Backlash against college educated women

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How any woman could vote for a man found liable of sexual abuse is beyond comprehension. Not to mention all the accusations of sexual harassment, groping, sexual misconduct.

It’s really quite twisted.

The Dems had Bill Clinton out campaigning for Kamala whose husband impregnated the nanny.

I know it's hard for you to understand consent.

You do understand Bill was accused of rape and we believe all women, right?

Did a jury find him liable of sexual abuse?

Do you know what a civil vs a criminal proceeding is? Do you believe all women or not? Do you understand the environment for women coming forward in the early 90s against a political figure vs after the me too era?

[Anonymous]

All the back and forth about utter nonsense on this thread.

The bottom line is Trump voters decided to align themselves with a toxic male, sexual harasser/abuser.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All the back and forth about utter nonsense on this thread.

The bottom line is Trump voters decided to align themselves with a toxic male, sexual harasser/abuser.

So has the left, you just forgot your history and want to pretend it didn’t happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a college educated woman with a master’s degree who voted for Trump. The left has disrespected me for the last time. I’m finished with giving any of them the benefit of the doubt.

Substitute Harris for Trump and right for left and I'm with you. Here we all are.

The women that Vance referred to as “childless cat ladies” have been shaming me for being a married mother of two for long enough. Harris supporters are anti-mother.

Anti-mother? Harris voter here. Mother of 2 boys. There is no way on this earth I would ever vote for someone as toxic as Trump. We are raising our sons to be decent, empathetic humans. Trump embodies the opposite of any characteristics I would want my kids to ever have. Sad how many voters fell for the hate.

Are you teaching them to stay out of women's bathrooms?

Mine are in college and there are not actually women's bathrooms or men's bathrooms. They just have bathrooms.

But if that freaks you out or is something that your students can't tolerate, you still should provide them with a college education if they want that. Maybe there is a commuter school or something that would be a good option or you could find a college with bathrooms more to your liking.

Let us know how you feel when you are changing at the Y (or probably your club for the DCUM crowd) and a naked man is gawking at you. Or when you are trying to pee and some dude is peeking into your stall in jerking off.

Omg. Seriously go to a YMCA and check out the scene. The only people that ever change at a YMCA are ones that use the pool . That is little kids learning to swim and some old people doing laps. You are spending your life terrified of ghosts that don't exist.

You are at the “this isn’t happening” stage of the gaslighting pipeline which is “this isn’t happening”, then, “well it’s only happening a few places so why do you care” and finally “well yes this is happening but it’s actually a good thing”

Yes, this happening. Stop gaslighting.

https://mynorthwest.com/3588678/rantz-watch-80-year-old-defend-privacy-rights-trans-locker-room-controversy/

A random anecdote reported on one republican website does not equal a trend. Your post is useless. I can report a random anecdote that in college, a gay men peeped other men in the dorm shower.

Are you going to require crotch checks for entry to every public bathroom? Require gay men to use womens rooms and lesbians to use mens rooms?

Dumb argument. We’ve never required crotch checks in bathrooms and want a return to the status quo.

The status quo didn't even allow gay folks to marry so you are not getting that.

Watch us. It started with congressional bathrooms and will move on to all federal buildings. You do know your side lost the election?

Watch you grill women who have too many muscles? Laws have to have a way of being enforced. You're just going to end up looking like a lunatic when you angrily call out some woman who happens to weight train and has short hair.

Women with muscles and short hair are women.

I know you think that when a women refuses to wear make up and heels, the is a man. But no. She is a woman, was born a woman, and will always be a woman.

How do you know though? Maybe you need to require to check it out. Can be confusing sometimes, for sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How any woman could vote for a man found liable of sexual abuse is beyond comprehension. Not to mention all the accusations of sexual harassment, groping, sexual misconduct.

It’s really quite twisted.

The Dems had Bill Clinton out campaigning for Kamala whose husband impregnated the nanny.

I know it's hard for you to understand consent.

You do understand Bill was accused of rape and we believe all women, right?

Did a jury find him liable of sexual abuse?

Do you know what a civil vs a criminal proceeding is? Do you believe all women or not? Do you understand the environment for women coming forward in the early 90s against a political figure vs after the me too era?

No, she just knows what MSNBC tells her. Given the dwindling ratings, she doesn't realize her bubble is shrinking every day. When it bursts, there will be zero self-reflection.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How any woman could vote for a man found liable of sexual abuse is beyond comprehension. Not to mention all the accusations of sexual harassment, groping, sexual misconduct.

It’s really quite twisted.

The Dems had Bill Clinton out campaigning for Kamala whose husband impregnated the nanny.

