Michael Moore prediction for 2022 election

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched Judy Woodruff last night talking with a group of 18-yr old first-time voters and they all had one issue in common: Roe v Wade and we're voting for pro-choice candidates. I suspect there may be a tsunami of voters with this single issue. We don't take kindly to having our rights taken away by religious zealots!

This made me happy, thank you.

Many younger voters aren't realizing impact of economy yet and are buffered by their parents and student loans. Older voters will be at the polls, too-- and very much aware.

Many clueless old people don’t want to admit that abortion is an economic issue and are buffered by no longer having to worry about that aspect of their life.

And many older women remember the girls who went away and the women who died. People are very much aware.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched Judy Woodruff last night talking with a group of 18-yr old first-time voters and they all had one issue in common: Roe v Wade and we're voting for pro-choice candidates. I suspect there may be a tsunami of voters with this single issue. We don't take kindly to having our rights taken away by religious zealots!

This made me happy, thank you.

Many younger voters aren't realizing impact of economy yet and are buffered by their parents and student loans. Older voters will be at the polls, too-- and very much aware.

Duh, older voters are always at the polls. That’s not news.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched Judy Woodruff last night talking with a group of 18-yr old first-time voters and they all had one issue in common: Roe v Wade and we're voting for pro-choice candidates. I suspect there may be a tsunami of voters with this single issue. We don't take kindly to having our rights taken away by religious zealots!

This made me happy, thank you.

Many younger voters aren't realizing impact of economy yet and are buffered by their parents and student loans. Older voters will be at the polls, too-- and very much aware.

Many clueless old people don’t want to admit that abortion is an economic issue and are buffered by no longer having to worry about that aspect of their life.

And many older women remember the girls who went away and the women who died. People are very much aware.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched Judy Woodruff last night talking with a group of 18-yr old first-time voters and they all had one issue in common: Roe v Wade and we're voting for pro-choice candidates. I suspect there may be a tsunami of voters with this single issue. We don't take kindly to having our rights taken away by religious zealots!

This made me happy, thank you.

Many younger voters aren't realizing impact of economy yet and are buffered by their parents and student loans. Older voters will be at the polls, too-- and very much aware.

Many clueless old people don’t want to admit that abortion is an economic issue and are buffered by no longer having to worry about that aspect of their life.

And many older women remember the girls who went away and the women who died. People are very much aware.

+1

Sanders again sounding like a ringer for the right wing. How can that batty old man not understand that abortion is an economic issue? Is he not smart enough to make the connection between abortion and economics for his voters? Argh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched Judy Woodruff last night talking with a group of 18-yr old first-time voters and they all had one issue in common: Roe v Wade and we're voting for pro-choice candidates. I suspect there may be a tsunami of voters with this single issue. We don't take kindly to having our rights taken away by religious zealots!

This made me happy, thank you.

Many younger voters aren't realizing impact of economy yet and are buffered by their parents and student loans. Older voters will be at the polls, too-- and very much aware.

Well, older doesn't mean smarter in this case it seems. Our best economic times over the last 30 years have been under Democratic administrations, and sometimes with a GOP controlled Congress. I don't think the political whim of the day or year is what shapes or controls our economy even though a heck of a lot of people like to believe it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched Judy Woodruff last night talking with a group of 18-yr old first-time voters and they all had one issue in common: Roe v Wade and we're voting for pro-choice candidates. I suspect there may be a tsunami of voters with this single issue. We don't take kindly to having our rights taken away by religious zealots!

This made me happy, thank you.

Many younger voters aren't realizing impact of economy yet and are buffered by their parents and student loans. Older voters will be at the polls, too-- and very much aware.

Many clueless old people don’t want to admit that abortion is an economic issue and are buffered by no longer having to worry about that aspect of their life.

And many older women remember the girls who went away and the women who died. People are very much aware.

+1

Sanders again sounding like a ringer for the right wing. How can that batty old man not understand that abortion is an economic issue? Is he not smart enough to make the connection between abortion and economics for his voters? Argh.

Sanders is focused, like most left wing politicians throughout history, on advancing the material causes of the proletariat / working class. People like you are libertarians who shroud themselves in “left wing” clothing and care more about virtue signaling for social credit than actually materially benefiting the working class. Fact of the matter is that a lot of “leftists” nowadays only care about advancing the concerns of UMC, overeducated white people and everyone else’s concerns (black, brown, and white) are thrown aside. Look no further than all of these UMC whites using “Latinx” and being “woke” about LGBTQ issues but not having the same level of energy and support for unionizing efforts at Amazon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched Judy Woodruff last night talking with a group of 18-yr old first-time voters and they all had one issue in common: Roe v Wade and we're voting for pro-choice candidates. I suspect there may be a tsunami of voters with this single issue. We don't take kindly to having our rights taken away by religious zealots!

