Help me understand Republican women in their 30s and 40s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican women in the age range you mentioned are by and large intelligent, articulate, understand the role of government and are carrying concealed weapons to ward off criminals and rapists.

They have conservative views, are willing to compromise on abortion, with laws similar to what exists in Europe. They want a secure border and support giving people a hand up without providing perpetual handouts.

In other words typical normal people that lean a little right of center who are never going to support the extreme views of the progressive wing no matter how loudly they shout.

You must be a smug idiot to think women can just ward off rapists.

Aren’t you one of the people that think it’s fine for imprisoned women to be cell mates with convicted rapists and male sex offenders? Don’t you believe the imprisoned women can just ward off the rapists who now identify as women and share their cells? Why would this be any different? At least the PP has a gun.

Time to stop drinking and get out of mommy's basement.

So yes, you believe women prisoners should be imprisoned with convicted male rapists who now identify as women. Got it.

Moron. No one wrote that.

Yep. Seems like some angry right winger is hard at work strawmanning and sock puppeting tonight.

We are still waiting for the PP who resorted to name-calling (“Moron.”) to come out and state that he fully opposes housing biological female prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, and that he is opposed to the political party that is supporting that policy.

Why should someone have to speak to something they never said in the first place? That was your strawman, not theirs.

So, do you support housing biological women prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, which is currently supported by the Democratic Party? Yes or no? It’s a straightforward question.

You don't want a sleazy pervert who commits sexual assault in prison with women but you DO want him to run the country? Yes or no? It's a straightforward question.

I’m not voting for Trump. I don’t want transwomen convicted of sexual assault and rape housed with biological women and I don’t want Trump as my president.

Yet you support a party that fully backs and endorses sleazy sex-abuser Trump, which refuses to question anything Trump says or does, which installed Trump's daughter-in-law as RNC chair...

I literally said I am not voting for Trump. I’m not a Republican. I just understand why women in their 30s/40s might be Republican. Hint: it’s people like you.

Oh come on. If people vote on either side because of discourse from random internet strangers, that’s ludicrous. On this thread, we’ve asked for statistics and exact reasons why feminists should vote Republican. The reasons have been because they believe in a fetus’s rights > its mother’s rights, and abortion division is a given. Then we heard that imprisoned women have to room with trans women. But, we haven’t seen any data about how widespread this is. They haven’t been able to articulate why this issue is the most important feminist issue over say improving maternal health including mental health, fighting for equal wages and equalizing wages for Black women, more money for medical testing on women, better access and affordability for childcare, and on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am a 44 year old Jewish Republican woman and proud of it.

Before around a year ago I was a very Liberal Democrat, then Biden proceeded to ally him with Hamas and helped them invade Isreal in their genocidal attacks on 10/7 and continue to be Hamas’ biggest supporter on the international stage, feeding them through the disgusting pier and ignoring Israel’s desperate pleas to honor our alliance by sending the might of the US Military to aid the IDF in their noble goal of complete destruction of Hamas and retrieval of every single innocent Israeli hostage.

After that, I knew I could never vote for a democrat or liberal ever again. I am going to be proud to vote for Donald Trump, who has been a true friend to the Jewish people, a hero worthy of succeeding David, Moses, and the other greats!

I never say unhinged on these threads, but saying that Biden helped Hamas attack Israel on 10/7 is truly the most unhinged thing I’ve ever read on DCUM. And that’s saying something. I’m a Dem and definitely not a Biden fan or religious, but to say that Trump is greater than Moses is blasphemy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am a 44 year old Jewish Republican woman and proud of it.

Before around a year ago I was a very Liberal Democrat, then Biden proceeded to ally him with Hamas and helped them invade Isreal in their genocidal attacks on 10/7 and continue to be Hamas’ biggest supporter on the international stage, feeding them through the disgusting pier and ignoring Israel’s desperate pleas to honor our alliance by sending the might of the US Military to aid the IDF in their noble goal of complete destruction of Hamas and retrieval of every single innocent Israeli hostage.

After that, I knew I could never vote for a democrat or liberal ever again. I am going to be proud to vote for Donald Trump, who has been a true friend to the Jewish people, a hero worthy of succeeding David, Moses, and the other greats!

I never say unhinged on these threads, but saying that Biden helped Hamas attack Israel on 10/7 is truly the most unhinged thing I’ve ever read on DCUM. And that’s saying something. I’m a Dem and definitely not a Biden fan or religious, but to say that Trump is greater than Moses is blasphemy.

She didn't say how he helped Hamas. But it's difficult to argue that all the money we sent to Iran probably helped.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican women in the age range you mentioned are by and large intelligent, articulate, understand the role of government and are carrying concealed weapons to ward off criminals and rapists.

They have conservative views, are willing to compromise on abortion, with laws similar to what exists in Europe. They want a secure border and support giving people a hand up without providing perpetual handouts.

In other words typical normal people that lean a little right of center who are never going to support the extreme views of the progressive wing no matter how loudly they shout.

You must be a smug idiot to think women can just ward off rapists.

Aren’t you one of the people that think it’s fine for imprisoned women to be cell mates with convicted rapists and male sex offenders? Don’t you believe the imprisoned women can just ward off the rapists who now identify as women and share their cells? Why would this be any different? At least the PP has a gun.

