Piers Morgan got canned from his morning show

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He doesn't get how this sounds, but it's bad.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6460443/PIERS-MORGAN-Ex-friend-Meghan-Markle-ruthless-social-climbing-actress-used-getting-way.html

And he continues to be angry that people call him out for his obsession instead of "siding" with him.

I'm so embarrassed for him after reading that. Well, half of it; I had to quit.

You really should read it all. He made some predictions in there that she was now on a mission to take down the royal family and to get her way about that. And he boldly stated that it wouldn't go well for her.
I think he has woefully underestimated her.
But, that doesn't mean he was wrong about the motive.

That's some British Qanon shit. I'm good without intentionally climbing into poisoned rabbit holes.

It’s not conspiracy. A lot of people mentioned this, it’s not a secret. That’s why the royal family was desperate to stop this wedding from happening. They knew it would be a hot mess and lo and behold, it is a hot mess. Two very damaged people have found each other and are now trying to drag everyone down into their pit of spite.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While I’m not a fan of the BRF or Megan, Piers is a tool! He clearly had some sort of ax to grind with Megan. I don’t know but he was obsessed with her. The other anchor called him out on it too.

Piers was an old windbag. Good riddance! Yay!

Yes, they used to be gossipy chums and she'd come into town and they'd meet up for a pint and dish about the who's who of Britain and the ins and outs of Hollywood. It doesn't appear that they dated at all. It wasn't that. It was that he enjoyed the flattery of her wanting to be in his company and he was a big shot. At the time, HE was a big deal. And suddenly, she got her in with Harry and ghosted Piers like yesterday's news. He got his feelings hurt, but in a monstrous way. His attitude wasn't sadness, it was "how dare you treat me like YOU aren't good enough for ME you big fraud!" So instead of moving on, he made it his mission to "expose" her, but it only made him look more and more petty.

This. Let’s not perpetuate the rumor of them dating or being anything more than two wretched souls who enjoy a good gossip. He’s vile and she’s really no better, but nothing suggests that they were ever romantic.

They met for dinner once. They didn’t gossip and weren’t friends. In order to “expose” someone you would actually have to know them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He doesn't get how this sounds, but it's bad.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6460443/PIERS-MORGAN-Ex-friend-Meghan-Markle-ruthless-social-climbing-actress-used-getting-way.html

And he continues to be angry that people call him out for his obsession instead of "siding" with him.

I'm so embarrassed for him after reading that. Well, half of it; I had to quit.

You really should read it all. He made some predictions in there that she was now on a mission to take down the royal family and to get her way about that. And he boldly stated that it wouldn't go well for her.
I think he has woefully underestimated her.
But, that doesn't mean he was wrong about the motive.

That's some British Qanon shit. I'm good without intentionally climbing into poisoned rabbit holes.

It’s not conspiracy. A lot of people mentioned this, it’s not a secret. That’s why the royal family was desperate to stop this wedding from happening. They knew it would be a hot mess and lo and behold, it is a hot mess. Two very damaged people have found each other and are now trying to drag everyone down into their pit of spite.

Huh?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While I’m not a fan of the BRF or Megan, Piers is a tool! He clearly had some sort of ax to grind with Megan. I don’t know but he was obsessed with her. The other anchor called him out on it too.

Piers was an old windbag. Good riddance! Yay!

Yes, they used to be gossipy chums and she'd come into town and they'd meet up for a pint and dish about the who's who of Britain and the ins and outs of Hollywood. It doesn't appear that they dated at all. It wasn't that. It was that he enjoyed the flattery of her wanting to be in his company and he was a big shot. At the time, HE was a big deal. And suddenly, she got her in with Harry and ghosted Piers like yesterday's news. He got his feelings hurt, but in a monstrous way. His attitude wasn't sadness, it was "how dare you treat me like YOU aren't good enough for ME you big fraud!" So instead of moving on, he made it his mission to "expose" her, but it only made him look more and more petty.

He met her ONE TIME and she never returned his phone calls. He’s been a bitter, jealous, obsessed a-hole ever since. The amount of time he spends talking and tweeting about her borders on stalkerish psycho insanity. He seems to think about her every waking minute while she probably barely remembers the dinner.

I hadn't seen that weird psycho article someone posted above, where he was "ghosted" by her.

DOES HE THINK THEY WENT ON A DATE???? This is like the weirdest revelation. It all of a sudden it all makes sense why he hates her so much. I never knew they used to be "friends" but he thinks they were on a date, doesn't he?

