Reported: Susan Rice unmasked names caught up in surveillance

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole story has me wondering if the previous administration surveilled the Romney campaign.
We would never know.

Was the Romney campaign speaking and coordinating with foreign adversaries?

If so, yes.

Do we know if Hillary's campaign was coordinating with foreign adversaries? There certainly was a lot of pay-to-play going on during her tenure as Sos.

Deflecting back to Hilary again. How about answering why the Trump campaign is being investigated (since July). Hilary is not being investigated. AND the pay-to-play has been debunked. SO.....back to the issue at hand.... RUSSIA. Does it bother you that the campaign is being investigated by the FBI and was possibly colluding with foreign agents????

A) Pay-to-play has not been debunked. The investigation of the CF was not closed.

B) If the campaign was colluding, of course it would bother me. But the Trump adversaries have been making that allegation for months, and there is no evidence of it. So far, the only thing we have is that Russia leaked some embarrassing emails about the DNC's unethical behavior (while disclosing Podesta's incompetence). It's like the libs are saying "hey....it's unethical for Russia to disclose how unethical we are!"

C) Finally, it is not a deflection to point out Hillary's questionable dealings with adversarial counties. It's an effort to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the liberals. They didn't seem to care that Hillary was granting favors (i.e., uranium sales) to our adversary (i.e., Russia) in exchange for CF contributions and Bill's speaking fees.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole story has me wondering if the previous administration surveilled the Romney campaign.
We would never know.

Was the Romney campaign speaking and coordinating with foreign adversaries?

If so, yes.

Do we know if Hillary's campaign was coordinating with foreign adversaries? There certainly was a lot of pay-to-play going on during her tenure as Sos.

Even if she were why should you care? None of you care that Trump did it so on the unlikely off chance Hillary magically was you should be fine with it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole story has me wondering if the previous administration surveilled the Romney campaign.
We would never know.

Was the Romney campaign speaking and coordinating with foreign adversaries?

If so, yes.

Do we know if Hillary's campaign was coordinating with foreign adversaries? There certainly was a lot of pay-to-play going on during her tenure as Sos.

Deflecting back to Hilary again. How about answering why the Trump campaign is being investigated (since July). Hilary is not being investigated. AND the pay-to-play has been debunked. SO.....back to the issue at hand.... RUSSIA. Does it bother you that the campaign is being investigated by the FBI and was possibly colluding with foreign agents????

A) Pay-to-play has not been debunked. The investigation of the CF was not closed.

B) If the campaign was colluding, of course it would bother me. But the Trump adversaries have been making that allegation for months, and there is no evidence of it. So far, the only thing we have is that Russia leaked some embarrassing emails about the DNC's unethical behavior (while disclosing Podesta's incompetence). It's like the libs are saying "hey....it's unethical for Russia to disclose how unethical we are!"

C) Finally, it is not a deflection to point out Hillary's questionable dealings with adversarial counties. It's an effort to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the liberals. They didn't seem to care that Hillary was granting favors (i.e., uranium sales) to our adversary (i.e., Russia) in exchange for CF contributions and Bill's speaking fees.

Everything you commented has been proven to be false. There was no Hillary uranium deal. There's tons of Russia evidence. You might as well be saying the earth isn't proven to be round and could still be flat. Stop destroying your brain with Fox and abreitbart. It is such a sad waste of a human life to be this moronic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole story has me wondering if the previous administration surveilled the Romney campaign.
We would never know.

Was the Romney campaign speaking and coordinating with foreign adversaries?

If so, yes.

Do we know if Hillary's campaign was coordinating with foreign adversaries? There certainly was a lot of pay-to-play going on during her tenure as Sos.

Even if she were why should you care? None of you care that Trump did it so on the unlikely off chance Hillary magically was you should be fine with it.

Who says none of us care that Trump did it? There's no evidence that Trump did it! You libs are talking as if it's a proven fact. If it turns out he coordinated with the Russians to win the election, I'd be for impeachment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole story has me wondering if the previous administration surveilled the Romney campaign.
We would never know.

Was the Romney campaign speaking and coordinating with foreign adversaries?

If so, yes.

Do we know if Hillary's campaign was coordinating with foreign adversaries? There certainly was a lot of pay-to-play going on during her tenure as Sos.

Deflecting back to Hilary again. How about answering why the Trump campaign is being investigated (since July). Hilary is not being investigated. AND the pay-to-play has been debunked. SO.....back to the issue at hand.... RUSSIA. Does it bother you that the campaign is being investigated by the FBI and was possibly colluding with foreign agents????

