OP here. I moved on and remarried several years ago. I have no insecurities/jealousies about my ex’s new relationship (although I was surprised ex is moving in with someone they’ve been with for a very short period of time). Ex’s reasons for moving doesn’t really play into my concern. And I’m not just lucky; we both signed a stipulation saying neither of us would move outside of the area. We both agreed to stay here and raise our kids here; ex is the one going back on that. |
Well I guess he can’t move. |
what a selfish jerk. he couldn't wait a few years before moving that far away? |
He COULD move if he made a reasonable, good-faith effort to accommodate the situation -- by flexing his visitation time so his kids don't miss out on activities, and by doing more of the driving. But instead he's proposing a bottom line of breaching the agreement AND making OP and his children bear all the burden of it. That's a really, really crappy way to start out something that should be a negotiation with kid's best interests in mind. |
OP here: I don’t think ex is a jerk, but I do think ex is unreasonable for wanting to move this far away and expecting nothing else (schedule, transportation logistics) to change. |
I'm the original PP whose parents had this situation. That you say "playdates" tells me that your children are younger, or that you see them as younger. The OP's kids are 14 and 16. They do not have "playdates." OP likely does not do a whole lot to arrange their social lives (e.g., have "playdates") because they are teenagers. Developmentally, it is important for teenagers to spend time with their friends, developing their interests and talents. There are ways to balance social needs and family needs, even in divorced families. My dad made no effort to balance those needs. His take was that he shouldn't have to because he didn't want a divorce, for my mom to move, etc. That is not a good way to approach the situation at all. I agree that playdates for younger children can be scheduled at the convenience of the scheduling parent fairly easily. I also agree that spending time with the non-custodial parent is important, and FWIW, my relationship with my father now is great. But I'm 40. When I was 15 and had to explain to my boyfriend why I couldn't be his date to the homecoming dance, or when I wasn't allowed to try out for any school plays or sports because my dad refused to commit to allowing me to go any school activities, all I saw was that my dad was ruining my life, preventing me from doing stuff, etc. to punish my mom. He was pretty clear about that. When I would get the courage to ask about a specific thing, his response would invariably be, "That sounds like something you should complain to your mom about, since if she hadn't decided to get divorced and move, you'd be going to high school here and going to homecoming here and this wouldn't be an issue." To the other PP, I don't know how you can navigate the dynamic. I never resented my mom for divorcing my dad OR moving. She went out of her way to make it as easy on us as possible. W/R/T the OP of this thread, they were court-ordered to split the driving, so usually the way it worked was that she would drive us down and he would drive us back. After a while, she agreed to do ALL the driving because the drives back with him were fairly excruciating for me (my dad is a great study in how NOT to parent post-divorce, despite our excellent relationship now). But the distance between them was only about 45 minutes so it was less intrusive than what OP is describing. |
| Men are seriously selfish and stupid when it comes to their kids and sex partners. |
| Op, let him move. He barely sees the kids but he should be responsible for all transportation. Don’t give in. He is moving, not you. You continue to drive the same distance and that is it. |
He can move. He probably sees the kids twice a month. He can do that but he needs to do all the driving. |
He's breaking a legal agreement and will not have a leg to stand on. This is NOT your problem, and I've never heard of a court forcing the custodial parent to handle transportation once the other parent decided to move away. |
OP here. I’m repeating myself now, but again…if I refuse to continue to split the driving 50/50 after ex moves, and we have to go to mediation/court to resolve this dispute, I’m afraid a judge will just tell me we have to split it equally anyway. In which case I will have wasted $$$$ for nothing. Which is why I was trying to figure out the actual odds of winning this fight in court. |
You’re not going to figure out the odds of winning this. It’s a fool’s errand. Even if you’re 98% likely to win, you could still get assigned the old misogynistic judge who’s still bitter about his divorce and makes you do the driving. This fact finding mission is an exercise in futility. |
He is moving away. Generally the parent moving away is responsible. He is not being forced to move for work, he is voluntarily moving. He absolutely should do the bulk of the transportation. You are refusing to drive. You are not refusing his time. Big difference. |
| What state are you in? |
He only has limited visitation. Its not unreasonable for either parent to move for what ever reason, including a relationship. If he had shared custody it would be different. He is welcome to move but needs to do all the transportation outside what OP already does. |