PSA: Please do not host a Christian seder

[Anonymous]

31 pages of two groups arguing about which of their made up stories are more true. Nothing is absolutely sacred, there is only what is sacred to the individual. The beauty of America is that everyone is free to do whatever they want. Frankly, I'm offended by the tax breaks given to groups simply because they call themselves a religion, but what can you do? Live and let live.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:31 pages of two groups arguing about which of their made up stories are more true. Nothing is absolutely sacred, there is only what is sacred to the individual. The beauty of America is that everyone is free to do whatever they want. Frankly, I'm offended by the tax breaks given to groups simply because they call themselves a religion, but what can you do? Live and let live.

Freedom doesn’t mean it’s ok to disrespect people. Please just move on if this thread doesn’t interest you.

[Anonymous]

Ha, Christians just like to steal other peoples stuff. The fun holiday with the bunny and chocolate eggs which celebrate a zombie rising from the dead. Or Christmas which is what - not the birthday of Jesus and celebrated with pagan trees. Now they want to take a Jewish dinner event?

It's funny because most christians have never actually READ the whole bible, but love to quote it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:31 pages of two groups arguing about which of their made up stories are more true. Nothing is absolutely sacred, there is only what is sacred to the individual. The beauty of America is that everyone is free to do whatever they want. Frankly, I'm offended by the tax breaks given to groups simply because they call themselves a religion, but what can you do? Live and let live.

Freedom doesn’t mean it’s ok to disrespect people. Please just move on if this thread doesn’t interest you.

NP, but, actually it kind of does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:31 pages of two groups arguing about which of their made up stories are more true. Nothing is absolutely sacred, there is only what is sacred to the individual. The beauty of America is that everyone is free to do whatever they want. Frankly, I'm offended by the tax breaks given to groups simply because they call themselves a religion, but what can you do? Live and let live.

Freedom doesn’t mean it’s ok to disrespect people. Please just move on if this thread doesn’t interest you.

NP, but, actually it kind of does.

Exactly. Lots of older men like to play the "respect" card to keep women in line. To which I raise two middle fingers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:31 pages of two groups arguing about which of their made up stories are more true. Nothing is absolutely sacred, there is only what is sacred to the individual. The beauty of America is that everyone is free to do whatever they want. Frankly, I'm offended by the tax breaks given to groups simply because they call themselves a religion, but what can you do? Live and let live.

Freedom doesn’t mean it’s ok to disrespect people. Please just move on if this thread doesn’t interest you.

NP, but, actually it kind of does.

No — it means I can’t stop you from disrespecting my religion. But you still might consider not doing so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:31 pages of two groups arguing about which of their made up stories are more true. Nothing is absolutely sacred, there is only what is sacred to the individual. The beauty of America is that everyone is free to do whatever they want. Frankly, I'm offended by the tax breaks given to groups simply because they call themselves a religion, but what can you do? Live and let live.

Freedom doesn’t mean it’s ok to disrespect people. Please just move on if this thread doesn’t interest you.

NP, but, actually it kind of does.

No — it means I can’t stop you from disrespecting my religion. But you still might consider not doing so.

It means you can ask, but can't force someone to do what you asked.

It means you can derive some pleasure from being holier-than-thou on a public message board, but you can't stop people from thinking ill of you.

It means anyone else can do the same thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:31 pages of two groups arguing about which of their made up stories are more true. Nothing is absolutely sacred, there is only what is sacred to the individual. The beauty of America is that everyone is free to do whatever they want. Frankly, I'm offended by the tax breaks given to groups simply because they call themselves a religion, but what can you do? Live and let live.

Freedom doesn’t mean it’s ok to disrespect people. Please just move on if this thread doesn’t interest you.

NP, but, actually it kind of does.

No — it means I can’t stop you from disrespecting my religion. But you still might consider not doing so.

It means you can ask, but can't force someone to do what you asked.

It means you can derive some pleasure from being holier-than-thou on a public message board, but you can't stop people from thinking ill of you.

It means anyone else can do the same thing.

If you define pointing out religious appropriation as being holier than thou, then I really don’t know what to say.

