Kate spending time with "birth family"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Royals exist to serve the people of Britain. They, and their privacy, can not be compared to others.

Also, their timeline and lies keep changing. She was last seen after Christmas, then they kept repeating she will be seen after Easter.

It was reported William needs time off as well to tend to his wife and kids and a particular mention of the phrase “school run” was made in regards to William’s responsibilities. Now, she’ll be out for the rest of the year but an emphasis is made that she’ll be with the “birth family”.

Are we to really presume the kids are not with their mother at this time and that William is truly dropping and picking them up from school daily?

It’s a ridiculous notion but one the Place gave as a reasoning for Williams per usual scant work schedule .

If William is not with Kate and she’s with the birth family , why did the Palace lie? William is not with Kate and was only spotted going to the hospital to see her once back in January. Charles saw Kate more than he did

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is very concerning that she was last seen during Christmas and now they’re saying she will be gone for the rest of the year .

All of the appearances of Kate from 2024 have the markings of either body double or AI.

The farm stand pap appearance where her face seemingly became slender again after the TMZ car appearance with her mother where the car has five tires. The Prince William double somehow grew more hair back and became 20 years younger as did Kate. Those were obviously young stunt doubles on a paid gig

Then, there’s the BBC video with a jacketless Kate in the cold with a bird chirp soundtrack and greenery in the midst of a wintry March. BBC admits editing was done and is adamant William was not present during the filming of the statement. He wasn’t there to provide Kate moral support while she had to address the world with such devastatingly emotional news.

I agree with all of this 100%. Every single piece of messaging about this situation has been shady. Honestly, it's mind boggling. They have billions at their disposal; why can they not put out one honest, trustworthy piece of communication about what is going on? They are getting doubters because they are putting out dubious information.

But do we have the 'right' to know?

This is such a ridiculous question. I shouldn’t be lied to, and I’m allowed as much speculation as I’d like if I am being lied to.

I get where you’re coming from. No one likes feeling like they are being duped or deceived. At the same time, it’s weird that you (apparently?) think you’re entitled to any information on her health. If she’s lying, she’s lying. It’s her prerogative.

It reminds of the Black Panther actor who kept his cancer diagnosis private. Can you imagine? “How DARE you keep this info from me! You’re a celebrity! You walk a red carpet and do interviews in magazines, you MUST disclose what type of cancer you have, your treatment protocol, whether you’ve lost your hair, how much weight you’ve lost!!!” That’s insane. They’re entitled to privacy and yes, they are even allowed to lie to you.

+1

Black Panther in my mind is a little different. Disney put a fortune in this man to lead a Marvel franchise for Black Panther. Spent a fortune finding the right actor, promoting him, etc. Now they really have nothing to continue this franchise which was also started for the black community to have their super hero.

Guess it's all his fault for getting cancer and making Disney lose all that money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Royals exist to serve the people of Britain. They, and their privacy, can not be compared to others.

Also, their timeline and lies keep changing. She was last seen after Christmas, then they kept repeating she will be seen after Easter.

It was reported William needs time off as well to tend to his wife and kids and a particular mention of the phrase “school run” was made in regards to William’s responsibilities. Now, she’ll be out for the rest of the year but an emphasis is made that she’ll be with the “birth family”.

Are we to really presume the kids are not with their mother at this time and that William is truly dropping and picking them up from school daily?

It’s a ridiculous notion but one the Place gave as a reasoning for Williams per usual scant work schedule .

If William is not with Kate and she’s with the birth family , why did the Palace lie? William is not with Kate and was only spotted going to the hospital to see her once back in January. Charles saw Kate more than he did

Does school not end for the summer in the UK?

[Anonymous]

The only person narcissists feel bad about is themselves. No doubt "someone" is mad at Kate for "inconveniencing" and making things about herself! Maybe some will now believe that Harry was the scapegoat all along. Without Harry to fill the role, Kate is it.

In 2024, there is no excuse for William not to be seen with his wife, sick or not, divorcing or not. Remember how often Charles was with Diana even after things collapsed?

If Kate was sick, what better time for the royals to benefit from her illness? From William holding her hand, for kids hugging their mom, to being human to us. To those who are their "subjects."
She can wear a scarf if balding; she can issue follow-up statements.
Can these people hire a Hollywood PR representative? I mean, I know they have very low IQs overall. Still, my DD, who is a media manager for a local TV and radio station, uses less interesting stories to garner hundreds of thousands of views here locally.

I wish Kate all the best. I think we can now see that they do not allow health issues to be public. Think about all of you who tore Meghan and Harry apart.

