OK sure, fair. My oldest is easy. My youngest will absolutely someday try and find the wrong clouds. |
| She sounds like our family, generally. Competent and athletic enough with sports, but not some obvious superstar phenom and the priority is academics. Wasn't pushed and won't push my kids unless something changes and we discover some major talent and passion. I guess in that situation maybe we would push? Or at least try to meet their needs, but frankly, I'm not expecting to have a Michael Phelps on our hands. They can do whatever they want and we will support but if they decide it's not their thing, that's fine too. We're not gunning for college scholarships in the athletic sphere. |
It's not about being smug. Not all kids are going to do the wrong things and it shouldn't be assumed that they will. Overscheduling will do nothing, if kids really want to do the wrong things. |
So, overscheduling is ok because it might keep kids out of trouble? Don't you think that could also be detrimental? |
Kids need to have a life outside of school, homework and activities. Will some kids not use their time wisely? Yes, but that doesn't mean you should treat all kids like that. |
You’re taking a weird all-or-nothing stance on this. It comes down to knowing your kid. Two of mine can easily occupy themselves in productive (or at a minimum not actively harmful) ways, but the third? Yeah, we’ll keep that kid as busy as we possibly can for as long as we can. If nothing else, the structure is good for this particular child. |
| “Worth it” in what sense? |
| I don't think you can push a kid who doesn't want to be pushed. You can offer opportunities and encourage her but she either loves it or not. |
Op your post reads like you are judging the families who are "pushing" their kids by questioning the end goal. At the same time, you are seemingly wondering if you should join them. And your line about you and DH and your academics seems weird and competitive. Reading between the lines, I think you want her to be a superstar and are bummed she doesn't have the drive to do it. But remember.. she is very young. I wouldn't let her quit so she can have sleepovers with her friends but she should be choosing to go all in on a sport, not being forced. |
I don't think my stance is all or nothing. An above commenter has an all or nothing stance imo. They said they'd rather overschedule their kid rather than them being bored and causing trouble. To me, that's an all or nothing stance. |
| Op save your time and effort and let your kid focus on academics . |
Why wouldn't you let her quit to have sleepovers and free play/hang out time with friends? Why does that have no value anymore? Do you think organized activities trump unorganized or something? |
| DH's nieces and nephews were all heavily involved in travel basketball and soccer, to the point where it consumed their families lives and they traveled all over the greater west coast for them. Only 1 continued to play in college and it's for a DIII school that she could have easily been accepted to without soccer. To think of all those thousands of dollars and hours wasted... |
Well specifically re: sleepovers, I personally dislike them and think they aren't really age appropriate for an eight year olds. My kid is very social and has never come home drama free. I personally would not let my kid do no organized activities to just sit around and have playdates. Sports are good for learning teamwork and getting exercise, and yes, keeping them off screens or out of trouble. If she wanted to do something in lieu of soccer, totally different. |
DP and +1. That said, I think that organized team sports are good for certain things and like my kids to do them. I also think unorganized hangout time with friends is good and I like my kids to get that too. I wouldn't want to completely eliminate either. |