
Go away weirdo. Also you are unlikely to come out ahead in a data analysis discussion, because you can’t do even basic math. |
If you know you are right why are you so threatened by any other discussion or decisions on the topic? Why do you have such a hard time staying on topic. You are laser focused on justifying your choices vs staying on topic which is how do kids feel about it? There is an assumption that kids held back doing well are only doing well because they are held back. Reality is they probably would have been fine in either grade. Kids with academic or behavioral issues need more support and holding back doesn’t always fix things. So, back to the discussion. How do older kids feel about it? How does it impact them as 18-19 year old seniors? Is being the first to drive really a good thing? I personally don’t think so. Is it the best to be the most physically mature like another poster stated? Is it best to not be challenged in school? What is going on with preschools if these kids are not prepared for K as the parents state? |
So, instead of a discussion the best you can do is name call? There is data on both sides and you can google it if you are interested. I very much can do math and a child held back from January to June would turn 19 in high school. The discussion is not about data but about how the kids feel about it? Start your own thread to name call, bully and discuss, although you are not capable of discussion, data. |
Why don't you just reread this thread? The question has been answered. I guess you're still waiting for some unicorn to come and make your point for you. Redshirted kids are doing just fine. There's plenty of data to support that. You just won't bother to read it. |
No, you have turned it into the same argument to prove you are right that all kids with spring, summer and early fall birthdays should be held back. I have read the thread. However the topic is on how do older kids feel about it? There is data both ways on kids are fine and kids are not fine and why it’s a bad idea. You are only looking at one sided data to prove you were right to hold your kids back. But, again the data is not the discussion. The discussion is about how these kids feel who were held back. Data is not feelings. Anytime someone says their kids are fine going on time you argue why they are not. Does that boost your ego to name call? But, here is an article for you on future possible outcomes. https://ed.stanford.edu/in-the-media/does-redshirting-kindergarteners-harm-or-help-years-go?newsletter=true |
Me? Lol. There are several people here. |
An article about what happened to kids redshirted in 1985? Cool story. |
You still can’t do math. Lol. Poor thing. |
It’s more recent than the statistics posted above and the article is relevant even though you don’t like what it says. It’s the outcome which is what the holding back bully was asking for. |
If you hold back a year they are 18 going in as seniors and turn 19. How is that hard to get? Funny how you cannot have a civil discussion. They turn 18 in spring of junior year. |
Typically redshirted kids the youngest in their grade to begin with, so they are less than a few months from the cutoff. Let’s say the cutoff is Sept 1st and it is an August birthday. Summer birthdays are the norm. So in their last year of high school, they do not turn 19 until after graduation and before college. They are no more than a few months older than the kids following the regular cutoffs. It is actually pretty trivial. |
Except in NY and a few other areas fall kids miss the cutoff. That is not redshirting. Redshirting is generally February to August birthdays with the primary being March to July. So, March to June would turn 19. It’s not pretty trivial. Then they start college at 19 instead of 18. |
Natural law redshirter makes an appearance!! Oh crazy lady, I love your totally nuts posts. Please tell us more about how it’s natural law that cutoffs should be Jan 1. Love those posts. |
I’m in NY where public school cut off is 12/31, and private school cut offs vary between 9/1 and 12/31. My kids have September and November bdays and are probably attending a private school with a December cutoff. I plan to redshirt both of them. They would both turn 18 in their senior year of high school. So anti redshirter really can’t do math. The vast majority of redshirts are not May birthdays and won’t turn 19 in high school. What’s ridiculous is the lack of a standardized cutoff across the country and even locally. The curriculum and testing is fairly standardized across the country so there is no reason that a child with a fall birthday should be able to start K in NY at 4, but that same child would start a full year later in California or Illinois where the cutoff is 9/1. In NY, the 12/31 cutoff is a way to provide childcare to lower income families. That is admirable, but at the same time, is not a solution based on increasing academic and behavioral expection of kindergarteners |
Who gives a flying fart how old someone is when they start college? |