They were right. They came and said, look, we are human, we have issues, and they should not be swept under the rug.
I do think Meghan and Harry were overly dramatic in the poor us narrative; I mean, LOL!

I can't help but think that Kate is being shunned and isolated by William and the Royal PR, probably based on his orders.
It could also be that she told him she was taking this time off due to illness or for something else, or that she would go public with his dirty laundry.

There is dirty laundry, just about every rumor we had about actors later was proven true, so it will be about William. It could also be that she told him she is taking this time off for illness or for what and to get the hell away from her, or hell will break loose.

None of this makes sense at all. It is like a bunch of arrogant narcissists got together and are gaslighting Kate and the world. But, not surprising at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is very concerning that she was last seen during Christmas and now they’re saying she will be gone for the rest of the year .

All of the appearances of Kate from 2024 have the markings of either body double or AI.

The farm stand pap appearance where her face seemingly became slender again after the TMZ car appearance with her mother where the car has five tires. The Prince William double somehow grew more hair back and became 20 years younger as did Kate. Those were obviously young stunt doubles on a paid gig

Then, there’s the BBC video with a jacketless Kate in the cold with a bird chirp soundtrack and greenery in the midst of a wintry March. BBC admits editing was done and is adamant William was not present during the filming of the statement. He wasn’t there to provide Kate moral support while she had to address the world with such devastatingly emotional news.

I agree with all of this 100%. Every single piece of messaging about this situation has been shady. Honestly, it's mind boggling. They have billions at their disposal; why can they not put out one honest, trustworthy piece of communication about what is going on? They are getting doubters because they are putting out dubious information.

But do we have the 'right' to know?

This is such a ridiculous question. I shouldn’t be lied to, and I’m allowed as much speculation as I’d like if I am being lied to.

I get where you’re coming from. No one likes feeling like they are being duped or deceived. At the same time, it’s weird that you (apparently?) think you’re entitled to any information on her health. If she’s lying, she’s lying. It’s her prerogative.

It reminds of the Black Panther actor who kept his cancer diagnosis private. Can you imagine? “How DARE you keep this info from me! You’re a celebrity! You walk a red carpet and do interviews in magazines, you MUST disclose what type of cancer you have, your treatment protocol, whether you’ve lost your hair, how much weight you’ve lost!!!” That’s insane. They’re entitled to privacy and yes, they are even allowed to lie to you.

Ok, and I am entitled to say that I believe they are lying.

And people are entit

People are entitled to reply and push back. Especially when the opinion is based on misinformation.

You are just pushing the thread to top of recent topic screen-you tell people they should not post, they then write back saying who are you to tell me not to post, the same people and others then continue to talk about topic at hand to prove you wrong. Your persistentence in telling people not to discuss the topic is self defeating. If you didn't tell people not to post this thread would go dormant because no news has come out recently. You have no ability to see patters and that is concerning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is very concerning that she was last seen during Christmas and now they’re saying she will be gone for the rest of the year .


All of the appearances of Kate from 2024 have the markings of either body double or AI.


The farm stand pap appearance where her face seemingly became slender again after the TMZ car appearance with her mother where the car has five tires. The Prince William double somehow grew more hair back and became 20 years younger as did Kate. Those were obviously young stunt doubles on a paid gig

Then, there’s the BBC video with a jacketless Kate in the cold with a bird chirp soundtrack and greenery in the midst of a wintry March. BBC admits editing was done and is adamant William was not present during the filming of the statement. He wasn’t there to provide Kate moral support while she had to address the world with such devastatingly emotional news.

All of this x10000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Royals exist to serve the people of Britain. They, and their privacy, can not be compared to others.

Also, their timeline and lies keep changing. She was last seen after Christmas, then they kept repeating she will be seen after Easter.

It was reported William needs time off as well to tend to his wife and kids and a particular mention of the phrase “school run” was made in regards to William’s responsibilities. Now, she’ll be out for the rest of the year but an emphasis is made that she’ll be with the “birth family”.

Are we to really presume the kids are not with their mother at this time and that William is truly dropping and picking them up from school daily?

It’s a ridiculous notion but one the Place gave as a reasoning for Williams per usual scant work schedule .

If William is not with Kate and she’s with the birth family , why did the Palace lie? William is not with Kate and was only spotted going to the hospital to see her once back in January. Charles saw Kate more than he did

Does school not end for the summer in the UK?

The Palace made the school run comment back in March. I’m not sure if they’re in school or not now . The appearance during the soccer match with George is no accident. People were asking where the kids were and suddenly George appears.

