In my neighborhood, it’s the dads who are the insane dog people. Never leashing their dogs, insisting they’re all so sweet and would never hurt a fly. |
NP, but absolutely. For me, it's an essential part of life, like how most people want kids. I happen to not want kids, but I will always have dogs. And I've never met someone I vibed with who didn't like dogs. People who don't like dogs are either uptight about cleanliness, lacking empathy, or seem almost threatened by the idea that humans are animals too, whether that's rooted in religion or just arrogance. |
I don't think you know what that means. |
What's arrogant is making vast, sweeping generalizations about everyone on the planet who doesn't like dogs enough for your approval. As if you personally know exactly how countless strangers think and feel. I wonder how you'd react if someone were as grossly generalizing about you? "People who are obsessed with dogs are slobs, hate people, and are threatened by the idea of having to deal with humans who might not adore them unconditionally and unquestioningly." Get the idea? My statements about you are exactly as accurate as yours about me. Which is not at all, since we've never met. But I have a feeling you think it's just fine for you to create stereotypes of others and bray those portrayals as if they're universal truths, because, after all, you love dogs so it's...OK for you stereotype strangers, I guess? |
You're no better than a racist or misogynist. |
What position was your hand in, OP, if you remember? I'm sorry this happened and I totally understand how this could make someone a no-dog person, and that also makes me sad for what that person is missing, but I get it. Probably like me and cats; I just think they are dicks. If your hand was in the wrong position and this was not explained at the time, I am sorry- and that still doesn't make it ok. If your hand was in a non-threatening position and the dog bit you, then that owner is a jerk and I hope their dog didn't go on to bite others. I don't think this is a character flaw in you. I could be with a non-dog person possibly, as long as they also engaged with my pet, but if they didn't engage I don't think I could do it- like if I had a child and my partner wanted to also ignore them. |
Definitely not uptight at all |
Yup You're totally not uptight |
Not the PP to whom you're responding, I'm a DP. Your answer is kindly meant, but I hope you can step back and with a little objectivity see how the part in bold is basically equating a child with a pet. Do you have children, PP? |
Not uptight, just pi$$3d at idiots who think their pronouncements are Universal Gospel Truth. But then, mabye you really do believe that God is just Dog backward, so.... |
Cute try, but that was someone else and you think it was me....I'm not the only one on this thread who sees your arrogance. |
DP but are you trying to make the point that if someone doesn't like a dog that makes them uptight? That's insane!! I think that makes YOU sound like the uptight, unwilling to change, close-minded person! I am not a clean/tidy/organized person, btw, and I still don't want a dog. |
Thanks, I did mean it kindly. Absolutely- 4 chiildren, 4 dogs, 4 guinea pigs, too many fish to count, and a lot of nature in the yard. Perhaps some pet owners would not care if their partner ignores their beloved pet. Yes, it would be worse/weirder for a human to deliberately attempt to continue to ignore another human, than it would be for a human to ignore an animal. Still not a relationship I would want to be in if someone I love is ignoring someone I love. What exactly is the issue with equating the two in this situation? |
This is why racial stereotypes are dangerous. Every Indian Hindu and Muslim I've dated has have loved dogs, many owned dogs. |
It’s stupid to say that while women have a monopoly on liking dogs. |