What do you the most judgemental about?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I judge people who have pets instead of children, and these pets have everything, they go to hotels, they go to the vet, they eat like kings and in this world millions of children die every day of hunger or because they do not have money to afford a doctor, so sad, really.

I judge them too primarily because they usually hate kids and are busy giving me and my well-behaved DC stink eye for daring to be on the same plane with them.

I don't judge the childless, and I don't judge pet-lovers. Just those who hate kids just for existing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I judge people who have pets instead of children, and these pets have everything, they go to hotels, they go to the vet, they eat like kings and in this world millions of children die every day of hunger or because they do not have money to afford a doctor, so sad, really.

to this poster: i see you post the same thing about pets every time there is a pet thread....do YOU pay for children's medical bills? really, because if you do then good for you, but if not, why are you so insistent on euthanising every single furry creature out there...do you really think it will save lives. that's like saying to your kid..."finish all your food because kids are starving in Africa." finishing your food will not feed the starving child.

[Anonymous]

trust fund babies who borrow money for things like their portion of the dinner check with no intention of paying you back or treating the next time around.

[Anonymous]

to this poster: i see you post the same thing about pets every time there is a pet thread....do YOU pay for children's medical bills? really, because if you do then good for you, but if not, why are you so insistent on euthanising every single furry creature out there...do you really think it will save lives. that's like saying to your kid..."finish all your food because kids are starving in Africa." finishing your food will not feed the starving child."


FYI that was my first post here and actually I say to my kids "eat your food because kids are starving" and they are good kids, they care about people and when they have allowance they always give something to the poor, good thing they will not be like you.

[Anonymous]

People who give their children intentionally misspelled names. It's like giving your kids a head start on stupidity.

[Anonymous]

quote=Anonymous]People who give their children intentionally misspelled names. It's like giving your kids a head start on stupidity.

Totally agree. Every vowel you subsitute with a "Y" is one step closer to the stripper pole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People who give their children intentionally misspelled names. It's like giving your kids a head start on stupidity.

LOVE this. Met a few too many Jordyns lately, I think.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:quote=Anonymous]People who give their children intentionally misspelled names. It's like giving your kids a head start on stupidity.

Totally agree. Every vowel you subsitute with a "Y" is one step closer to the stripper pole.

Or rap star.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:to this poster: i see you post the same thing about pets every time there is a pet thread....do YOU pay for children's medical bills? really, because if you do then good for you, but if not, why are you so insistent on euthanising every single furry creature out there...do you really think it will save lives. that's like saying to your kid..."finish all your food because kids are starving in Africa." finishing your food will not feed the starving child."


FYI that was my first post here and actually I say to my kids "eat your food because kids are starving" and they are good kids, they care about people and when they have allowance they always give something to the poor, good thing they will not be like you.

that's how children learn not to trust their own hunger/satisfied feelings and end up fat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People who give their children intentionally misspelled names. It's like giving your kids a head start on stupidity.

Ditto.

[Anonymous]

Ooops. Meant rap music star.

[Anonymous]

And people who think the childless pet owners are somehow wasting resources. New flash: your kid has a far bigger carbon footprint than a dog, will pollute more, and will require more community resources. Those pet people are paying the same property taxes that you are, to fund the schools. But they're not using them.

I don't know who these kid-haters are. I've never met a childless pet owner who didn't want kids to exist.

But even if they do hate you-- they're still paying for your kid's school while you throw diapers into landfills and drive a minivan, so cut them a break.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:to this poster: i see you post the same thing about pets every time there is a pet thread....do YOU pay for children's medical bills? really, because if you do then good for you, but if not, why are you so insistent on euthanising every single furry creature out there...do you really think it will save lives. that's like saying to your kid..."finish all your food because kids are starving in Africa." finishing your food will not feed the starving child."


FYI that was my first post here and actually I say to my kids "eat your food because kids are starving" and they are good kids, they care about people and when they have allowance they always give something to the poor, good thing they will not be like you.

actually, i sponsor lots of children and volunteer with victims of human trafficking. i don't consider myself anti-human, but i also think that furry creatures need to be treated kindly too. i judge people who think that its ok to mistreat them or kill them off for no reason or the "theory" that it'll somehow give money to those starving/sick/suffering people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:to this poster: i see you post the same thing about pets every time there is a pet thread....do YOU pay for children's medical bills? really, because if you do then good for you, but if not, why are you so insistent on euthanising every single furry creature out there...do you really think it will save lives. that's like saying to your kid..."finish all your food because kids are starving in Africa." finishing your food will not feed the starving child."


FYI that was my first post here and actually I say to my kids "eat your food because kids are starving" and they are good kids, they care about people and when they have allowance they always give something to the poor, good thing they will not be like you.

actually, i sponsor lots of children and volunteer with victims of human trafficking. i don't consider myself anti-human, but i also think that furry creatures need to be treated kindly too. i judge people who think that its ok to mistreat them or kill them off for no reason or the "theory" that it'll somehow give money to those starving/sick/suffering people.

I don't think she was trying to imply that we need to put furry creatures down, I think she was only trying to say that, if you want to adopt something that will take as much as your time, love, money and consideration as a child would, adopt a child in need. Then, if your house is big enough and your child is asking for a pet, get one too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:to this poster: i see you post the same thing about pets every time there is a pet thread....do YOU pay for children's medical bills? really, because if you do then good for you, but if not, why are you so insistent on euthanising every single furry creature out there...do you really think it will save lives. that's like saying to your kid..."finish all your food because kids are starving in Africa." finishing your food will not feed the starving child."


FYI that was my first post here and actually I say to my kids "eat your food because kids are starving" and they are good kids, they care about people and when they have allowance they always give something to the poor, good thing they will not be like you.

actually, i sponsor lots of children and volunteer with victims of human trafficking. i don't consider myself anti-human, but i also think that furry creatures need to be treated kindly too. i judge people who think that its ok to mistreat them or kill them off for no reason or the "theory" that it'll somehow give money to those starving/sick/suffering people.

I don't think she was trying to imply that we need to put furry creatures down, I think she was only trying to say that, if you want to adopt something that will take as much as your time, love, money and consideration as a child would, adopt a child in need. Then, if your house is big enough and your child is asking for a pet, get one too.

well, she said it was her first time, so maybe that's not what she was implying...but there was a recent thread where the woman who i thought was her, actually WAS saying that.