He's acting like a spurned lover -- although I'm pretty sure he was married at the time. Even from his descriptions it sounds more like a friendly / professional meet-up when she happened to be in the same city. They met face to face for the first time, then she went off with friends. Then I guess he had some kind of expectations or feelings and has been running his mouth full of nastiness ever since. He seems obsessed and full of hatred. I wonder what his wife makes of it?

It's sick how he turned full throttle just because she used to text him, met him in person once, and then started dated someone. It doesn't compute. The "punishment" doesn't fit the "crime." He felt something for her, there is no question in my mind, and he totally feels rejected. There would be no other reason to have that level of hatred directed at someone you (a complete sexist a-hole) met one time, so much so you write a whole article about it, blind to how humiliating it looks for you. So utterly bizarre.

He's obviously sexually obsessed with her and has been for years. According to his own description of their interactions, he "liked Suits" and slid into her DMs. She met up with him for drinks once while in London, which he often describes in blow by blow action, from what she drank to following her out to the taxi. He thought it was a date.

He wanted a piece of that sweet American milk chocolate. She probably realized that because he's sexually aggressive (go look at what he tweeted for international women's day-- and look up articles about how he asked female guests about who they've slept with).

He tries to play this off like he attacks women because he's a bitchy man. But he's not, he's just a sexually entitled, pot bellied crusty old tosspot geezer who can't stop trying to virtually BDSM the dutchess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While I’m not a fan of the BRF or Megan, Piers is a tool! He clearly had some sort of ax to grind with Megan. I don’t know but he was obsessed with her. The other anchor called him out on it too.

Piers was an old windbag. Good riddance! Yay!

Yes, they used to be gossipy chums and she'd come into town and they'd meet up for a pint and dish about the who's who of Britain and the ins and outs of Hollywood. It doesn't appear that they dated at all. It wasn't that. It was that he enjoyed the flattery of her wanting to be in his company and he was a big shot. At the time, HE was a big deal. And suddenly, she got her in with Harry and ghosted Piers like yesterday's news. He got his feelings hurt, but in a monstrous way. His attitude wasn't sadness, it was "how dare you treat me like YOU aren't good enough for ME you big fraud!" So instead of moving on, he made it his mission to "expose" her, but it only made him look more and more petty.

He met her ONE TIME and she never returned his phone calls. He’s been a bitter, jealous, obsessed a-hole ever since. The amount of time he spends talking and tweeting about her borders on stalkerish psycho insanity. He seems to think about her every waking minute while she probably barely remembers the dinner.

I hadn't seen that weird psycho article someone posted above, where he was "ghosted" by her.

DOES HE THINK THEY WENT ON A DATE???? This is like the weirdest revelation. It all of a sudden it all makes sense why he hates her so much. I never knew they used to be "friends" but he thinks they were on a date, doesn't he?

He's acting like a spurned lover -- although I'm pretty sure he was married at the time. Even from his descriptions it sounds more like a friendly / professional meet-up when she happened to be in the same city. They met face to face for the first time, then she went off with friends. Then I guess he had some kind of expectations or feelings and has been running his mouth full of nastiness ever since. He seems obsessed and full of hatred. I wonder what his wife makes of it?

It's sick how he turned full throttle just because she used to text him, met him in person once, and then started dated someone. It doesn't compute. The "punishment" doesn't fit the "crime." He felt something for her, there is no question in my mind, and he totally feels rejected. There would be no other reason to have that level of hatred directed at someone you (a complete sexist a-hole) met one time, so much so you write a whole article about it, blind to how humiliating it looks for you. So utterly bizarre.

He's obviously sexually obsessed with her and has been for years. According to his own description of their interactions, he "liked Suits" and slid into her DMs. She met up with him for drinks once while in London, which he often describes in blow by blow action, from what she drank to following her out to the taxi. He thought it was a date.

He wanted a piece of that sweet American milk chocolate. She probably realized that because he's sexually aggressive (go look at what he tweeted for international women's day-- and look up articles about how he asked female guests about who they've slept with).

He tries to play this off like he attacks women because he's a bitchy man. But he's not, he's just a sexually entitled, pot bellied crusty old tosspot geezer who can't stop trying to virtually BDSM the dutchess.

Lol looks like you are daydreaming your own erotic Markle fantasy!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While I’m not a fan of the BRF or Megan, Piers is a tool! He clearly had some sort of ax to grind with Megan. I don’t know but he was obsessed with her. The other anchor called him out on it too.