Time to stop drinking and get out of mommy's basement.

So yes, you believe women prisoners should be imprisoned with convicted male rapists who now identify as women. Got it.

Moron. No one wrote that.

Yep. Seems like some angry right winger is hard at work strawmanning and sock puppeting tonight.

We are still waiting for the PP who resorted to name-calling (“Moron.”) to come out and state that he fully opposes housing biological female prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, and that he is opposed to the political party that is supporting that policy.

Why should someone have to speak to something they never said in the first place? That was your strawman, not theirs.

So, do you support housing biological women prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, which is currently supported by the Democratic Party? Yes or no? It’s a straightforward question.

You don't want a sleazy pervert who commits sexual assault in prison with women but you DO want him to run the country? Yes or no? It's a straightforward question.

I’m not voting for Trump. I don’t want transwomen convicted of sexual assault and rape housed with biological women and I don’t want Trump as my president.

Yet you support a party that fully backs and endorses sleazy sex-abuser Trump, which refuses to question anything Trump says or does, which installed Trump's daughter-in-law as RNC chair...

I literally said I am not voting for Trump. I’m not a Republican. I just understand why women in their 30s/40s might be Republican. Hint: it’s people like you.

Oh come on. If people vote on either side because of discourse from random internet strangers, that’s ludicrous. On this thread, we’ve asked for statistics and exact reasons why feminists should vote Republican. The reasons have been because they believe in a fetus’s rights > its mother’s rights, and abortion division is a given. Then we heard that imprisoned women have to room with trans women. But, we haven’t seen any data about how widespread this is. They haven’t been able to articulate why this issue is the most important feminist issue over say improving maternal health including mental health, fighting for equal wages and equalizing wages for Black women, more money for medical testing on women, better access and affordability for childcare, and on.

And we told you that we don't care if you think we are feminists and we don't care what you think we should limit our attention to in terms of issues. We've repeatedly told you what issues matter to us. The issues that you listed are nice to have but right now, we don't even have basics like security and economy working well. I also don't agree with "equal wages" when it's just a euphemism for socialism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am a 44 year old Jewish Republican woman and proud of it.

Before around a year ago I was a very Liberal Democrat, then Biden proceeded to ally him with Hamas and helped them invade Isreal in their genocidal attacks on 10/7 and continue to be Hamas’ biggest supporter on the international stage, feeding them through the disgusting pier and ignoring Israel’s desperate pleas to honor our alliance by sending the might of the US Military to aid the IDF in their noble goal of complete destruction of Hamas and retrieval of every single innocent Israeli hostage.

After that, I knew I could never vote for a democrat or liberal ever again. I am going to be proud to vote for Donald Trump, who has been a true friend to the Jewish people, a hero worthy of succeeding David, Moses, and the other greats!

I never say unhinged on these threads, but saying that Biden helped Hamas attack Israel on 10/7 is truly the most unhinged thing I’ve ever read on DCUM. And that’s saying something. I’m a Dem and definitely not a Biden fan or religious, but to say that Trump is greater than Moses is blasphemy.

She didn't say how he helped Hamas. But it's difficult to argue that all the money we sent to Iran probably helped.

Some points of correction and clarification:

A.) It was Iran's money to begin with. Contrary to Republican claims, it's not US taxpayer dollars. The US had frozen Iranian assets.

B.) Also, the Iranian money was unfrozen but it wasn't sent to Iran as a lump sum of free money, there are still strict conditions: The money is only disbursed with approval and can only be paid out on orders of humanitarian-related items, such as food, medicine and medical equipment, and anything with potential dual use for military weaponry is forbidden.

C.) I think the only argument that could be made is that Iran could divert existing funding for food and medicine to military purposes - however there's never been any concrete or specific evidence that this has happened, and

D.) Not all of the funds were disbursed and the funds were frozen again as Iranian hostility resumed.

https://www.factcheck.org/2023/10/republican-claims-on-hamas-attack-and-iran-funds-distort-the-facts/

And as usual this is yet another example of how Republicans have distorted and misrepresented the facts in order to sway the opinions of people like the PP.

(enter stage left the person who will say "and this is exactly why you are pushing people into the arms of the GOP" - by correcting the record. 🙄)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican women in the age range you mentioned are by and large intelligent, articulate, understand the role of government and are carrying concealed weapons to ward off criminals and rapists.

They have conservative views, are willing to compromise on abortion, with laws similar to what exists in Europe. They want a secure border and support giving people a hand up without providing perpetual handouts.

In other words typical normal people that lean a little right of center who are never going to support the extreme views of the progressive wing no matter how loudly they shout.

You must be a smug idiot to think women can just ward off rapists.

Aren’t you one of the people that think it’s fine for imprisoned women to be cell mates with convicted rapists and male sex offenders? Don’t you believe the imprisoned women can just ward off the rapists who now identify as women and share their cells? Why would this be any different? At least the PP has a gun.

Time to stop drinking and get out of mommy's basement.

So yes, you believe women prisoners should be imprisoned with convicted male rapists who now identify as women. Got it.

Moron. No one wrote that.

Yep. Seems like some angry right winger is hard at work strawmanning and sock puppeting tonight.