I also want to point out that plenty of Christians on this thread have called out Christians who insist on having these Seders as being self-centered, ignorant about their religion, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:31 pages of two groups arguing about which of their made up stories are more true. Nothing is absolutely sacred, there is only what is sacred to the individual. The beauty of America is that everyone is free to do whatever they want. Frankly, I'm offended by the tax breaks given to groups simply because they call themselves a religion, but what can you do? Live and let live.

Freedom doesn’t mean it’s ok to disrespect people. Please just move on if this thread doesn’t interest you.

NP, but, actually it kind of does.

No — it means I can’t stop you from disrespecting my religion. But you still might consider not doing so.

It means you can ask, but can't force someone to do what you asked.

It means you can derive some pleasure from being holier-than-thou on a public message board, but you can't stop people from thinking ill of you.

It means anyone else can do the same thing.

If you define pointing out religious appropriation as being holier than thou, then I really don’t know what to say.

I also want to point out that plenty of Christians on this thread have called out Christians who insist on having these Seders as being self-centered, ignorant about their religion, etc.

And what you seem unable or unwilling to acknowledge is that the majority of Christians do not host or attend "Christian Seders," but yes, the Passover story in Exodus does hold meaning for us. So stop your incessant preaching about something that...were just not doing. We're just not having Seders. So enough, already. Literally e-nough.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:31 pages of two groups arguing about which of their made up stories are more true. Nothing is absolutely sacred, there is only what is sacred to the individual. The beauty of America is that everyone is free to do whatever they want. Frankly, I'm offended by the tax breaks given to groups simply because they call themselves a religion, but what can you do? Live and let live.

Freedom doesn’t mean it’s ok to disrespect people. Please just move on if this thread doesn’t interest you.

NP, but, actually it kind of does.

No — it means I can’t stop you from disrespecting my religion. But you still might consider not doing so.

It means you can ask, but can't force someone to do what you asked.

It means you can derive some pleasure from being holier-than-thou on a public message board, but you can't stop people from thinking ill of you.

It means anyone else can do the same thing.

If you define pointing out religious appropriation as being holier than thou, then I really don’t know what to say.

I also want to point out that plenty of Christians on this thread have called out Christians who insist on having these Seders as being self-centered, ignorant about their religion, etc.

And what you seem unable or unwilling to acknowledge is that the majority of Christians do not host or attend "Christian Seders," but yes, the Passover story in Exodus does hold meaning for us. So stop your incessant preaching about something that...were just not doing. We're just not having Seders. So enough, already. Literally e-nough.

Multiple people on this thread have talked about how their churches indeed do have these Seders. And for the millionth time, no one telling you to stop acknowledging Exodus.

So you need to just stop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:31 pages of two groups arguing about which of their made up stories are more true. Nothing is absolutely sacred, there is only what is sacred to the individual. The beauty of America is that everyone is free to do whatever they want. Frankly, I'm offended by the tax breaks given to groups simply because they call themselves a religion, but what can you do? Live and let live.

Freedom doesn’t mean it’s ok to disrespect people. Please just move on if this thread doesn’t interest you.

NP, but, actually it kind of does.

No — it means I can’t stop you from disrespecting my religion. But you still might consider not doing so.

It means you can ask, but can't force someone to do what you asked.

It means you can derive some pleasure from being holier-than-thou on a public message board, but you can't stop people from thinking ill of you.

It means anyone else can do the same thing.

If you define pointing out religious appropriation as being holier than thou, then I really don’t know what to say.

I also want to point out that plenty of Christians on this thread have called out Christians who insist on having these Seders as being self-centered, ignorant about their religion, etc.

And what you seem unable or unwilling to acknowledge is that the majority of Christians do not host or attend "Christian Seders," but yes, the Passover story in Exodus does hold meaning for us. So stop your incessant preaching about something that...were just not doing. We're just not having Seders. So enough, already. Literally e-nough.

Multiple people on this thread have talked about how their churches indeed do have these Seders. And for the millionth time, no one telling you to stop acknowledging Exodus.

So you need to just stop.

No, they have said they have Passover suppers or some other acknowledgment of Passover, not a "Seder." Sorry.

Clearly Passover means next to nothing to you if this is how you spend your time and energy. Enjoy your day! I won't be reading or responding again, so best wishes to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:31 pages of two groups arguing about which of their made up stories are more true. Nothing is absolutely sacred, there is only what is sacred to the individual. The beauty of America is that everyone is free to do whatever they want. Frankly, I'm offended by the tax breaks given to groups simply because they call themselves a religion, but what can you do? Live and let live.

