get over name brand / prestige obsession

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it makes a difference if you go to a tippy top school. Other than that, the next T50 don’t matter as much. The difference between a school like Tufts or Vanderbilt, say, is negligible even though Vandy is higher ranked. They are both great schools.

I there is another difference once you start past the T100 school. You may have more opportunities graduating from Emory than Appalachian, for instance.

But if you are talking T15-T50, it makes no difference.

You didn't understand my post at all. How old are your kids?

What are you talking about? The pp is spot on.

Sigh. I give up. Clearly you're still in the midst of all of this. Y'all can just go ahead and split hairs between schools and tiers like you always do. As I said, I should have known I was preaching to the wrong crowd.

I'm out.

Just look at the salary outcomes from the school and it obvious that IN GENERAL, higher ranked schools produce better outcomes.

Not really if you look at mid career salaries the highest ones outside Ivies are generally STEM schools not the highest ranked ones either

Such a weasly argument. Again IN GENERAL across all majors. Obviously you have a STEM degree because you lack basic critical thinking and reading comprehension skills.

People usually resort to name-calling when they can't debate any more on the facts.
No one is arguing that a kid from MIT will do better financially and have more opportunities generally speaking than a kid that is a VT if they both have the same major. My argument is that MAJOR, GPA and marketable knowledge is generally so much more important than where you go. Ask me how I know.

+1 and I will add work ethic
in fact, drive and work ethic is the biggest predictor of success and one can not be taught or trained to have it

And what do unhooked kids at top schools disproportionately have over kids from other schools?

There is an ocean of difference between the student who is naturally brilliant but a bit spoiled by their talents (even lazy or over confident) and the scrappy kid who may not be of genius level but works his or her butt off. I will hire the applicant who has true work ethic every time regardless of what college their degree is from. In fact I do

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing how many horrible people your post brought out of the woodwork, OP. It hits a nerve because they have so much riding on this stuff.

I'm with you, and these people who are obsessed with rankings and prestige must be insufferable in real life.

not as insufferable as smug know-it-alls like you who care what other people value. If you don't think it matters, that's fine, but why the need to preach about it?

[Anonymous]

I think they have sacrificed so much to "get where they are," that it is incredibly threatening to find out maybe it was not necessary...or even the path that was best for their family.

No, they have to insult reasonable posts like this, rather than accept that their costly approach may not have been necessary (or rewarding in the ways that really count).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think they have sacrificed so much to "get where they are," that it is incredibly threatening to find out maybe it was not necessary...or even the path that was best for their family.

No, they have to insult reasonable posts like this, rather than accept that their costly approach may not have been necessary (or rewarding in the ways that really count).

Exactly! It's so threatening to them precisely because of this. They KNOW it's true, but can't really acknowledge it because they have so much invested in it. This college board is really among the worst of DCUM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think they have sacrificed so much to "get where they are," that it is incredibly threatening to find out maybe it was not necessary...or even the path that was best for their family.

No, they have to insult reasonable posts like this, rather than accept that their costly approach may not have been necessary (or rewarding in the ways that really count).

Exactly! It's so threatening to them precisely because of this. They KNOW it's true, but can't really acknowledge it because they have so much invested in it. This college board is really among the worst of DCUM.

No it’s actually the opposite. Deep down you guys are the ones who are insecure that you’re not as successful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think they have sacrificed so much to "get where they are," that it is incredibly threatening to find out maybe it was not necessary...or even the path that was best for their family.

No, they have to insult reasonable posts like this, rather than accept that their costly approach may not have been necessary (or rewarding in the ways that really count).

Or maybe their experience is that their kid had opportunities at or as a result of attending a prestige school they wouldn't otherwise have. You're the one who isn't allowing for the possibility that the name brand matters.

No, you have to insult them and call them horrible people, rather than accept that your approach may have short-changed your kid (or denied them opportunities or rewards in ways that really count).

At the end of the day, live your own life and let other people live theirs. OP doesn't have some magical answer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The two options are not wealth or poverty.

The vast majority of adults fall in between. You are deceiving yourself about what is necessary for a good life.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/26/how-your-salary-and-the-way-you-spend-money-affect-your-happiness.html

Thank you. This is why the focus on schools and salaries is so weird to me. My husband went to Williams, which is usually ranked in the top 3 colleges, and got his JD at a top 10 law school but he works in government because he was so horrified by the lifestyles of the partners at the summer he spent working in a firm that he decided he didn't want to do that with his life. He will never make more than he makes now, which is like $165K a year. I went to a SLAC that was ranked in the 10-15 range in the 90s and is now ranked in the 20-25 range and I've always made way more than him because I wanted to work in the private sector--I happen to do something that is more remunerative and I am really good at it, even though it has literally nothing to do with my undergrad major. We're both happy and have a reasonable work-life balance.

