Red Piller

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP that was a vivid depiction of I’m sure is reality for some men. But that doesn’t justify responding to that reality with hatred toward women.

Thanks, and I agree. Most of these men are just frustrated and angry at the injustice of the universe while they go through an awakening. For example, they learn that their dinner dates often texted other men for hookups afterwards. They are not misogynists. Most of incel Elliot Rodger's murder victims were men.

Red Pill men eventually learn that the women who invited them in for coffee don't actually want coffee. They also learn that the surest sign that a woman will sleep with them is when she says "I'm not going to sleep with you!"

Dating can be exhausting and demoralizing. Women run a small risk of a bad violent outcome. But men run a large risk of paying for flakes and dinner whores. It is like death by a thousand cuts. There is a lot to hate.

Of course, some men are just aggrieved and entitled butthurt losers. They are not just angry at women; they are angry at minorities, immigrants, gays, Jews, and the globalist conspiracy to deny their access to sex.

Huh? yes it IS misogyny to act like you own a woman’s attention just because you took her to dinner. She is perfectly free to do whatever she wants after, as are you. You were under no obligation to pay for dinner. Characterizing a woman’s behavior like this as an “injustice” is absolutely misogynistic. Characterizing women as always lying about their sexual intentions is misogynistic. Drawing an equivalency between RAPE and … checks notes … paying for dinner is misogynistic. Calling women who don’t behave like you wish “whores” is misogynistic.

anyway thanks for the reminder to run at the slightest mention of any red pill crap.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP that was a vivid depiction of I’m sure is reality for some men. But that doesn’t justify responding to that reality with hatred toward women.

Thanks, and I agree. Most of these men are just frustrated and angry at the injustice of the universe while they go through an awakening. For example, they learn that their dinner dates often texted other men for hookups afterwards. They are not misogynists. Most of incel Elliot Rodger's murder victims were men.

Red Pill men eventually learn that the women who invited them in for coffee don't actually want coffee. They also learn that the surest sign that a woman will sleep with them is when she says "I'm not going to sleep with you!"

Dating can be exhausting and demoralizing. Women run a small risk of a bad violent outcome. But men run a large risk of paying for flakes and dinner whores. It is like death by a thousand cuts. There is a lot to hate.

Of course, some men are just aggrieved and entitled butthurt losers. They are not just angry at women; they are angry at minorities, immigrants, gays, Jews, and the globalist conspiracy to deny their access to sex.

Huh? yes it IS misogyny to act like you own a woman’s attention just because you took her to dinner. She is perfectly free to do whatever she wants after, as are you. You were under no obligation to pay for dinner. Characterizing a woman’s behavior like this as an “injustice” is absolutely misogynistic. Characterizing women as always lying about their sexual intentions is misogynistic. Drawing an equivalency between RAPE and … checks notes … paying for dinner is misogynistic. Calling women who don’t behave like you wish “whores” is misogynistic.

anyway thanks for the reminder to run at the slightest mention of any red pill crap.

+1
Superb analysis!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, the harpies will hate this but you need to assess the nature of the red pill comments/beliefs. If it’s that women should stay home, be subservient to men and have babies, and that does not fit with your worldview, you have every right to bow out.

However, if his red pill beliefs are along the lines of being wary of women at the early stages so he is not used for free meals and entertainment, that’s entirely different. That’s virtually every man’s lived experience. Now, you can still bail if you want, but that might be premature where he’s only seeking to protect himself.

Ew no. If a boyfriend even tried to suggest his default was to view women as gold diggers, that is even worse than having some traditional beliefs about women and families. You can be a perfectly good person if your preference is to have a SAHM for your kids and you are seeking a woman who feels the same - not my thing but many couples agree on this. having a grudge against supposed “gold diggers” that you feel free to express to your new GF is totally different. and gross.

Golddigger has entered the chat.

ha you wish. In actual fact my xDH mooched off me for years paying zero joint expenses and now has not contributed a single cent to our kid’s expenses post divorce. Is that the kind of gold digger you are referring to?