He does give off weekend dad/divorced dad. He’s not with Kate during this time

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is very concerning that she was last seen during Christmas and now they’re saying she will be gone for the rest of the year .

All of the appearances of Kate from 2024 have the markings of either body double or AI.

The farm stand pap appearance where her face seemingly became slender again after the TMZ car appearance with her mother where the car has five tires. The Prince William double somehow grew more hair back and became 20 years younger as did Kate. Those were obviously young stunt doubles on a paid gig

Then, there’s the BBC video with a jacketless Kate in the cold with a bird chirp soundtrack and greenery in the midst of a wintry March. BBC admits editing was done and is adamant William was not present during the filming of the statement. He wasn’t there to provide Kate moral support while she had to address the world with such devastatingly emotional news.

I agree with all of this 100%. Every single piece of messaging about this situation has been shady. Honestly, it's mind boggling. They have billions at their disposal; why can they not put out one honest, trustworthy piece of communication about what is going on? They are getting doubters because they are putting out dubious information.

But do we have the 'right' to know?

This is such a ridiculous question. I shouldn’t be lied to, and I’m allowed as much speculation as I’d like if I am being lied to.

I get where you’re coming from. No one likes feeling like they are being duped or deceived. At the same time, it’s weird that you (apparently?) think you’re entitled to any information on her health. If she’s lying, she’s lying. It’s her prerogative.

It reminds of the Black Panther actor who kept his cancer diagnosis private. Can you imagine? “How DARE you keep this info from me! You’re a celebrity! You walk a red carpet and do interviews in magazines, you MUST disclose what type of cancer you have, your treatment protocol, whether you’ve lost your hair, how much weight you’ve lost!!!” That’s insane. They’re entitled to privacy and yes, they are even allowed to lie to you.

Ok, and I am entitled to say that I believe they are lying.

And people are entit

People are entitled to reply and push back. Especially when the opinion is based on misinformation.

You are just pushing the thread to top of recent topic screen-you tell people they should not post, they then write back saying who are you to tell me not to post, the same people and others then continue to talk about topic at hand to prove you wrong. Your persistentence in telling people not to discuss the topic is self defeating. If you didn't tell people not to post this thread would go dormant because no news has come out recently. You have no ability to see patters and that is concerning.

It's different people replying to you, FYI. No one is saying don't post. They are disagreeing with your, or others', posts. That's what a discussion board is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Royals exist to serve the people of Britain. They, and their privacy, can not be compared to others.

Also, their timeline and lies keep changing. She was last seen after Christmas, then they kept repeating she will be seen after Easter.

It was reported William needs time off as well to tend to his wife and kids and a particular mention of the phrase “school run” was made in regards to William’s responsibilities. Now, she’ll be out for the rest of the year but an emphasis is made that she’ll be with the “birth family”.

Are we to really presume the kids are not with their mother at this time and that William is truly dropping and picking them up from school daily?

It’s a ridiculous notion but one the Place gave as a reasoning for Williams per usual scant work schedule .

If William is not with Kate and she’s with the birth family , why did the Palace lie? William is not with Kate and was only spotted going to the hospital to see her once back in January. Charles saw Kate more than he did

Does school not end for the summer in the UK?

The kids have not been in school this year (2024). At all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The only person narcissists feel bad about is themselves. No doubt "someone" is mad at Kate for "inconveniencing" and making things about herself! Maybe some will now believe that Harry was the scapegoat all along. Without Harry to fill the role, Kate is it.

In 2024, there is no excuse for William not to be seen with his wife, sick or not, divorcing or not. Remember how often Charles was with Diana even after things collapsed?

If Kate was sick, what better time for the royals to benefit from her illness? From William holding her hand, for kids hugging their mom, to being human to us. To those who are their "subjects."
She can wear a scarf if balding; she can issue follow-up statements.
Can these people hire a Hollywood PR representative? I mean, I know they have very low IQs overall. Still, my DD, who is a media manager for a local TV and radio station, uses less interesting stories to garner hundreds of thousands of views here locally.

I wish Kate all the best. I think we can now see that they do not allow health issues to be public. Think about all of you who tore Meghan and Harry apart.

They were right. They came and said, look, we are human, we have issues, and they should not be swept under the rug.
I do think Meghan and Harry were overly dramatic in the poor us narrative; I mean, LOL!

I can't help but think that Kate is being shunned and isolated by William and the Royal PR, probably based on his orders.
It could also be that she told him she was taking this time off due to illness or for something else, or that she would go public with his dirty laundry.

There is dirty laundry, just about every rumor we had about actors later was proven true, so it will be about William. It could also be that she told him she is taking this time off for illness or for what and to get the hell away from her, or hell will break loose.

