Reported: Susan Rice unmasked names caught up in surveillance

[Anonymous]

Yo, the original source on this is also responsible for Pizzagate.

Wake up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That was her job. Stop embarrassing yourself, OP. Are you the same poster who thinks the VP passes laws?

What is her job? To conduct surveillance of the private AmCit? Based on what?

...on the fact that those American citizens were speaking with foreign spies and adversaries? Duh.

^ This is the far bigger problem and potential threat to national security. Whining about Rice is just shooting the messenger and missing the point.

[Anonymous]

And the name "Susan Rice" is like red meat for the right. How do these people not know when they are being played?

At the (brief) presser today, Spicey was complaining that the media was not taking this story seriously enough.

[Anonymous]

The PERFECT analogy in all of this whining about "leaking" and "unmasking" would be if Donald Trump actually DID shoot someone to death on Times Square in broad daylight and someone caught video of it with their camera phone.

The Trump supporters would all be whining about the person with the camera phone rather than talking about the murder that just happened.

[Anonymous]

Very strange that what bothers Trumpkins is not the potential that Trump's closest advisers and inner circle may have been actively colluding with the Russians but that they were caught. Party over country, FFS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Very strange that what bothers Trumpkins is not the potential that Trump's closest advisers and inner circle may have been actively colluding with the Russians but that they were caught. Party over country, FFS.

Time will tell. I have a feeling that the media will have to get on board with the truth or risk their own credibility. They will not continue to support liberal liars if they find themselves losing the battle. They will need to survive. We already see normally liberal-leaning media picking up this story.

Should be interesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Evelyn Farkas started the whole ball rolling:

“I was urging my former colleagues and, frankly speaking, the people on the Hill – it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can, get as much intelligence as you can, before President Obama leaves the administration.”

Loose lips sink ships.

Sinking the Trump ship. I can't believe you a-holes who are pissed because the campaign was caught talking to shady people. You loved the bright light of Wikileaks on the sausage making at the DNC and now you are pissed because people engaged in potential treason were monitored.

We'll know one knows who they were speaking to, except the one report on the Russian ambassador. Both campaigns were chock full of foreign policy advisers - I would imagine both Trump and Hilary's people were chatting with people all over the world. I just don't see the scandal in someone speaking with an ambassador.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Evelyn Farkas started the whole ball rolling:

“I was urging my former colleagues and, frankly speaking, the people on the Hill – it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can, get as much intelligence as you can, before President Obama leaves the administration.”

Loose lips sink ships.

Sinking the Trump ship. I can't believe you a-holes who are pissed because the campaign was caught talking to shady people. You loved the bright light of Wikileaks on the sausage making at the DNC and now you are pissed because people engaged in potential treason were monitored.

We'll know one knows who they were speaking to, except the one report on the Russian ambassador. Both campaigns were chock full of foreign policy advisers - I would imagine both Trump and Hilary's people were chatting with people all over the world. I just don't see the scandal in someone speaking with an ambassador.

**Well, no**

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Evelyn Farkas started the whole ball rolling:

“I was urging my former colleagues and, frankly speaking, the people on the Hill – it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can, get as much intelligence as you can, before President Obama leaves the administration.”

Loose lips sink ships.

Sinking the Trump ship. I can't believe you a-holes who are pissed because the campaign was caught talking to shady people. You loved the bright light of Wikileaks on the sausage making at the DNC and now you are pissed because people engaged in potential treason were monitored.

We'll know one knows who they were speaking to, except the one report on the Russian ambassador. Both campaigns were chock full of foreign policy advisers - I would imagine both Trump and Hilary's people were chatting with people all over the world. I just don't see the scandal in someone speaking with an ambassador.

Then why would Nunes make such a stink about it? Of course it doesn't help that both Flynn and Sessions lied.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very strange that what bothers Trumpkins is not the potential that Trump's closest advisers and inner circle may have been actively colluding with the Russians but that they were caught. Party over country, FFS.

Time will tell. I have a feeling that the media will have to get on board with the truth or risk their own credibility. They will not continue to support liberal liars if they find themselves losing the battle. They will need to survive. We already see normally liberal-leaning media picking up this story.

Should be interesting.

What will be interesting will be watching the scales fall from the eyes of true believers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very strange that what bothers Trumpkins is not the potential that Trump's closest advisers and inner circle may have been actively colluding with the Russians but that they were caught. Party over country, FFS.

Time will tell. I have a feeling that the media will have to get on board with the truth or risk their own credibility. They will not continue to support liberal liars if they find themselves losing the battle. They will need to survive. We already see normally liberal-leaning media picking up this story.

Should be interesting.

I really hope You are a bot, because it is pitiful to go through life so willfully blind to the fact that conservative media has been feeding you lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Very strange that what bothers Trumpkins is not the potential that Trump's closest advisers and inner circle may have been actively colluding with the Russians but that they were caught. Party over country, FFS.

If there was proof of this, it would have been leaked a long time ago. Like, before the election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very strange that what bothers Trumpkins is not the potential that Trump's closest advisers and inner circle may have been actively colluding with the Russians but that they were caught. Party over country, FFS.

If there was proof of this, it would have been leaked a long time ago. Like, before the election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very strange that what bothers Trumpkins is not the potential that Trump's closest advisers and inner circle may have been actively colluding with the Russians but that they were caught. Party over country, FFS.

Time will tell. I have a feeling that the media will have to get on board with the truth or risk their own credibility. They will not continue to support liberal liars if they find themselves losing the battle. They will need to survive. We already see normally liberal-leaning media picking up this story.

Should be interesting.

I really hope You are a bot, because it is pitiful to go through life so willfully blind to the fact that conservative media has been feeding you lies.

I know, I'm SO pathetic. You have shamed me...NOT

PS - Do liberals really think this type of talk even works? LOL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very strange that what bothers Trumpkins is not the potential that Trump's closest advisers and inner circle may have been actively colluding with the Russians but that they were caught. Party over country, FFS.

If there was proof of this, it would have been leaked a long time ago. Like, before the election.

Panetta should have used a better password -