Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
They aren’t the Wales. The Wales most likely think not a whit about them. |
It doesn't though, there's absolutely nothing natural about it, it looks so awkward. |
Never! Meggies does NOT want you to see her butt. |
What a seriously stupid comment. |
Agreed. I think that is part of what makes it look unnatural. Also Archie is 6 and a half. He should be close to 4 feet tall by now. I wonder how long he had to hang there! Maybe awhile and he slipped down. Usually kids jump up when they jump onto you. they don't grab low and then lift their legs off the ground like that. |
No. Each parent close to just 1 kid? Weird. Nobody does that. It’s a group photo, all together. This is just odd. |
Ahhh, so sweet. Like every daughter puts their head on daddy’s shoulder while he’s holding the youngest. As awkward as Harry’s. No matter what Harry and Meghan do, the British folks on here will find fault with it. |
| Lillibet's hair is not brushed. |
It’s odd how often they miss the mark. People notice. |
I’m a bit over the posed “casual” and “chill” pretending not to pose posed family pictures. In general, not just in this photo. I get this is (was?) a big trend but seems silly to get everyone dressed up, drive out to some big empty field or whatever, and then have a photographer take photos of the family pretending they are just laughing in a field together and that they are unaware the person they paid to take photos of them is taking photos |
They aren't trying to be casual or natural. That is a clearly posed family picture and they aren't trying to hide that. |
💯 |
|
I’m very neutral on Meghan and Harry. (I like Harry more than her). I see the criticism and I see the noise.
My take on Wales and Sussex. Our last family photo shoot had pictures like both. We did some playing at a creek, some barefoot kids, climbing on rocks, standing and walking together naturally across a bridge on a creek. We had some “sitting in a field.” It was a pretty field and taking a break from our walking around the area. **This is all very common for families of all classes. It’s silly to criticize the location/family pose. Each family probably has private additional photos of the exact same session with “each others’” style.** |
|
Neutral parent here commenting again
It’s more interesting to talk about choices, outside of the pose and location. And not as a criticism OF them, but a signal FROM them Unbrushed hair—raising a child “gentle” or with a lot more personal agency than children in the inner circle. Transparent dress—not thinking. Didn’t enter her mind. So that’s dumb. Combine not thinking with the lighting. And then.. she chose it. Didn’t choose another. Didn’t say, let’s use the other shoot we did, or a future one. Putting all else first besides a little bit of modesty. Maybe thought it was sexy/funny. Funny to see herself outside the rules. She has shown this in other choices since leaving UK. Consistent. Not criticism, analysis of her choice. Both choosing nature, not posed indoors. Generational, fitting with many families. Turning kids away - I’m least surprised by this. When you have 1. Harry’s trauma from lack of privacy. Yes, did you even read his book. Hate it all you want, you can tell how much he fears. He learned to pilot a f***** helicopter, but he’s more in his element there than among press. Small steps to avoid the same for his innocent children 2. Other side of same coin, people were conspiracy-talk about dolls or borrowed children when they were babies. They have to show the children to combat this. |
| She 100% knew that dress was transparent and the photographer would have told her and she would have been looking at her hat the photographer was taking on the camera. She has a team of people and they probably had multiple wardrobe changes at the shoot. Meghan likes to control everything and she would have known exactly what this looked like. These are not oh how funny, didn’t realize until we got the proofs that you could see through my dress. |