Anonymous wrote:Harry recently went on a ski trip with his friend and then they participated in a Snow Polo competition. He was introduced at the competition as Harry Wales. But Meghan was clear she is a Sussex so curious as to why they are using different names.
Harry Wales and Meghan Sussex
That was like 150 years ago. Way different times.
He's been Harry Wales since childhood because his dad was Prince of Wales then. He used that last name at school and in the military. He got the Sussex title as a wedding gift. So his wife is Duchess of Sussex. She is not a Princess of Wales OR THE Princess of Wales. I guess she was never made a Princess. Technically, I think Kate was not until William became THE Prince of Wales. There was much remark over how William put "princess of the UK" as Kate's occupation on (George's?) birth certificate. At that point she could have gone by Kate Cambridge. And was a royal duchess. At that time, she could also have been called Princess William.
Actually, Meghan is a princess. She is Princess Henry of Wales.
Meghan is not a princess of wales.
I thought they were all over and done with the titles. Not a Princess. I think her daughter is though. But again thought they wanted no titles?
No - they want the titles and the security but not to do any of the royal 'work'.
The Queen called Will and Kate “Won’t and Can’t”.
They all seem to be over the “work” part, whatever that was.
They are out doing Royal things every week and living by Royal rules and all of that. Fine. So they can have the titles and pomp and represent the country.
Meghan and Harry aren't doing any of the Royal things or living by Royal rules. Yet they want the royal titles and apparently are upset they don't have the security. I think people would have more respect for them, or at least the respect they seem to want, if they would stop trying to be royal Americans, a la Countess Luann, and just be normal people.
Harry’s titles (and his wife’s by marriage) are his birthright. That’s kind of the whole point of the monarchy, that certain people in one specific family are the head of a nation.
There’s no halfway about it.
Either you accept the premise that the members of a certain family deserve titles by birth or you don’t believe in a monarchy.
Pick a lane.
Harry and Meghan did pick a lane. They moved across the ocean to another country and trashed the royal family. Buh bye monarchy.
Do you not understand what monarchy is? He doesn’t stop being a prince because he moved.
It’s his birthright. Just like being the future king is William’s.
Pick a lane. Either you support the idea that one family is so special they should have taxpayer funded estates and titles and money or you don’t. It’s silly to pretend otherwise.
Totally understand: but if you reject being a part of it, then you don't get the benefits.
Edward the 8th abdicated an entire throne and was bestowed the Duke of Windsor, living abroad. He kept all his benefits.
Anonymous wrote:It’s a posed casual photo. Totally fine. My daughter hates when I wash / brush her hair, and so her hair, which I don’t let grow past her shoulders, kind of look like this all the time.
It's posed, but definitely not casual. Meghan is practically wearing a gown. Her daughter has on a dress and shiny dress shoes. It's the equivalent of going for a 5 mile run, coming home, not showering or washing your face , keeping your hair up in the sweaty ponytail, and throwing on a fancy dress to attend a wedding.
DP who just joined this thread here. Worry about your own family instead of hating the Instagram post of a family you've never met, and who you only know through lies spread by the British tabloids. Why this obsessive hate, are you escaping something in your own life?
My opinions (mainly negative) of the Sussexes are not formed by the British tabloids, which I do not read or pay attention to. My opinions are formed by the words that come out of their mouths that I hear with my own ears and their own actions that I can see for myself.
This reminds me of when people accuse Trump 'haters' of being brainwashed by the media. We don't nee the media to hear what he is saying on TV or read what he is tweeting. It's right in front of us.
Just get off the fox box. They lie by omission and sway by bias opinion. H&M are rarely in any other news, so I’m sure this is where your “opinions” come from
DP. I don't watch Fox and I doubt the PP does, either. And "rarely in any other news"? Meghan and Harry are all over different outlets.
The fact that Meghan Markle draws a nastier mob and longer thread than Prince Andrew rather neatly tells you everything you need to know about the royals’ fans.
Anonymous wrote:The fact that Meghan Markle draws a nastier mob and longer thread than Prince Andrew rather neatly tells you everything you need to know about the royals’ fans.
Anonymous wrote:The fact that Meghan Markle draws a nastier mob and longer thread than Prince Andrew rather neatly tells you everything you need to know about the royals’ fans.
Anonymous wrote:The fact that Meghan Markle draws a nastier mob and longer thread than Prince Andrew rather neatly tells you everything you need to know about the royals’ fans.
