WaPo: Virginia will block schools from accommodating transgender students

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is wonderful news!

NO IS NOT. IT COST $0 TO RESPECT EVERY STUDENT!!!
CANT WAIT FOR THE PROTEST

That's right. Thank you for caring about respecting my two daughters, who do not want to have to deal with males in their restrooms and locker rooms, and on their sports teams.

THIS THIS THIS

I don’t want my daughter in the locker room changing with biological males either. What about her rights? She doesn’t want it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is wonderful news!

NO IS NOT. IT COST $0 TO RESPECT EVERY STUDENT!!!
CANT WAIT FOR THE PROTEST

That's right. Thank you for caring about respecting my two daughters, who do not want to have to deal with males in their restrooms and locker rooms, and on their sports teams.

THIS THIS THIS

I don’t want my daughter in the locker room changing with biological males either. What about her rights? She doesn’t want it.

So, you support policies like in MD that allow the establishment of all gender restrooms and changing rooms, in addition to the single sex ones that already exist right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I generally like youngkin and his education initiatives. This is bad move on his part.

Youngkin is a race-baiter. In Virginia, home of Brown vs Board of Education. Anyone who likes his “education initiatives” should be ashamed of themselves.

Um, Virginia is not the home of Brown v. Board of Education.

Wow. I didn’t realize that Richmond blocked Arlington from integrating back in 1956.

VA conservatives have a long history of being total POSs.

Bet you also didn’t know that Virginia had the only county in the US tk close its schools for 5 years instead of integrating.

VA has an extremely racist past. People don’t realize how “southern” VA really is 🤷‍♀️

And it’s rearing its ugly head again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden admin’s revision to Title IX should overrule this; they just need to get through the thousands of comments left by “parent rights” groups like this. But at that point misnaming and misgendering should constitute a form of harassment covered under Title IX

First Amendment would keep that from being a form of harassment.

First Amendment rights don't protect my ability to say whatever I want in the classroom. Once I start accepting a paycheck, and being paid to speak to children, I need to say certain things, and avoid saying certain things. For example I could be disciplined or fired for things like:

Calling kids derogatory names
Telling the kids answers to controlled tests
Teaching kids that 1 + 1 = 7 or that there wasn't really a Holocaust.

Sadly, if I taught in VA, Youngkin thinks I should be disciplined or fired for telling kids the truth about history.

This is not a first amendment situation.

Teaching creationism :lol:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is wonderful news!

NO IS NOT. IT COST $0 TO RESPECT EVERY STUDENT!!!
CANT WAIT FOR THE PROTEST

That's right. Thank you for caring about respecting my two daughters, who do not want to have to deal with males in their restrooms and locker rooms, and on their sports teams.

THIS THIS THIS

I don’t want my daughter in the locker room changing with biological males either. What about her rights? She doesn’t want it.

So, you support policies like in MD that allow the establishment of all gender restrooms and changing rooms, in addition to the single sex ones that already exist right?

NP but I think we waste enough public funds on accommodating everyone and everything in our schools. Free lunch, free breakfast, special needs accommodations, ESOL, subsidized after school care, "no nut" classrooms and lunchrooms. Jesus is there anyone who doesn't have a debilitating conditions that needs state support and my tax dollars anymore? I need to start thinking about how to claim a new room or building needs to be built to accommodate my own kids. Oh I know - my son is sensitive to too much noise so maybe I should lobby government to build an anechoic chamber in each school. Get a life

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is wonderful news!

NO IS NOT. IT COST $0 TO RESPECT EVERY STUDENT!!!
CANT WAIT FOR THE PROTEST

That's right. Thank you for caring about respecting my two daughters, who do not want to have to deal with males in their restrooms and locker rooms, and on their sports teams.

Your “daughters” have bigger things to worry about in the bathroom than the very rare transgender girl. Who likely prefers individual bathrooms anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden admin’s revision to Title IX should overrule this; they just need to get through the thousands of comments left by “parent rights” groups like this. But at that point misnaming and misgendering should constitute a form of harassment covered under Title IX

First Amendment would keep that from being a form of harassment.

First Amendment rights don't protect my ability to say whatever I want in the classroom. Once I start accepting a paycheck, and being paid to speak to children, I need to say certain things, and avoid saying certain things. For example I could be disciplined or fired for things like:

Calling kids derogatory names
Telling the kids answers to controlled tests
Teaching kids that 1 + 1 = 7 or that there wasn't really a Holocaust.

Sadly, if I taught in VA, Youngkin thinks I should be disciplined or fired for telling kids the truth about history.

This is not a first amendment situation.