A) Pay-to-play has not been debunked. The investigation of the CF was not closed.

B) If the campaign was colluding, of course it would bother me. But the Trump adversaries have been making that allegation for months, and there is no evidence of it. So far, the only thing we have is that Russia leaked some embarrassing emails about the DNC's unethical behavior (while disclosing Podesta's incompetence). It's like the libs are saying "hey....it's unethical for Russia to disclose how unethical we are!"

C) Finally, it is not a deflection to point out Hillary's questionable dealings with adversarial counties. It's an effort to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the liberals. They didn't seem to care that Hillary was granting favors (i.e., uranium sales) to our adversary (i.e., Russia) in exchange for CF contributions and Bill's speaking fees.

Everything you commented has been proven to be false. There was no Hillary uranium deal. There's tons of Russia evidence. You might as well be saying the earth isn't proven to be round and could still be flat. Stop destroying your brain with Fox and abreitbart. It is such a sad waste of a human life to be this moronic.

Sorry, but everything said is true. Continue to call people who voted differently than you "morons," and you'll continue to lose elections.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole story has me wondering if the previous administration surveilled the Romney campaign.
We would never know.

Was the Romney campaign speaking and coordinating with foreign adversaries?

If so, yes.

Do we know if Hillary's campaign was coordinating with foreign adversaries? There certainly was a lot of pay-to-play going on during her tenure as Sos.

Even if she were why should you care? None of you care that Trump did it so on the unlikely off chance Hillary magically was you should be fine with it.

Who says none of us care that Trump did it? There's no evidence that Trump did it! You libs are talking as if it's a proven fact. If it turns out he coordinated with the Russians to win the election, I'd be for impeachment.

No you wouldn't because you would never believe the evidence. He will claim it's made up and you'll believe him. If you truly believe there's no evidence yet you're never going to. Just admit it, you enjoy having our country destroyed and look forward to Russia being the dominant world power. You're scared of black people, Mexicans, marijuana, facts, truth, competence, and progress, so you're totally fine with being led by someone else just like you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole story has me wondering if the previous administration surveilled the Romney campaign.
We would never know.

Was the Romney campaign speaking and coordinating with foreign adversaries?

If so, yes.

Do we know if Hillary's campaign was coordinating with foreign adversaries? There certainly was a lot of pay-to-play going on during her tenure as Sos.

Deflecting back to Hilary again. How about answering why the Trump campaign is being investigated (since July). Hilary is not being investigated. AND the pay-to-play has been debunked. SO.....back to the issue at hand.... RUSSIA. Does it bother you that the campaign is being investigated by the FBI and was possibly colluding with foreign agents????

A) Pay-to-play has not been debunked. The investigation of the CF was not closed.

B) If the campaign was colluding, of course it would bother me. But the Trump adversaries have been making that allegation for months, and there is no evidence of it. So far, the only thing we have is that Russia leaked some embarrassing emails about the DNC's unethical behavior (while disclosing Podesta's incompetence). It's like the libs are saying "hey....it's unethical for Russia to disclose how unethical we are!"

C) Finally, it is not a deflection to point out Hillary's questionable dealings with adversarial counties. It's an effort to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the liberals. They didn't seem to care that Hillary was granting favors (i.e., uranium sales) to our adversary (i.e., Russia) in exchange for CF contributions and Bill's speaking fees.

Everything you commented has been proven to be false. There was no Hillary uranium deal. There's tons of Russia evidence. You might as well be saying the earth isn't proven to be round and could still be flat. Stop destroying your brain with Fox and abreitbart. It is such a sad waste of a human life to be this moronic.

Sorry, but everything said is true. Continue to call people who voted differently than you "morons," and you'll continue to lose elections.

You are a moron. its why your life is so sad you had to vote for someone like Trump and defend him with no justification. I almost wish I were as stupid as you, it would make life so much easier.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole story has me wondering if the previous administration surveilled the Romney campaign.
We would never know.

Was the Romney campaign speaking and coordinating with foreign adversaries?

If so, yes.

Do we know if Hillary's campaign was coordinating with foreign adversaries? There certainly was a lot of pay-to-play going on during her tenure as Sos.

Deflecting back to Hilary again. How about answering why the Trump campaign is being investigated (since July). Hilary is not being investigated. AND the pay-to-play has been debunked. SO.....back to the issue at hand.... RUSSIA. Does it bother you that the campaign is being investigated by the FBI and was possibly colluding with foreign agents????

A) Pay-to-play has not been debunked. The investigation of the CF was not closed.

