Reported: Susan Rice unmasked names caught up in surveillance

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:McMaster says Rice did nothing wrong:
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/345205-mcmaster-thinks-susan-rice-did-nothing-wrong-report?amp

McMaster is lying. McMaster is a puppet of Hillary. McMaster is a Russian colluder. Or something. He's clearly not going to last long.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe those who leaked are the same people in the FBI that pushed Comey to open the investigation again a week before the election after finding new emails on Weiner's computer.

^This is quite possible.

Joe DiGenova, the former U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, has a solid reputation and is a good man. I lived right next door to him for many years so got to know him. He obviously is alarmed about the weighty issue of unmasking and more. It's encouraging to see him speak up.

Except that he was talking to The Daily Caller. Game over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe those who leaked are the same people in the FBI that pushed Comey to open the investigation again a week before the election after finding new emails on Weiner's computer.

^This is quite possible.

Joe DiGenova, the former U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, has a solid reputation and is a good man. I lived right next door to him for many years so got to know him. He obviously is alarmed about the weighty issue of unmasking and more. It's encouraging to see him speak up.

Joe DiG is a wingnut and so is his son.

Mantra of the left:

1. Ignore the facts or possible facts
2. Attack the messenger
3. Put up roadblocks of doubt before the facts finally come out

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McMaster says Rice did nothing wrong:
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/345205-mcmaster-thinks-susan-rice-did-nothing-wrong-report?amp

McMaster is lying. McMaster is a puppet of Hillary. McMaster is a Russian colluder. Or something. He's clearly not going to last long.

NBC reported yesterday that Trump wants him out of the WH and in charge of the war in Afghanistan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe those who leaked are the same people in the FBI that pushed Comey to open the investigation again a week before the election after finding new emails on Weiner's computer.

^This is quite possible.

Joe DiGenova, the former U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, has a solid reputation and is a good man. I lived right next door to him for many years so got to know him. He obviously is alarmed about the weighty issue of unmasking and more. It's encouraging to see him speak up.

Joe DiG is a wingnut and so is his son.

Mantra of the left:

1. Ignore the facts or possible facts
2. Attack the messenger
3. Put up roadblocks of doubt before the facts finally come out

Sure. I think you're confusing the "left" with the rightwing BS industry.

[Anonymous]

And with this

http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/13/politics/susan-rice-house-investigators-unmasked-trump-officials/index.html

I think we can concede a few things:

1) Susan Rice did nothing wrong, improper or illegal
2) This was a completely manufactured story
3) This believing this story need to take a good, hard look at who was responsible for creating and propagating this story and evaluate their own perspective on news and information.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe those who leaked are the same people in the FBI that pushed Comey to open the investigation again a week before the election after finding new emails on Weiner's computer.

^This is quite possible.

Joe DiGenova, the former U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, has a solid reputation and is a good man. I lived right next door to him for many years so got to know him. He obviously is alarmed about the weighty issue of unmasking and more. It's encouraging to see him speak up.

Joe DiG is a wingnut and so is his son.

Mantra of the left:

1. Ignore the facts or possible facts
2. Attack the messenger
3. Put up roadblocks of doubt before the facts finally come out

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe those who leaked are the same people in the FBI that pushed Comey to open the investigation again a week before the election after finding new emails on Weiner's computer.

^This is quite possible.

Joe DiGenova, the former U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, has a solid reputation and is a good man. I lived right next door to him for many years so got to know him. He obviously is alarmed about the weighty issue of unmasking and more. It's encouraging to see him speak up.

Joe DiG is a wingnut and so is his son.

Mantra of the left:

1. Ignore the facts or possible facts
2. Attack the messenger
3. Put up roadblocks of doubt before the facts finally come out

Exactly.

Uh, did you read the article about Susan Rice? Yes, let's let the facts come out. She has been completely exonerated. And the messenger, Nunes, has been censured, lost his security clearance and will likely be brought up for obstruction of justice charges.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe those who leaked are the same people in the FBI that pushed Comey to open the investigation again a week before the election after finding new emails on Weiner's computer.

^This is quite possible.

Joe DiGenova, the former U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, has a solid reputation and is a good man. I lived right next door to him for many years so got to know him. He obviously is alarmed about the weighty issue of unmasking and more. It's encouraging to see him speak up.

Joe DiG is a wingnut and so is his son.

Mantra of the left:

1. Ignore the facts or possible facts
2. Attack the messenger
3. Put up roadblocks of doubt before the facts finally come out

Exactly.

Uh, did you read the article about Susan Rice? Yes, let's let the facts come out. She has been completely exonerated. And the messenger, Nunes, has been censured, lost his security clearance and will likely be brought up for obstruction of justice charges.

PP's cute little "Mantra" lost is actually "exactly" what the Trumpsters did. All projection, all of the time!

[Anonymous]

And all the Republicans on the committee are praising Susan Rice for unmasking Trump.

hmmmm.....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And with this

http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/13/politics/susan-rice-house-investigators-unmasked-trump-officials/index.html

I think we can concede a few things:

1) Susan Rice did nothing wrong, improper or illegal
2) This was a completely manufactured story
3) This believing this story need to take a good, hard look at who was responsible for creating and propagating this story and evaluate their own perspective on news and information.

Lol CNN.

This article brought up more questions than answers:

1) This happened after the election. She knew full well that the prince was meeting with the new administration. Trump and his associates were targeted.

2) She doesn't need to unmask names to figure out the intent of the UAE prince. She had the whole transcript.

3) Again this happened after the election. It's highly inappropriate for the outgoing administration to spy on the new president.

[Anonymous]

^^^^^

Wow, you are truly an idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And with this

http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/13/politics/susan-rice-house-investigators-unmasked-trump-officials/index.html

I think we can concede a few things:

1) Susan Rice did nothing wrong, improper or illegal
2) This was a completely manufactured story
3) This believing this story need to take a good, hard look at who was responsible for creating and propagating this story and evaluate their own perspective on news and information.

Lol CNN.

This article brought up more questions than answers:

1) This happened after the election. She knew full well that the prince was meeting with the new administration. Trump and his associates were targeted.

2) She doesn't need to unmask names to figure out the intent of the UAE prince. She had the whole transcript.

3) Again this happened after the election. It's highly inappropriate for the outgoing administration to spy on the new president.

First-- the testimony was closed. all questions were apparently resolved to the satisfaction of the Republicans on the committee. Because they said so. Do you not trust Congressional Republicans now, either?

And, no, we have one POTUS at a time. Before the election, after the election. Obama's security team was in charge of national security until noon on 1/20. They got to make the call about what they needed. The Obama team explained themselves to Congress. Congress thinks Rice acted properly. And unless you a copy of what she had, you don't know what she needed. But, I'm guessing who he met with-- meeting with Trump's national security folks vs diplomatic folks does matter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:^^^^^

Wow, you are truly an idiot.

This.

[Anonymous]

^^^^ Your double digit IQ will not be able to understand. She had the whole transcript. Why'd she need to unmask "US Person x" to Trump and his staff to understand the intent of the crown prince?