Harry and Meghan’s Christmas card

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They all look so disheveled and awkward both individually and with each other.

The girl’s hair definitely needs to be brushed and cut.

What up with the weird photoshopping his bald spot with tree leaves?

It is just such a bad Christmas card. So I looked up William’s. It looks classy while Harry’s looks so trashy.

Here is William’s:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9975zk98kyo

That's lovely ^^. They don't feel the need to hide their kids' faces...

With all the hate directed at the Sussexes--even on a place like DCUM from the hate hobbyists on this thread--I totally get why they hide their kids' faces.

By publishing the card, rather than sending it to family and friends, they open themselves to commentary. That they hide their kids’ faces is funny because they can fully hide their kids and themselves if they were smart enough to realize that their attempt at being public figures without talking about the royal family has failed miserably.

But William and Kate put out a picture every year and poor Harry thinks he’s still part of the royal family and wants to keep some of its traditions.

It's not a card, it's an Instagram post. One of many Instagram posts. Their Christmas card is just Harry and Meghan.

And since when do Kate and William own Christmas cards, to the point where Harry and Meghan--and presumably the rest of us--shouldn't be sending them out?! Geez.

Honestly you haters are a pathetic bunch. Get a real hobby, one that makes you happy, instead of spending 25 pages using incorrect details to hate on a family you never met.

Not sure if you are aware that you are on this thread too.

It is a Christmas card because that’s how it’s being reported in the media. But regardless, the point that Harry is miserable over his decision to leave the royal family still stands. He even dropped his demand that his family apologize to Meghan in a bid to get them to forgive him. But I don’t think William will consider it.

I just joined the thread 1-2 pages ago. Ask the moderator. So no, I haven't been in the ditch with you and your obsessive hate for 25 pages.

The fact that the media misunderstands--or is even lying about--an Instagram post does NOT make it a Christmas card. Do you want/expect your social media posts to count as your Christmas/holiday cards? What is wrong with you?

And what's your evidence that Harry is (a) miserable, or (b) dropped his demand for an apology? No, the Daily Mail certainly doesn't count. Harry has repeatedly said that he doesn't want to return to Britain except for visits to family and his charities. Read Anna Pasternak, Meredith Constant, or others about the terrible British media. Where, for starters, they have to publish everything the palaces give them, and delete everything the palaces don't like, if they want to maintain access to the royals. Many in Britain are calling for a new press investigation; the British media have gotten that bad.

It sounds like this is very important to you.

It was reported in the daily beast that he dropped his demand they apologize to his wife.

So you concede... nobody's Instagram post becomes their Christmas card because "the media says so."

LOL

Tom Sykes of the Daily Beast is a big player in the media industrial hate machine against the Sussexes. Sykes went to Eton with William, and there's speculation he's paid by KP, which has been proven to bully rota journalists and to use paid bots (Sykes was kicked out of the rota last summer, but he's still useful). There's also speculation that Sykes is angling for a journalistic seat deep inside future King William's court, so he's playing to William's more incandescent tendencies toward his brother.

Toying with haters like you is fun. I wouldn't say it's important to me, or even that I'm a huge fan of Meghan or her show. I just think haters like you, who spend their time on biased hate channels, are disgusting. So I'm here to blow up your little hate thread, and to have fun doing it.

I didn’t know that about Sykes. Good for him.

Good for Sykes for... monetizing hate and ignoring or twisting key facts?

How is reporting that Harry dropped his demand that his family apologize to his wife “monetizing hate”? And you know it makes sense he would do that. He’s been begging for them to reconcile with him, saying he wants to move on. Of course, this is after he and his wife called his family racist on Oprah. He later denied that but it made him look more like a fool.

Because Sykes makes stuff up all the time to sell his Substack subscriptions. There are Reddit subs that pick Sykes' columns apart.

It's clear Harry wants to reconcile with Charles, who's been ill. But it's much less clear Harry wants to reconcile with William and Kate. Since you're familiar with Spare, you'll know the stories about William shoving Harry, Kate allowing that lie about Meghan making her cry when it was the other way around, the questions about Archie's skin color, both of them briefing the press against Harry and Meghan, and so much more.

All of that is irrelevant except for the racism accusation, which Harry tried to take back. He said his wife didn’t call his family racist, when she did, for millions to see.

Wut? Why are you calling all the things William and Kate did to Harry "irrelevant", like William shoving Harry, Kate making Meghan cry, and the rest? And when Kate asked about Archie's skin color, is that "irrelevant" to you? Or are only the things Harry and Meghan say "relevant" to you?

And what's wrong with Harry saying there was "unconscious bias" among the royals?

Answers on a postcard, please.

Stop whinging!
DP

Answer the arguments and stop posting insults....

Do you understand what 'DP' means? It means DIFFERENT POSTER. I'm not the person you're having this breathless exchange of insults with. But it's certainly cute that you're implying YOU aren't posting insults, too.

Good grief this is pathetic. Being a DP has nothing to do with anything, because you posted immediately after a set of questions. Still waiting for a reasoned response from you or anyone else. Unless you're trying to prove your only goal is to get the thread locked.

I posted sarcastically using your idiotic "whinging" phrase. Because you are, indeed, whining. I'm not the poster you were directing your ridiculous questions to, nor do I have any interest in your fixation on "racism" or your silly questions that you're demanding someone answer.

You keep making reference to my goal being to "get the thread locked". What are you braying about? This is a truly stupid thread, yes, but it's YOU who has been insulting people right and left. If anyone is going to get this thread locked, it is definitely you. You seem scared to death that someone's going to report you to the moderator - because you know how unhinged you are! If anyone should be reported, it's you. I haven't done that, but I would applaud anyone who did. You need a serious timeout.

Sorry, but this post is unhinged. Some people are trying to have serious discussions with facts. Yet here you are insulting everyone who produces facts and logic.

Again with the projection and gaslighting. Wow. Best of luck to you and this toxic cesspool of a thread.

Sorry, but is there anything of value in that Meghan hater's post? It's dripping with insults and rage to the point that it's kind of scary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They all look so disheveled and awkward both individually and with each other.