B) If the campaign was colluding, of course it would bother me. But the Trump adversaries have been making that allegation for months, and there is no evidence of it. So far, the only thing we have is that Russia leaked some embarrassing emails about the DNC's unethical behavior (while disclosing Podesta's incompetence). It's like the libs are saying "hey....it's unethical for Russia to disclose how unethical we are!"

C) Finally, it is not a deflection to point out Hillary's questionable dealings with adversarial counties. It's an effort to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the liberals. They didn't seem to care that Hillary was granting favors (i.e., uranium sales) to our adversary (i.e., Russia) in exchange for CF contributions and Bill's speaking fees.

Everything you commented has been proven to be false. There was no Hillary uranium deal. There's tons of Russia evidence. You might as well be saying the earth isn't proven to be round and could still be flat. Stop destroying your brain with Fox and abreitbart. It is such a sad waste of a human life to be this moronic.

Sorry, but everything said is true. Continue to call people who voted differently than you "morons," and you'll continue to lose elections.

The PP wasn't calling people who voted differently than him morons. He specifically call YOU a moron for puppeting information that is known to be false. Either you have no grasp on the truth OR you are purposely spouting disinformation on behalf of Putin (which, according to Senate testimony is still occurring). Which is it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
When it all comes out, there is zero chance PP will accept it as true. That's the great thing nowadays, if you don't like something, it's fake news!

BINGO!
Comey has come out and said there was Russian interference and they are investigating whether the Trump campaigns' involvement. Apparently some people would prefer to bury their head in the sand then to deal with reality.

EXACT QUOTE:
“I have been authorized by the Department of Justice to confirm that the FBI, as part of our counterintelligence mission, is investigating the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election,” Comey said. “And that includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts.”

Yes. Russia supposedly hacked Podesta. Duh. That doesn't mean Trump put Putin up to it

Yeah, but Trump benefitted from it and then went all soft on Ukraine. Duh.

If Trump benefitted from Podesta's hack, that's because Podesta's emails contained things the American people felt they could not tolerate. The rest of your statement is pure propaganda.

The "things the American people felt they could not tolerate" weren't there which is why they came up with fabricated bizarro Pizzagate theories about Podesta's emails. YOUR statements are nothing but pure propaganda.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole story has me wondering if the previous administration surveilled the Romney campaign.
We would never know.

Was the Romney campaign speaking and coordinating with foreign adversaries?

If so, yes.

Do we know if Hillary's campaign was coordinating with foreign adversaries? There certainly was a lot of pay-to-play going on during her tenure as Sos.

Deflecting back to Hilary again. How about answering why the Trump campaign is being investigated (since July). Hilary is not being investigated. AND the pay-to-play has been debunked. SO.....back to the issue at hand.... RUSSIA. Does it bother you that the campaign is being investigated by the FBI and was possibly colluding with foreign agents????

A) Pay-to-play has not been debunked. The investigation of the CF was not closed.

B) If the campaign was colluding, of course it would bother me. But the Trump adversaries have been making that allegation for months, and there is no evidence of it. So far, the only thing we have is that Russia leaked some embarrassing emails about the DNC's unethical behavior (while disclosing Podesta's incompetence). It's like the libs are saying "hey....it's unethical for Russia to disclose how unethical we are!"

C) Finally, it is not a deflection to point out Hillary's questionable dealings with adversarial counties. It's an effort to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the liberals. They didn't seem to care that Hillary was granting favors (i.e., uranium sales) to our adversary (i.e., Russia) in exchange for CF contributions and Bill's speaking fees.

Everything you commented has been proven to be false. There was no Hillary uranium deal. There's tons of Russia evidence. You might as well be saying the earth isn't proven to be round and could still be flat. Stop destroying your brain with Fox and abreitbart. It is such a sad waste of a human life to be this moronic.

Sorry, but everything said is true. Continue to call people who voted differently than you "morons," and you'll continue to lose elections.

You are a moron. its why your life is so sad you had to vote for someone like Trump and defend him with no justification. I almost wish I were as stupid as you, it would make life so much easier.

I'm the moron? I just explained to you that you will continue to lose elections by calling your opponents "morons," and what do you do? Call me a moron again. Watching you childish liberals go into meltdown over losing an election makes me happier every day that you did. Face it, Trump is in for four years. If you don't like it, move to Canada.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole story has me wondering if the previous administration surveilled the Romney campaign.
We would never know.

Was the Romney campaign speaking and coordinating with foreign adversaries?

If so, yes.

