Backlash against college educated women

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a college educated woman with a master’s degree who voted for Trump. The left has disrespected me for the last time. I’m finished with giving any of them the benefit of the doubt.

Substitute Harris for Trump and right for left and I'm with you. Here we all are.

The women that Vance referred to as “childless cat ladies” have been shaming me for being a married mother of two for long enough. Harris supporters are anti-mother.

Anti-mother? Harris voter here. Mother of 2 boys. There is no way on this earth I would ever vote for someone as toxic as Trump. We are raising our sons to be decent, empathetic humans. Trump embodies the opposite of any characteristics I would want my kids to ever have. Sad how many voters fell for the hate.

Are you teaching them to stay out of women's bathrooms?

Mine are in college and there are not actually women's bathrooms or men's bathrooms. They just have bathrooms.

But if that freaks you out or is something that your students can't tolerate, you still should provide them with a college education if they want that. Maybe there is a commuter school or something that would be a good option or you could find a college with bathrooms more to your liking.

Let us know how you feel when you are changing at the Y (or probably your club for the DCUM crowd) and a naked man is gawking at you. Or when you are trying to pee and some dude is peeking into your stall in jerking off.

Omg. Seriously go to a YMCA and check out the scene. The only people that ever change at a YMCA are ones that use the pool . That is little kids learning to swim and some old people doing laps. You are spending your life terrified of ghosts that don't exist.

You are at the “this isn’t happening” stage of the gaslighting pipeline which is “this isn’t happening”, then, “well it’s only happening a few places so why do you care” and finally “well yes this is happening but it’s actually a good thing”

Yes, this happening. Stop gaslighting.

https://mynorthwest.com/3588678/rantz-watch-80-year-old-defend-privacy-rights-trans-locker-room-controversy/

A random anecdote reported on one republican website does not equal a trend. Your post is useless. I can report a random anecdote that in college, a gay men peeped other men in the dorm shower.

Are you going to require crotch checks for entry to every public bathroom? Require gay men to use womens rooms and lesbians to use mens rooms?

Dumb argument. We’ve never required crotch checks in bathrooms and want a return to the status quo.

The status quo didn't even allow gay folks to marry so you are not getting that.

Watch us. It started with congressional bathrooms and will move on to all federal buildings. You do know your side lost the election?

Watch you grill women who have too many muscles? Laws have to have a way of being enforced. You're just going to end up looking like a lunatic when you angrily call out some woman who happens to weight train and has short hair.

We all managed just fine I don’t know, just 3-5 years ago? Your side is the one causing societal upheaval with new rules, we are returning to the way we always did it.

But yes, we will get the laws passed because one of the reasons we won the presidency, house and senate was this.

Did you though? These are from further back from that. You weren't fine. You were never fine. Shifts re: trans folks really have not changed the fact that crappy people do crappy things.

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/man-dressed-as-woman-arrested-for-spying-into-mall-bathroom-stall-police-say/1979766/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/police-looking-for-two-time-womens-room-peeper/2015/10/14/9754c660-729d-11e5-9cbb-790369643cf9_story.html

https://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/2015/05/ypsilanti_porta-potty_peeper_i.html

https://www.local10.com/news/2015/12/02/parkland-man-says-he-caught-peeping-tom-watching-his-wife-shower/

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2015/05/barber-docked-for-peeping-at-female-neighbour-in-bathroom/

https://www.dailycamera.com/2015/02/13/boulder-potty-peeper-luke-chrisco-sentenced-to-six-years-in-prison/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/man-dressed-as-a-woman-peeps-on-women-in-bathroom-at-wal-mart/2015/06/10/cd88e1d6-0f5a-11e5-a0dc-2b6f404ff5cf_story.html

You don’t have to convince me about the risk of men in women’s bathrooms! That’s the entire point! Agree 100 percent and glad you do too. By keeping men out of women’s bathrooms we preserve her right to speak up in alarm and ask for help after running into potential predator, rather than silencing herself for fear of being labeled a bigot.

So glad we are on the same page!

[Anonymous]

People vote for who they want to vote for=

“They are lashing out at me, me, ME!!”

No, people aren’t thinking about you when they vote. Get over yourselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a college educated woman with a master’s degree who voted for Trump. The left has disrespected me for the last time. I’m finished with giving any of them the benefit of the doubt.

Substitute Harris for Trump and right for left and I'm with you. Here we all are.