The girl’s hair definitely needs to be brushed and cut.

What up with the weird photoshopping his bald spot with tree leaves?

It is just such a bad Christmas card. So I looked up William’s. It looks classy while Harry’s looks so trashy.

Here is William’s:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9975zk98kyo

That's lovely ^^. They don't feel the need to hide their kids' faces...

With all the hate directed at the Sussexes--even on a place like DCUM from the hate hobbyists on this thread--I totally get why they hide their kids' faces.

By publishing the card, rather than sending it to family and friends, they open themselves to commentary. That they hide their kids’ faces is funny because they can fully hide their kids and themselves if they were smart enough to realize that their attempt at being public figures without talking about the royal family has failed miserably.

But William and Kate put out a picture every year and poor Harry thinks he’s still part of the royal family and wants to keep some of its traditions.

It's not a card, it's an Instagram post. One of many Instagram posts. Their Christmas card is just Harry and Meghan.

And since when do Kate and William own Christmas cards, to the point where Harry and Meghan--and presumably the rest of us--shouldn't be sending them out?! Geez.

Honestly you haters are a pathetic bunch. Get a real hobby, one that makes you happy, instead of spending 25 pages using incorrect details to hate on a family you never met.

Not sure if you are aware that you are on this thread too.

It is a Christmas card because that’s how it’s being reported in the media. But regardless, the point that Harry is miserable over his decision to leave the royal family still stands. He even dropped his demand that his family apologize to Meghan in a bid to get them to forgive him. But I don’t think William will consider it.

I just joined the thread 1-2 pages ago. Ask the moderator. So no, I haven't been in the ditch with you and your obsessive hate for 25 pages.

The fact that the media misunderstands--or is even lying about--an Instagram post does NOT make it a Christmas card. Do you want/expect your social media posts to count as your Christmas/holiday cards? What is wrong with you?

And what's your evidence that Harry is (a) miserable, or (b) dropped his demand for an apology? No, the Daily Mail certainly doesn't count. Harry has repeatedly said that he doesn't want to return to Britain except for visits to family and his charities. Read Anna Pasternak, Meredith Constant, or others about the terrible British media. Where, for starters, they have to publish everything the palaces give them, and delete everything the palaces don't like, if they want to maintain access to the royals. Many in Britain are calling for a new press investigation; the British media have gotten that bad.

It sounds like this is very important to you.

It was reported in the daily beast that he dropped his demand they apologize to his wife.

So you concede... nobody's Instagram post becomes their Christmas card because "the media says so."

LOL

Tom Sykes of the Daily Beast is a big player in the media industrial hate machine against the Sussexes. Sykes went to Eton with William, and there's speculation he's paid by KP, which has been proven to bully rota journalists and to use paid bots (Sykes was kicked out of the rota last summer, but he's still useful). There's also speculation that Sykes is angling for a journalistic seat deep inside future King William's court, so he's playing to William's more incandescent tendencies toward his brother.

Toying with haters like you is fun. I wouldn't say it's important to me, or even that I'm a huge fan of Meghan or her show. I just think haters like you, who spend their time on biased hate channels, are disgusting. So I'm here to blow up your little hate thread, and to have fun doing it.

I didn’t know that about Sykes. Good for him.

Good for Sykes for... monetizing hate and ignoring or twisting key facts?

How is reporting that Harry dropped his demand that his family apologize to his wife “monetizing hate”? And you know it makes sense he would do that. He’s been begging for them to reconcile with him, saying he wants to move on. Of course, this is after he and his wife called his family racist on Oprah. He later denied that but it made him look more like a fool.

Because Sykes makes stuff up all the time to sell his Substack subscriptions. There are Reddit subs that pick Sykes' columns apart.

It's clear Harry wants to reconcile with Charles, who's been ill. But it's much less clear Harry wants to reconcile with William and Kate. Since you're familiar with Spare, you'll know the stories about William shoving Harry, Kate allowing that lie about Meghan making her cry when it was the other way around, the questions about Archie's skin color, both of them briefing the press against Harry and Meghan, and so much more.

All of that is irrelevant except for the racism accusation, which Harry tried to take back. He said his wife didn’t call his family racist, when she did, for millions to see.

Wut? Why are you calling all the things William and Kate did to Harry "irrelevant", like William shoving Harry, Kate making Meghan cry, and the rest? And when Kate asked about Archie's skin color, is that "irrelevant" to you? Or are only the things Harry and Meghan say "relevant" to you?

And what's wrong with Harry saying there was "unconscious bias" among the royals?

Answers on a postcard, please.

Katie made sweet virginal what’s a yacht Meghan sob, eh? Unconscious bias, why?

For the racism claim: in Endgame, foam-faced Omid Scobie identified the royal racist by role, not name - as the Princess of Wales, who at the time was Camilla. There is no evidence of course that anyone said anything racist. Maybe they were wondering whether Meghan’s still apparent strabismus would impact their kids. Turns out it did.

I’m sure Meghan is too busy sourcing shea butter and salons for a good Dominican blowout for her children to worry about whether her card was cute or not.

^^^ Hey readers, bumping this typical Meghan hater. Form your own judgment! (For the record, the racists were identified by name, not by role, as Kate and Charles. You probably already clocked that strabismus has nothing to do with skin color. Kate was a yacht girl on the Solent before uni. And this poster lost me with the reference to blowing out black hair, ugh.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They all look so disheveled and awkward both individually and with each other.

The girl’s hair definitely needs to be brushed and cut.

What up with the weird photoshopping his bald spot with tree leaves?

It is just such a bad Christmas card. So I looked up William’s. It looks classy while Harry’s looks so trashy.

Here is William’s:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9975zk98kyo

That's lovely ^^. They don't feel the need to hide their kids' faces...

With all the hate directed at the Sussexes--even on a place like DCUM from the hate hobbyists on this thread--I totally get why they hide their kids' faces.

By publishing the card, rather than sending it to family and friends, they open themselves to commentary. That they hide their kids’ faces is funny because they can fully hide their kids and themselves if they were smart enough to realize that their attempt at being public figures without talking about the royal family has failed miserably.