Piers was an old windbag. Good riddance! Yay!

Yes, they used to be gossipy chums and she'd come into town and they'd meet up for a pint and dish about the who's who of Britain and the ins and outs of Hollywood. It doesn't appear that they dated at all. It wasn't that. It was that he enjoyed the flattery of her wanting to be in his company and he was a big shot. At the time, HE was a big deal. And suddenly, she got her in with Harry and ghosted Piers like yesterday's news. He got his feelings hurt, but in a monstrous way. His attitude wasn't sadness, it was "how dare you treat me like YOU aren't good enough for ME you big fraud!" So instead of moving on, he made it his mission to "expose" her, but it only made him look more and more petty.

He met her ONE TIME and she never returned his phone calls. He’s been a bitter, jealous, obsessed a-hole ever since. The amount of time he spends talking and tweeting about her borders on stalkerish psycho insanity. He seems to think about her every waking minute while she probably barely remembers the dinner.

I hadn't seen that weird psycho article someone posted above, where he was "ghosted" by her.

DOES HE THINK THEY WENT ON A DATE???? This is like the weirdest revelation. It all of a sudden it all makes sense why he hates her so much. I never knew they used to be "friends" but he thinks they were on a date, doesn't he?

He's acting like a spurned lover -- although I'm pretty sure he was married at the time. Even from his descriptions it sounds more like a friendly / professional meet-up when she happened to be in the same city. They met face to face for the first time, then she went off with friends. Then I guess he had some kind of expectations or feelings and has been running his mouth full of nastiness ever since. He seems obsessed and full of hatred. I wonder what his wife makes of it?

It's sick how he turned full throttle just because she used to text him, met him in person once, and then started dated someone. It doesn't compute. The "punishment" doesn't fit the "crime." He felt something for her, there is no question in my mind, and he totally feels rejected. There would be no other reason to have that level of hatred directed at someone you (a complete sexist a-hole) met one time, so much so you write a whole article about it, blind to how humiliating it looks for you. So utterly bizarre.

He's obviously sexually obsessed with her and has been for years. According to his own description of their interactions, he "liked Suits" and slid into her DMs. She met up with him for drinks once while in London, which he often describes in blow by blow action, from what she drank to following her out to the taxi. He thought it was a date.

He wanted a piece of that sweet American milk chocolate. She probably realized that because he's sexually aggressive (go look at what he tweeted for international women's day-- and look up articles about how he asked female guests about who they've slept with).

He tries to play this off like he attacks women because he's a bitchy man. But he's not, he's just a sexually entitled, pot bellied crusty old tosspot geezer who can't stop trying to virtually BDSM the dutchess.

I don’t like the dude but this is weird and gross. Go away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While I’m not a fan of the BRF or Megan, Piers is a tool! He clearly had some sort of ax to grind with Megan. I don’t know but he was obsessed with her. The other anchor called him out on it too.

Piers was an old windbag. Good riddance! Yay!

Yes, they used to be gossipy chums and she'd come into town and they'd meet up for a pint and dish about the who's who of Britain and the ins and outs of Hollywood. It doesn't appear that they dated at all. It wasn't that. It was that he enjoyed the flattery of her wanting to be in his company and he was a big shot. At the time, HE was a big deal. And suddenly, she got her in with Harry and ghosted Piers like yesterday's news. He got his feelings hurt, but in a monstrous way. His attitude wasn't sadness, it was "how dare you treat me like YOU aren't good enough for ME you big fraud!" So instead of moving on, he made it his mission to "expose" her, but it only made him look more and more petty.

He met her ONE TIME and she never returned his phone calls. He’s been a bitter, jealous, obsessed a-hole ever since. The amount of time he spends talking and tweeting about her borders on stalkerish psycho insanity. He seems to think about her every waking minute while she probably barely remembers the dinner.

I hadn't seen that weird psycho article someone posted above, where he was "ghosted" by her.

DOES HE THINK THEY WENT ON A DATE???? This is like the weirdest revelation. It all of a sudden it all makes sense why he hates her so much. I never knew they used to be "friends" but he thinks they were on a date, doesn't he?

He's acting like a spurned lover -- although I'm pretty sure he was married at the time. Even from his descriptions it sounds more like a friendly / professional meet-up when she happened to be in the same city. They met face to face for the first time, then she went off with friends. Then I guess he had some kind of expectations or feelings and has been running his mouth full of nastiness ever since. He seems obsessed and full of hatred. I wonder what his wife makes of it?