We are still waiting for the PP who resorted to name-calling (“Moron.”) to come out and state that he fully opposes housing biological female prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, and that he is opposed to the political party that is supporting that policy.

Why should someone have to speak to something they never said in the first place? That was your strawman, not theirs.

So, do you support housing biological women prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, which is currently supported by the Democratic Party? Yes or no? It’s a straightforward question.

You don't want a sleazy pervert who commits sexual assault in prison with women but you DO want him to run the country? Yes or no? It's a straightforward question.

I’m not voting for Trump. I don’t want transwomen convicted of sexual assault and rape housed with biological women and I don’t want Trump as my president.

Yet you support a party that fully backs and endorses sleazy sex-abuser Trump, which refuses to question anything Trump says or does, which installed Trump's daughter-in-law as RNC chair...

I literally said I am not voting for Trump. I’m not a Republican. I just understand why women in their 30s/40s might be Republican. Hint: it’s people like you.

Oh come on. If people vote on either side because of discourse from random internet strangers, that’s ludicrous. On this thread, we’ve asked for statistics and exact reasons why feminists should vote Republican. The reasons have been because they believe in a fetus’s rights > its mother’s rights, and abortion division is a given. Then we heard that imprisoned women have to room with trans women. But, we haven’t seen any data about how widespread this is. They haven’t been able to articulate why this issue is the most important feminist issue over say improving maternal health including mental health, fighting for equal wages and equalizing wages for Black women, more money for medical testing on women, better access and affordability for childcare, and on.

And we told you that we don't care if you think we are feminists and we don't care what you think we should limit our attention to in terms of issues. We've repeatedly told you what issues matter to us. The issues that you listed are nice to have but right now, we don't even have basics like security and economy working well. I also don't agree with "equal wages" when it's just a euphemism for socialism.

Let Fox and OAN continue to do all your thinking for you. You haven’t had an independent thought since your father started brainwashing you as a child. Oh no! I was mean online (unlike Trump who is mean online, in person and in policy)! Now you’ll have to go make a donation to Trump in retaliation!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican women in the age range you mentioned are by and large intelligent, articulate, understand the role of government and are carrying concealed weapons to ward off criminals and rapists.

They have conservative views, are willing to compromise on abortion, with laws similar to what exists in Europe. They want a secure border and support giving people a hand up without providing perpetual handouts.

In other words typical normal people that lean a little right of center who are never going to support the extreme views of the progressive wing no matter how loudly they shout.

You must be a smug idiot to think women can just ward off rapists.

Aren’t you one of the people that think it’s fine for imprisoned women to be cell mates with convicted rapists and male sex offenders? Don’t you believe the imprisoned women can just ward off the rapists who now identify as women and share their cells? Why would this be any different? At least the PP has a gun.

Time to stop drinking and get out of mommy's basement.

So yes, you believe women prisoners should be imprisoned with convicted male rapists who now identify as women. Got it.

Moron. No one wrote that.

Yep. Seems like some angry right winger is hard at work strawmanning and sock puppeting tonight.

We are still waiting for the PP who resorted to name-calling (“Moron.”) to come out and state that he fully opposes housing biological female prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, and that he is opposed to the political party that is supporting that policy.

Why should someone have to speak to something they never said in the first place? That was your strawman, not theirs.

So, do you support housing biological women prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, which is currently supported by the Democratic Party? Yes or no? It’s a straightforward question.

You don't want a sleazy pervert who commits sexual assault in prison with women but you DO want him to run the country? Yes or no? It's a straightforward question.

I’m not voting for Trump. I don’t want transwomen convicted of sexual assault and rape housed with biological women and I don’t want Trump as my president.

Yet you support a party that fully backs and endorses sleazy sex-abuser Trump, which refuses to question anything Trump says or does, which installed Trump's daughter-in-law as RNC chair...

I literally said I am not voting for Trump. I’m not a Republican. I just understand why women in their 30s/40s might be Republican. Hint: it’s people like you.

Oh come on. If people vote on either side because of discourse from random internet strangers, that’s ludicrous. On this thread, we’ve asked for statistics and exact reasons why feminists should vote Republican. The reasons have been because they believe in a fetus’s rights > its mother’s rights, and abortion division is a given. Then we heard that imprisoned women have to room with trans women. But, we haven’t seen any data about how widespread this is. They haven’t been able to articulate why this issue is the most important feminist issue over say improving maternal health including mental health, fighting for equal wages and equalizing wages for Black women, more money for medical testing on women, better access and affordability for childcare, and on.

And we told you that we don't care if you think we are feminists and we don't care what you think we should limit our attention to in terms of issues. We've repeatedly told you what issues matter to us. The issues that you listed are nice to have but right now, we don't even have basics like security and economy working well. I also don't agree with "equal wages" when it's just a euphemism for socialism.

Let Fox and OAN continue to do all your thinking for you. You haven’t had an independent thought since your father started brainwashing you as a child. Oh no! I was mean online (unlike Trump who is mean online, in person and in policy)! Now you’ll have to go make a donation to Trump in retaliation!

It’s always remarkable to me how freely leftists engage in explicit sexism when they encounter a woman who doesn’t fawn over them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican women in the age range you mentioned are by and large intelligent, articulate, understand the role of government and are carrying concealed weapons to ward off criminals and rapists.