The women that Vance referred to as “childless cat ladies” have been shaming me for being a married mother of two for long enough. Harris supporters are anti-mother.

Anti-mother? Harris voter here. Mother of 2 boys. There is no way on this earth I would ever vote for someone as toxic as Trump. We are raising our sons to be decent, empathetic humans. Trump embodies the opposite of any characteristics I would want my kids to ever have. Sad how many voters fell for the hate.

Are you teaching them to stay out of women's bathrooms?

Mine are in college and there are not actually women's bathrooms or men's bathrooms. They just have bathrooms.

But if that freaks you out or is something that your students can't tolerate, you still should provide them with a college education if they want that. Maybe there is a commuter school or something that would be a good option or you could find a college with bathrooms more to your liking.

Let us know how you feel when you are changing at the Y (or probably your club for the DCUM crowd) and a naked man is gawking at you. Or when you are trying to pee and some dude is peeking into your stall in jerking off.

Omg. Seriously go to a YMCA and check out the scene. The only people that ever change at a YMCA are ones that use the pool . That is little kids learning to swim and some old people doing laps. You are spending your life terrified of ghosts that don't exist.

You are at the “this isn’t happening” stage of the gaslighting pipeline which is “this isn’t happening”, then, “well it’s only happening a few places so why do you care” and finally “well yes this is happening but it’s actually a good thing”

Yes, this happening. Stop gaslighting.

https://mynorthwest.com/3588678/rantz-watch-80-year-old-defend-privacy-rights-trans-locker-room-controversy/

A random anecdote reported on one republican website does not equal a trend. Your post is useless. I can report a random anecdote that in college, a gay men peeped other men in the dorm shower.

Are you going to require crotch checks for entry to every public bathroom? Require gay men to use womens rooms and lesbians to use mens rooms?

Dumb argument. We’ve never required crotch checks in bathrooms and want a return to the status quo.

The status quo didn't even allow gay folks to marry so you are not getting that.

Watch us. It started with congressional bathrooms and will move on to all federal buildings. You do know your side lost the election?

Watch you grill women who have too many muscles? Laws have to have a way of being enforced. You're just going to end up looking like a lunatic when you angrily call out some woman who happens to weight train and has short hair.

We all managed just fine I don’t know, just 3-5 years ago? Your side is the one causing societal upheaval with new rules, we are returning to the way we always did it.

But yes, we will get the laws passed because one of the reasons we won the presidency, house and senate was this.

Did you though? These are from further back from that. You weren't fine. You were never fine. Shifts re: trans folks really have not changed the fact that crappy people do crappy things.

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/man-dressed-as-woman-arrested-for-spying-into-mall-bathroom-stall-police-say/1979766/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/police-looking-for-two-time-womens-room-peeper/2015/10/14/9754c660-729d-11e5-9cbb-790369643cf9_story.html

https://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/2015/05/ypsilanti_porta-potty_peeper_i.html

https://www.local10.com/news/2015/12/02/parkland-man-says-he-caught-peeping-tom-watching-his-wife-shower/

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2015/05/barber-docked-for-peeping-at-female-neighbour-in-bathroom/

https://www.dailycamera.com/2015/02/13/boulder-potty-peeper-luke-chrisco-sentenced-to-six-years-in-prison/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/man-dressed-as-a-woman-peeps-on-women-in-bathroom-at-wal-mart/2015/06/10/cd88e1d6-0f5a-11e5-a0dc-2b6f404ff5cf_story.html

You don’t have to convince me about the risk of men in women’s bathrooms! That’s the entire point! Agree 100 percent and glad you do too. By keeping men out of women’s bathrooms we preserve her right to speak up in alarm and ask for help after running into potential predator, rather than silencing herself for fear of being labeled a bigot.

So glad we are on the same page!

Great, how are you enforcing this law? For something to be a law, it must have a way to enforce it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Still waiting for someone to say what institution has become stronger and more productive since the assimilation of women.

Modern politics assumes women should be involved in all aspects of life, but I wonder where's the evidence that it's a good idea to do so.

How about many men out there aren’t capable and are full of corruption. Trump is the biggest example of this. Voters actually think a sociopathic, vengeance filled 78 yr old who is in clear cognitive decline should be president? This would never fly at any company.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Still waiting for someone to say what institution has become stronger and more productive since the assimilation of women.

