Gender Non-Conforming Boy - Looking for Resources Not Your Opinions Or Judgment

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:yall are sick and ridiculous

boys should not be wearing princess outfits or pinktails

yall need to actually parent your children

...because? No one has yet actually explained why a boy shouldn't wear a princess costume on halloween. OR pigtails, for that matter.

I can believe i actually have to answer this question because they aren't girls duh

And girls can’t dress up as Superman then?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:yall are sick and ridiculous

boys should not be wearing princess outfits or pinktails

yall need to actually parent your children

Still die in still a fire.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:yall are sick and ridiculous

boys should not be wearing princess outfits or pinktails

yall need to actually parent your children

...because? No one has yet actually explained why a boy shouldn't wear a princess costume on halloween. OR pigtails, for that matter.

I can believe i actually have to answer this question because they aren't girls duh

Location?
Age?
Race?
Nationality?
Religion?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, I think you're in DC, you're in luck. This kind of thing is openly accepted at my child's preschool. One boy decided to grow his hair out and wear dresses all year. My daughter just said, "Larlo likes princess things like me!" and truly, no one cares. It was actually a much easier conversation than the whole, "Timmy has two mommies / daddies" dynamic.

Kids do this everywhere. It's no big deal.

The people who think it's "inappropriate" probably never had kids or had kids 50 years ago. Their opinions are completely IRRELEVANT.

I don't necessarily agree. I know a lot of people where I'm from and from places I've lived where it would be a big deal. There's absolutely nothing wrong with it, but some people definitely think there is when you leave the bubble of DC.

In my experience, LMC neighborhoods.

Where - in 2019 - would it be a big deal?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:yall are sick and ridiculous

boys should not be wearing princess outfits or pinktails

yall need to actually parent your children

Still die in still a fire.

NP. What is wrong with you?

[Anonymous]

“Princesses,” by definition, are female. It’s inherent in the word. Prince is the male form, for those of you who are a little slow today.

[Anonymous]

Who wouldn't prefer the girly stuff? It is way more fun!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“Princesses,” by definition, are female. It’s inherent in the word. Prince is the male form, for those of you who are a little slow today.

Ok. So what? Can a girl dress as superMAN? Can a boy dress as a giraffe- which is specifically not a human?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Princesses,” by definition, are female. It’s inherent in the word. Prince is the male form, for those of you who are a little slow today.

Ok. So what? Can a girl dress as superMAN? Can a boy dress as a giraffe- which is specifically not a human?

Your kids can dress up as a can of oil, for all I care.

But for my kids? No. I would not allow my 3-year-old son -- or any age son -- to dress up as a princess, at Halloween or anytime. Further, I think that it is a dereliction of parental responsibility to do so.

[Anonymous]

Most men (even people in general and yes, in DC too) would agree with PP whether they would admit it IRL or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, I think you're in DC, you're in luck. This kind of thing is openly accepted at my child's preschool. One boy decided to grow his hair out and wear dresses all year. My daughter just said, "Larlo likes princess things like me!" and truly, no one cares. It was actually a much easier conversation than the whole, "Timmy has two mommies / daddies" dynamic.

Kids do this everywhere. It's no big deal.

The people who think it's "inappropriate" probably never had kids or had kids 50 years ago. Their opinions are completely IRRELEVANT.

I don't necessarily agree. I know a lot of people where I'm from and from places I've lived where it would be a big deal. There's absolutely nothing wrong with it, but some people definitely think there is when you leave the bubble of DC.

In my experience, LMC neighborhoods.

Where - in 2019 - would it be a big deal?

I'd say almost anywhere on Long Island, UMC and all. My daughter was concerned recently that she might have to come out as bi to some family members on LI ( she was anticipating a conversation many years into the future) and she was extra teen angsty about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“Princesses,” by definition, are female. It’s inherent in the word. Prince is the male form, for those of you who are a little slow today.

So, my dd isn't a turtle. yet, I let her go as one of those mutant ninja turtles one year for halloween. And another year she went as scooby do (she's not a dog) oh, and then she was snoopy (again, she's not a dog). Was I a bad parent because she wanted to dress up as animals (mainly dogs) for every halloween? Please explain your logic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Princesses,” by definition, are female. It’s inherent in the word. Prince is the male form, for those of you who are a little slow today.

So, my dd isn't a turtle. yet, I let her go as one of those mutant ninja turtles one year for halloween. And another year she went as scooby do (she's not a dog) oh, and then she was snoopy (again, she's not a dog). Was I a bad parent because she wanted to dress up as animals (mainly dogs) for every halloween? Please explain your logic.

lol this is like talking to an athiest

congratulations you are a transgender supporters

most of the country thinks you are nuts

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Princesses,” by definition, are female. It’s inherent in the word. Prince is the male form, for those of you who are a little slow today.

So, my dd isn't a turtle. yet, I let her go as one of those mutant ninja turtles one year for halloween. And another year she went as scooby do (she's not a dog) oh, and then she was snoopy (again, she's not a dog). Was I a bad parent because she wanted to dress up as animals (mainly dogs) for every halloween? Please explain your logic.

lol this is like talking to an athiest

congratulations you are a transgender supporters

most of the country thinks you are nuts

That you confuse a preschooler dressing up in a costume with the transgender community's fight for civil rights suggests you need to consider furthering your own education. These are not two of the same thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Princesses,” by definition, are female. It’s inherent in the word. Prince is the male form, for those of you who are a little slow today.

So, my dd isn't a turtle. yet, I let her go as one of those mutant ninja turtles one year for halloween. And another year she went as scooby do (she's not a dog) oh, and then she was snoopy (again, she's not a dog). Was I a bad parent because she wanted to dress up as animals (mainly dogs) for every halloween? Please explain your logic.

lol this is like talking to an athiest

congratulations you are a transgender supporters

most of the country thinks you are nuts

So it's ok for a boy to dress up in any costume of any kind except a dress. What about a kilt? Where does that fall?