Do we know if Hillary's campaign was coordinating with foreign adversaries? There certainly was a lot of pay-to-play going on during her tenure as Sos.

Deflecting back to Hilary again. How about answering why the Trump campaign is being investigated (since July). Hilary is not being investigated. AND the pay-to-play has been debunked. SO.....back to the issue at hand.... RUSSIA. Does it bother you that the campaign is being investigated by the FBI and was possibly colluding with foreign agents????

A) Pay-to-play has not been debunked. The investigation of the CF was not closed.

B) If the campaign was colluding, of course it would bother me. But the Trump adversaries have been making that allegation for months, and there is no evidence of it. So far, the only thing we have is that Russia leaked some embarrassing emails about the DNC's unethical behavior (while disclosing Podesta's incompetence). It's like the libs are saying "hey....it's unethical for Russia to disclose how unethical we are!"

C) Finally, it is not a deflection to point out Hillary's questionable dealings with adversarial counties. It's an effort to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the liberals. They didn't seem to care that Hillary was granting favors (i.e., uranium sales) to our adversary (i.e., Russia) in exchange for CF contributions and Bill's speaking fees.

Everything you commented has been proven to be false. There was no Hillary uranium deal. There's tons of Russia evidence. You might as well be saying the earth isn't proven to be round and could still be flat. Stop destroying your brain with Fox and abreitbart. It is such a sad waste of a human life to be this moronic.

Sorry, but everything said is true. Continue to call people who voted differently than you "morons," and you'll continue to lose elections.

FALSE. There was no "uranium deal." When you look at the timeline and sequence of events, the "uranium deal" conspiracy theory falls completely apart.
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/

You don't get to keep repeating falsehoods just because you want to believe them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole story has me wondering if the previous administration surveilled the Romney campaign.
We would never know.

Was the Romney campaign speaking and coordinating with foreign adversaries?

If so, yes.

Do we know if Hillary's campaign was coordinating with foreign adversaries? There certainly was a lot of pay-to-play going on during her tenure as Sos.

Deflecting back to Hilary again. How about answering why the Trump campaign is being investigated (since July). Hilary is not being investigated. AND the pay-to-play has been debunked. SO.....back to the issue at hand.... RUSSIA. Does it bother you that the campaign is being investigated by the FBI and was possibly colluding with foreign agents????

A) Pay-to-play has not been debunked. The investigation of the CF was not closed.

B) If the campaign was colluding, of course it would bother me. But the Trump adversaries have been making that allegation for months, and there is no evidence of it. So far, the only thing we have is that Russia leaked some embarrassing emails about the DNC's unethical behavior (while disclosing Podesta's incompetence). It's like the libs are saying "hey....it's unethical for Russia to disclose how unethical we are!"

C) Finally, it is not a deflection to point out Hillary's questionable dealings with adversarial counties. It's an effort to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the liberals. They didn't seem to care that Hillary was granting favors (i.e., uranium sales) to our adversary (i.e., Russia) in exchange for CF contributions and Bill's speaking fees.

Everything you commented has been proven to be false. There was no Hillary uranium deal. There's tons of Russia evidence. You might as well be saying the earth isn't proven to be round and could still be flat. Stop destroying your brain with Fox and abreitbart. It is such a sad waste of a human life to be this moronic.

Sorry, but everything said is true. Continue to call people who voted differently than you "morons," and you'll continue to lose elections.

You are a moron. its why your life is so sad you had to vote for someone like Trump and defend him with no justification. I almost wish I were as stupid as you, it would make life so much easier.

I'm the moron? I just explained to you that you will continue to lose elections by calling your opponents "morons," and what do you do? Call me a moron again. Watching you childish liberals go into meltdown over losing an election makes me happier every day that you did. Face it, Trump is in for four years. If you don't like it, move to Canada.

If the only way to win an election is to be a misinformed ignoramus who believes utter falsehoods then I guess I would rather be smart and right and still lose elections. Surely you see how bizarre it is to say the only way to win elections right now is to be hopelessly wrong and confident in the wrongness. Have some pride.

And Canada doesn't want us.

[Anonymous]

Also nobody is melting down over losing the election. We are melting down over being led by a demented liar who is probably compromised by Russia. You aren't melting down over that because you're not smart enough to detect the lies and Russia doesn't bother you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole story has me wondering if the previous administration surveilled the Romney campaign.
We would never know.

Was the Romney campaign speaking and coordinating with foreign adversaries?

If so, yes.

Do we know if Hillary's campaign was coordinating with foreign adversaries? There certainly was a lot of pay-to-play going on during her tenure as Sos.