It's sick how he turned full throttle just because she used to text him, met him in person once, and then started dated someone. It doesn't compute. The "punishment" doesn't fit the "crime." He felt something for her, there is no question in my mind, and he totally feels rejected. There would be no other reason to have that level of hatred directed at someone you (a complete sexist a-hole) met one time, so much so you write a whole article about it, blind to how humiliating it looks for you. So utterly bizarre.

He's obviously sexually obsessed with her and has been for years. According to his own description of their interactions, he "liked Suits" and slid into her DMs. She met up with him for drinks once while in London, which he often describes in blow by blow action, from what she drank to following her out to the taxi. He thought it was a date.

He wanted a piece of that sweet American milk chocolate. She probably realized that because he's sexually aggressive (go look at what he tweeted for international women's day-- and look up articles about how he asked female guests about who they've slept with).

He tries to play this off like he attacks women because he's a bitchy man. But he's not, he's just a sexually entitled, pot bellied crusty old tosspot geezer who can't stop trying to virtually BDSM the dutchess.

I don’t like the dude but this is weird and gross. Go away.

DP. There is no doubt in my mind that the man is Fatal Attraction levels of obsessed and we all know that when men get obsessed it often has a sexualized component to it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He doesn't get how this sounds, but it's bad.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6460443/PIERS-MORGAN-Ex-friend-Meghan-Markle-ruthless-social-climbing-actress-used-getting-way.html

And he continues to be angry that people call him out for his obsession instead of "siding" with him.

I'm so embarrassed for him after reading that. Well, half of it; I had to quit.

You really should read it all. He made some predictions in there that she was now on a mission to take down the royal family and to get her way about that. And he boldly stated that it wouldn't go well for her.
I think he has woefully underestimated her.
But, that doesn't mean he was wrong about the motive.

That's some British Qanon shit. I'm good without intentionally climbing into poisoned rabbit holes.

It’s not conspiracy. A lot of people mentioned this, it’s not a secret. That’s why the royal family was desperate to stop this wedding from happening. They knew it would be a hot mess and lo and behold, it is a hot mess. Two very damaged people have found each other and are now trying to drag everyone down into their pit of spite.

Huh?

https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/06/17/like-prince-william-prince-philip-expressed-doubts-about-meghan-markle/

Not take down like secretly plot against them, but take down like she wouldn’t fit in and flee. They basically said she didn’t seem like she had the personality for dealing with the protocols of the family and the crazy media coverage. It’s difficult enough as it is for someone already in the aristocracy, forget about a person with the baggage of a prior husband, estranged family and a career. And of course it looks bad on everyone when suddenly someone flees because they can’t take the heat. So they expressed their concerns but ultimately it was Harry’s choice to proceed with the marriage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wasn't he team BRF?

Yes, but he went way too far in his insane anti-Meghan diatribes.

Actually, he was pretty mild compared to what I’ve read on DCUM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While I’m not a fan of the BRF or Megan, Piers is a tool! He clearly had some sort of ax to grind with Megan. I don’t know but he was obsessed with her. The other anchor called him out on it too.

Piers was an old windbag. Good riddance! Yay!

Yes, they used to be gossipy chums and she'd come into town and they'd meet up for a pint and dish about the who's who of Britain and the ins and outs of Hollywood. It doesn't appear that they dated at all. It wasn't that. It was that he enjoyed the flattery of her wanting to be in his company and he was a big shot. At the time, HE was a big deal. And suddenly, she got her in with Harry and ghosted Piers like yesterday's news. He got his feelings hurt, but in a monstrous way. His attitude wasn't sadness, it was "how dare you treat me like YOU aren't good enough for ME you big fraud!" So instead of moving on, he made it his mission to "expose" her, but it only made him look more and more petty.

He met her ONE TIME and she never returned his phone calls. He’s been a bitter, jealous, obsessed a-hole ever since. The amount of time he spends talking and tweeting about her borders on stalkerish psycho insanity. He seems to think about her every waking minute while she probably barely remembers the dinner.

I hadn't seen that weird psycho article someone posted above, where he was "ghosted" by her.

DOES HE THINK THEY WENT ON A DATE???? This is like the weirdest revelation. It all of a sudden it all makes sense why he hates her so much. I never knew they used to be "friends" but he thinks they were on a date, doesn't he?

He's acting like a spurned lover -- although I'm pretty sure he was married at the time. Even from his descriptions it sounds more like a friendly / professional meet-up when she happened to be in the same city. They met face to face for the first time, then she went off with friends. Then I guess he had some kind of expectations or feelings and has been running his mouth full of nastiness ever since. He seems obsessed and full of hatred. I wonder what his wife makes of it?