Modern politics assumes women should be involved in all aspects of life, but I wonder where's the evidence that it's a good idea to do so.

The institution of marital sex

https://nypost.com/2024/07/29/lifestyle/gen-z-women-have-gotten-significantly-hornier-in-return-to-office-work-heres-why-survey/

https://www.psypost.org/when-women-do-more-household-labor-they-see-their-partner-as-a-dependent-and-sexual-desire-dwindles/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a college educated woman with a master’s degree who voted for Trump. The left has disrespected me for the last time. I’m finished with giving any of them the benefit of the doubt.

Substitute Harris for Trump and right for left and I'm with you. Here we all are.

The women that Vance referred to as “childless cat ladies” have been shaming me for being a married mother of two for long enough. Harris supporters are anti-mother.

Anti-mother? Harris voter here. Mother of 2 boys. There is no way on this earth I would ever vote for someone as toxic as Trump. We are raising our sons to be decent, empathetic humans. Trump embodies the opposite of any characteristics I would want my kids to ever have. Sad how many voters fell for the hate.

Are you teaching them to stay out of women's bathrooms?

Mine are in college and there are not actually women's bathrooms or men's bathrooms. They just have bathrooms.

But if that freaks you out or is something that your students can't tolerate, you still should provide them with a college education if they want that. Maybe there is a commuter school or something that would be a good option or you could find a college with bathrooms more to your liking.

Let us know how you feel when you are changing at the Y (or probably your club for the DCUM crowd) and a naked man is gawking at you. Or when you are trying to pee and some dude is peeking into your stall in jerking off.

Omg. Seriously go to a YMCA and check out the scene. The only people that ever change at a YMCA are ones that use the pool . That is little kids learning to swim and some old people doing laps. You are spending your life terrified of ghosts that don't exist.

You are at the “this isn’t happening” stage of the gaslighting pipeline which is “this isn’t happening”, then, “well it’s only happening a few places so why do you care” and finally “well yes this is happening but it’s actually a good thing”

Yes, this happening. Stop gaslighting.

https://mynorthwest.com/3588678/rantz-watch-80-year-old-defend-privacy-rights-trans-locker-room-controversy/

A random anecdote reported on one republican website does not equal a trend. Your post is useless. I can report a random anecdote that in college, a gay men peeped other men in the dorm shower.

Are you going to require crotch checks for entry to every public bathroom? Require gay men to use womens rooms and lesbians to use mens rooms?

Dumb argument. We’ve never required crotch checks in bathrooms and want a return to the status quo.

The status quo didn't even allow gay folks to marry so you are not getting that.

Watch us. It started with congressional bathrooms and will move on to all federal buildings. You do know your side lost the election?

Watch you grill women who have too many muscles? Laws have to have a way of being enforced. You're just going to end up looking like a lunatic when you angrily call out some woman who happens to weight train and has short hair.

We all managed just fine I don’t know, just 3-5 years ago? Your side is the one causing societal upheaval with new rules, we are returning to the way we always did it.

But yes, we will get the laws passed because one of the reasons we won the presidency, house and senate was this.

Did you though? These are from further back from that. You weren't fine. You were never fine. Shifts re: trans folks really have not changed the fact that crappy people do crappy things.

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/man-dressed-as-woman-arrested-for-spying-into-mall-bathroom-stall-police-say/1979766/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/police-looking-for-two-time-womens-room-peeper/2015/10/14/9754c660-729d-11e5-9cbb-790369643cf9_story.html

https://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/2015/05/ypsilanti_porta-potty_peeper_i.html

https://www.local10.com/news/2015/12/02/parkland-man-says-he-caught-peeping-tom-watching-his-wife-shower/

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2015/05/barber-docked-for-peeping-at-female-neighbour-in-bathroom/

https://www.dailycamera.com/2015/02/13/boulder-potty-peeper-luke-chrisco-sentenced-to-six-years-in-prison/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/man-dressed-as-a-woman-peeps-on-women-in-bathroom-at-wal-mart/2015/06/10/cd88e1d6-0f5a-11e5-a0dc-2b6f404ff5cf_story.html

You don’t have to convince me about the risk of men in women’s bathrooms! That’s the entire point! Agree 100 percent and glad you do too. By keeping men out of women’s bathrooms we preserve her right to speak up in alarm and ask for help after running into potential predator, rather than silencing herself for fear of being labeled a bigot.

So glad we are on the same page!