Deflecting back to Hilary again. How about answering why the Trump campaign is being investigated (since July). Hilary is not being investigated. AND the pay-to-play has been debunked. SO.....back to the issue at hand.... RUSSIA. Does it bother you that the campaign is being investigated by the FBI and was possibly colluding with foreign agents????

A) Pay-to-play has not been debunked. The investigation of the CF was not closed.

B) If the campaign was colluding, of course it would bother me. But the Trump adversaries have been making that allegation for months, and there is no evidence of it. So far, the only thing we have is that Russia leaked some embarrassing emails about the DNC's unethical behavior (while disclosing Podesta's incompetence). It's like the libs are saying "hey....it's unethical for Russia to disclose how unethical we are!"

C) Finally, it is not a deflection to point out Hillary's questionable dealings with adversarial counties. It's an effort to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the liberals. They didn't seem to care that Hillary was granting favors (i.e., uranium sales) to our adversary (i.e., Russia) in exchange for CF contributions and Bill's speaking fees.

Everything you commented has been proven to be false. There was no Hillary uranium deal. There's tons of Russia evidence. You might as well be saying the earth isn't proven to be round and could still be flat. Stop destroying your brain with Fox and abreitbart. It is such a sad waste of a human life to be this moronic.

Sorry, but everything said is true. Continue to call people who voted differently than you "morons," and you'll continue to lose elections.

You are a moron. its why your life is so sad you had to vote for someone like Trump and defend him with no justification. I almost wish I were as stupid as you, it would make life so much easier.

I'm the moron? I just explained to you that you will continue to lose elections by calling your opponents "morons," and what do you do? Call me a moron again. Watching you childish liberals go into meltdown over losing an election makes me happier every day that you did. Face it, Trump is in for four years. If you don't like it, move to Canada.

Yes, you are a moron. I don't call everyone who disagrees with my politics a moron. I reserve that for the true morons.

FWIW, there are a lot of conservatives that I don't see eye to eye with, but I happen to think they are intelligent, well-read individuals. You do not fall into that category.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole story has me wondering if the previous administration surveilled the Romney campaign.
We would never know.

Was the Romney campaign speaking and coordinating with foreign adversaries?

If so, yes.

Do we know if Hillary's campaign was coordinating with foreign adversaries? There certainly was a lot of pay-to-play going on during her tenure as Sos.

Deflecting back to Hilary again. How about answering why the Trump campaign is being investigated (since July). Hilary is not being investigated. AND the pay-to-play has been debunked. SO.....back to the issue at hand.... RUSSIA. Does it bother you that the campaign is being investigated by the FBI and was possibly colluding with foreign agents????

A) Pay-to-play has not been debunked. The investigation of the CF was not closed.

B) If the campaign was colluding, of course it would bother me. But the Trump adversaries have been making that allegation for months, and there is no evidence of it. So far, the only thing we have is that Russia leaked some embarrassing emails about the DNC's unethical behavior (while disclosing Podesta's incompetence). It's like the libs are saying "hey....it's unethical for Russia to disclose how unethical we are!"

C) Finally, it is not a deflection to point out Hillary's questionable dealings with adversarial counties. It's an effort to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the liberals. They didn't seem to care that Hillary was granting favors (i.e., uranium sales) to our adversary (i.e., Russia) in exchange for CF contributions and Bill's speaking fees.

Everything you commented has been proven to be false. There was no Hillary uranium deal. There's tons of Russia evidence. You might as well be saying the earth isn't proven to be round and could still be flat. Stop destroying your brain with Fox and abreitbart. It is such a sad waste of a human life to be this moronic.

Sorry, but everything said is true. Continue to call people who voted differently than you "morons," and you'll continue to lose elections.

You are a moron. its why your life is so sad you had to vote for someone like Trump and defend him with no justification. I almost wish I were as stupid as you, it would make life so much easier.

I'm the moron? I just explained to you that you will continue to lose elections by calling your opponents "morons," and what do you do? Call me a moron again. Watching you childish liberals go into meltdown over losing an election makes me happier every day that you did. Face it, Trump is in for four years. If you don't like it, move to Canada.

Liberals calling you moron is the least of the Trump supporters' problems. The coal jobs are not coming back. We're footing the bill for the wall. Tens of millions are going to lose healthcare and the remainder will see big premium hikes or other losses of coverage. The debt will rise by trillions. Our air and water will no longer be protected. And so on and so on. And if you still want to keep blaming liberals after all this then you are truly just cutting your own nose off to spite your faces. Maybe some day you will wake up to that fact.