Are you going on dates solely to get fed or entertained? Then yes.

What does "not this" look like? because the way you've framed it makes it look like "I put the dinner in, I'm owed a sex" and... yikes.

You’ve made a logical leap that is not supported by the post. No one was talking about sex.

To clarify it further for you, do you go on dates where you’re really not that interested in the man, but you know you will get a free meal or entertained?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:PP that was a vivid depiction of I’m sure is reality for some men. But that doesn’t justify responding to that reality with hatred toward women. The reality is no one is entitled a partner. If one’s dating experience isn’t what they like it to be, the healthy response is to modify one’s expectations or appeal, not hate an entire gender.

Not the PP, but no one is talking about hatred. What we are talking about is how many men feel like “the system” is stacked against them and that many women will treat them like an atm. It’s not about hating those women, it’s about avoiding them in your dating journey.

[Anonymous]

I’ve shared this on here before, but I would tell him! Very specifically why. I read a thread from men in what turned them away from the red pill lifestyle, and more than one man said when they realized how their views were making women feel (aka disgusted by them), it caused them to do some introspection and ultimately led a few away from it.

These men are taking “dating” advice from men who aren’t even successful at dating. They are consuming content they think makes them attractive to women, but it’s only really (marginally) attractive to other men.

So yes, tell him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP that was a vivid depiction of I’m sure is reality for some men. But that doesn’t justify responding to that reality with hatred toward women.

Thanks, and I agree. Most of these men are just frustrated and angry at the injustice of the universe while they go through an awakening. For example, they learn that their dinner dates often texted other men for hookups afterwards. They are not misogynists. Most of incel Elliot Rodger's murder victims were men.

Red Pill men eventually learn that the women who invited them in for coffee don't actually want coffee. They also learn that the surest sign that a woman will sleep with them is when she says "I'm not going to sleep with you!"

Dating can be exhausting and demoralizing. Women run a small risk of a bad violent outcome. But men run a large risk of paying for flakes and dinner whores. It is like death by a thousand cuts. There is a lot to hate.

Of course, some men are just aggrieved and entitled butthurt losers. They are not just angry at women; they are angry at minorities, immigrants, gays, Jews, and the globalist conspiracy to deny their access to sex.

Huh? yes it IS misogyny to act like you own a woman’s attention just because you took her to dinner. She is perfectly free to do whatever she wants after, as are you. You were under no obligation to pay for dinner. Characterizing a woman’s behavior like this as an “injustice” is absolutely misogynistic. Characterizing women as always lying about their sexual intentions is misogynistic. Drawing an equivalency between RAPE and … checks notes … paying for dinner is misogynistic. Calling women who don’t behave like you wish “whores” is misogynistic.

anyway thanks for the reminder to run at the slightest mention of any red pill crap.

So, what should we call women who do the things that you’ve mentioned?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP, the harpies will hate this but you need to assess the nature of the red pill comments/beliefs. If it’s that women should stay home, be subservient to men and have babies, and that does not fit with your worldview, you have every right to bow out.

However, if his red pill beliefs are along the lines of being wary of women at the early stages so he is not used for free meals and entertainment, that’s entirely different. That’s virtually every man’s lived experience. Now, you can still bail if you want, but that might be premature where he’s only seeking to protect himself.

You just discredited your entire post by calling women “harpies”. You don’t respect women and are a red piller yourself. Go back to your bridge.

[Anonymous]

Almost nobody on this thread actually knows what red pilled means.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP that was a vivid depiction of I’m sure is reality for some men. But that doesn’t justify responding to that reality with hatred toward women.

Thanks, and I agree. Most of these men are just frustrated and angry at the injustice of the universe while they go through an awakening. For example, they learn that their dinner dates often texted other men for hookups afterwards. They are not misogynists. Most of incel Elliot Rodger's murder victims were men.

