I agree. I SAH, going on 3 years, and my DH actually asks me before making purchases with “his money.” DH and I have a shared life and we don’t see the income as “his money.” That would be a really strange and outdated view imo. |
Um what? |
|
For us personally, my husband’s 401k, though hefty by some standards, is smaller than most of our cash or investment accounts which I am a joint holder on.
This business with the 401k is a weird thing to get hung up on. |
It's as if some of these pps can't imagine a man would love and honor his wife. Isn't that part of the vow? |
That is nice. But that is not true for many women especially women who are in abusive relationships. A wife can not legally get access to a H account while married. Once you divorce you can get 1/2. |
I don't think people are talking about their own relationships. They just know that life is not perfect and it does not always work that way. It's nice your H/my H/me and you love and honor our spouses but many do not. Have you ever checked out the domestic violence stats? |
Ok... now we are talking about abusive relationships? What? |
|
I sincerely hope those of you who don't have access to your family's finances and who have exited the workforce for long periods of time do not have a situation where your husbands screw you over.
Unfortunately, I have seen situations where husbands drained bank accounts during a divorce, leaving the wife with nothing. You just never know. My grandma has told me for a long time that I need to always be able to take care of myself financially. That doesn't mean siphoning money off into some secret account, but it does mean having my name on all of our finances and--for me--continuing to work. |
That’s fine. But most are not in abusive relationships. Next. |
I find it very odd that anyone asks a spouse if they can purchase something (unless it’s like, a car). Presumably your husband is an adult? |
|
What a bizarre turn this thread has taken.
So first it was SAHM are stupid and lazy. Then they are keeping back ALL WOMEN. Then, oh, maybe not all women, WOHM just don’t like being attacked! Then WOHM are worried about SAHM not having financial access. And now we are bringing in abused SAHM and lamenting their lack of financial access? |
It happens, they find somebody new and it happens. I don't mean he has to beat you to be abusive. |
What point are you trying to make? Genuinely curious. Also, very classy to dismiss the abused with “next.” |
Yeah, I'm the PP who said that most people would presumably discourage a woman from staying home if her husband was an abusive alcoholic. There are some circumstances in which stay at home is a bad idea, no doubt. If your DH is abusive, don't quit your job and stay at home. If your DH is unemployed and you don't have any other source of income, don't quit your job and stay at home. If you don't trust your DH, don't quit your job and stay at home (frankly, don't have children with him in the first place). Again, just because there are some circumstances in which a woman shouldn't stay home doesn't mean there's anything intrinsically wrong with staying home. |
Everyone in here is saying they do have full access to every account. |