Freedom doesn’t mean it’s ok to disrespect people. Please just move on if this thread doesn’t interest you.

NP, but, actually it kind of does.

No — it means I can’t stop you from disrespecting my religion. But you still might consider not doing so.

It means you can ask, but can't force someone to do what you asked.

It means you can derive some pleasure from being holier-than-thou on a public message board, but you can't stop people from thinking ill of you.

It means anyone else can do the same thing.

If you define pointing out religious appropriation as being holier than thou, then I really don’t know what to say.

I also want to point out that plenty of Christians on this thread have called out Christians who insist on having these Seders as being self-centered, ignorant about their religion, etc.

And what you seem unable or unwilling to acknowledge is that the majority of Christians do not host or attend "Christian Seders," but yes, the Passover story in Exodus does hold meaning for us. So stop your incessant preaching about something that...were just not doing. We're just not having Seders. So enough, already. Literally e-nough.

Multiple people on this thread have talked about how their churches indeed do have these Seders. And for the millionth time, no one telling you to stop acknowledging Exodus.

So you need to just stop.

No, they have said they have Passover suppers or some other acknowledgment of Passover, not a "Seder." Sorry.

Clearly Passover means next to nothing to you if this is how you spend your time and energy. Enjoy your day! I won't be reading or responding again, so best wishes to you.

We have our Seder tonight. Not at 9:30am.

The existence of Christian Seders is undeniable. If you want to deny it, I can’t stop you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:31 pages of two groups arguing about which of their made up stories are more true. Nothing is absolutely sacred, there is only what is sacred to the individual. The beauty of America is that everyone is free to do whatever they want. Frankly, I'm offended by the tax breaks given to groups simply because they call themselves a religion, but what can you do? Live and let live.

Freedom doesn’t mean it’s ok to disrespect people. Please just move on if this thread doesn’t interest you.

NP, but, actually it kind of does.

No — it means I can’t stop you from disrespecting my religion. But you still might consider not doing so.

It means you can ask, but can't force someone to do what you asked.

It means you can derive some pleasure from being holier-than-thou on a public message board, but you can't stop people from thinking ill of you.

It means anyone else can do the same thing.

If you define pointing out religious appropriation as being holier than thou, then I really don’t know what to say.

I also want to point out that plenty of Christians on this thread have called out Christians who insist on having these Seders as being self-centered, ignorant about their religion, etc.

And what you seem unable or unwilling to acknowledge is that the majority of Christians do not host or attend "Christian Seders," but yes, the Passover story in Exodus does hold meaning for us. So stop your incessant preaching about something that...were just not doing. We're just not having Seders. So enough, already. Literally e-nough.

Multiple people on this thread have talked about how their churches indeed do have these Seders. And for the millionth time, no one telling you to stop acknowledging Exodus.

So you need to just stop.

No, they have said they have Passover suppers or some other acknowledgment of Passover, not a "Seder." Sorry.

Clearly Passover means next to nothing to you if this is how you spend your time and energy. Enjoy your day! I won't be reading or responding again, so best wishes to you.

Lovely that you’re now policing how a Jew spends their time. You’re really something else.

[Anonymous]

I would like to start a new “Easter” tradition. We will have a festive meal in which we recount the long lists of false messiahs from Shabbtai Tsvi to Jesus. During the hours he supposedly stood on the cross, we will recount the names of Jews murdered in his name, of course we won’t make it very far through the list, given its size. I’m thinking Jell-O shots (WASP-fare) with blood orange emulsion (to recall blood libel), and peeps dioramas of auto de fes? I mean, Christianity is part of our history and freedom of religion and all that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would like to start a new “Easter” tradition. We will have a festive meal in which we recount the long lists of false messiahs from Shabbtai Tsvi to Jesus. During the hours he supposedly stood on the cross, we will recount the names of Jews murdered in his name, of course we won’t make it very far through the list, given its size. I’m thinking Jell-O shots (WASP-fare) with blood orange emulsion (to recall blood libel), and peeps dioramas of auto de fes? I mean, Christianity is part of our history and freedom of religion and all that.

Go for it.