They have conservative views, are willing to compromise on abortion, with laws similar to what exists in Europe. They want a secure border and support giving people a hand up without providing perpetual handouts.

In other words typical normal people that lean a little right of center who are never going to support the extreme views of the progressive wing no matter how loudly they shout.

You must be a smug idiot to think women can just ward off rapists.

Aren’t you one of the people that think it’s fine for imprisoned women to be cell mates with convicted rapists and male sex offenders? Don’t you believe the imprisoned women can just ward off the rapists who now identify as women and share their cells? Why would this be any different? At least the PP has a gun.

Time to stop drinking and get out of mommy's basement.

So yes, you believe women prisoners should be imprisoned with convicted male rapists who now identify as women. Got it.

Moron. No one wrote that.

Yep. Seems like some angry right winger is hard at work strawmanning and sock puppeting tonight.

We are still waiting for the PP who resorted to name-calling (“Moron.”) to come out and state that he fully opposes housing biological female prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, and that he is opposed to the political party that is supporting that policy.

Why should someone have to speak to something they never said in the first place? That was your strawman, not theirs.

So, do you support housing biological women prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, which is currently supported by the Democratic Party? Yes or no? It’s a straightforward question.

You don't want a sleazy pervert who commits sexual assault in prison with women but you DO want him to run the country? Yes or no? It's a straightforward question.

I’m not voting for Trump. I don’t want transwomen convicted of sexual assault and rape housed with biological women and I don’t want Trump as my president.

Yet you support a party that fully backs and endorses sleazy sex-abuser Trump, which refuses to question anything Trump says or does, which installed Trump's daughter-in-law as RNC chair...

I literally said I am not voting for Trump. I’m not a Republican. I just understand why women in their 30s/40s might be Republican. Hint: it’s people like you.

Oh come on. If people vote on either side because of discourse from random internet strangers, that’s ludicrous. On this thread, we’ve asked for statistics and exact reasons why feminists should vote Republican. The reasons have been because they believe in a fetus’s rights > its mother’s rights, and abortion division is a given. Then we heard that imprisoned women have to room with trans women. But, we haven’t seen any data about how widespread this is. They haven’t been able to articulate why this issue is the most important feminist issue over say improving maternal health including mental health, fighting for equal wages and equalizing wages for Black women, more money for medical testing on women, better access and affordability for childcare, and on.

Love how you’ve decided that women need to subvert all their issues. As usual, men are more important to you. Grotesque.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are forcing poor women to have babies they can’t feed, cloth, raise. Why?
I’m an educator. Do you know how hard it is to educate an unwanted child?
But, that’s what repubs want right? More factory workers. Servants.

Which states have banned adoption?

A woman should not be forced to carry.

That’s not what you said, is it? Let us know when the state starts forcing men or women to raise the children that they created.

So now the GOP will bring us forced adoptions along with forced births? Horrifying.

Both female and male parents have the “choice” to not raise the children which they have created. I’d think it would popular among the pro-choice crowd.

You would think wrong. Just stay out of all of these private decisions. If you want to give birth and give up the baby for adoption, that is your decision. It is not your place to insert yourself into that decision for other people's families. Butt out.

Then it sounds like we agree. No one, Democrats or Republicans, is forcing women to feed, clothe, and raise babies.

It sounds like we don't agree at all. You are dense or something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican women in the age range you mentioned are by and large intelligent, articulate, understand the role of government and are carrying concealed weapons to ward off criminals and rapists.

They have conservative views, are willing to compromise on abortion, with laws similar to what exists in Europe. They want a secure border and support giving people a hand up without providing perpetual handouts.

In other words typical normal people that lean a little right of center who are never going to support the extreme views of the progressive wing no matter how loudly they shout.

You must be a smug idiot to think women can just ward off rapists.

Aren’t you one of the people that think it’s fine for imprisoned women to be cell mates with convicted rapists and male sex offenders? Don’t you believe the imprisoned women can just ward off the rapists who now identify as women and share their cells? Why would this be any different? At least the PP has a gun.

Time to stop drinking and get out of mommy's basement.

So yes, you believe women prisoners should be imprisoned with convicted male rapists who now identify as women. Got it.

Moron. No one wrote that.

Yep. Seems like some angry right winger is hard at work strawmanning and sock puppeting tonight.

We are still waiting for the PP who resorted to name-calling (“Moron.”) to come out and state that he fully opposes housing biological female prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, and that he is opposed to the political party that is supporting that policy.

Why should someone have to speak to something they never said in the first place? That was your strawman, not theirs.

So, do you support housing biological women prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, which is currently supported by the Democratic Party? Yes or no? It’s a straightforward question.

You don't want a sleazy pervert who commits sexual assault in prison with women but you DO want him to run the country? Yes or no? It's a straightforward question.

I’m not voting for Trump. I don’t want transwomen convicted of sexual assault and rape housed with biological women and I don’t want Trump as my president.

Yet you support a party that fully backs and endorses sleazy sex-abuser Trump, which refuses to question anything Trump says or does, which installed Trump's daughter-in-law as RNC chair...

