Fetteman’s that justify his candidacy. He’s failed upwards whilst living off of his parents until he was 49 years old. Quite a role model for our youth.

He seems so much more qualified and decent than the other guy, who is a TV charlatan best known for selling snake oil and doesn't even live in PA.

Again, you can’t point to any accomplishment. And you do realize that it’s possible that they are both unqualified or is that too difficult a concept to process?

[Anonymous]

John Fetterman is what Bart Simpson would be if he grew up. His brain is filled with hoops and bong resin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody can point to a single accomplishment of Fetteman’s that justify his candidacy. He’s failed upwards whilst living off of his parents until he was 49 years old. Quite a role model for our youth.

He seems so much more qualified and decent than the other guy, who is a TV charlatan best known for selling snake oil and doesn't even live in PA.

Again, you can’t point to any accomplishment. And you do realize that it’s possible that they are both unqualified or is that too difficult a concept to process?

We are in a ramped up, fear mongered, hyper polarized environment. People vote against the more threatening candidate. That means women, parents, and most people that are from PA and care about PA are not interested in electing a con artist from NJ.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody can point to a single accomplishment of Fetteman’s that justify his candidacy. He’s failed upwards whilst living off of his parents until he was 49 years old. Quite a role model for our youth.

He seems so much more qualified and decent than the other guy, who is a TV charlatan best known for selling snake oil and doesn't even live in PA.

Again, you can’t point to any accomplishment. And you do realize that it’s possible that they are both unqualified or is that too difficult a concept to process?

For Senate, I don't need to point to be any particular accomplishment. He's been a mayor and a lieutenant gov which is more experienced in government than Oz. Has. He understands politics and procedure in a way that yet another talk show host TV celebrity doesn't.

And I tend to agree with his positions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody can point to a single accomplishment of Fetteman’s that justify his candidacy. He’s failed upwards whilst living off of his parents until he was 49 years old. Quite a role model for our youth.

He seems so much more qualified and decent than the other guy, who is a TV charlatan best known for selling snake oil and doesn't even live in PA.

Again, you can’t point to any accomplishment. And you do realize that it’s possible that they are both unqualified or is that too difficult a concept to process?

For Senate, I don't need to point to be any particular accomplishment. He's been a mayor and a lieutenant gov which is more experienced in government than Oz. Has. He understands politics and procedure in a way that yet another talk show host TV celebrity doesn't.

And I tend to agree with his positions.

You hold your elected officials to remarkably low standards and you likely know next to nothing about Fetterman. He drove a small municipality into the ground with his ridiculous policies while earning a whopping $700/year for his effort. Quite an accomplished fellow. What’s truly horrifying is that we let uninformed imbeciles like you vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody can point to a single accomplishment of Fetteman’s that justify his candidacy. He’s failed upwards whilst living off of his parents until he was 49 years old. Quite a role model for our youth.

He seems so much more qualified and decent than the other guy, who is a TV charlatan best known for selling snake oil and doesn't even live in PA.

Again, you can’t point to any accomplishment. And you do realize that it’s possible that they are both unqualified or is that too difficult a concept to process?

For Senate, I don't need to point to be any particular accomplishment. He's been a mayor and a lieutenant gov which is more experienced in government than Oz. Has. He understands politics and procedure in a way that yet another talk show host TV celebrity doesn't.

And I tend to agree with his positions.

You hold your elected officials to remarkably low standards and you likely know next to nothing about Fetterman. He drove a small municipality into the ground with his ridiculous policies while earning a whopping $700/year for his effort. Quite an accomplished fellow. What’s truly horrifying is that we let uninformed imbeciles like you vote.

And an imbecile like you is going to vote for Oz.