Reported: Susan Rice unmasked names caught up in surveillance

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It went from no spying ... to Susan Rice's job was to spy on Trump. Talk about moving the goal posts. Was Susan's job to be in a black van parked on Fifth Avenue? Give me a break. More shady crap in a big pile of shady crap Obama pulled over 8 years. Just like Cheney ... and just like Slick Willy.

NOVODY SAID IT WAS HER JOB TO SPY ON TEUMP

It is her job to review Intel collected on those who being surveilled via a FISA warrant. Trump was talking to those people and got caught up in their communications. Susan Rice read them as part of her JOB. Jesus Christ, pull your head out of your ass.

The question remains: Why did Obama relax the distribution rules with two weeks left in his Presidency, and why was Rice keeping databases on Trump and team? Americans are supposed to be 'person a' and 'person b' unless there is a specific warrant on them. Rice had names.

And, my understanding was that once she received the names, she was supposed to keep them to herself. That clearly did not happen.

Proof that she distributed names?

[Anonymous]

This whole story has me wondering if the previous administration surveilled the Romney campaign.
We would never know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This whole story has me wondering if the previous administration surveilled the Romney campaign.
We would never know.

Was the Romney campaign speaking and coordinating with foreign adversaries?

If so, yes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This whole story has me wondering if the previous administration surveilled the Romney campaign.
We would never know.

Really? Why would you possibly wonder that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It went from no spying ... to Susan Rice's job was to spy on Trump. Talk about moving the goal posts. Was Susan's job to be in a black van parked on Fifth Avenue? Give me a break. More shady crap in a big pile of shady crap Obama pulled over 8 years. Just like Cheney ... and just like Slick Willy.

NOVODY SAID IT WAS HER JOB TO SPY ON TEUMP

It is her job to review Intel collected on those who being surveilled via a FISA warrant. Trump was talking to those people and got caught up in their communications. Susan Rice read them as part of her JOB. Jesus Christ, pull your head out of your ass.

The question remains: Why did Obama relax the distribution rules with two weeks left in his Presidency, and why was Rice keeping databases on Trump and team? Americans are supposed to be 'person a' and 'person b' unless there is a specific warrant on them. Rice had names.

And, my understanding was that once she received the names, she was supposed to keep them to herself. That clearly did not happen.

Proof that she distributed names?

Because somebody said so. That's all the proof PP needs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It went from no spying ... to Susan Rice's job was to spy on Trump. Talk about moving the goal posts. Was Susan's job to be in a black van parked on Fifth Avenue? Give me a break. More shady crap in a big pile of shady crap Obama pulled over 8 years. Just like Cheney ... and just like Slick Willy.

NOVODY SAID IT WAS HER JOB TO SPY ON TEUMP

It is her job to review Intel collected on those who being surveilled via a FISA warrant. Trump was talking to those people and got caught up in their communications. Susan Rice read them as part of her JOB. Jesus Christ, pull your head out of your ass.

The question remains: Why did Obama relax the distribution rules with two weeks left in his Presidency, and why was Rice keeping databases on Trump and team? Americans are supposed to be 'person a' and 'person b' unless there is a specific warrant on them. Rice had names.

And, my understanding was that once she received the names, she was supposed to keep them to herself. That clearly did not happen.

Proof that she distributed names?

Because somebody said so. That's all the proof PP needs.

Someone did, given the 'intelligences' have names.

[Anonymous]

29 pages of a thread dedicated to outrage that people from Trump's inner circle and perhaps Trump himself were caught engaging with people who were under surveillance.

Okie dokie. Trumpkin logic: don't hate the criminal; hate that they got caught.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It went from no spying ... to Susan Rice's job was to spy on Trump. Talk about moving the goal posts. Was Susan's job to be in a black van parked on Fifth Avenue? Give me a break. More shady crap in a big pile of shady crap Obama pulled over 8 years. Just like Cheney ... and just like Slick Willy.

NOVODY SAID IT WAS HER JOB TO SPY ON TEUMP

It is her job to review Intel collected on those who being surveilled via a FISA warrant. Trump was talking to those people and got caught up in their communications. Susan Rice read them as part of her JOB. Jesus Christ, pull your head out of your ass.

The question remains: Why did Obama relax the distribution rules with two weeks left in his Presidency, and why was Rice keeping databases on Trump and team? Americans are supposed to be 'person a' and 'person b' unless there is a specific warrant on them. Rice had names.

And, my understanding was that once she received the names, she was supposed to keep them to herself. That clearly did not happen.

Proof that she distributed names?

Because somebody said so. That's all the proof PP needs.

Someone did, given the 'intelligences' have names.

You need to work on your thinking skills.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This whole story has me wondering if the previous administration surveilled the Romney campaign.
We would never know.