You can still say it, that’s your choice not to because you don’t want to be fired. Just like people can choose not to say things too, they won’t get fired either. Both choices have consequences. You still have first amendment rights though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is wonderful news!

NO IS NOT. IT COST $0 TO RESPECT EVERY STUDENT!!!
CANT WAIT FOR THE PROTEST

That's right. Thank you for caring about respecting my two daughters, who do not want to have to deal with males in their restrooms and locker rooms, and on their sports teams.

Your “daughters” have bigger things to worry about in the bathroom than the very rare transgender girl. Who likely prefers individual bathrooms anyway.

Trust me, my trans kid never set foot in a bathroom for either gender in four years of high school

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is wonderful news!

NO IS NOT. IT COST $0 TO RESPECT EVERY STUDENT!!!
CANT WAIT FOR THE PROTEST

That's right. Thank you for caring about respecting my two daughters, who do not want to have to deal with males in their restrooms and locker rooms, and on their sports teams.

THIS THIS THIS

I don’t want my daughter in the locker room changing with biological males either. What about her rights? She doesn’t want it.

So, you support policies like in MD that allow the establishment of all gender restrooms and changing rooms, in addition to the single sex ones that already exist right?

NP but I think we waste enough public funds on accommodating everyone and everything in our schools. Free lunch, free breakfast, special needs accommodations, ESOL, subsidized after school care, "no nut" classrooms and lunchrooms. Jesus is there anyone who doesn't have a debilitating conditions that needs state support and my tax dollars anymore? I need to start thinking about how to claim a new room or building needs to be built to accommodate my own kids. Oh I know - my son is sensitive to too much noise so maybe I should lobby government to build an anechoic chamber in each school. Get a life

So, you think that the whiny poster above shouldn't be accommodated for her kid's need to have control of who uses the same bathroom?

No one is building new bathrooms. They are just changing the signs on existing bathrooms.

[Anonymous]

So will a student be free to call a teacher whatever they want if the teacher decides to call them whatever they want?

And whatever happened to parents being the ones in charge? If a parent tells a school that their child has a name change, why does the school get to say nope to that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is wonderful news!

You can at least take comfort knowing you’ll have plenty of company when you’re roasting eternally in Hell

There’s no hell, sweetie.

Woke parents are fanning the flames of gender identity. It’s like the battle of who can be the wokest. I know a mom and all her kids are trans, a statistical impossibility.

I thought we were supportive of parental control of children, letting parents make educational and other decisions for kids, not the school or the government. Please, someone make up our minds for us!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is wonderful news!

You can at least take comfort knowing you’ll have plenty of company when you’re roasting eternally in Hell :)

There’s no hell, sweetie.

Woke parents are fanning the flames of gender identity. It’s like the battle of who can be the wokest. I know a mom and all her kids are trans, a statistical impossibility.

I thought we were supportive of parental control of children, letting parents make educational and other decisions for kids, not the school or the government. Please, someone make up our minds for us!

Well played.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden admin’s revision to Title IX should overrule this; they just need to get through the thousands of comments left by “parent rights” groups like this. But at that point misnaming and misgendering should constitute a form of harassment covered under Title IX

First Amendment would keep that from being a form of harassment.

I don't understand how "freedom of speech" covers the names people call other people. The first amendment doesn't entitle people to just say whatever they want to say whenever, wherever, however.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is wonderful news!

NO IS NOT. IT COST $0 TO RESPECT EVERY STUDENT!!!
CANT WAIT FOR THE PROTEST

That's right. Thank you for caring about respecting my two daughters, who do not want to have to deal with males in their restrooms and locker rooms, and on their sports teams.

THIS THIS THIS

I don’t want my daughter in the locker room changing with biological males either. What about her rights? She doesn’t want it.

So, you support policies like in MD that allow the establishment of all gender restrooms and changing rooms, in addition to the single sex ones that already exist right?

NP who doesn't agree with the pronoun/name aspect of this policy, but who shares the sentiments of PP regarding restrooms....Yes, I would support the establishment of all-gender restrooms and changing rooms IN ADDITION to single sex ones. First of all, the lines for women's rooms would be shorter. Second of all, it accommodates everyone by allowing everyone to choose whether they use "co-ed" or single-sex.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is wonderful news!

You can at least take comfort knowing you’ll have plenty of company when you’re roasting eternally in Hell

There’s no hell, sweetie.

Woke parents are fanning the flames of gender identity. It’s like the battle of who can be the wokest. I know a mom and all her kids are trans, a statistical impossibility.

Unless there’s a genetic factor.

It’s getting hot in here. Must be all of the bigots.

Oh please. A "genetic factor?" Like, they all have a crazy mother?