But William and Kate put out a picture every year and poor Harry thinks he’s still part of the royal family and wants to keep some of its traditions.

It's not a card, it's an Instagram post. One of many Instagram posts. Their Christmas card is just Harry and Meghan.

And since when do Kate and William own Christmas cards, to the point where Harry and Meghan--and presumably the rest of us--shouldn't be sending them out?! Geez.

Honestly you haters are a pathetic bunch. Get a real hobby, one that makes you happy, instead of spending 25 pages using incorrect details to hate on a family you never met.

Not sure if you are aware that you are on this thread too.

It is a Christmas card because that’s how it’s being reported in the media. But regardless, the point that Harry is miserable over his decision to leave the royal family still stands. He even dropped his demand that his family apologize to Meghan in a bid to get them to forgive him. But I don’t think William will consider it.

I just joined the thread 1-2 pages ago. Ask the moderator. So no, I haven't been in the ditch with you and your obsessive hate for 25 pages.

The fact that the media misunderstands--or is even lying about--an Instagram post does NOT make it a Christmas card. Do you want/expect your social media posts to count as your Christmas/holiday cards? What is wrong with you?

And what's your evidence that Harry is (a) miserable, or (b) dropped his demand for an apology? No, the Daily Mail certainly doesn't count. Harry has repeatedly said that he doesn't want to return to Britain except for visits to family and his charities. Read Anna Pasternak, Meredith Constant, or others about the terrible British media. Where, for starters, they have to publish everything the palaces give them, and delete everything the palaces don't like, if they want to maintain access to the royals. Many in Britain are calling for a new press investigation; the British media have gotten that bad.

It sounds like this is very important to you.

It was reported in the daily beast that he dropped his demand they apologize to his wife.

So you concede... nobody's Instagram post becomes their Christmas card because "the media says so."

LOL

Tom Sykes of the Daily Beast is a big player in the media industrial hate machine against the Sussexes. Sykes went to Eton with William, and there's speculation he's paid by KP, which has been proven to bully rota journalists and to use paid bots (Sykes was kicked out of the rota last summer, but he's still useful). There's also speculation that Sykes is angling for a journalistic seat deep inside future King William's court, so he's playing to William's more incandescent tendencies toward his brother.

Toying with haters like you is fun. I wouldn't say it's important to me, or even that I'm a huge fan of Meghan or her show. I just think haters like you, who spend their time on biased hate channels, are disgusting. So I'm here to blow up your little hate thread, and to have fun doing it.

I didn’t know that about Sykes. Good for him.

Good for Sykes for... monetizing hate and ignoring or twisting key facts?

How is reporting that Harry dropped his demand that his family apologize to his wife “monetizing hate”? And you know it makes sense he would do that. He’s been begging for them to reconcile with him, saying he wants to move on. Of course, this is after he and his wife called his family racist on Oprah. He later denied that but it made him look more like a fool.

Because Sykes makes stuff up all the time to sell his Substack subscriptions. There are Reddit subs that pick Sykes' columns apart.

It's clear Harry wants to reconcile with Charles, who's been ill. But it's much less clear Harry wants to reconcile with William and Kate. Since you're familiar with Spare, you'll know the stories about William shoving Harry, Kate allowing that lie about Meghan making her cry when it was the other way around, the questions about Archie's skin color, both of them briefing the press against Harry and Meghan, and so much more.

All of that is irrelevant except for the racism accusation, which Harry tried to take back. He said his wife didn’t call his family racist, when she did, for millions to see.

Wut? Why are you calling all the things William and Kate did to Harry "irrelevant", like William shoving Harry, Kate making Meghan cry, and the rest? And when Kate asked about Archie's skin color, is that "irrelevant" to you? Or are only the things Harry and Meghan say "relevant" to you?

And what's wrong with Harry saying there was "unconscious bias" among the royals?

Answers on a postcard, please.

Katie made sweet virginal what’s a yacht Meghan sob, eh? Unconscious bias, why?

For the racism claim: in Endgame, foam-faced Omid Scobie identified the royal racist by role, not name - as the Princess of Wales, who at the time was Camilla. There is no evidence of course that anyone said anything racist. Maybe they were wondering whether Meghan’s still apparent strabismus would impact their kids. Turns out it did.

I’m sure Meghan is too busy sourcing shea butter and salons for a good Dominican blowout for her children to worry about whether her card was cute or not.

^^^ Hey readers, bumping this typical Meghan hater. Form your own judgment! (For the record, the racists were identified by name, not by role, as Kate and Charles. You probably already clocked that strabismus has nothing to do with skin color. Kate was a yacht girl on the Solent before uni. And this poster lost me with the reference to blowing out black hair, ugh.)

PS. This is all extremely easy to google, and readers should do. An object lesson in why you shouldn't trust anything the Meghan haters post here.

[Anonymous]

Few people need to read anyone else's opinion. Most of us recognize class, manners, and kind behavior when we see and hear it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s a posed casual photo. Totally fine. My daughter hates when I wash / brush her hair, and so her hair, which I don’t let grow past her shoulders, kind of look like this all the time.

It's posed, but definitely not casual. Meghan is practically wearing a gown. Her daughter has on a dress and shiny dress shoes. It's the equivalent of going for a 5 mile run, coming home, not showering or washing your face , keeping your hair up in the sweaty ponytail, and throwing on a fancy dress to attend a wedding.

DP who just joined this thread here. Worry about your own family instead of hating the Instagram post of a family you've never met, and who you only know through lies spread by the British tabloids. Why this obsessive hate, are you escaping something in your own life?

My opinions (mainly negative) of the Sussexes are not formed by the British tabloids, which I do not read or pay attention to. My opinions are formed by the words that come out of their mouths that I hear with my own ears and their own actions that I can see for myself.

This reminds me of when people accuse Trump 'haters' of being brainwashed by the media. We don't nee the media to hear what he is saying on TV or read what he is tweeting. It's right in front of us.

