Mueller does not find Trump campaign knowingly conspired with Russia

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the American judicial system, the investigators investigate and the prosecutors assess and recommend. It is not up to the prosecutors to "establish" or "determine." That is up to a jury or in the case of President, the Congress.

If the Trump Administration is so clear of exoneration, then there should be no issue with releasing the full report, unredacted (except for release of intel or other sensitive issues). Let's see all of Barr's use of phrases in full context.

The rest of this is just spin an noise.

+1 - Thank you. It is up to Congress (the House) to fully establish and determine the obstruction piece. Barr/Rosenstein/Mueller purposely left this door open. Trump and the campaign did not conspire they concluded, true, but they certainly welcomed the help of Russian operatives.

The question on the collusion piece is, "Do you as an American citizen want this type of person as your President? The kind of man who along with his aides openly welcomed the help of a foreign enemy win the election?"

Think about that as you vote again in 2020.

Neither the Trump campaign nor Trump ever reported actions of the Russian to the US authorities. Never. In fact, Trump railed against the US Intel repeatedly. Why?

It's so sweet to see you obviously moving the goalposts with such conviction and dedication.

Your ego is too invested in this, isn't it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the American judicial system, the investigators investigate and the prosecutors assess and recommend. It is not up to the prosecutors to "establish" or "determine." That is up to a jury or in the case of President, the Congress.

If the Trump Administration is so clear of exoneration, then there should be no issue with releasing the full report, unredacted (except for release of intel or other sensitive issues). Let's see all of Barr's use of phrases in full context.

The rest of this is just spin an noise.

+1 - Thank you. It is up to Congress (the House) to fully establish and determine the obstruction piece. Barr/Rosenstein/Mueller purposely left this door open. Trump and the campaign did not conspire they concluded, true, but they certainly welcomed the help of Russian operatives.

The question on the collusion piece is, "Do you as an American citizen want this type of person as your President? The kind of man who along with his aides openly welcomed the help of a foreign enemy win the election?"

Think about that as you vote again in 2020.

Neither the Trump campaign nor Trump ever reported actions of the Russian to the US authorities. Never. In fact, Trump railed against the US Intel repeatedly. Why?

It's so sweet to see you obviously moving the goalposts with such conviction and dedication.

Your ego is too invested in this, isn't it?

Why is it that every other campaign has reported such information to the FBI but not Trump's? Why are you excusing it? Or is your bar so low?

[Anonymous]

I would be curious to see the Trump supporters refute this take.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/03/mueller-report-barr-summary-obstruction-conspiracy-close-reading.html

[Anonymous]

And I would be curious for the Trump supporters to explain these several instances of obstruction and "collusion" in plain sight? https://twitter.com/waltshaub/status/1110140981465309185

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would be curious to see the Trump supporters refute this take.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/03/mueller-report-barr-summary-obstruction-conspiracy-close-reading.html

Refute what? Evidence that Mueller and his team of pitbull lawyers have seen and investigated and said “no collusion?”

Trump supporters don’t have to refute Mueller. Democrats do.

[Anonymous]

How many liberals are going to need therapy in the wake of this, seeing as they've virtually assured Trump's reelection in 2020?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would be curious to see the Trump supporters refute this take.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/03/mueller-report-barr-summary-obstruction-conspiracy-close-reading.html

Refute what? Evidence that Mueller and his team of pitbull lawyers have seen and investigated and said “no collusion?”

Trump supporters don’t have to refute Mueller. Democrats do.

+1 exactly

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would be curious to see the Trump supporters refute this take.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/03/mueller-report-barr-summary-obstruction-conspiracy-close-reading.html

Refute what? Evidence that Mueller and his team of pitbull lawyers have seen and investigated and said “no collusion?”

Trump supporters don’t have to refute Mueller. Democrats do.

Except that isn't what Mueller said. Please read more carefully.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would be curious to see the Trump supporters refute this take.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/03/mueller-report-barr-summary-obstruction-conspiracy-close-reading.html

Refute what? Evidence that Mueller and his team of pitbull lawyers have seen and investigated and said “no collusion?”

Trump supporters don’t have to refute Mueller. Democrats do.

+1 exactly

+2

The delusional crowd will now have to find a new conspiracy theory (believe, they will)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How many liberals are going to need therapy in the wake of this, seeing as they've virtually assured Trump's reelection in 2020?

Trump needs to push the "fake news" narrative hard now after this. You had the media pushing this thing really hard for the past 2+ years, in what has basically been a soft coup attempt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many liberals are going to need therapy in the wake of this, seeing as they've virtually assured Trump's reelection in 2020?

Trump needs to push the "fake news" narrative hard now after this. You had the media pushing this thing really hard for the past 2+ years, in what has basically been a soft coup attempt.

+1.

Essentially 50% of political news in US mainstream media for the last 2 years have been FAKE NEWS.

Those "uneducated" Trump voters are looking smarter by the day.

Also, I love Lindsey Graham.

[Anonymous]

Since Mueller said no collusion, the media and democrats are saying “whatever” and keeping the Russian issue going.

Which proves the democrats only care about the narrative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many liberals are going to need therapy in the wake of this, seeing as they've virtually assured Trump's reelection in 2020?

Trump needs to push the "fake news" narrative hard now after this. You had the media pushing this thing really hard for the past 2+ years, in what has basically been a soft coup attempt.

+1.

Essentially 50% of political news in US mainstream media for the last 2 years have been FAKE NEWS.

Those "uneducated" Trump voters are looking smarter by the day.

Also, I love Lindsey Graham.

Me too

[Anonymous]

Rush Limbaugh: "Once the Deep State realizes they can overturn elections, there will be no more free elections and you can say bye-bye America"

Truer words have never been spoken

We should not even legitimize this investigation by rejoicing over the results. There should have been no investigation to begin with.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Since Mueller said no collusion, the media and democrats are saying “whatever” and keeping the Russian issue going.

Which proves the democrats only care about the narrative.

The reason is they still plan to push the narratives in the House to go after impeachment. It will backfire big time.