I know it's hard for you to understand consent.

You do understand Bill was accused of rape and we believe all women, right?

Did a jury find him liable of sexual abuse?

Do you know what a civil vs a criminal proceeding is? Do you believe all women or not? Do you understand the environment for women coming forward in the early 90s against a political figure vs after the me too era?

No, she just knows what MSNBC tells her. Given the dwindling ratings, she doesn't realize her bubble is shrinking every day. When it bursts, there will be zero self-reflection.

Is that the fox news spiel for today? Newsmax perhaps?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How any woman could vote for a man found liable of sexual abuse is beyond comprehension. Not to mention all the accusations of sexual harassment, groping, sexual misconduct.

It’s really quite twisted.

The Dems had Bill Clinton out campaigning for Kamala whose husband impregnated the nanny.

I know it's hard for you to understand consent.

You do understand Bill was accused of rape and we believe all women, right?

The left: “Believe all women”!

Women: “we don’t want males in bathrooms and locker rooms”

The left: “No, not like that”

You have obvs failed to grasp what “believe all women,” means per this post, and by your sanctioning of the felon and his appointees who have actually assaulted women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the back and forth about utter nonsense on this thread.

The bottom line is Trump voters decided to align themselves with a toxic male, sexual harasser/abuser.

So has the left, you just forgot your history and want to pretend it didn’t happen.

Oh did a previous president elect also nominate a child sex trafficker for AG?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How any woman could vote for a man found liable of sexual abuse is beyond comprehension. Not to mention all the accusations of sexual harassment, groping, sexual misconduct.

It’s really quite twisted.

The Dems had Bill Clinton out campaigning for Kamala whose husband impregnated the nanny.

I know it's hard for you to understand consent.

You do understand Bill was accused of rape and we believe all women, right?

Did a jury find him liable of sexual abuse?

Do you know what a civil vs a criminal proceeding is? Do you believe all women or not? Do you understand the environment for women coming forward in the early 90s against a political figure vs after the me too era?

No, she just knows what MSNBC tells her. Given the dwindling ratings, she doesn't realize her bubble is shrinking every day. When it bursts, there will be zero self-reflection.

Is that the fox news spiel for today? Newsmax perhaps?

Maybe just answer the questions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the back and forth about utter nonsense on this thread.

The bottom line is Trump voters decided to align themselves with a toxic male, sexual harasser/abuser.

So has the left, you just forgot your history and want to pretend it didn’t happen.

Oh did a previous president elect also nominate a child sex trafficker for AG?

Let me know when Gaetz gets charged for trafficking! But do keep sidetracking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How any woman could vote for a man found liable of sexual abuse is beyond comprehension. Not to mention all the accusations of sexual harassment, groping, sexual misconduct.

It’s really quite twisted.

The Dems had Bill Clinton out campaigning for Kamala whose husband impregnated the nanny.

I know it's hard for you to understand consent.

You do understand Bill was accused of rape and we believe all women, right?

The left: “Believe all women”!

Women: “we don’t want males in bathrooms and locker rooms”

The left: “No, not like that”

You have obvs failed to grasp what “believe all women,” means per this post, and by your sanctioning of the felon and his appointees who have actually assaulted women.

Believe all women isn’t limited to “per this post.” Either you believe all women or you don’t, according to your own rules, and if you do then Bill too is a rapist and you have no claim against Trump voters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a college educated woman with a master’s degree who voted for Trump. The left has disrespected me for the last time. I’m finished with giving any of them the benefit of the doubt.

Substitute Harris for Trump and right for left and I'm with you. Here we all are.

The women that Vance referred to as “childless cat ladies” have been shaming me for being a married mother of two for long enough. Harris supporters are anti-mother.

Anti-mother? Harris voter here. Mother of 2 boys. There is no way on this earth I would ever vote for someone as toxic as Trump. We are raising our sons to be decent, empathetic humans. Trump embodies the opposite of any characteristics I would want my kids to ever have. Sad how many voters fell for the hate.

Are you teaching them to stay out of women's bathrooms?

Mine are in college and there are not actually women's bathrooms or men's bathrooms. They just have bathrooms.

But if that freaks you out or is something that your students can't tolerate, you still should provide them with a college education if they want that. Maybe there is a commuter school or something that would be a good option or you could find a college with bathrooms more to your liking.

Let us know how you feel when you are changing at the Y (or probably your club for the DCUM crowd) and a naked man is gawking at you. Or when you are trying to pee and some dude is peeking into your stall in jerking off.

