Billionaire heiress abducted during her Friday morning run in Memphis

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Husband paid the guy to do it. Just like that guy in Boston in the 80s

Um, no. Charles Stuart did it himself and made up a black assailant a la Susan Smith.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is going on? Sounds like a nasty POS criminal is responsible for this. Does it matter if the husband had tattoos, was or wasn’t employed, or even was or wasn’t an addict. Seems he had nothing to do with this so let’s not tear apart the poor man dealing with an awful situation.

Watch this 60 clip with the sound off.

What is the inference regarding his body language? Yes, he touches his face 6 or 7 times in 60 seconds. Does that infer a guilty conscience or just that he might be on drugs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if this woman is autistic. It explains the huge forced smile in every single picture. She also has kind of vacant look in the eyes that is subtle but I see in a lot of autistic people. It would also explain hyper fixation on running, making unsafe choices like going for a run at 4:30 am and not understanding and following implied WASPy norms/obligations—aka marrying someone outside of her “caste” as one PP put it (gross).

That was my thought as well. On the spectrum, which may explain why she wasn’t swooped up by a high status boy in college. Or SSRIs. Something is off about her exaggerated smile in every photo. And her judgement with the spouse and jogging routine suggests this is a pattern of behavior. Plus being just a pre-k teacher with her credentials and at her age.

Her public posts about her marriage are also very off. Beyond oversharing.

Link?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is going on? Sounds like a nasty POS criminal is responsible for this. Does it matter if the husband had tattoos, was or wasn’t employed, or even was or wasn’t an addict. Seems he had nothing to do with this so let’s not tear apart the poor man dealing with an awful situation.

Watch this 60 clip with the sound off.

What is the inference regarding his body language? Yes, he touches his face 6 or 7 times in 60 seconds. Does that infer a guilty conscience or just that he might be on drugs?

There's a site called Bombards body language / body language ghost, where she analyzes all kinds of people including the rich & famous and especially criminals. This would be a good one for her to review.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if this woman is autistic. It explains the huge forced smile in every single picture. She also has kind of vacant look in the eyes that is subtle but I see in a lot of autistic people. It would also explain hyper fixation on running, making unsafe choices like going for a run at 4:30 am and not understanding and following implied WASPy norms/obligations—aka marrying someone outside of her “caste” as one PP put it (gross).

That was my thought as well. On the spectrum, which may explain why she wasn’t swooped up by a high status boy in college. Or SSRIs. Something is off about her exaggerated smile in every photo. And her judgement with the spouse and jogging routine suggests this is a pattern of behavior. Plus being just a pre-k teacher with her credentials and at her age.

Her public posts about her marriage are also very off. Beyond oversharing.

Link?

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Husband paid the guy to do it. Just like that guy in Boston in the 80s

Maybe, but if this is the case, this individual will mostly likely eventually tell this to the police in an effort to strike some deal for some leniency. He would have nothing to gain by keeping it quiet if he knows that he is already implicated in the crime.

If he’s been in the system recently he knows to lawyer up. He ain’t talking.

He was arrested in June for theft, apparently. And since this is a long holiday weekend maybe he hasn’t met with his lawyer yet and will use her location as a bargaining tool.

[Anonymous]

I don’t want to jump to conclusions here but the fact that the spouse is usually responsible and that they were very public about marital problems does not bode well for the DH.

I know what it is about social media oversharers but it communicates a certain level of instability, drama, and impulsivity. Of course most of these people don’t murder their spouses but imo it adds to the perception that they were highly emotional people in a volition relationship.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t want to jump to conclusions here but the fact that the spouse is usually responsible and that they were very public about marital problems does not bode well for the DH.

I know what it is about social media oversharers but it communicates a certain level of instability, drama, and impulsivity. Of course most of these people don’t murder their spouses but imo it adds to the perception that they were highly emotional people in a volition relationship.

**volatile

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t want to jump to conclusions here but the fact that the spouse is usually responsible and that they were very public about marital problems does not bode well for the DH.

I know what it is about social media oversharers but it communicates a certain level of instability, drama, and impulsivity. Of course most of these people don’t murder their spouses but imo it adds to the perception that they were highly emotional people in a volition relationship.

