Why don't we have them take a test and find out? Oh right, you people are afraid of testing the merits of the kids. |
That's about 5 or 6 kids in every school. It is very reasonable to think some schools will have 30 kids better than those kids. Academy of Loudoun admissions waitlist is filled with kids from Stone Hill. |
Good idea. We did it that way for 30 years and had a student body that made it the #1 public high school in America. Seemed to work pretty well. |
There are indeed probably dozens of kids at Carson, Cooper and Longfellow stronger than the best students at Holmes, Key, Poe or Whitman, which is precisely why the SJWs on the School Board are dispensing with merit-based admissions to ensure a pork-barrel system of geographic representation. |
Because testing tells you who is good at taking tests, not who is good at working together with others to solve problems. TJ has been recognized as the #1 school in America for several years precisely BECAUSE they have overselected for test-taking ability and because those rankings for many years have been dependent on test scores. Standardized testing is increasingly recognized as an outdated and outmoded way of measuring a student's ability to contribute to an elite academic environment. Many of the best colleges and universities in the country are running away from them, and that number grows every year. |
This is just circular reasoning. Declare the testing is a bad measure, and you get to select with racial quotas and declare this is better because the testing has been identified as bad. |
It's not me that has identified standardized testing as inadequate. It's the world's top universities, which are essentially businesses tasked with acquiring and nurturing top talent. If shunning these exams is good enough for Caltech, then it's more than good enough for TJ. |
What a load of crap. You are so full of it. |
You are an idiot. Caltech isn't "shunning" it. The put in a Covid moratorium. Just look at their website: Two-year Moratorium on requirement and consideration of SAT and/or ACT test scores As of June 2020, Caltech has enacted a two-year moratorium on both the requirement and consideration of SAT and/or ACT test scores as part of the undergraduate admissions process. This change, made in response to the global COVID-19 pandemic and its continuing impact on access to these exams for students across the country and globe, will be in effect for all first-year students applying to Caltech for Fall 2021 and Fall 2022. |
They won't go back. |
....okay |
You talk as if these kids exist in a vacuum and don't interact with anyone else except for their test-taking books. It takes a team effort to educate kids - everyone from parents, teachers, tutors, and yes, even fellow students. This is why some parents make an effort to put their kids into well-performing schools so that they can be among similarly driven-minded peers. If you know someone who is exceptionally well at working together with others to solve problems, maybe they could solve the problem of their low test scores? Or is that not a problem that they are good at solving?
|
Thankfully, it's no longer a problem that they need to worry about solving. They can use that time to focus on problems that impact others, or on literally anything else besides putting hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars into a skill that has very limited application outside of an ever-decreasing number of career paths. |
DP. Elite universities can ignore the ACT or SAT, because they have plenty of applicants with extraordinary achievements to select from. ACTs and SATs are meaningless when they get applicants who are Regeneron Science Talent Search Finalists, or kids who make it to the USA Math Olympiad, or any other notable accomplishment. They also frequently ask for things like AMC scores, and they still look at AP exam scores. I would have no problem with TJ eliminating their entrance exams, providing that they instead looked at Mathcounts placement, AMC 8 scores, AMC 10 scores, Science Olympiad placement, etc. |
Why? Not everyone has the same extracurricular opportunities or desires. Why look at things like science Olympiad placement when 1) not all teams are treated the same or perform the same, and 2) not all students who would be interested or willing to participate are able to due to family constraints? |