Just get off the fox box. They lie by omission and sway by bias opinion. H&M are rarely in any other news, so I’m sure this is where your “opinions” come from

DP. I don't watch Fox and I doubt the PP does, either. And "rarely in any other news"? Meghan and Harry are all over different outlets.

https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Culture/meghan-markle-prince-harry-share-new-family-photo/story?id=128559773
https://www.eonline.com/news/1426390/meghan-markle-prince-harrys-2025-holiday-family-photo
https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/lifestyle-buzz/meghan-markle-and-prince-harry-say-staff-cuts-are-inevitable-amid-archewell-restructuring/ar-AA1SQsEb?ocid=BingNewsSerp
https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/lifestyle-buzz/meghan-markle-and-prince-harry-say-staff-cuts-are-inevitable-amid-archewell-restructuring/ar-AA1SQsEb?ocid=BingNewsSerp
https://www.today.com/parents/meghan-markle-prince-harry-holiday-card-2025-rcna250079
https://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/873887/prince-harry-meghan-markle-unveil-2025-christmas-card/

Wut? None of these give biased reporting about the Sussexes or could be the source for your biased opinions. Go on, point us to what you really read.

You claimed, "H&M are rarely in any other news". All of the above sources make clear you have no idea what you're talking about. They're all over the media. You really need to stop contradicting yourself and moving goalposts. You seem unable to hold a rational discussion with anyone.

That wasn't me, but I'll take this. Linking to a handful of anodyne, quite innocent reports about the Sussexes' Instagram post is not the same as revealing the sources that feed your obvious biases.

Stop accusing others of being unable to hold a rational discussion when you're clearly unable to participate honestly.

Oh, that's rich! All I did was respond to what was said, by providing a list of sources in which M/H appear. If anyone has "obvious biases" here, we all know who it is and what those biases are. Take a hard look in the mirror and take your own advice.

You provided the most vanilla reporting out there, so pat yourself on the back? Any rational person can see the obsessive Meghan hate is coming from somewhere else, but you're not about to divulge that, are you?

I’m not a Meghan “hater” (or fan, fwiw). But you are so bizarrely invested, it’s comical.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They all look so disheveled and awkward both individually and with each other.

The girl’s hair definitely needs to be brushed and cut.

What up with the weird photoshopping his bald spot with tree leaves?

It is just such a bad Christmas card. So I looked up William’s. It looks classy while Harry’s looks so trashy.

Here is William’s:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9975zk98kyo

That's lovely ^^. They don't feel the need to hide their kids' faces...

With all the hate directed at the Sussexes--even on a place like DCUM from the hate hobbyists on this thread--I totally get why they hide their kids' faces.

By publishing the card, rather than sending it to family and friends, they open themselves to commentary. That they hide their kids’ faces is funny because they can fully hide their kids and themselves if they were smart enough to realize that their attempt at being public figures without talking about the royal family has failed miserably.

But William and Kate put out a picture every year and poor Harry thinks he’s still part of the royal family and wants to keep some of its traditions.

It's not a card, it's an Instagram post. One of many Instagram posts. Their Christmas card is just Harry and Meghan.

And since when do Kate and William own Christmas cards, to the point where Harry and Meghan--and presumably the rest of us--shouldn't be sending them out?! Geez.

Honestly you haters are a pathetic bunch. Get a real hobby, one that makes you happy, instead of spending 25 pages using incorrect details to hate on a family you never met.

Not sure if you are aware that you are on this thread too.

It is a Christmas card because that’s how it’s being reported in the media. But regardless, the point that Harry is miserable over his decision to leave the royal family still stands. He even dropped his demand that his family apologize to Meghan in a bid to get them to forgive him. But I don’t think William will consider it.

I just joined the thread 1-2 pages ago. Ask the moderator. So no, I haven't been in the ditch with you and your obsessive hate for 25 pages.

The fact that the media misunderstands--or is even lying about--an Instagram post does NOT make it a Christmas card. Do you want/expect your social media posts to count as your Christmas/holiday cards? What is wrong with you?

And what's your evidence that Harry is (a) miserable, or (b) dropped his demand for an apology? No, the Daily Mail certainly doesn't count. Harry has repeatedly said that he doesn't want to return to Britain except for visits to family and his charities. Read Anna Pasternak, Meredith Constant, or others about the terrible British media. Where, for starters, they have to publish everything the palaces give them, and delete everything the palaces don't like, if they want to maintain access to the royals. Many in Britain are calling for a new press investigation; the British media have gotten that bad.

It sounds like this is very important to you.

It was reported in the daily beast that he dropped his demand they apologize to his wife.

So you concede... nobody's Instagram post becomes their Christmas card because "the media says so."

LOL

Tom Sykes of the Daily Beast is a big player in the media industrial hate machine against the Sussexes. Sykes went to Eton with William, and there's speculation he's paid by KP, which has been proven to bully rota journalists and to use paid bots (Sykes was kicked out of the rota last summer, but he's still useful). There's also speculation that Sykes is angling for a journalistic seat deep inside future King William's court, so he's playing to William's more incandescent tendencies toward his brother.

Toying with haters like you is fun. I wouldn't say it's important to me, or even that I'm a huge fan of Meghan or her show. I just think haters like you, who spend their time on biased hate channels, are disgusting. So I'm here to blow up your little hate thread, and to have fun doing it.

I didn’t know that about Sykes. Good for him.

Good for Sykes for... monetizing hate and ignoring or twisting key facts?

How is reporting that Harry dropped his demand that his family apologize to his wife “monetizing hate”? And you know it makes sense he would do that. He’s been begging for them to reconcile with him, saying he wants to move on. Of course, this is after he and his wife called his family racist on Oprah. He later denied that but it made him look more like a fool.

Because Sykes makes stuff up all the time to sell his Substack subscriptions. There are Reddit subs that pick Sykes' columns apart.

It's clear Harry wants to reconcile with Charles, who's been ill. But it's much less clear Harry wants to reconcile with William and Kate. Since you're familiar with Spare, you'll know the stories about William shoving Harry, Kate allowing that lie about Meghan making her cry when it was the other way around, the questions about Archie's skin color, both of them briefing the press against Harry and Meghan, and so much more.

All of that is irrelevant except for the racism accusation, which Harry tried to take back. He said his wife didn’t call his family racist, when she did, for millions to see.