Yes, because there can be fair debate between the Meghan lovers and haters. There is pretty much total consensus that Andrew is a loser, boorish pedophile who needs to be totally banished.
That's lovely ^^. They don't feel the need to hide their kids' faces...
With all the hate directed at the Sussexes--even on a place like DCUM from the hate hobbyists on this thread--I totally get why they hide their kids' faces.
By publishing the card, rather than sending it to family and friends, they open themselves to commentary. That they hide their kids’ faces is funny because they can fully hide their kids and themselves if they were smart enough to realize that their attempt at being public figures without talking about the royal family has failed miserably.
But William and Kate put out a picture every year and poor Harry thinks he’s still part of the royal family and wants to keep some of its traditions.
It's not a card, it's an Instagram post. One of many Instagram posts. Their Christmas card is just Harry and Meghan.
And since when do Kate and William own Christmas cards, to the point where Harry and Meghan--and presumably the rest of us--shouldn't be sending them out?! Geez.
Honestly you haters are a pathetic bunch. Get a real hobby, one that makes you happy, instead of spending 25 pages using incorrect details to hate on a family you never met.
Not sure if you are aware that you are on this thread too.
It is a Christmas card because that’s how it’s being reported in the media. But regardless, the point that Harry is miserable over his decision to leave the royal family still stands. He even dropped his demand that his family apologize to Meghan in a bid to get them to forgive him. But I don’t think William will consider it.
I just joined the thread 1-2 pages ago. Ask the moderator. So no, I haven't been in the ditch with you and your obsessive hate for 25 pages.
The fact that the media misunderstands--or is even lying about--an Instagram post does NOT make it a Christmas card. Do you want/expect your social media posts to count as your Christmas/holiday cards? What is wrong with you?
And what's your evidence that Harry is (a) miserable, or (b) dropped his demand for an apology? No, the Daily Mail certainly doesn't count. Harry has repeatedly said that he doesn't want to return to Britain except for visits to family and his charities. Read Anna Pasternak, Meredith Constant, or others about the terrible British media. Where, for starters, they have to publish everything the palaces give them, and delete everything the palaces don't like, if they want to maintain access to the royals. Many in Britain are calling for a new press investigation; the British media have gotten that bad.
It sounds like this is very important to you.
It was reported in the daily beast that he dropped his demand they apologize to his wife.
So you concede... nobody's Instagram post becomes their Christmas card because "the media says so."
LOL
Tom Sykes of the Daily Beast is a big player in the media industrial hate machine against the Sussexes. Sykes went to Eton with William, and there's speculation he's paid by KP, which has been proven to bully rota journalists and to use paid bots (Sykes was kicked out of the rota last summer, but he's still useful). There's also speculation that Sykes is angling for a journalistic seat deep inside future King William's court, so he's playing to William's more incandescent tendencies toward his brother.
Toying with haters like you is fun. I wouldn't say it's important to me, or even that I'm a huge fan of Meghan or her show. I just think haters like you, who spend their time on biased hate channels, are disgusting. So I'm here to blow up your little hate thread, and to have fun doing it.
I didn’t know that about Sykes. Good for him.
Good for Sykes for... monetizing hate and ignoring or twisting key facts?
How is reporting that Harry dropped his demand that his family apologize to his wife “monetizing hate”? And you know it makes sense he would do that. He’s been begging for them to reconcile with him, saying he wants to move on. Of course, this is after he and his wife called his family racist on Oprah. He later denied that but it made him look more like a fool.
Because Sykes makes stuff up all the time to sell his Substack subscriptions. There are Reddit subs that pick Sykes' columns apart.
It's clear Harry wants to reconcile with Charles, who's been ill. But it's much less clear Harry wants to reconcile with William and Kate. Since you're familiar with Spare, you'll know the stories about William shoving Harry, Kate allowing that lie about Meghan making her cry when it was the other way around, the questions about Archie's skin color, both of them briefing the press against Harry and Meghan, and so much more.
All of that is irrelevant except for the racism accusation, which Harry tried to take back. He said his wife didn’t call his family racist, when she did, for millions to see.
Wut? Why are you calling all the things William and Kate did to Harry "irrelevant", like William shoving Harry, Kate making Meghan cry, and the rest? And when Kate asked about Archie's skin color, is that "irrelevant" to you? Or are only the things Harry and Meghan say "relevant" to you?
And what's wrong with Harry saying there was "unconscious bias" among the royals?