I literally said I am not voting for Trump. I’m not a Republican. I just understand why women in their 30s/40s might be Republican. Hint: it’s people like you.

Oh come on. If people vote on either side because of discourse from random internet strangers, that’s ludicrous. On this thread, we’ve asked for statistics and exact reasons why feminists should vote Republican. The reasons have been because they believe in a fetus’s rights > its mother’s rights, and abortion division is a given. Then we heard that imprisoned women have to room with trans women. But, we haven’t seen any data about how widespread this is. They haven’t been able to articulate why this issue is the most important feminist issue over say improving maternal health including mental health, fighting for equal wages and equalizing wages for Black women, more money for medical testing on women, better access and affordability for childcare, and on.

And we told you that we don't care if you think we are feminists and we don't care what you think we should limit our attention to in terms of issues. We've repeatedly told you what issues matter to us. The issues that you listed are nice to have but right now, we don't even have basics like security and economy working well. I also don't agree with "equal wages" when it's just a euphemism for socialism.

Let Fox and OAN continue to do all your thinking for you. You haven’t had an independent thought since your father started brainwashing you as a child. Oh no! I was mean online (unlike Trump who is mean online, in person and in policy)! Now you’ll have to go make a donation to Trump in retaliation!

It’s always remarkable to me how freely leftists engage in explicit sexism when they encounter a woman who doesn’t fawn over them.

The conservative machine and media brainwashes everyone who's exposed to it for long enough, regardless of gender. Weird that you are making this about "sexism" - probably the same poster from above who was randomly accusing people of misogyny upthread, without any sound basis for doing so. I have plenty of relatives male and female alike who spout the FOX News and other right wing talking points with zero self-awareness, zero critical thinking, zero logic applied, and not a single millisecond devoted to fact checking their talking points. I call that brainwashing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican women in the age range you mentioned are by and large intelligent, articulate, understand the role of government and are carrying concealed weapons to ward off criminals and rapists.

They have conservative views, are willing to compromise on abortion, with laws similar to what exists in Europe. They want a secure border and support giving people a hand up without providing perpetual handouts.

In other words typical normal people that lean a little right of center who are never going to support the extreme views of the progressive wing no matter how loudly they shout.

You must be a smug idiot to think women can just ward off rapists.

Aren’t you one of the people that think it’s fine for imprisoned women to be cell mates with convicted rapists and male sex offenders? Don’t you believe the imprisoned women can just ward off the rapists who now identify as women and share their cells? Why would this be any different? At least the PP has a gun.

Time to stop drinking and get out of mommy's basement.

So yes, you believe women prisoners should be imprisoned with convicted male rapists who now identify as women. Got it.

Moron. No one wrote that.

Yep. Seems like some angry right winger is hard at work strawmanning and sock puppeting tonight.

We are still waiting for the PP who resorted to name-calling (“Moron.”) to come out and state that he fully opposes housing biological female prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, and that he is opposed to the political party that is supporting that policy.

Why should someone have to speak to something they never said in the first place? That was your strawman, not theirs.

So, do you support housing biological women prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, which is currently supported by the Democratic Party? Yes or no? It’s a straightforward question.

You don't want a sleazy pervert who commits sexual assault in prison with women but you DO want him to run the country? Yes or no? It's a straightforward question.

I’m not voting for Trump. I don’t want transwomen convicted of sexual assault and rape housed with biological women and I don’t want Trump as my president.

Yet you support a party that fully backs and endorses sleazy sex-abuser Trump, which refuses to question anything Trump says or does, which installed Trump's daughter-in-law as RNC chair...

I literally said I am not voting for Trump. I’m not a Republican. I just understand why women in their 30s/40s might be Republican. Hint: it’s people like you.

Oh come on. If people vote on either side because of discourse from random internet strangers, that’s ludicrous. On this thread, we’ve asked for statistics and exact reasons why feminists should vote Republican. The reasons have been because they believe in a fetus’s rights > its mother’s rights, and abortion division is a given. Then we heard that imprisoned women have to room with trans women. But, we haven’t seen any data about how widespread this is. They haven’t been able to articulate why this issue is the most important feminist issue over say improving maternal health including mental health, fighting for equal wages and equalizing wages for Black women, more money for medical testing on women, better access and affordability for childcare, and on.

Love how you’ve decided that women need to subvert all their issues. As usual, men are more important to you. Grotesque.

DP... I don't understand this response at all. How is the PP saying men are more important? I didn't see anything to warrant that in the comment you are responding to. The PP was merely asking how issues should be prioritized.

Should every other issue of concern to women be completely subverted and be subordinate in order to deal with trans people in prisons? Another woman's interest in womens health, maternal health, access to affordable childcare, equal wages for women, access to contraception and reproductive health, paid family leave, support for women-owned businesses, anti-discrimination laws against women, addressing domestic violence, human sex trafficking, improved political representation by women, and all of these other issues need to shut up, sit down and take a back seat because you demand the issue of transwomen in women's prisons be the top priority?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican women in the age range you mentioned are by and large intelligent, articulate, understand the role of government and are carrying concealed weapons to ward off criminals and rapists.

They have conservative views, are willing to compromise on abortion, with laws similar to what exists in Europe. They want a secure border and support giving people a hand up without providing perpetual handouts.