Wut? Why are you calling all the things William and Kate did to Harry "irrelevant", like William shoving Harry, Kate making Meghan cry, and the rest? And when Kate asked about Archie's skin color, is that "irrelevant" to you? Or are only the things Harry and Meghan say "relevant" to you?

And what's wrong with Harry saying there was "unconscious bias" among the royals?

Answers on a postcard, please.

Katie made sweet virginal what’s a yacht Meghan sob, eh? Unconscious bias, why?

For the racism claim: in Endgame, foam-faced Omid Scobie identified the royal racist by role, not name - as the Princess of Wales, who at the time was Camilla. There is no evidence of course that anyone said anything racist. Maybe they were wondering whether Meghan’s still apparent strabismus would impact their kids. Turns out it did.

I’m sure Meghan is too busy sourcing shea butter and salons for a good Dominican blowout for her children to worry about whether her card was cute or not.

^^^ Hey readers, bumping this typical Meghan hater. Form your own judgment! (For the record, the racists were identified by name, not by role, as Kate and Charles. You probably already clocked that strabismus has nothing to do with skin color. Kate was a yacht girl on the Solent before uni. And this poster lost me with the reference to blowing out black hair, ugh.)

DP. Hey, psycho poster: are you the person pretending that you’ve been providing “facts and evidence”? Yet here you are spreading lies? Kate was not a yacht girl, and you know it. She was a low-paid deckhand who did hard labor as a summer job.

Maybe stop spreading stupid lies while accusing others? That’s classic projection.

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/a26997929/kate-middleton-deckhand-job-low-pay/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They all look so disheveled and awkward both individually and with each other.

The girl’s hair definitely needs to be brushed and cut.

What up with the weird photoshopping his bald spot with tree leaves?

It is just such a bad Christmas card. So I looked up William’s. It looks classy while Harry’s looks so trashy.

Here is William’s:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9975zk98kyo

That's lovely ^^. They don't feel the need to hide their kids' faces...

With all the hate directed at the Sussexes--even on a place like DCUM from the hate hobbyists on this thread--I totally get why they hide their kids' faces.

By publishing the card, rather than sending it to family and friends, they open themselves to commentary. That they hide their kids’ faces is funny because they can fully hide their kids and themselves if they were smart enough to realize that their attempt at being public figures without talking about the royal family has failed miserably.

But William and Kate put out a picture every year and poor Harry thinks he’s still part of the royal family and wants to keep some of its traditions.

It's not a card, it's an Instagram post. One of many Instagram posts. Their Christmas card is just Harry and Meghan.

And since when do Kate and William own Christmas cards, to the point where Harry and Meghan--and presumably the rest of us--shouldn't be sending them out?! Geez.

Honestly you haters are a pathetic bunch. Get a real hobby, one that makes you happy, instead of spending 25 pages using incorrect details to hate on a family you never met.

Not sure if you are aware that you are on this thread too.

It is a Christmas card because that’s how it’s being reported in the media. But regardless, the point that Harry is miserable over his decision to leave the royal family still stands. He even dropped his demand that his family apologize to Meghan in a bid to get them to forgive him. But I don’t think William will consider it.

I just joined the thread 1-2 pages ago. Ask the moderator. So no, I haven't been in the ditch with you and your obsessive hate for 25 pages.

The fact that the media misunderstands--or is even lying about--an Instagram post does NOT make it a Christmas card. Do you want/expect your social media posts to count as your Christmas/holiday cards? What is wrong with you?

And what's your evidence that Harry is (a) miserable, or (b) dropped his demand for an apology? No, the Daily Mail certainly doesn't count. Harry has repeatedly said that he doesn't want to return to Britain except for visits to family and his charities. Read Anna Pasternak, Meredith Constant, or others about the terrible British media. Where, for starters, they have to publish everything the palaces give them, and delete everything the palaces don't like, if they want to maintain access to the royals. Many in Britain are calling for a new press investigation; the British media have gotten that bad.

It sounds like this is very important to you.

It was reported in the daily beast that he dropped his demand they apologize to his wife.

So you concede... nobody's Instagram post becomes their Christmas card because "the media says so."

LOL

Tom Sykes of the Daily Beast is a big player in the media industrial hate machine against the Sussexes. Sykes went to Eton with William, and there's speculation he's paid by KP, which has been proven to bully rota journalists and to use paid bots (Sykes was kicked out of the rota last summer, but he's still useful). There's also speculation that Sykes is angling for a journalistic seat deep inside future King William's court, so he's playing to William's more incandescent tendencies toward his brother.

Toying with haters like you is fun. I wouldn't say it's important to me, or even that I'm a huge fan of Meghan or her show. I just think haters like you, who spend their time on biased hate channels, are disgusting. So I'm here to blow up your little hate thread, and to have fun doing it.

I didn’t know that about Sykes. Good for him.

Good for Sykes for... monetizing hate and ignoring or twisting key facts?

How is reporting that Harry dropped his demand that his family apologize to his wife “monetizing hate”? And you know it makes sense he would do that. He’s been begging for them to reconcile with him, saying he wants to move on. Of course, this is after he and his wife called his family racist on Oprah. He later denied that but it made him look more like a fool.

Because Sykes makes stuff up all the time to sell his Substack subscriptions. There are Reddit subs that pick Sykes' columns apart.

It's clear Harry wants to reconcile with Charles, who's been ill. But it's much less clear Harry wants to reconcile with William and Kate. Since you're familiar with Spare, you'll know the stories about William shoving Harry, Kate allowing that lie about Meghan making her cry when it was the other way around, the questions about Archie's skin color, both of them briefing the press against Harry and Meghan, and so much more.

All of that is irrelevant except for the racism accusation, which Harry tried to take back. He said his wife didn’t call his family racist, when she did, for millions to see.

Wut? Why are you calling all the things William and Kate did to Harry "irrelevant", like William shoving Harry, Kate making Meghan cry, and the rest? And when Kate asked about Archie's skin color, is that "irrelevant" to you? Or are only the things Harry and Meghan say "relevant" to you?

And what's wrong with Harry saying there was "unconscious bias" among the royals?