Answers on a postcard, please.
Katie made sweet virginal what’s a yacht Meghan sob, eh? Unconscious bias, why?
For the racism claim: in Endgame, foam-faced Omid Scobie identified the royal racist by role, not name - as the Princess of Wales, who at the time was Camilla. There is no evidence of course that anyone said anything racist. Maybe they were wondering whether Meghan’s still apparent strabismus would impact their kids. Turns out it did.
I’m sure Meghan is too busy sourcing shea butter and salons for a good Dominican blowout for her children to worry about whether her card was cute or not.
^^^ Hey readers, bumping this typical Meghan hater. Form your own judgment! (For the record, the racists were identified by name, not by role, as Kate and Charles. You probably already clocked that strabismus has nothing to do with skin color. Kate was a yacht girl on the Solent before uni. And this poster lost me with the reference to blowing out black hair, ugh.)
Ugh, friend. All these tricks talking about textured and stringy hair. Can we even appreciate how much time Harry has spent shopping for Cantu to manage Princess of color Lili’s kitchen???
Get over yourself, dummy. A fug photo is just that, and your sensitivity is your flaw.
Anonymous wrote:The fact that Meghan Markle draws a nastier mob and longer thread than Prince Andrew rather neatly tells you everything you need to know about the royals’ fans.
Yes, because there can be fair debate between the Meghan lovers and haters. There is pretty much total consensus that Andrew is a loser, boorish pedophile who needs to be totally banished.
Except it’s not a fair debate. OP started a thread 31 pages ago to complain about a little girl’s hair on what she falsely called a Christmas card. The thread has continued in that vein for 31 pages: the anti-Meghan posts rely mainly on lies and frothing hyperbole, as this thread so ably demonstrates. Debunk all the lies and strip out the hyperbole and very little would remain.
That's lovely ^^. They don't feel the need to hide their kids' faces...
With all the hate directed at the Sussexes--even on a place like DCUM from the hate hobbyists on this thread--I totally get why they hide their kids' faces.
By publishing the card, rather than sending it to family and friends, they open themselves to commentary. That they hide their kids’ faces is funny because they can fully hide their kids and themselves if they were smart enough to realize that their attempt at being public figures without talking about the royal family has failed miserably.
But William and Kate put out a picture every year and poor Harry thinks he’s still part of the royal family and wants to keep some of its traditions.
It's not a card, it's an Instagram post. One of many Instagram posts. Their Christmas card is just Harry and Meghan.
And since when do Kate and William own Christmas cards, to the point where Harry and Meghan--and presumably the rest of us--shouldn't be sending them out?! Geez.
Honestly you haters are a pathetic bunch. Get a real hobby, one that makes you happy, instead of spending 25 pages using incorrect details to hate on a family you never met.
Not sure if you are aware that you are on this thread too.
It is a Christmas card because that’s how it’s being reported in the media. But regardless, the point that Harry is miserable over his decision to leave the royal family still stands. He even dropped his demand that his family apologize to Meghan in a bid to get them to forgive him. But I don’t think William will consider it.
I just joined the thread 1-2 pages ago. Ask the moderator. So no, I haven't been in the ditch with you and your obsessive hate for 25 pages.
The fact that the media misunderstands--or is even lying about--an Instagram post does NOT make it a Christmas card. Do you want/expect your social media posts to count as your Christmas/holiday cards? What is wrong with you?
And what's your evidence that Harry is (a) miserable, or (b) dropped his demand for an apology? No, the Daily Mail certainly doesn't count. Harry has repeatedly said that he doesn't want to return to Britain except for visits to family and his charities. Read Anna Pasternak, Meredith Constant, or others about the terrible British media. Where, for starters, they have to publish everything the palaces give them, and delete everything the palaces don't like, if they want to maintain access to the royals. Many in Britain are calling for a new press investigation; the British media have gotten that bad.
It sounds like this is very important to you.
It was reported in the daily beast that he dropped his demand they apologize to his wife.
So you concede... nobody's Instagram post becomes their Christmas card because "the media says so."
LOL
Tom Sykes of the Daily Beast is a big player in the media industrial hate machine against the Sussexes. Sykes went to Eton with William, and there's speculation he's paid by KP, which has been proven to bully rota journalists and to use paid bots (Sykes was kicked out of the rota last summer, but he's still useful). There's also speculation that Sykes is angling for a journalistic seat deep inside future King William's court, so he's playing to William's more incandescent tendencies toward his brother.