In other words typical normal people that lean a little right of center who are never going to support the extreme views of the progressive wing no matter how loudly they shout.

You must be a smug idiot to think women can just ward off rapists.

Aren’t you one of the people that think it’s fine for imprisoned women to be cell mates with convicted rapists and male sex offenders? Don’t you believe the imprisoned women can just ward off the rapists who now identify as women and share their cells? Why would this be any different? At least the PP has a gun.

Time to stop drinking and get out of mommy's basement.

So yes, you believe women prisoners should be imprisoned with convicted male rapists who now identify as women. Got it.

Moron. No one wrote that.

Yep. Seems like some angry right winger is hard at work strawmanning and sock puppeting tonight.

We are still waiting for the PP who resorted to name-calling (“Moron.”) to come out and state that he fully opposes housing biological female prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, and that he is opposed to the political party that is supporting that policy.

Why should someone have to speak to something they never said in the first place? That was your strawman, not theirs.

So, do you support housing biological women prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, which is currently supported by the Democratic Party? Yes or no? It’s a straightforward question.

You don't want a sleazy pervert who commits sexual assault in prison with women but you DO want him to run the country? Yes or no? It's a straightforward question.

I’m not voting for Trump. I don’t want transwomen convicted of sexual assault and rape housed with biological women and I don’t want Trump as my president.

Yet you support a party that fully backs and endorses sleazy sex-abuser Trump, which refuses to question anything Trump says or does, which installed Trump's daughter-in-law as RNC chair...

I literally said I am not voting for Trump. I’m not a Republican. I just understand why women in their 30s/40s might be Republican. Hint: it’s people like you.

Oh come on. If people vote on either side because of discourse from random internet strangers, that’s ludicrous. On this thread, we’ve asked for statistics and exact reasons why feminists should vote Republican. The reasons have been because they believe in a fetus’s rights > its mother’s rights, and abortion division is a given. Then we heard that imprisoned women have to room with trans women. But, we haven’t seen any data about how widespread this is. They haven’t been able to articulate why this issue is the most important feminist issue over say improving maternal health including mental health, fighting for equal wages and equalizing wages for Black women, more money for medical testing on women, better access and affordability for childcare, and on.

And we told you that we don't care if you think we are feminists and we don't care what you think we should limit our attention to in terms of issues. We've repeatedly told you what issues matter to us. The issues that you listed are nice to have but right now, we don't even have basics like security and economy working well. I also don't agree with "equal wages" when it's just a euphemism for socialism.

Let Fox and OAN continue to do all your thinking for you. You haven’t had an independent thought since your father started brainwashing you as a child. Oh no! I was mean online (unlike Trump who is mean online, in person and in policy)! Now you’ll have to go make a donation to Trump in retaliation!

It’s always remarkable to me how freely leftists engage in explicit sexism when they encounter a woman who doesn’t fawn over them.

The conservative machine and media brainwashes everyone who's exposed to it for long enough, regardless of gender. Weird that you are making this about "sexism" - probably the same poster from above who was randomly accusing people of misogyny upthread, without any sound basis for doing so. I have plenty of relatives male and female alike who spout the FOX News and other right wing talking points with zero self-awareness, zero critical thinking, zero logic applied, and not a single millisecond devoted to fact checking their talking points. I call that brainwashing.

Aren’t you the poster who told the female PP who had the temerity to disagree with you that she had been brainwashed by her father? And yet you simultaneously believe you aren’t a raging sexist? Man, the lack of self-awareness is quite something to see.

I realize that you don’t believe women are capable of independent thought, as that is currently the position of the progressive left and you just freely demonstrated that, but that can’t stop everyone else from seeing your deeply patriarchal and anti-woman world view.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican women in the age range you mentioned are by and large intelligent, articulate, understand the role of government and are carrying concealed weapons to ward off criminals and rapists.

They have conservative views, are willing to compromise on abortion, with laws similar to what exists in Europe. They want a secure border and support giving people a hand up without providing perpetual handouts.

In other words typical normal people that lean a little right of center who are never going to support the extreme views of the progressive wing no matter how loudly they shout.

You must be a smug idiot to think women can just ward off rapists.

Aren’t you one of the people that think it’s fine for imprisoned women to be cell mates with convicted rapists and male sex offenders? Don’t you believe the imprisoned women can just ward off the rapists who now identify as women and share their cells? Why would this be any different? At least the PP has a gun.

Time to stop drinking and get out of mommy's basement.

So yes, you believe women prisoners should be imprisoned with convicted male rapists who now identify as women. Got it.

Moron. No one wrote that.

Yep. Seems like some angry right winger is hard at work strawmanning and sock puppeting tonight.

We are still waiting for the PP who resorted to name-calling (“Moron.”) to come out and state that he fully opposes housing biological female prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, and that he is opposed to the political party that is supporting that policy.

Why should someone have to speak to something they never said in the first place? That was your strawman, not theirs.

So, do you support housing biological women prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, which is currently supported by the Democratic Party? Yes or no? It’s a straightforward question.

You don't want a sleazy pervert who commits sexual assault in prison with women but you DO want him to run the country? Yes or no? It's a straightforward question.

I’m not voting for Trump. I don’t want transwomen convicted of sexual assault and rape housed with biological women and I don’t want Trump as my president.