Answers on a postcard, please.

Katie made sweet virginal what’s a yacht Meghan sob, eh? Unconscious bias, why?

For the racism claim: in Endgame, foam-faced Omid Scobie identified the royal racist by role, not name - as the Princess of Wales, who at the time was Camilla. There is no evidence of course that anyone said anything racist. Maybe they were wondering whether Meghan’s still apparent strabismus would impact their kids. Turns out it did.

I’m sure Meghan is too busy sourcing shea butter and salons for a good Dominican blowout for her children to worry about whether her card was cute or not.

^^^ Hey readers, bumping this typical Meghan hater. Form your own judgment! (For the record, the racists were identified by name, not by role, as Kate and Charles. You probably already clocked that strabismus has nothing to do with skin color. Kate was a yacht girl on the Solent before uni. And this poster lost me with the reference to blowing out black hair, ugh.)

PS. This is all extremely easy to google, and readers should do. An object lesson in why you shouldn't trust anything the Meghan haters post here.

Yes, it’s very easy to google and see that you’re lying about KM being a “yacht girl,” among other things. Do better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They all look so disheveled and awkward both individually and with each other.

The girl’s hair definitely needs to be brushed and cut.

What up with the weird photoshopping his bald spot with tree leaves?

It is just such a bad Christmas card. So I looked up William’s. It looks classy while Harry’s looks so trashy.

Here is William’s:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9975zk98kyo

That's lovely ^^. They don't feel the need to hide their kids' faces...

With all the hate directed at the Sussexes--even on a place like DCUM from the hate hobbyists on this thread--I totally get why they hide their kids' faces.

By publishing the card, rather than sending it to family and friends, they open themselves to commentary. That they hide their kids’ faces is funny because they can fully hide their kids and themselves if they were smart enough to realize that their attempt at being public figures without talking about the royal family has failed miserably.

But William and Kate put out a picture every year and poor Harry thinks he’s still part of the royal family and wants to keep some of its traditions.

It's not a card, it's an Instagram post. One of many Instagram posts. Their Christmas card is just Harry and Meghan.

And since when do Kate and William own Christmas cards, to the point where Harry and Meghan--and presumably the rest of us--shouldn't be sending them out?! Geez.

Honestly you haters are a pathetic bunch. Get a real hobby, one that makes you happy, instead of spending 25 pages using incorrect details to hate on a family you never met.

Not sure if you are aware that you are on this thread too.

It is a Christmas card because that’s how it’s being reported in the media. But regardless, the point that Harry is miserable over his decision to leave the royal family still stands. He even dropped his demand that his family apologize to Meghan in a bid to get them to forgive him. But I don’t think William will consider it.

I just joined the thread 1-2 pages ago. Ask the moderator. So no, I haven't been in the ditch with you and your obsessive hate for 25 pages.

The fact that the media misunderstands--or is even lying about--an Instagram post does NOT make it a Christmas card. Do you want/expect your social media posts to count as your Christmas/holiday cards? What is wrong with you?

And what's your evidence that Harry is (a) miserable, or (b) dropped his demand for an apology? No, the Daily Mail certainly doesn't count. Harry has repeatedly said that he doesn't want to return to Britain except for visits to family and his charities. Read Anna Pasternak, Meredith Constant, or others about the terrible British media. Where, for starters, they have to publish everything the palaces give them, and delete everything the palaces don't like, if they want to maintain access to the royals. Many in Britain are calling for a new press investigation; the British media have gotten that bad.

It sounds like this is very important to you.

It was reported in the daily beast that he dropped his demand they apologize to his wife.

So you concede... nobody's Instagram post becomes their Christmas card because "the media says so."

LOL

Tom Sykes of the Daily Beast is a big player in the media industrial hate machine against the Sussexes. Sykes went to Eton with William, and there's speculation he's paid by KP, which has been proven to bully rota journalists and to use paid bots (Sykes was kicked out of the rota last summer, but he's still useful). There's also speculation that Sykes is angling for a journalistic seat deep inside future King William's court, so he's playing to William's more incandescent tendencies toward his brother.

Toying with haters like you is fun. I wouldn't say it's important to me, or even that I'm a huge fan of Meghan or her show. I just think haters like you, who spend their time on biased hate channels, are disgusting. So I'm here to blow up your little hate thread, and to have fun doing it.

I didn’t know that about Sykes. Good for him.

Good for Sykes for... monetizing hate and ignoring or twisting key facts?

How is reporting that Harry dropped his demand that his family apologize to his wife “monetizing hate”? And you know it makes sense he would do that. He’s been begging for them to reconcile with him, saying he wants to move on. Of course, this is after he and his wife called his family racist on Oprah. He later denied that but it made him look more like a fool.

Because Sykes makes stuff up all the time to sell his Substack subscriptions. There are Reddit subs that pick Sykes' columns apart.

It's clear Harry wants to reconcile with Charles, who's been ill. But it's much less clear Harry wants to reconcile with William and Kate. Since you're familiar with Spare, you'll know the stories about William shoving Harry, Kate allowing that lie about Meghan making her cry when it was the other way around, the questions about Archie's skin color, both of them briefing the press against Harry and Meghan, and so much more.

All of that is irrelevant except for the racism accusation, which Harry tried to take back. He said his wife didn’t call his family racist, when she did, for millions to see.

Wut? Why are you calling all the things William and Kate did to Harry "irrelevant", like William shoving Harry, Kate making Meghan cry, and the rest? And when Kate asked about Archie's skin color, is that "irrelevant" to you? Or are only the things Harry and Meghan say "relevant" to you?

And what's wrong with Harry saying there was "unconscious bias" among the royals?

Answers on a postcard, please.

Katie made sweet virginal what’s a yacht Meghan sob, eh? Unconscious bias, why?

For the racism claim: in Endgame, foam-faced Omid Scobie identified the royal racist by role, not name - as the Princess of Wales, who at the time was Camilla. There is no evidence of course that anyone said anything racist. Maybe they were wondering whether Meghan’s still apparent strabismus would impact their kids. Turns out it did.