It doesn't appear to me to be a planned abduction with the spouse hiring this person to do it. If so, it wasn't planned very carefully. It took police very little time to track down the vehicle and the driver, as the driver left his shoes there at the scene and returned the vehicle to the house of the person to whom the vehicle was registered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any body language experts want to analyze this. Hubby is quite fidgety.

Disheveled appearance, wiping nonexistent tears, and he’s aged very harshly in their short marriage. Most men settle down after marriage, he went from seemingly clean cut at the wedding to getting a bunch of visible tattoos and has aged 20 years. Red flags galore.

The hate and victim blaming of the husband is ridiculous. He is not morbidly obese (like most Americans), his shirt tail is tucked in. He is wearing
a belt. He is groomed. Many Americans continue to get tattoos throughout their life. His appearance is better than about 70% of males walking through the Atlanta airport and his wife is missing on top of things.

[Anonymous]

Rich Southern debutantes are married by early 20s, either to a boy she went to high school with or some rich Christian boy she would meet at Baylor University. It’s not like she was away in Manhattan too busy as a corporate lawyer. She’s a pre-k teacher. How’d she end up with this sketchy bum in her late 20s?

[Anonymous]

Cleotha Abston was only 16 when he kidnapped the lawyer, Kemper Durand. According to Durand, Abston had a documented criminal history for violent crime beginning at age 12:

"Durand also detailed Abston's lengthy history in the juvenile court system prior to his conviction for the kidnapping, the earliest of which, Durand said, dated back to 1995 when he was no older than 12-years-old. Abston also appeared in juvenile court records in 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999 for charges including theft, aggravated assault, aggravated assault with a weapon, and rape, according to Durand's statement.

Durand died in early February 2013, seven years before Abston would be released in November 2020 at age 36. In the two years since his release, there are no further documented charges against Abston in Shelby County."

https://www.commercialappeal.com/story/news/local/2022/09/04/eliza-fletcher-disappearance-what-we-know-arrest-affidavit-cleothra-abston/7993164001/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Awful. She seems like a lovely person. Her poor kids!

Is the husband the same age or older/younger?

Goodness. How do you know she is a lovely person?

NP. Why are you so eager to tear down a mom who was kidnapped?

I’m not. However, I am also not eager to anoint someone a good person simply because she is a white woman worth billions. There is no indication that she was either good or bad, but you know DCUM and their stereotypes.

…so…less-than-perfect and amazing people deserve to get kidnapped? That’s what you’re going with? Privileged but imperfect people = deserve to be kidnapped? Uh oh, 95% of DCUM, know that if something happens to you, we’ll tell your kids that you deserved it.

No, I am not. Stop playing obtuse or at least stop jumping into the middle of conversation without context. An earlier poster said she seems like a lovely person with nothing more than she was white, blonde and a billionaire heiress. How does that make a person lovely?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any body language experts want to analyze this. Hubby is quite fidgety.

Disheveled appearance, wiping nonexistent tears, and he’s aged very harshly in their short marriage. Most men settle down after marriage, he went from seemingly clean cut at the wedding to getting a bunch of visible tattoos and has aged 20 years. Red flags galore.

The hate and victim blaming of the husband is ridiculous. He is not morbidly obese (like most Americans), his shirt tail is tucked in. He is wearing
a belt. He is groomed. Many Americans continue to get tattoos throughout their life. His appearance is better than about 70% of males walking through the Atlanta airport and his wife is missing on top of things.

Hartsfield–Jackson is hardly an arbiter of breeding and good taste.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Awful. She seems like a lovely person. Her poor kids!

Is the husband the same age or older/younger?

Goodness. How do you know she is a lovely person?

NP. Why are you so eager to tear down a mom who was kidnapped?

I’m not. However, I am also not eager to anoint someone a good person simply because she is a white woman worth billions. There is no indication that she was either good or bad, but you know DCUM and their stereotypes.

…so…less-than-perfect and amazing people deserve to get kidnapped? That’s what you’re going with? Privileged but imperfect people = deserve to be kidnapped? Uh oh, 95% of DCUM, know that if something happens to you, we’ll tell your kids that you deserved it.

No, I am not. Stop playing obtuse or at least stop jumping into the middle of conversation without context. An earlier poster said she seems like a lovely person with nothing more than she was white, blonde and a billionaire heiress. How does that make a person lovely?

She’s a teacher who is married with two kids who likes to exercise. Sounds pleasant enough. Show me some evidence that she was a horrible person who deserve to be kidnapped.