This made me happy, thank you.

Many younger voters aren't realizing impact of economy yet and are buffered by their parents and student loans. Older voters will be at the polls, too-- and very much aware.

Well, older doesn't mean smarter in this case it seems. Our best economic times over the last 30 years have been under Democratic administrations, and sometimes with a GOP controlled Congress. I don't think the political whim of the day or year is what shapes or controls our economy even though a heck of a lot of people like to believe it.

Older often means having personal knowledge of the economic times and impact of the 70's and 80's.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That’s insanity but whoever wins will regret it as we will ge in a recession if not depression soon

Yes but if they can codify abortion that is a huge win to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That’s insanity but whoever wins will regret it as we will ge in a recession if not depression soon

I don't think he will be able to deny recession all the way up to November election. (Dem strategists are probably relying on early voting to keep it close.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That’s insanity but whoever wins will regret it as we will ge in a recession if not depression soon

Yes but if they can codify abortion that is a huge win to me.

What does codify abortion mean?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That’s insanity but whoever wins will regret it as we will ge in a recession if not depression soon

Yes but if they can codify abortion that is a huge win to me.

What does codify abortion mean?

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3755/text

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched Judy Woodruff last night talking with a group of 18-yr old first-time voters and they all had one issue in common: Roe v Wade and we're voting for pro-choice candidates. I suspect there may be a tsunami of voters with this single issue. We don't take kindly to having our rights taken away by religious zealots!

This made me happy, thank you.

Many younger voters aren't realizing impact of economy yet and are buffered by their parents and student loans. Older voters will be at the polls, too-- and very much aware.

Many clueless old people don’t want to admit that abortion is an economic issue and are buffered by no longer having to worry about that aspect of their life.

And many older women remember the girls who went away and the women who died. People are very much aware.

+1

Sanders again sounding like a ringer for the right wing. How can that batty old man not understand that abortion is an economic issue? Is he not smart enough to make the connection between abortion and economics for his voters? Argh.

Ugh. I’m not a Bernie supporter because while some of his ideas are good, they aren’t practical or can’t be implemented in a practical manner. He is spit on though on this. He’s saying the messaging is wrong. Like Defund the Police? WTH? That did not resonate with many people. It sounded like abolish all police and law & order when that’s not what it meant. Redirect some funds to involve more social services on certain calls, invest in more preventative social measures are some of the ideas. Defund the police was terrible phrasing. Bernie is just saying turn the phrasing around.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched Judy Woodruff last night talking with a group of 18-yr old first-time voters and they all had one issue in common: Roe v Wade and we're voting for pro-choice candidates. I suspect there may be a tsunami of voters with this single issue. We don't take kindly to having our rights taken away by religious zealots!

This made me happy, thank you.

Many younger voters aren't realizing impact of economy yet and are buffered by their parents and student loans. Older voters will be at the polls, too-- and very much aware.

Many clueless old people don’t want to admit that abortion is an economic issue and are buffered by no longer having to worry about that aspect of their life.

And many older women remember the girls who went away and the women who died. People are very much aware.

+1

Sanders again sounding like a ringer for the right wing. How can that batty old man not understand that abortion is an economic issue? Is he not smart enough to make the connection between abortion and economics for his voters? Argh.

Sanders is focused, like most left wing politicians throughout history, on advancing the material causes of the proletariat / working class. People like you are libertarians who shroud themselves in “left wing” clothing and care more about virtue signaling for social credit than actually materially benefiting the working class. Fact of the matter is that a lot of “leftists” nowadays only care about advancing the concerns of UMC, overeducated white people and everyone else’s concerns (black, brown, and white) are thrown aside. Look no further than all of these UMC whites using “Latinx” and being “woke” about LGBTQ issues but not having the same level of energy and support for unionizing efforts at Amazon.

Well said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That’s insanity but whoever wins will regret it as we will ge in a recession if not depression soon

soon?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
A recession is predicted in 6-9 months, and in the meantime, employment is surprisingly high.

Midterms will not be too affected by economic woes, despite inflation.

yes, there are a lot of unfilled manufacturing jobs out there.

https://www.bizjournals.com/baltimore/news/2022/08/18/maryland-manufacturers-workforce-reshoring-hiring.html