Yet you support a party that fully backs and endorses sleazy sex-abuser Trump, which refuses to question anything Trump says or does, which installed Trump's daughter-in-law as RNC chair...

I literally said I am not voting for Trump. I’m not a Republican. I just understand why women in their 30s/40s might be Republican. Hint: it’s people like you.

Oh come on. If people vote on either side because of discourse from random internet strangers, that’s ludicrous. On this thread, we’ve asked for statistics and exact reasons why feminists should vote Republican. The reasons have been because they believe in a fetus’s rights > its mother’s rights, and abortion division is a given. Then we heard that imprisoned women have to room with trans women. But, we haven’t seen any data about how widespread this is. They haven’t been able to articulate why this issue is the most important feminist issue over say improving maternal health including mental health, fighting for equal wages and equalizing wages for Black women, more money for medical testing on women, better access and affordability for childcare, and on.

And we told you that we don't care if you think we are feminists and we don't care what you think we should limit our attention to in terms of issues. We've repeatedly told you what issues matter to us. The issues that you listed are nice to have but right now, we don't even have basics like security and economy working well. I also don't agree with "equal wages" when it's just a euphemism for socialism.

Let Fox and OAN continue to do all your thinking for you. You haven’t had an independent thought since your father started brainwashing you as a child. Oh no! I was mean online (unlike Trump who is mean online, in person and in policy)! Now you’ll have to go make a donation to Trump in retaliation!

It’s always remarkable to me how freely leftists engage in explicit sexism when they encounter a woman who doesn’t fawn over them.

The conservative machine and media brainwashes everyone who's exposed to it for long enough, regardless of gender. Weird that you are making this about "sexism" - probably the same poster from above who was randomly accusing people of misogyny upthread, without any sound basis for doing so. I have plenty of relatives male and female alike who spout the FOX News and other right wing talking points with zero self-awareness, zero critical thinking, zero logic applied, and not a single millisecond devoted to fact checking their talking points. I call that brainwashing.

Aren’t you the poster who told the female PP who had the temerity to disagree with you that she had been brainwashed by her father? And yet you simultaneously believe you aren’t a raging sexist? Man, the lack of self-awareness is quite something to see.

I realize that you don’t believe women are capable of independent thought, as that is currently the position of the progressive left and you just freely demonstrated that, but that can’t stop everyone else from seeing your deeply patriarchal and anti-woman world view.

Nope. There are multiple posters in this thread. How about responding to comments based on what they actually contain on their own, rather than trying to conflate with what someone else said or what you imagined they thought while posting?

Your entire retort completely missed the mark for that reason.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican women in the age range you mentioned are by and large intelligent, articulate, understand the role of government and are carrying concealed weapons to ward off criminals and rapists.

They have conservative views, are willing to compromise on abortion, with laws similar to what exists in Europe. They want a secure border and support giving people a hand up without providing perpetual handouts.

In other words typical normal people that lean a little right of center who are never going to support the extreme views of the progressive wing no matter how loudly they shout.

You must be a smug idiot to think women can just ward off rapists.

Aren’t you one of the people that think it’s fine for imprisoned women to be cell mates with convicted rapists and male sex offenders? Don’t you believe the imprisoned women can just ward off the rapists who now identify as women and share their cells? Why would this be any different? At least the PP has a gun.

Time to stop drinking and get out of mommy's basement.

So yes, you believe women prisoners should be imprisoned with convicted male rapists who now identify as women. Got it.

Moron. No one wrote that.

Yep. Seems like some angry right winger is hard at work strawmanning and sock puppeting tonight.

We are still waiting for the PP who resorted to name-calling (“Moron.”) to come out and state that he fully opposes housing biological female prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, and that he is opposed to the political party that is supporting that policy.

Why should someone have to speak to something they never said in the first place? That was your strawman, not theirs.

So, do you support housing biological women prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, which is currently supported by the Democratic Party? Yes or no? It’s a straightforward question.

You don't want a sleazy pervert who commits sexual assault in prison with women but you DO want him to run the country? Yes or no? It's a straightforward question.

I’m not voting for Trump. I don’t want transwomen convicted of sexual assault and rape housed with biological women and I don’t want Trump as my president.

Yet you support a party that fully backs and endorses sleazy sex-abuser Trump, which refuses to question anything Trump says or does, which installed Trump's daughter-in-law as RNC chair...

I literally said I am not voting for Trump. I’m not a Republican. I just understand why women in their 30s/40s might be Republican. Hint: it’s people like you.

Oh come on. If people vote on either side because of discourse from random internet strangers, that’s ludicrous. On this thread, we’ve asked for statistics and exact reasons why feminists should vote Republican. The reasons have been because they believe in a fetus’s rights > its mother’s rights, and abortion division is a given. Then we heard that imprisoned women have to room with trans women. But, we haven’t seen any data about how widespread this is. They haven’t been able to articulate why this issue is the most important feminist issue over say improving maternal health including mental health, fighting for equal wages and equalizing wages for Black women, more money for medical testing on women, better access and affordability for childcare, and on.