It's sick how he turned full throttle just because she used to text him, met him in person once, and then started dated someone. It doesn't compute. The "punishment" doesn't fit the "crime." He felt something for her, there is no question in my mind, and he totally feels rejected. There would be no other reason to have that level of hatred directed at someone you (a complete sexist a-hole) met one time, so much so you write a whole article about it, blind to how humiliating it looks for you. So utterly bizarre.

He's obviously sexually obsessed with her and has been for years. According to his own description of their interactions, he "liked Suits" and slid into her DMs. She met up with him for drinks once while in London, which he often describes in blow by blow action, from what she drank to following her out to the taxi. He thought it was a date.

He wanted a piece of that sweet American milk chocolate. She probably realized that because he's sexually aggressive (go look at what he tweeted for international women's day-- and look up articles about how he asked female guests about who they've slept with).

He tries to play this off like he attacks women because he's a bitchy man. But he's not, he's just a sexually entitled, pot bellied crusty old tosspot geezer who can't stop trying to virtually BDSM the dutchess.

I don’t like the dude but this is weird and gross. Go away.

It is weird and gross, and grosser still is that the UK media gives this obsessed stalker a platform. He is absolutely sexually obsessed with her and if read his own words you will draw the same conclusion. She very likely stopped returning his calls because he made an unwelcome advance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wasn't he team BRF?

Yes, but he went way too far in his insane anti-Meghan diatribes.

Actually, he was pretty mild compared to what I’ve read on DCUM.

Eh, the Reddit comments aren’t exactly all positive. Turns out not a lot of ordinary people are sympathetic to the dirty laundry of a bunch of clueless rich people. There’s a pandemic going on, people are losing homes and jobs and worrying about school for their kids, meanwhile the Royals are bickering amongst themselves in a he said, she said soap opera.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In a dust up over Meghan Markle
Lol
I hope he sinks into well deserved obscurity
Trump won't pull any strings to help him either

Piers Morgan is tight with Murdoch world. Rupert paid him for years, and hired him as an editor.
You don't work for Rupert Murdoch as an editor unless you are a hateful person who will advance the Murdoch family's political agenda.

Morgan is a low-life hack, picked out of obscurity by a rightwing billionaire, and paid to push hate and white identity politics to achieve conservative political goals.

Forget him and let's worry about taking the Murdoch family down. They're at the root of this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While I’m not a fan of the BRF or Megan, Piers is a tool! He clearly had some sort of ax to grind with Megan. I don’t know but he was obsessed with her. The other anchor called him out on it too.

Piers was an old windbag. Good riddance! Yay!

Yes, they used to be gossipy chums and she'd come into town and they'd meet up for a pint and dish about the who's who of Britain and the ins and outs of Hollywood. It doesn't appear that they dated at all. It wasn't that. It was that he enjoyed the flattery of her wanting to be in his company and he was a big shot. At the time, HE was a big deal. And suddenly, she got her in with Harry and ghosted Piers like yesterday's news. He got his feelings hurt, but in a monstrous way. His attitude wasn't sadness, it was "how dare you treat me like YOU aren't good enough for ME you big fraud!" So instead of moving on, he made it his mission to "expose" her, but it only made him look more and more petty.

He met her ONE TIME and she never returned his phone calls. He’s been a bitter, jealous, obsessed a-hole ever since. The amount of time he spends talking and tweeting about her borders on stalkerish psycho insanity. He seems to think about her every waking minute while she probably barely remembers the dinner.

I hadn't seen that weird psycho article someone posted above, where he was "ghosted" by her.

DOES HE THINK THEY WENT ON A DATE???? This is like the weirdest revelation. It all of a sudden it all makes sense why he hates her so much. I never knew they used to be "friends" but he thinks they were on a date, doesn't he?

He's acting like a spurned lover -- although I'm pretty sure he was married at the time. Even from his descriptions it sounds more like a friendly / professional meet-up when she happened to be in the same city. They met face to face for the first time, then she went off with friends. Then I guess he had some kind of expectations or feelings and has been running his mouth full of nastiness ever since. He seems obsessed and full of hatred. I wonder what his wife makes of it?