I’m sure Meghan is too busy sourcing shea butter and salons for a good Dominican blowout for her children to worry about whether her card was cute or not.

^^^ Hey readers, bumping this typical Meghan hater. Form your own judgment! (For the record, the racists were identified by name, not by role, as Kate and Charles. You probably already clocked that strabismus has nothing to do with skin color. Kate was a yacht girl on the Solent before uni. And this poster lost me with the reference to blowing out black hair, ugh.)

PS. This is all extremely easy to google, and readers should do. An object lesson in why you shouldn't trust anything the Meghan haters post here.

Yes, it’s very easy to google and see that you’re lying about KM being a “yacht girl,” among other things. Do better.

It’s very easy to google and see that Meghan was never a yacht girl either. https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/entertainment-celebrity/was-meghan-markle-ever-a-yacht-girl-before-meeting-prince-harry-the-duchess-yacht-trend-explained/ar-AA1IKK9i

The point wrt the scary post about Meghan’s kids’ supposed strabismus (another lie) still stands: the yacht girl line is yet another lie made up by haters. No surprise you guys lept to Kate’s defense even as you spread more lies about Meghan. Shameless.

[Anonymous]

31 pages because of an instagram post? This is nuts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:31 pages because of an instagram post? This is nuts.

Are you new here? It’s the same thing in every royal thread. The last 20 years of the royal family must be dredged up because people can’t stay on topic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They all look so disheveled and awkward both individually and with each other.

The girl’s hair definitely needs to be brushed and cut.

What up with the weird photoshopping his bald spot with tree leaves?

It is just such a bad Christmas card. So I looked up William’s. It looks classy while Harry’s looks so trashy.

Here is William’s:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9975zk98kyo

That's lovely ^^. They don't feel the need to hide their kids' faces...

With all the hate directed at the Sussexes--even on a place like DCUM from the hate hobbyists on this thread--I totally get why they hide their kids' faces.

By publishing the card, rather than sending it to family and friends, they open themselves to commentary. That they hide their kids’ faces is funny because they can fully hide their kids and themselves if they were smart enough to realize that their attempt at being public figures without talking about the royal family has failed miserably.

But William and Kate put out a picture every year and poor Harry thinks he’s still part of the royal family and wants to keep some of its traditions.

It's not a card, it's an Instagram post. One of many Instagram posts. Their Christmas card is just Harry and Meghan.

And since when do Kate and William own Christmas cards, to the point where Harry and Meghan--and presumably the rest of us--shouldn't be sending them out?! Geez.

Honestly you haters are a pathetic bunch. Get a real hobby, one that makes you happy, instead of spending 25 pages using incorrect details to hate on a family you never met.

Not sure if you are aware that you are on this thread too.

It is a Christmas card because that’s how it’s being reported in the media. But regardless, the point that Harry is miserable over his decision to leave the royal family still stands. He even dropped his demand that his family apologize to Meghan in a bid to get them to forgive him. But I don’t think William will consider it.

I just joined the thread 1-2 pages ago. Ask the moderator. So no, I haven't been in the ditch with you and your obsessive hate for 25 pages.

The fact that the media misunderstands--or is even lying about--an Instagram post does NOT make it a Christmas card. Do you want/expect your social media posts to count as your Christmas/holiday cards? What is wrong with you?

And what's your evidence that Harry is (a) miserable, or (b) dropped his demand for an apology? No, the Daily Mail certainly doesn't count. Harry has repeatedly said that he doesn't want to return to Britain except for visits to family and his charities. Read Anna Pasternak, Meredith Constant, or others about the terrible British media. Where, for starters, they have to publish everything the palaces give them, and delete everything the palaces don't like, if they want to maintain access to the royals. Many in Britain are calling for a new press investigation; the British media have gotten that bad.

It sounds like this is very important to you.

It was reported in the daily beast that he dropped his demand they apologize to his wife.

So you concede... nobody's Instagram post becomes their Christmas card because "the media says so."

LOL

Tom Sykes of the Daily Beast is a big player in the media industrial hate machine against the Sussexes. Sykes went to Eton with William, and there's speculation he's paid by KP, which has been proven to bully rota journalists and to use paid bots (Sykes was kicked out of the rota last summer, but he's still useful). There's also speculation that Sykes is angling for a journalistic seat deep inside future King William's court, so he's playing to William's more incandescent tendencies toward his brother.

Toying with haters like you is fun. I wouldn't say it's important to me, or even that I'm a huge fan of Meghan or her show. I just think haters like you, who spend their time on biased hate channels, are disgusting. So I'm here to blow up your little hate thread, and to have fun doing it.

I didn’t know that about Sykes. Good for him.

Good for Sykes for... monetizing hate and ignoring or twisting key facts?

How is reporting that Harry dropped his demand that his family apologize to his wife “monetizing hate”? And you know it makes sense he would do that. He’s been begging for them to reconcile with him, saying he wants to move on. Of course, this is after he and his wife called his family racist on Oprah. He later denied that but it made him look more like a fool.

Because Sykes makes stuff up all the time to sell his Substack subscriptions. There are Reddit subs that pick Sykes' columns apart.

It's clear Harry wants to reconcile with Charles, who's been ill. But it's much less clear Harry wants to reconcile with William and Kate. Since you're familiar with Spare, you'll know the stories about William shoving Harry, Kate allowing that lie about Meghan making her cry when it was the other way around, the questions about Archie's skin color, both of them briefing the press against Harry and Meghan, and so much more.

All of that is irrelevant except for the racism accusation, which Harry tried to take back. He said his wife didn’t call his family racist, when she did, for millions to see.

Wut? Why are you calling all the things William and Kate did to Harry "irrelevant", like William shoving Harry, Kate making Meghan cry, and the rest? And when Kate asked about Archie's skin color, is that "irrelevant" to you? Or are only the things Harry and Meghan say "relevant" to you?

And what's wrong with Harry saying there was "unconscious bias" among the royals?

Answers on a postcard, please.

Katie made sweet virginal what’s a yacht Meghan sob, eh? Unconscious bias, why?

