Montgomery- 5 more days and masks off.

[Anonymous]

It what if the seceb day average goes back under 50 by Wednesday? They can’t keep lifting and reinstating every seven days ! This is crazy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s a perfectly sane policy and in line with CDC guidance. Wear masks when levels are higher than a certain number. Give folks a few days to plan and business to prepare. This is going to be forever. Makes perfect sense to me. Nothing is restricted. No one is panicking. Wear masks when the community transmission levels are above the number. Optional when below.

Easy. Sensible

Right. To me it is the equivalent of carrying an umbrella on certain days and leaving it at home on other days. And, I truly do not understand the hysteria against periodic mask wearing when necessary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: It what if the seceb day average goes back under 50 by Wednesday? They can’t keep lifting and reinstating every seven days ! This is crazy.

Yes, this is concerning. They should increase the time necessary to life the mask mandate. Instead of 7 maybe 14 or even 21 days. And then allow for some fluctuation before reinstating a mask mandate. Because constantly going back and forth is ridiculous in terms of formal policy/mandate.

[Anonymous]

If people put in as much effort to follow the guidelines and protocols of our health officials that they put into trying to defy science at every turn, then maybe this pandemic would be relegated by now and mask mandates would no longer be needed?

Of course, that will never happen since half of this country's raison d'être is to own the libs and will never comply to logic and sensibility. So here we are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: It what if the seceb day average goes back under 50 by Wednesday? They can’t keep lifting and reinstating every seven days ! This is crazy.

Yes, this is concerning. They should increase the time necessary to life the mask mandate. Instead of 7 maybe 14 or even 21 days. And then allow for some fluctuation before reinstating a mask mandate. Because constantly going back and forth is ridiculous in terms of formal policy/mandate.

They should just require it for county facilities (to maximize protection for their employees and the public using those facilities) and make it recommended everywhere else. Not everything has to be a rule. It's fair for them to make rules for their own buildings (and not difficult to move back and forth). Businesses should get to choose elsewhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If people put in as much effort to follow the guidelines and protocols of our health officials that they put into trying to defy science at every turn, then maybe this pandemic would be relegated by now and mask mandates would no longer be needed?

Of course, that will never happen since half of this country's raison d'être is to own the libs and will never comply to logic and sensibility. So here we are.

Has nothing to do with owning the libs (whom I'm to the left of), but continue to stick your science-denying head in the sand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: It what if the seceb day average goes back under 50 by Wednesday? They can’t keep lifting and reinstating every seven days ! This is crazy.

Yes, this is concerning. They should increase the time necessary to life the mask mandate. Instead of 7 maybe 14 or even 21 days. And then allow for some fluctuation before reinstating a mask mandate. Because constantly going back and forth is ridiculous in terms of formal policy/mandate.

This may end up happenign what the Council (acting as Board of Health) meets on Tuesday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: It what if the seceb day average goes back under 50 by Wednesday? They can’t keep lifting and reinstating every seven days ! This is crazy.

Yes, this is concerning. They should increase the time necessary to life the mask mandate. Instead of 7 maybe 14 or even 21 days. And then allow for some fluctuation before reinstating a mask mandate. Because constantly going back and forth is ridiculous in terms of formal policy/mandate.

This may end up happenign what the Council (acting as Board of Health) meets on Tuesday.

Please.. yes... I hope so. It's ridiculous to look at one day.

[Anonymous]

The MoCo show posted this breaking news:

BREAKING Press Release: Council Meets as the Board of Health on Nov. 2 to Introduce, Hold a Public Hearing and Vote on Amended Board of Health Regulation on Indoor Masking Requirements; Public Hearing Scheduled for 1:30 p.m.

The amended Board of Health regulation, sponsored by the Montgomery County Council, would require seven consecutive days of substantial COVID-19 transmission in the community for an indoor face covering requirement to be reinstated in areas open to the public. The requirement to wear face coverings in indoor spaces that are open to the public also terminates when the County returns to a status of moderate COVID-19 transmission for seven consecutive days.

Full press release available in the link below.

[Anonymous]

This at least makes a little more sense. Masks back on IF SEVEN DAYS OF INCREASED cases. But the other way around. At least that’s reasonable. Although I think they should base on 14 days or even monthly. * Unless people are dropping dead like flies. Obviously…

[Anonymous]

Or we could just keep a mask policy in place until covid is gone, eliminating all this confusion and back and forth.


Wouldn’t that make more sense?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Or we could just keep a mask policy in place until covid is gone, eliminating all this confusion and back and forth.


Wouldn’t that make more sense?

What’s your definition of “when Covid is gone”? Because Covid is here to stay just like the flu just like the common cold. You realize that don’t you? That would mean masks forever. I don’t think people want that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Or we could just keep a mask policy in place until covid is gone, eliminating all this confusion and back and forth.


Wouldn’t that make more sense?

What’s your definition of “when Covid is gone”? Because Covid is here to stay just like the flu just like the common cold. You realize that don’t you? That would mean masks forever. I don’t think people want that.

It’s “gone” when there are no more cases being reported Duh.

Until then, yes, keep masks in place. This is a very binary argument. I don’t see an opportunity for obtuseness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Or we could just keep a mask policy in place until covid is gone, eliminating all this confusion and back and forth.


Wouldn’t that make more sense?

not really. Why force people to wear masks when the cases are low? Covid is here to stay in one way, shape or form. Are you suggesting we wear masks forever?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: It what if the seceb day average goes back under 50 by Wednesday? They can’t keep lifting and reinstating every seven days ! This is crazy.

Yes, this is concerning. They should increase the time necessary to life the mask mandate. Instead of 7 maybe 14 or even 21 days. And then allow for some fluctuation before reinstating a mask mandate. Because constantly going back and forth is ridiculous in terms of formal policy/mandate.

This may end up happenign what the Council (acting as Board of Health) meets on Tuesday.

They aren't considering increasing the time to lift the mandate.

They want to require 7 days of "substantial" transmission to reinstate the mandate. That means if we dip back into moderate within 7 days, the mandate is still dropped. Let's hope they do this