It's sick how he turned full throttle just because she used to text him, met him in person once, and then started dated someone. It doesn't compute. The "punishment" doesn't fit the "crime." He felt something for her, there is no question in my mind, and he totally feels rejected. There would be no other reason to have that level of hatred directed at someone you (a complete sexist a-hole) met one time, so much so you write a whole article about it, blind to how humiliating it looks for you. So utterly bizarre.

He's obviously sexually obsessed with her and has been for years. According to his own description of their interactions, he "liked Suits" and slid into her DMs. She met up with him for drinks once while in London, which he often describes in blow by blow action, from what she drank to following her out to the taxi. He thought it was a date.

He wanted a piece of that sweet American milk chocolate. She probably realized that because he's sexually aggressive (go look at what he tweeted for international women's day-- and look up articles about how he asked female guests about who they've slept with).

He tries to play this off like he attacks women because he's a bitchy man. But he's not, he's just a sexually entitled, pot bellied crusty old tosspot geezer who can't stop trying to virtually BDSM the dutchess.

I’m not sure what sort of an impact you were hoping for, but putting your own racist AF comment out there might not be the look you were hoping for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In a dust up over Meghan Markle
Lol
I hope he sinks into well deserved obscurity
Trump won't pull any strings to help him either

Piers Morgan is tight with Murdoch world. Rupert paid him for years, and hired him as an editor.
You don't work for Rupert Murdoch as an editor unless you are a hateful person who will advance the Murdoch family's political agenda.

Morgan is a low-life hack, picked out of obscurity by a rightwing billionaire, and paid to push hate and white identity politics to achieve conservative political goals.

Forget him and let's worry about taking the Murdoch family down. They're at the root of this.

Rupert Murdoch said that Piers had more balls than brains. Not a ringing endorsement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While I’m not a fan of the BRF or Megan, Piers is a tool! He clearly had some sort of ax to grind with Megan. I don’t know but he was obsessed with her. The other anchor called him out on it too.

Piers was an old windbag. Good riddance! Yay!

Yes, they used to be gossipy chums and she'd come into town and they'd meet up for a pint and dish about the who's who of Britain and the ins and outs of Hollywood. It doesn't appear that they dated at all. It wasn't that. It was that he enjoyed the flattery of her wanting to be in his company and he was a big shot. At the time, HE was a big deal. And suddenly, she got her in with Harry and ghosted Piers like yesterday's news. He got his feelings hurt, but in a monstrous way. His attitude wasn't sadness, it was "how dare you treat me like YOU aren't good enough for ME you big fraud!" So instead of moving on, he made it his mission to "expose" her, but it only made him look more and more petty.

He met her ONE TIME and she never returned his phone calls. He’s been a bitter, jealous, obsessed a-hole ever since. The amount of time he spends talking and tweeting about her borders on stalkerish psycho insanity. He seems to think about her every waking minute while she probably barely remembers the dinner.

I hadn't seen that weird psycho article someone posted above, where he was "ghosted" by her.

DOES HE THINK THEY WENT ON A DATE???? This is like the weirdest revelation. It all of a sudden it all makes sense why he hates her so much. I never knew they used to be "friends" but he thinks they were on a date, doesn't he?

He's acting like a spurned lover -- although I'm pretty sure he was married at the time. Even from his descriptions it sounds more like a friendly / professional meet-up when she happened to be in the same city. They met face to face for the first time, then she went off with friends. Then I guess he had some kind of expectations or feelings and has been running his mouth full of nastiness ever since. He seems obsessed and full of hatred. I wonder what his wife makes of it?

It's sick how he turned full throttle just because she used to text him, met him in person once, and then started dated someone. It doesn't compute. The "punishment" doesn't fit the "crime." He felt something for her, there is no question in my mind, and he totally feels rejected. There would be no other reason to have that level of hatred directed at someone you (a complete sexist a-hole) met one time, so much so you write a whole article about it, blind to how humiliating it looks for you. So utterly bizarre.

He's obviously sexually obsessed with her and has been for years. According to his own description of their interactions, he "liked Suits" and slid into her DMs. She met up with him for drinks once while in London, which he often describes in blow by blow action, from what she drank to following her out to the taxi. He thought it was a date.

He wanted a piece of that sweet American milk chocolate. She probably realized that because he's sexually aggressive (go look at what he tweeted for international women's day-- and look up articles about how he asked female guests about who they've slept with).

He tries to play this off like he attacks women because he's a bitchy man. But he's not, he's just a sexually entitled, pot bellied crusty old tosspot geezer who can't stop trying to virtually BDSM the dutchess.

We might not agree on Markle but I’m glad we all agree that this PP just took it too far. Gross PP.