Toying with haters like you is fun. I wouldn't say it's important to me, or even that I'm a huge fan of Meghan or her show. I just think haters like you, who spend their time on biased hate channels, are disgusting. So I'm here to blow up your little hate thread, and to have fun doing it.
I didn’t know that about Sykes. Good for him.
Good for Sykes for... monetizing hate and ignoring or twisting key facts?
How is reporting that Harry dropped his demand that his family apologize to his wife “monetizing hate”? And you know it makes sense he would do that. He’s been begging for them to reconcile with him, saying he wants to move on. Of course, this is after he and his wife called his family racist on Oprah. He later denied that but it made him look more like a fool.
Because Sykes makes stuff up all the time to sell his Substack subscriptions. There are Reddit subs that pick Sykes' columns apart.
It's clear Harry wants to reconcile with Charles, who's been ill. But it's much less clear Harry wants to reconcile with William and Kate. Since you're familiar with Spare, you'll know the stories about William shoving Harry, Kate allowing that lie about Meghan making her cry when it was the other way around, the questions about Archie's skin color, both of them briefing the press against Harry and Meghan, and so much more.
All of that is irrelevant except for the racism accusation, which Harry tried to take back. He said his wife didn’t call his family racist, when she did, for millions to see.
Wut? Why are you calling all the things William and Kate did to Harry "irrelevant", like William shoving Harry, Kate making Meghan cry, and the rest? And when Kate asked about Archie's skin color, is that "irrelevant" to you? Or are only the things Harry and Meghan say "relevant" to you?
And what's wrong with Harry saying there was "unconscious bias" among the royals?
Answers on a postcard, please.
Katie made sweet virginal what’s a yacht Meghan sob, eh? Unconscious bias, why?
For the racism claim: in Endgame, foam-faced Omid Scobie identified the royal racist by role, not name - as the Princess of Wales, who at the time was Camilla. There is no evidence of course that anyone said anything racist. Maybe they were wondering whether Meghan’s still apparent strabismus would impact their kids. Turns out it did.
I’m sure Meghan is too busy sourcing shea butter and salons for a good Dominican blowout for her children to worry about whether her card was cute or not.
^^^ Hey readers, bumping this typical Meghan hater. Form your own judgment! (For the record, the racists were identified by name, not by role, as Kate and Charles. You probably already clocked that strabismus has nothing to do with skin color. Kate was a yacht girl on the Solent before uni. And this poster lost me with the reference to blowing out black hair, ugh.)
Ugh, friend. All these tricks talking about textured and stringy hair. Can we even appreciate how much time Harry has spent shopping for Cantu to manage Princess of color Lili’s kitchen???
Get over yourself, dummy. A fug photo is just that, and your sensitivity is your flaw.
Anonymous wrote:The fact that Meghan Markle draws a nastier mob and longer thread than Prince Andrew rather neatly tells you everything you need to know about the royals’ fans.
Yes, because there can be fair debate between the Meghan lovers and haters. There is pretty much total consensus that Andrew is a loser, boorish pedophile who needs to be totally banished.
Except it’s not a fair debate. OP started a thread 31 pages ago to complain about a little girl’s hair on what she falsely called a Christmas card. The thread has continued in that vein for 31 pages: the anti-Meghan posts rely mainly on lies and frothing hyperbole, as this thread so ably demonstrates. Debunk all the lies and strip out the hyperbole and very little would remain.
It’s not that deep. Getting this upset over other people’s opinions is psychotic. Who cares?
Anonymous wrote:The fact that Meghan Markle draws a nastier mob and longer thread than Prince Andrew rather neatly tells you everything you need to know about the royals’ fans.
Yes, because there can be fair debate between the Meghan lovers and haters. There is pretty much total consensus that Andrew is a loser, boorish pedophile who needs to be totally banished.
Except it’s not a fair debate. OP started a thread 31 pages ago to complain about a little girl’s hair on what she falsely called a Christmas card. The thread has continued in that vein for 31 pages: the anti-Meghan posts rely mainly on lies and frothing hyperbole, as this thread so ably demonstrates. Debunk all the lies and strip out the hyperbole and very little would remain.
You mean about a little princess of color who has been treated poorly because of racism and unconscious bias and generalized haterarion of jam, right?
Anonymous wrote:The fact that Meghan Markle draws a nastier mob and longer thread than Prince Andrew rather neatly tells you everything you need to know about the royals’ fans.