And we told you that we don't care if you think we are feminists and we don't care what you think we should limit our attention to in terms of issues. We've repeatedly told you what issues matter to us. The issues that you listed are nice to have but right now, we don't even have basics like security and economy working well. I also don't agree with "equal wages" when it's just a euphemism for socialism.

Let Fox and OAN continue to do all your thinking for you. You haven’t had an independent thought since your father started brainwashing you as a child. Oh no! I was mean online (unlike Trump who is mean online, in person and in policy)! Now you’ll have to go make a donation to Trump in retaliation!

It’s always remarkable to me how freely leftists engage in explicit sexism when they encounter a woman who doesn’t fawn over them.

The conservative machine and media brainwashes everyone who's exposed to it for long enough, regardless of gender. Weird that you are making this about "sexism" - probably the same poster from above who was randomly accusing people of misogyny upthread, without any sound basis for doing so. I have plenty of relatives male and female alike who spout the FOX News and other right wing talking points with zero self-awareness, zero critical thinking, zero logic applied, and not a single millisecond devoted to fact checking their talking points. I call that brainwashing.

Aren’t you the poster who told the female PP who had the temerity to disagree with you that she had been brainwashed by her father? And yet you simultaneously believe you aren’t a raging sexist? Man, the lack of self-awareness is quite something to see.

I realize that you don’t believe women are capable of independent thought, as that is currently the position of the progressive left and you just freely demonstrated that, but that can’t stop everyone else from seeing your deeply patriarchal and anti-woman world view.

Nope. There are multiple posters in this thread. How about responding to comments based on what they actually contain on their own, rather than trying to conflate with what someone else said or what you imagined they thought while posting?

Your entire retort completely missed the mark for that reason.

Do you even understand how DCUM works.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republican women in the age range you mentioned are by and large intelligent, articulate, understand the role of government and are carrying concealed weapons to ward off criminals and rapists.

They have conservative views, are willing to compromise on abortion, with laws similar to what exists in Europe. They want a secure border and support giving people a hand up without providing perpetual handouts.

In other words typical normal people that lean a little right of center who are never going to support the extreme views of the progressive wing no matter how loudly they shout.

You must be a smug idiot to think women can just ward off rapists.

Aren’t you one of the people that think it’s fine for imprisoned women to be cell mates with convicted rapists and male sex offenders? Don’t you believe the imprisoned women can just ward off the rapists who now identify as women and share their cells? Why would this be any different? At least the PP has a gun.

Time to stop drinking and get out of mommy's basement.

So yes, you believe women prisoners should be imprisoned with convicted male rapists who now identify as women. Got it.

Moron. No one wrote that.

Yep. Seems like some angry right winger is hard at work strawmanning and sock puppeting tonight.

We are still waiting for the PP who resorted to name-calling (“Moron.”) to come out and state that he fully opposes housing biological female prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, and that he is opposed to the political party that is supporting that policy.

Why should someone have to speak to something they never said in the first place? That was your strawman, not theirs.

So, do you support housing biological women prisoners with transwomen convicted of rape or sexual assault, which is currently supported by the Democratic Party? Yes or no? It’s a straightforward question.

You don't want a sleazy pervert who commits sexual assault in prison with women but you DO want him to run the country? Yes or no? It's a straightforward question.

I’m not voting for Trump. I don’t want transwomen convicted of sexual assault and rape housed with biological women and I don’t want Trump as my president.

Yet you support a party that fully backs and endorses sleazy sex-abuser Trump, which refuses to question anything Trump says or does, which installed Trump's daughter-in-law as RNC chair...

I literally said I am not voting for Trump. I’m not a Republican. I just understand why women in their 30s/40s might be Republican. Hint: it’s people like you.

Oh come on. If people vote on either side because of discourse from random internet strangers, that’s ludicrous. On this thread, we’ve asked for statistics and exact reasons why feminists should vote Republican. The reasons have been because they believe in a fetus’s rights > its mother’s rights, and abortion division is a given. Then we heard that imprisoned women have to room with trans women. But, we haven’t seen any data about how widespread this is. They haven’t been able to articulate why this issue is the most important feminist issue over say improving maternal health including mental health, fighting for equal wages and equalizing wages for Black women, more money for medical testing on women, better access and affordability for childcare, and on.

Love how you’ve decided that women need to subvert all their issues. As usual, men are more important to you. Grotesque.

DP... I don't understand this response at all. How is the PP saying men are more important? I didn't see anything to warrant that in the comment you are responding to. The PP was merely asking how issues should be prioritized.

Should every other issue of concern to women be completely subverted and be subordinate in order to deal with trans people in prisons? Another woman's interest in womens health, maternal health, access to affordable childcare, equal wages for women, access to contraception and reproductive health, paid family leave, support for women-owned businesses, anti-discrimination laws against women, addressing domestic violence, human sex trafficking, improved political representation by women, and all of these other issues need to shut up, sit down and take a back seat because you demand the issue of transwomen in women's prisons be the top priority?

All of those other women's issues being deprioritized is exactly what would happen if large numbers of women agreed with the PP and made their sole focus to be outrage over trans women in women's prisons and as a result, voted a straight R ticket. Thankfully most women don't agree with the PP. While sure, they don't want to see other women being abused in prison, they have the sense to not throw away everything else that has been so hard fought over their lifetimes for that one issue by voting R.