We are privileged to be able to live in an area that has excellent public schools and we can afford to send our kids to college without worrying about the cost, but we have never pressured them to stress about course choices or grades or ECs or any of that for purposes of college admissions. I read these threads--or threads about people stressing about getting first graders identified for gifted services--and can't fathom why people want to spend 12 or 18 years making themselves and their kids worry about something, spending a fortune on tutors and coaches, and focusing so much on a goal that a) you can't control and b) doesn't guarantee anything.

Live your lives. If your kids are smart and hardworking, they will do OK whether they go to Harvard or some school that isn't in the top tier (now or 20 years from now).

[Anonymous]

I completely agree, OP. It all comes out in the wash, and so much depends on your definition of a successful life, which doesn't have much to do with salary.

My parents sent three kids to Ivies. Both of my siblings make boatloads of money but haven't visited my mom in years.

I would honestly rather my kids went to NOVA than Harvard.

[Anonymous]

Always entertaining to watch you pathetic loons argue over useless topics, your husbands are either saints or alcoholics to put up with your insane attitudes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Always entertaining to watch you pathetic loons argue over useless topics, your husbands are either saints or alcoholics to put up with your insane attitudes.

Well, aren't you a helpful addition!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Always entertaining to watch you pathetic loons argue over useless topics, your husbands are either saints or alcoholics to put up with your insane attitudes.

Well, aren't you a helpful addition!

Thanks, appreciate the shout out, you have a great weekend!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it makes a difference if you go to a tippy top school. Other than that, the next T50 don’t matter as much. The difference between a school like Tufts or Vanderbilt, say, is negligible even though Vandy is higher ranked. They are both great schools.

I there is another difference once you start past the T100 school. You may have more opportunities graduating from Emory than Appalachian, for instance.

But if you are talking T15-T50, it makes no difference.

You didn't understand my post at all. How old are your kids?

What are you talking about? The pp is spot on.

Sigh. I give up. Clearly you're still in the midst of all of this. Y'all can just go ahead and split hairs between schools and tiers like you always do. As I said, I should have known I was preaching to the wrong crowd.

I'm out.

I use this example of the relationship between school prestige and salary all the time in my undergraduate stats class. We talk about things like the "Bill Gates problem." (I.E. The average salary of a Harvard grad is quite high, but it's often due to a couple of outliers whose salaries have an inordinate effect on the mean. How might we control for this effect? Would it more be more useful to look at the median salary? Is the distribution skewed and how do we fix it? What salaries do those in the middle quartiles typically get, etc. )

We also talk about controlling for those other factors. For example, more people who go to Harvard are likely to go to work in a family business where they are paid an artificially inflated salary (see Jared Kushner).


Just look at the salary outcomes from the school and it obvious that IN GENERAL, higher ranked schools produce better outcomes.

Now control for parent salary. Oops, did we discover something we didn't mean to? Pull that curtain back into place!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Always entertaining to watch you pathetic loons argue over useless topics, your husbands are either saints or alcoholics to put up with your insane attitudes.

Plot twist: these are actually husbands arguing about trivial stuff to avoid doing work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think they have sacrificed so much to "get where they are," that it is incredibly threatening to find out maybe it was not necessary...or even the path that was best for their family.

No, they have to insult reasonable posts like this, rather than accept that their costly approach may not have been necessary (or rewarding in the ways that really count).

I am someone who went to lots of prestigious schools and collected lots of prestigious degrees. I have also made tremendous career (and financial) sacrifices in order to live in the same city as my husband for most of our careers, and to be available to my children. I feel a bit like I overprepared for an environment based on hypotheticals. (If I had no dependents and no desire to make my career work with my husband's career, then I would have made a lot of money based on my education and credentials. However, in the real world, we ended up in a smaller city where salaries are lower because we needed two jobs, not one. In addition, I took a few years out when my kids were young, etc. )

Given these factors, I probably would have the same job I have now even if I had gone to a significantly lower ranked school and worked less hard in college (and high school too, for that matter!)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Always entertaining to watch you pathetic loons argue over useless topics, your husbands are either saints or alcoholics to put up with your insane attitudes.

Plot twist: these are actually husbands arguing about trivial stuff to avoid doing work.

And you don't have a superiority complex, thinking you are judging us from on high, at all.