Have you read any analysis of what actually occurred or are you just spouting wildly inaccurate theories? Why would you think Romney was under surveillance? Trump was never under surveillance. The people he was dealing with were bad hombres, known spys and/or foreign agents operating in the US. The FBI requests the warrant if they have probable cause. A judge signs off on the FISA warrant. Please get a clue. Knowledge is power.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:29 pages of a thread dedicated to outrage that people from Trump's inner circle and perhaps Trump himself were caught engaging with people who were under surveillance.

Okie dokie. Trumpkin logic: don't hate the criminal; hate that they got caught.

Exactly. Blame the person who called the fire department to report the fire instead of the person standing there with the matchbook and lighter fluid in hand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole story has me wondering if the previous administration surveilled the Romney campaign.
We would never know.

Really? Why would you possibly wonder that?

Because of other stories of surveillance by the Obama administration.
This is from 2015, but received very little attention:

According to a bombshell Wall Street Journal article by Adam Entous and Danny Yadron, published online late Monday, the National Security Agency provided the White House with intercepted Israeli communications containing details of private discussions between Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. lawmakers and American Jewish groups on the Iran nuclear deal. If true, this could be the biggest scandal of the Obama presidency. The Journal article explains that President Obama decided to stop NSA collection against certain foreign leaders after the backlash against Edward Snowden’s disclosure that the NSA had eavesdropped on German chancellor Angela Merkel’s cellphone and monitored communications of the heads of state of other close U.S. allies. According to the Journal story, President Obama did not halt NSA spying against Netanyahu. This is not a surprise, given the president’s chilly relations with the Israeli leader and Israel’s aggressive spying against the United States. It’s also not a surprise that the Obama administration sought intelligence on Netanyahu’s efforts to undermine the nuclear deal. But it is stunning to learn that NSA sent the White House intelligence on private discussions with U.S. congressmen on a major policy dispute between the White House and Congress.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/429111/obama-nsas-congress-spying

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It went from no spying ... to Susan Rice's job was to spy on Trump. Talk about moving the goal posts. Was Susan's job to be in a black van parked on Fifth Avenue? Give me a break. More shady crap in a big pile of shady crap Obama pulled over 8 years. Just like Cheney ... and just like Slick Willy.

NOVODY SAID IT WAS HER JOB TO SPY ON TEUMP

It is her job to review Intel collected on those who being surveilled via a FISA warrant. Trump was talking to those people and got caught up in their communications. Susan Rice read them as part of her JOB. Jesus Christ, pull your head out of your ass.

The question remains: Why did Obama relax the distribution rules with two weeks left in his Presidency, and why was Rice keeping databases on Trump and team? Americans are supposed to be 'person a' and 'person b' unless there is a specific warrant on them. Rice had names.

And, my understanding was that once she received the names, she was supposed to keep them to herself. That clearly did not happen.

Proof that she distributed names?

Because somebody said so. That's all the proof PP needs.

Someone did, given the 'intelligences' have names.

In English, please.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole story has me wondering if the previous administration surveilled the Romney campaign.
We would never know.

Really? Why would you possibly wonder that?

Because of other stories of surveillance by the Obama administration.
This is from 2015, but received very little attention:

According to a bombshell Wall Street Journal article by Adam Entous and Danny Yadron, published online late Monday, the National Security Agency provided the White House with intercepted Israeli communications containing details of private discussions between Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. lawmakers and American Jewish groups on the Iran nuclear deal. If true, this could be the biggest scandal of the Obama presidency. The Journal article explains that President Obama decided to stop NSA collection against certain foreign leaders after the backlash against Edward Snowden’s disclosure that the NSA had eavesdropped on German chancellor Angela Merkel’s cellphone and monitored communications of the heads of state of other close U.S. allies. According to the Journal story, President Obama did not halt NSA spying against Netanyahu. This is not a surprise, given the president’s chilly relations with the Israeli leader and Israel’s aggressive spying against the United States. It’s also not a surprise that the Obama administration sought intelligence on Netanyahu’s efforts to undermine the nuclear deal. But it is stunning to learn that NSA sent the White House intelligence on private discussions with U.S. congressmen on a major policy dispute between the White House and Congress.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/429111/obama-nsas-congress-spying

National review.com is not a valid news source. Try again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole story has me wondering if the previous administration surveilled the Romney campaign.
We would never know.

Was the Romney campaign speaking and coordinating with foreign adversaries?

If so, yes.

Do we know if Hillary's campaign was coordinating with foreign adversaries? There certainly was a lot of pay-to-play going on during her tenure as Sos.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole story has me wondering if the previous administration surveilled the Romney campaign.
We would never know.

Was the Romney campaign speaking and coordinating with foreign adversaries?

If so, yes.

Do we know if Hillary's campaign was coordinating with foreign adversaries? There certainly was a lot of pay-to-play going on during her tenure as Sos.

Deflecting back to Hilary again. How about answering why the Trump campaign is being investigated (since July). Hilary is not being investigated. AND the pay-to-play has been debunked. SO.....back to the issue at hand.... RUSSIA. Does it bother you that the campaign is being investigated by the FBI and was possibly colluding with foreign agents????