Yes, because there can be fair debate between the Meghan lovers and haters. There is pretty much total consensus that Andrew is a loser, boorish pedophile who needs to be totally banished.
Except it’s not a fair debate. OP started a thread 31 pages ago to complain about a little girl’s hair on what she falsely called a Christmas card. The thread has continued in that vein for 31 pages: the anti-Meghan posts rely mainly on lies and frothing hyperbole, as this thread so ably demonstrates. Debunk all the lies and strip out the hyperbole and very little would remain.
It’s not that deep. Getting this upset over other people’s opinions is psychotic. Who cares?
Because she’s a white knight for Truth. Wait, is that racist?
Anonymous wrote:The fact that Meghan Markle draws a nastier mob and longer thread than Prince Andrew rather neatly tells you everything you need to know about the royals’ fans.
Yes, because there can be fair debate between the Meghan lovers and haters. There is pretty much total consensus that Andrew is a loser, boorish pedophile who needs to be totally banished.
Except it’s not a fair debate. OP started a thread 31 pages ago to complain about a little girl’s hair on what she falsely called a Christmas card. The thread has continued in that vein for 31 pages: the anti-Meghan posts rely mainly on lies and frothing hyperbole, as this thread so ably demonstrates. Debunk all the lies and strip out the hyperbole and very little would remain.
It’s not that deep. Getting this upset over other people’s opinions is psychotic. Who cares?
Not being upset over a thread that was created to trash a little mixed-race girl’s hair is what’s psychotic. We should all care.
Anonymous wrote:It’s a posed casual photo. Totally fine. My daughter hates when I wash / brush her hair, and so her hair, which I don’t let grow past her shoulders, kind of look like this all the time.
It's posed, but definitely not casual. Meghan is practically wearing a gown. Her daughter has on a dress and shiny dress shoes. It's the equivalent of going for a 5 mile run, coming home, not showering or washing your face , keeping your hair up in the sweaty ponytail, and throwing on a fancy dress to attend a wedding.
DP who just joined this thread here. Worry about your own family instead of hating the Instagram post of a family you've never met, and who you only know through lies spread by the British tabloids. Why this obsessive hate, are you escaping something in your own life?
My opinions (mainly negative) of the Sussexes are not formed by the British tabloids, which I do not read or pay attention to. My opinions are formed by the words that come out of their mouths that I hear with my own ears and their own actions that I can see for myself.
This reminds me of when people accuse Trump 'haters' of being brainwashed by the media. We don't nee the media to hear what he is saying on TV or read what he is tweeting. It's right in front of us.
Just get off the fox box. They lie by omission and sway by bias opinion. H&M are rarely in any other news, so I’m sure this is where your “opinions” come from
DP. I don't watch Fox and I doubt the PP does, either. And "rarely in any other news"? Meghan and Harry are all over different outlets.
They pay good money to be mentioned in the news! Those puff pieces don’t come cheap, their archwell foundation has a 1.8 million deficit
Now you’re lying about Archewell, which gave more money to charity last year than Will and Kate’s Royal Foundation did. (Something like $1.25m granted vs $1.1m, I don’t have the exact numbers but you can easily google, and the Sussex’s charity is not in deficit you made that up.)
Publications write about the Sussexes, and the Wales’s, for the clicks that attract advertisers. Both couples are perennially popular or perennially attract hate clicks. This is media 101.
To those calling me a liar-
It’s in several news stories today, and it’s a 2.6 million deficit so I actually understated.
They are renaming it, letting go of employees, and calling for volunteer staff
Anonymous wrote:The fact that Meghan Markle draws a nastier mob and longer thread than Prince Andrew rather neatly tells you everything you need to know about the royals’ fans.
Yes, because there can be fair debate between the Meghan lovers and haters. There is pretty much total consensus that Andrew is a loser, boorish pedophile who needs to be totally banished.
Except it’s not a fair debate. OP started a thread 31 pages ago to complain about a little girl’s hair on what she falsely called a Christmas card. The thread has continued in that vein for 31 pages: the anti-Meghan posts rely mainly on lies and frothing hyperbole, as this thread so ably demonstrates. Debunk all the lies and strip out the hyperbole and very little would remain.
It’s not that deep. Getting this upset over other people’s opinions is psychotic. Who cares?
Not being upset over a thread that was created to trash a little mixed-race girl’s hair is what’s psychotic. We should all care.
Exactly. Those kids are highly favored melanated kings and queens to be right?
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}