Red Pill men eventually learn that the women who invited them in for coffee don't actually want coffee. They also learn that the surest sign that a woman will sleep with them is when she says "I'm not going to sleep with you!"

Dating can be exhausting and demoralizing. Women run a small risk of a bad violent outcome. But men run a large risk of paying for flakes and dinner whores. It is like death by a thousand cuts. There is a lot to hate.

Of course, some men are just aggrieved and entitled butthurt losers. They are not just angry at women; they are angry at minorities, immigrants, gays, Jews, and the globalist conspiracy to deny their access to sex.

Huh? yes it IS misogyny to act like you own a woman’s attention just because you took her to dinner. She is perfectly free to do whatever she wants after, as are you. You were under no obligation to pay for dinner. Characterizing a woman’s behavior like this as an “injustice” is absolutely misogynistic. Characterizing women as always lying about their sexual intentions is misogynistic. Drawing an equivalency between RAPE and … checks notes … paying for dinner is misogynistic. Calling women who don’t behave like you wish “whores” is misogynistic.

anyway thanks for the reminder to run at the slightest mention of any red pill crap.

I’m so glad these disgusting men tell on themselves at the first opportunity. Makes it easy to know who to avoid. Men like this don’t deserve dates, and especially not sex.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP that was a vivid depiction of I’m sure is reality for some men. But that doesn’t justify responding to that reality with hatred toward women.

Thanks, and I agree. Most of these men are just frustrated and angry at the injustice of the universe while they go through an awakening. For example, they learn that their dinner dates often texted other men for hookups afterwards. They are not misogynists. Most of incel Elliot Rodger's murder victims were men.

Red Pill men eventually learn that the women who invited them in for coffee don't actually want coffee. They also learn that the surest sign that a woman will sleep with them is when she says "I'm not going to sleep with you!"

Dating can be exhausting and demoralizing. Women run a small risk of a bad violent outcome. But men run a large risk of paying for flakes and dinner whores. It is like death by a thousand cuts. There is a lot to hate.

Of course, some men are just aggrieved and entitled butthurt losers. They are not just angry at women; they are angry at minorities, immigrants, gays, Jews, and the globalist conspiracy to deny their access to sex.

Huh? yes it IS misogyny to act like you own a woman’s attention just because you took her to dinner. She is perfectly free to do whatever she wants after, as are you. You were under no obligation to pay for dinner. Characterizing a woman’s behavior like this as an “injustice” is absolutely misogynistic. Characterizing women as always lying about their sexual intentions is misogynistic. Drawing an equivalency between RAPE and … checks notes … paying for dinner is misogynistic. Calling women who don’t behave like you wish “whores” is misogynistic.

anyway thanks for the reminder to run at the slightest mention of any red pill crap.

I’m so glad these disgusting men tell on themselves at the first opportunity. Makes it easy to know who to avoid. Men like this don’t deserve dates, and especially not sex.

It’s a shame that misandrists such as yourself aren’t as forthright.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP that was a vivid depiction of I’m sure is reality for some men. But that doesn’t justify responding to that reality with hatred toward women.

Thanks, and I agree. Most of these men are just frustrated and angry at the injustice of the universe while they go through an awakening. For example, they learn that their dinner dates often texted other men for hookups afterwards. They are not misogynists. Most of incel Elliot Rodger's murder victims were men.

Red Pill men eventually learn that the women who invited them in for coffee don't actually want coffee. They also learn that the surest sign that a woman will sleep with them is when she says "I'm not going to sleep with you!"

Dating can be exhausting and demoralizing. Women run a small risk of a bad violent outcome. But men run a large risk of paying for flakes and dinner whores. It is like death by a thousand cuts. There is a lot to hate.

Of course, some men are just aggrieved and entitled butthurt losers. They are not just angry at women; they are angry at minorities, immigrants, gays, Jews, and the globalist conspiracy to deny their access to sex.