Great, how are you enforcing this law? For something to be a law, it must have a way to enforce it.

If a man is found in the women’s bathroom, the security guard or store staff can force him to leave or call the police. You know, like how we have done since the beginning of time. You act like this is some wild concept. It’s how we always did it until the most recent few years!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still waiting for someone to say what institution has become stronger and more productive since the assimilation of women.

Modern politics assumes women should be involved in all aspects of life, but I wonder where's the evidence that it's a good idea to do so.

How about many men out there aren’t capable and are full of corruption. Trump is the biggest example of this. Voters actually think a sociopathic, vengeance filled 78 yr old who is in clear cognitive decline should be president? This would never fly at any company.

Biden is 82 and no, he shouldn’t be president. But Kamala is off in Hawaii insisting he is “sharp as a tack” while he sends missiles to Ukraine to help launch WW3.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Still waiting for someone to say what institution has become stronger and more productive since the assimilation of women.

Modern politics assumes women should be involved in all aspects of life, but I wonder where's the evidence that it's a good idea to do so.

It's not. Because they can't compete with men, they lobby for everyone doing what they can and getting what they need which Is a disconnect between production and reward. This makes women inherently more Marxist than men. And history has proven that Marxism, and communist in general, doesn't work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still waiting for someone to say what institution has become stronger and more productive since the assimilation of women.

Modern politics assumes women should be involved in all aspects of life, but I wonder where's the evidence that it's a good idea to do so.

How about many men out there aren’t capable and are full of corruption. Trump is the biggest example of this. Voters actually think a sociopathic, vengeance filled 78 yr old who is in clear cognitive decline should be president? This would never fly at any company.

Biden is 82 and no, he shouldn’t be president. But Kamala is off in Hawaii insisting he is “sharp as a tack” while he sends missiles to Ukraine to help launch WW3.

Trump will be 82 at the end of his presidency. Have you heard him speaking at all? my guess is no. Total disaster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still waiting for someone to say what institution has become stronger and more productive since the assimilation of women.

Modern politics assumes women should be involved in all aspects of life, but I wonder where's the evidence that it's a good idea to do so.

How about many men out there aren’t capable and are full of corruption. Trump is the biggest example of this. Voters actually think a sociopathic, vengeance filled 78 yr old who is in clear cognitive decline should be president? This would never fly at any company.

Biden is 82 and no, he shouldn’t be president. But Kamala is off in Hawaii insisting he is “sharp as a tack” while he sends missiles to Ukraine to help launch WW3.

Trump will be 82 at the end of his presidency. Have you heard him speaking at all? my guess is no. Total disaster.

I have and I voted for him afterwards!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still waiting for someone to say what institution has become stronger and more productive since the assimilation of women.

Modern politics assumes women should be involved in all aspects of life, but I wonder where's the evidence that it's a good idea to do so.

How about many men out there aren’t capable and are full of corruption. Trump is the biggest example of this. Voters actually think a sociopathic, vengeance filled 78 yr old who is in clear cognitive decline should be president? This would never fly at any company.

Biden is 82 and no, he shouldn’t be president. But Kamala is off in Hawaii insisting he is “sharp as a tack” while he sends missiles to Ukraine to help launch WW3.

Trump will be 82 at the end of his presidency. Have you heard him speaking at all? my guess is no. Total disaster.

I have and I voted for him afterwards!

How embarrassing for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This election was about having men and corporations maintain power.

Racism was trumped by sexism showing that even men of color do not believe women can wield power,

It also solidified power in the hands of a select few billlionairs.

Maybe Taylor Swift and MacKensie Bezos will start spending their billions to take over truth social .

No, it was about the American people rejecting the Left's utterly stupid idea that it's okay for the government to tell social media companies to censor political opponents because "we only burn the bad books." You have to be unimaginably ignorant of history to support the censorship industrial complex or any of its dog whistles about "malinformation," "misinformation," and "disinformation," all of which can more accurately be characterized as "shit that leftists disagree with."

No you absolute moron. The "leftist, liberal media" and these cries of censorship are boogeymen created by the GOP propaganda machine to delegitimize any news outlet that tries to shine a light on all their lies or any attempt to shut down their flooding the zone with sh*t.

Steve Bannon admitted it out loud:
“The Democrats don’t matter,” Bannon told Lewis. “The real opposition is the media. And the way to deal with them is to flood the zone with shit.”