Omg. Seriously go to a YMCA and check out the scene. The only people that ever change at a YMCA are ones that use the pool . That is little kids learning to swim and some old people doing laps. You are spending your life terrified of ghosts that don't exist.

You are at the “this isn’t happening” stage of the gaslighting pipeline which is “this isn’t happening”, then, “well it’s only happening a few places so why do you care” and finally “well yes this is happening but it’s actually a good thing”

Yes, this happening. Stop gaslighting.

https://mynorthwest.com/3588678/rantz-watch-80-year-old-defend-privacy-rights-trans-locker-room-controversy/

A random anecdote reported on one republican website does not equal a trend. Your post is useless. I can report a random anecdote that in college, a gay men peeped other men in the dorm shower.

Are you going to require crotch checks for entry to every public bathroom? Require gay men to use womens rooms and lesbians to use mens rooms?

Dumb argument. We’ve never required crotch checks in bathrooms and want a return to the status quo.

The status quo didn't even allow gay folks to marry so you are not getting that.

Watch us. It started with congressional bathrooms and will move on to all federal buildings. You do know your side lost the election?

Watch you grill women who have too many muscles? Laws have to have a way of being enforced. You're just going to end up looking like a lunatic when you angrily call out some woman who happens to weight train and has short hair.

We all managed just fine I don’t know, just 3-5 years ago? Your side is the one causing societal upheaval with new rules, we are returning to the way we always did it.

But yes, we will get the laws passed because one of the reasons we won the presidency, house and senate was this.

Did you though? These are from further back from that. You weren't fine. You were never fine. Shifts re: trans folks really have not changed the fact that crappy people do crappy things.

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/man-dressed-as-woman-arrested-for-spying-into-mall-bathroom-stall-police-say/1979766/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/police-looking-for-two-time-womens-room-peeper/2015/10/14/9754c660-729d-11e5-9cbb-790369643cf9_story.html

https://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/2015/05/ypsilanti_porta-potty_peeper_i.html

https://www.local10.com/news/2015/12/02/parkland-man-says-he-caught-peeping-tom-watching-his-wife-shower/

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2015/05/barber-docked-for-peeping-at-female-neighbour-in-bathroom/

https://www.dailycamera.com/2015/02/13/boulder-potty-peeper-luke-chrisco-sentenced-to-six-years-in-prison/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/man-dressed-as-a-woman-peeps-on-women-in-bathroom-at-wal-mart/2015/06/10/cd88e1d6-0f5a-11e5-a0dc-2b6f404ff5cf_story.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why do I feel this election was a backlash against college educated women more than anything else? And why does that scare me?

To me it's gaslighting to hear men claim that colleges are indoctrination centers and that young women are radicalized and need to be deprogrammed.

It's like the social media pundits on the right have successfully learned how to DARVO, turn it all around, deny centuries of women having no rights, and women are believing it.

Because college educated women have some odd conceptions of the world.

Exhibit A) Immigration

College educated women are all on board as much immigration as is possible. Why is this crazy? Because immigrants are dominantly male and very little of the world supports women the way they are supported in the US. Thereby pitting male ( and female ) Americans that are sympathetic with women's rights in the US vs international crazies and skewing the workforce to be dominated by males from other countries. Sorry ladies, I love you all, but not that much.

Exhibit B) Social Hierarchies

College educated women in most urban and suburban areas are more than happy with social stratifications and economic segregation. They repeatedly turn everything into an elitist hegemony. Even things like the environment, we just don't deserve to live in a clean air area, I guess. Maybe if I had, no wait, I do have a couple of degrees. No, I need a trust fund. I know you don't like my 15yo Subaru Impreza, maybe if I had one of those polluting soccer mom SUVs, I guess only the college educated deserve to pollute...

It's not me, it's you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How any woman could vote for a man found liable of sexual abuse is beyond comprehension. Not to mention all the accusations of sexual harassment, groping, sexual misconduct.

It’s really quite twisted.

The Dems had Bill Clinton out campaigning for Kamala whose husband impregnated the nanny.

I know it's hard for you to understand consent.

You do understand Bill was accused of rape and we believe all women, right?

Did a jury find him liable of sexual abuse?

Do you know what a civil vs a criminal proceeding is? Do you believe all women or not? Do you understand the environment for women coming forward in the early 90s against a political figure vs after the me too era?

No, she just knows what MSNBC tells her. Given the dwindling ratings, she doesn't realize her bubble is shrinking every day. When it bursts, there will be zero self-reflection.

Is that the fox news spiel for today? Newsmax perhaps?

Are you pretending MSNBC isn't Fox News for the left?

[Anonymous]

No one is voting *at* you. Don't be so self centered.