For the racism claim: in Endgame, foam-faced Omid Scobie identified the royal racist by role, not name - as the Princess of Wales, who at the time was Camilla. There is no evidence of course that anyone said anything racist. Maybe they were wondering whether Meghan’s still apparent strabismus would impact their kids. Turns out it did.

I’m sure Meghan is too busy sourcing shea butter and salons for a good Dominican blowout for her children to worry about whether her card was cute or not.

^^^ Hey readers, bumping this typical Meghan hater. Form your own judgment! (For the record, the racists were identified by name, not by role, as Kate and Charles. You probably already clocked that strabismus has nothing to do with skin color. Kate was a yacht girl on the Solent before uni. And this poster lost me with the reference to blowing out black hair, ugh.)

PS. This is all extremely easy to google, and readers should do. An object lesson in why you shouldn't trust anything the Meghan haters post here.

Yes, it’s very easy to google and see that you’re lying about KM being a “yacht girl,” among other things. Do better.

Two posts from you at 1:30 am? And don’t keep pretending you’re a dp. Maybe it’s time to stop calling others psycho.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:31 pages because of an instagram post? This is nuts.

It really is nuts. Lying that it was a Christmas card, and spreading other lies that Meghan was a yacht girl who passed her crossed eyes to her children, while complaining she never shows her children’s’ faces, is also nuts. But here we are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s a posed casual photo. Totally fine. My daughter hates when I wash / brush her hair, and so her hair, which I don’t let grow past her shoulders, kind of look like this all the time.

It's posed, but definitely not casual. Meghan is practically wearing a gown. Her daughter has on a dress and shiny dress shoes. It's the equivalent of going for a 5 mile run, coming home, not showering or washing your face , keeping your hair up in the sweaty ponytail, and throwing on a fancy dress to attend a wedding.

DP who just joined this thread here. Worry about your own family instead of hating the Instagram post of a family you've never met, and who you only know through lies spread by the British tabloids. Why this obsessive hate, are you escaping something in your own life?

My opinions (mainly negative) of the Sussexes are not formed by the British tabloids, which I do not read or pay attention to. My opinions are formed by the words that come out of their mouths that I hear with my own ears and their own actions that I can see for myself.

This reminds me of when people accuse Trump 'haters' of being brainwashed by the media. We don't nee the media to hear what he is saying on TV or read what he is tweeting. It's right in front of us.

Just get off the fox box. They lie by omission and sway by bias opinion. H&M are rarely in any other news, so I’m sure this is where your “opinions” come from

DP. I don't watch Fox and I doubt the PP does, either. And "rarely in any other news"? Meghan and Harry are all over different outlets.

https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Culture/meghan-markle-prince-harry-share-new-family-photo/story?id=128559773
https://www.eonline.com/news/1426390/meghan-markle-prince-harrys-2025-holiday-family-photo
https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/lifestyle-buzz/meghan-markle-and-prince-harry-say-staff-cuts-are-inevitable-amid-archewell-restructuring/ar-AA1SQsEb?ocid=BingNewsSerp
https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/lifestyle-buzz/meghan-markle-and-prince-harry-say-staff-cuts-are-inevitable-amid-archewell-restructuring/ar-AA1SQsEb?ocid=BingNewsSerp
https://www.today.com/parents/meghan-markle-prince-harry-holiday-card-2025-rcna250079
https://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/873887/prince-harry-meghan-markle-unveil-2025-christmas-card/

They pay good money to be mentioned in the news! Those puff pieces don’t come cheap, their archwell foundation has a 1.8 million deficit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:31 pages because of an instagram post? This is nuts.

Hate will do that to people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s a posed casual photo. Totally fine. My daughter hates when I wash / brush her hair, and so her hair, which I don’t let grow past her shoulders, kind of look like this all the time.

It's posed, but definitely not casual. Meghan is practically wearing a gown. Her daughter has on a dress and shiny dress shoes. It's the equivalent of going for a 5 mile run, coming home, not showering or washing your face , keeping your hair up in the sweaty ponytail, and throwing on a fancy dress to attend a wedding.

DP who just joined this thread here. Worry about your own family instead of hating the Instagram post of a family you've never met, and who you only know through lies spread by the British tabloids. Why this obsessive hate, are you escaping something in your own life?

My opinions (mainly negative) of the Sussexes are not formed by the British tabloids, which I do not read or pay attention to. My opinions are formed by the words that come out of their mouths that I hear with my own ears and their own actions that I can see for myself.

This reminds me of when people accuse Trump 'haters' of being brainwashed by the media. We don't nee the media to hear what he is saying on TV or read what he is tweeting. It's right in front of us.

Just get off the fox box. They lie by omission and sway by bias opinion. H&M are rarely in any other news, so I’m sure this is where your “opinions” come from

DP. I don't watch Fox and I doubt the PP does, either. And "rarely in any other news"? Meghan and Harry are all over different outlets.

https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Culture/meghan-markle-prince-harry-share-new-family-photo/story?id=128559773
https://www.eonline.com/news/1426390/meghan-markle-prince-harrys-2025-holiday-family-photo
https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/lifestyle-buzz/meghan-markle-and-prince-harry-say-staff-cuts-are-inevitable-amid-archewell-restructuring/ar-AA1SQsEb?ocid=BingNewsSerp
https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/lifestyle-buzz/meghan-markle-and-prince-harry-say-staff-cuts-are-inevitable-amid-archewell-restructuring/ar-AA1SQsEb?ocid=BingNewsSerp
https://www.today.com/parents/meghan-markle-prince-harry-holiday-card-2025-rcna250079
https://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/873887/prince-harry-meghan-markle-unveil-2025-christmas-card/

They pay good money to be mentioned in the news! Those puff pieces don’t come cheap, their archwell foundation has a 1.8 million deficit

Now you’re lying about Archewell, which gave more money to charity last year than Will and Kate’s Royal Foundation did. (Something like $1.25m granted vs $1.1m, I don’t have the exact numbers but you can easily google, and the Sussex’s charity is not in deficit you made that up.)

Publications write about the Sussexes, and the Wales’s, for the clicks that attract advertisers. Both couples are perennially popular or perennially attract hate clicks. This is media 101.