That’s the Bannon business model: Flood the zone. Stink up the joint. As Jonathan Rauch once said, citing Bannon’s infamous quote, “This is not about persuasion: This is about disorientation.”

https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/16/media/steve-bannon-reliable-sources/index.html

And dummies like you have fallen for it. Get your head back on.

I noticed that you did not bother to refute the posters claim that the left thinks it’s a good idea for the government to tell social media companies to censor political opposition.

Why is that?

Yes, I did. You are just too stupid and steeped in your conspiracy theories to get it. Pointing out lies is not censorship. It's pointing out lies. Come back when your frontal lobe fully matures and you can engage in critical thinking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still waiting for someone to say what institution has become stronger and more productive since the assimilation of women.

Modern politics assumes women should be involved in all aspects of life, but I wonder where's the evidence that it's a good idea to do so.

It's not. Because they can't compete with men, they lobby for everyone doing what they can and getting what they need which Is a disconnect between production and reward. This makes women inherently more Marxist than men. And history has proven that Marxism, and communist in general, doesn't work.

So the world is basically a total disaster with Russia, what is happening in the middle east. Now Trump. All men. Disaster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a college educated woman with a master’s degree who voted for Trump. The left has disrespected me for the last time. I’m finished with giving any of them the benefit of the doubt.

Just look at the majority of posts on this site. Some seriously out of touch and angry people on the left. It would be concerning if they weren't such marshmallows.

Out of touch with what? The price of eggs being related to avian flu? Or the actual causes of inflation? Or the right bringing up trans stuff as a wedge issue repeatedly (every post I've seen about it on this site has generally been some MAGA type ranting that this impacts me more as a woman than abortion legislation).

Just because people who are educated don't fall for the right's propaganda, they are marshmallows?

Not the PP, but I’d say the election results pretty definitely show how out of touch DCUM liberals are.

Not really. In the end, Trump still won on a very tiny margin (one of the tiniest in the past 60 years), still the majority of POC didn't vote for him even though the percentages shifted right. The percentage shift mathematically seems more related to losing votes entirely (people not voting) than more people shifting votes to Trump. Many didn't vote for Harris over the Israeli/Palestine war, right or wrong on that one. That isn't an endorsement of Trump or MAGA policies.

This is some serious coping. The entire government structure shifted to one party.

No, it's spot on. There is no mandate. Not that the GOP ever cares about reality. They weave their own out of lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This election was about having men and corporations maintain power.

Racism was trumped by sexism showing that even men of color do not believe women can wield power,

It also solidified power in the hands of a select few billlionairs.

Maybe Taylor Swift and MacKensie Bezos will start spending their billions to take over truth social .

No, it was about the American people rejecting the Left's utterly stupid idea that it's okay for the government to tell social media companies to censor political opponents because "we only burn the bad books." You have to be unimaginably ignorant of history to support the censorship industrial complex or any of its dog whistles about "malinformation," "misinformation," and "disinformation," all of which can more accurately be characterized as "shit that leftists disagree with."

No you absolute moron. The "leftist, liberal media" and these cries of censorship are boogeymen created by the GOP propaganda machine to delegitimize any news outlet that tries to shine a light on all their lies or any attempt to shut down their flooding the zone with sh*t.

Steve Bannon admitted it out loud:
“The Democrats don’t matter,” Bannon told Lewis. “The real opposition is the media. And the way to deal with them is to flood the zone with shit.”

That’s the Bannon business model: Flood the zone. Stink up the joint. As Jonathan Rauch once said, citing Bannon’s infamous quote, “This is not about persuasion: This is about disorientation.”

https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/16/media/steve-bannon-reliable-sources/index.html

And dummies like you have fallen for it. Get your head back on.

I noticed that you did not bother to refute the posters claim that the left thinks it’s a good idea for the government to tell social media companies to censor political opposition.

Why is that?

Yes, I did. You are just too stupid and steeped in your conspiracy theories to get it. Pointing out lies is not censorship. It's pointing out lies. Come back when your frontal lobe fully matures and you can engage in critical thinking.

Apparently your critical thinking skills led to you misunderstanding what Biden was doing. He wasn’t “pointing out lies,” he was pressing the social media companies to remove posts and delete users who were posting about Jan 6 and Covid restrictions. That’s not adding government speech, it’s the government removing speech, and the case was only tossed due to standing of the plaintiffs.