Huh? yes it IS misogyny to act like you own a woman’s attention just because you took her to dinner. She is perfectly free to do whatever she wants after, as are you. You were under no obligation to pay for dinner. Characterizing a woman’s behavior like this as an “injustice” is absolutely misogynistic. Characterizing women as always lying about their sexual intentions is misogynistic. Drawing an equivalency between RAPE and … checks notes … paying for dinner is misogynistic. Calling women who don’t behave like you wish “whores” is misogynistic.

anyway thanks for the reminder to run at the slightest mention of any red pill crap.

I’m so glad these disgusting men tell on themselves at the first opportunity. Makes it easy to know who to avoid. Men like this don’t deserve dates, and especially not sex.

It’s a shame that misandrists such as yourself aren’t as forthright.

Op: so this guy is a misogynist AH, should I dump him?
You: he’s not a misogynist, he’s just like me! Angry at the world for not allowing me unlimited sex with any woman I want!
Dcum: so… you’re both misogynists

Keep it up, what other kind of stuff do you post so we can hone our what/who-to-avoid radar? There must be some other key signs we can look for…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, the harpies will hate this but you need to assess the nature of the red pill comments/beliefs. If it’s that women should stay home, be subservient to men and have babies, and that does not fit with your worldview, you have every right to bow out.

However, if his red pill beliefs are along the lines of being wary of women at the early stages so he is not used for free meals and entertainment, that’s entirely different. That’s virtually every man’s lived experience. Now, you can still bail if you want, but that might be premature where he’s only seeking to protect himself.

Ew no. If a boyfriend even tried to suggest his default was to view women as gold diggers, that is even worse than having some traditional beliefs about women and families. You can be a perfectly good person if your preference is to have a SAHM for your kids and you are seeking a woman who feels the same - not my thing but many couples agree on this. having a grudge against supposed “gold diggers” that you feel free to express to your new GF is totally different. and gross.

Golddigger has entered the chat.

ha you wish. In actual fact my xDH mooched off me for years paying zero joint expenses and now has not contributed a single cent to our kid’s expenses post divorce. Is that the kind of gold digger you are referring to?

Are you going on dates solely to get fed or entertained? Then yes.

What does "not this" look like? because the way you've framed it makes it look like "I put the dinner in, I'm owed a sex" and... yikes.

You’ve made a logical leap that is not supported by the post. No one was talking about sex.

To clarify it further for you, do you go on dates where you’re really not that interested in the man, but you know you will get a free meal or entertained?

Lol do you?

Look, I’m sure there are some true gold diggers out there. But if I guy I am dating had a huge history with multiple gold diggers and was therefore permanently scarred by it … I am going to wonder several things about him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Almost nobody on this thread actually knows what red pilled means.

Nobody cares about your fine grained distinction. We all know what we are talking about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP that was a vivid depiction of I’m sure is reality for some men. But that doesn’t justify responding to that reality with hatred toward women. The reality is no one is entitled a partner. If one’s dating experience isn’t what they like it to be, the healthy response is to modify one’s expectations or appeal, not hate an entire gender.

Not the PP, but no one is talking about hatred. What we are talking about is how many men feel like “the system” is stacked against them and that many women will treat them like an atm. It’s not about hating those women, it’s about avoiding them in your dating journey.

I cannot even express what a massive loser I would think a man was if he told me that “women treat men like ATMs and I have had to avoid those women on my dating journey.” Runnnnn girl!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’ve shared this on here before, but I would tell him! Very specifically why. I read a thread from men in what turned them away from the red pill lifestyle, and more than one man said when they realized how their views were making women feel (aka disgusted by them), it caused them to do some introspection and ultimately led a few away from it.

These men are taking “dating” advice from men who aren’t even successful at dating. They are consuming content they think makes them attractive to women, but it’s only really (marginally) attractive to other men.

So yes, tell him.

Huh. yes, this is a good test of character. If he can stand to hear “Hey, when you talk about it women that way, it’s upsetting to me” and take that on board fairly, then he may be worth keeping around.