None of this makes sense at all. It is like a bunch of arrogant narcissists got together and are gaslighting Kate and the world. But, not surprising at all.

I don’t think the Middletons like William based on the comments by the uncle Gary Middleton and his best friend, Richard Eden, editor of the DM. They have to toe the line as monarchists and not say too much but the little hints Eden/DM have put out there recently make it seem like William is insensitive and doesn’t protect Kate. I agree with that assessment.

A cancer stricken Kate apologizing on Twitter for a Mothers Day picture credited to William and posted by Williams team was disgusting. William should’ve posted the apology not her even if she did edit the picture . Where’s the protection?

[Anonymous]

Tow*

[Anonymous]

I still don't think she has cancer but they/she will die on that sword.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is very concerning that she was last seen during Christmas and now they’re saying she will be gone for the rest of the year .

All of the appearances of Kate from 2024 have the markings of either body double or AI.

The farm stand pap appearance where her face seemingly became slender again after the TMZ car appearance with her mother where the car has five tires. The Prince William double somehow grew more hair back and became 20 years younger as did Kate. Those were obviously young stunt doubles on a paid gig

Then, there’s the BBC video with a jacketless Kate in the cold with a bird chirp soundtrack and greenery in the midst of a wintry March. BBC admits editing was done and is adamant William was not present during the filming of the statement. He wasn’t there to provide Kate moral support while she had to address the world with such devastatingly emotional news.

I agree with all of this 100%. Every single piece of messaging about this situation has been shady. Honestly, it's mind boggling. They have billions at their disposal; why can they not put out one honest, trustworthy piece of communication about what is going on? They are getting doubters because they are putting out dubious information.

But do we have the 'right' to know?

This is such a ridiculous question. I shouldn’t be lied to, and I’m allowed as much speculation as I’d like if I am being lied to.

I get where you’re coming from. No one likes feeling like they are being duped or deceived. At the same time, it’s weird that you (apparently?) think you’re entitled to any information on her health. If she’s lying, she’s lying. It’s her prerogative.

It reminds of the Black Panther actor who kept his cancer diagnosis private. Can you imagine? “How DARE you keep this info from me! You’re a celebrity! You walk a red carpet and do interviews in magazines, you MUST disclose what type of cancer you have, your treatment protocol, whether you’ve lost your hair, how much weight you’ve lost!!!” That’s insane. They’re entitled to privacy and yes, they are even allowed to lie to you.

+1

Black Panther in my mind is a little different. Disney put a fortune in this man to lead a Marvel franchise for Black Panther. Spent a fortune finding the right actor, promoting him, etc. Now they really have nothing to continue this franchise which was also started for the black community to have their super hero.

Guess it's all his fault for getting cancer and making Disney lose all that money.

He had the cancer before Black Panther. He knew the significance of the role. He should not have taken it. You can see the scar on his abdomen in some scenes from operation(s). He wanted to create his own legacy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Royals exist to serve the people of Britain. They, and their privacy, can not be compared to others.

Also, their timeline and lies keep changing. She was last seen after Christmas, then they kept repeating she will be seen after Easter.

It was reported William needs time off as well to tend to his wife and kids and a particular mention of the phrase “school run” was made in regards to William’s responsibilities. Now, she’ll be out for the rest of the year but an emphasis is made that she’ll be with the “birth family”.

Are we to really presume the kids are not with their mother at this time and that William is truly dropping and picking them up from school daily?

It’s a ridiculous notion but one the Place gave as a reasoning for Williams per usual scant work schedule .

If William is not with Kate and she’s with the birth family , why did the Palace lie? William is not with Kate and was only spotted going to the hospital to see her once back in January. Charles saw Kate more than he did

Does school not end for the summer in the UK?

The kids have not been in school this year (2024). At all.

How do you know this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is very concerning that she was last seen during Christmas and now they’re saying she will be gone for the rest of the year .

All of the appearances of Kate from 2024 have the markings of either body double or AI.

The farm stand pap appearance where her face seemingly became slender again after the TMZ car appearance with her mother where the car has five tires. The Prince William double somehow grew more hair back and became 20 years younger as did Kate. Those were obviously young stunt doubles on a paid gig

Then, there’s the BBC video with a jacketless Kate in the cold with a bird chirp soundtrack and greenery in the midst of a wintry March. BBC admits editing was done and is adamant William was not present during the filming of the statement. He wasn’t there to provide Kate moral support while she had to address the world with such devastatingly emotional news.

I agree with all of this 100%. Every single piece of messaging about this situation has been shady. Honestly, it's mind boggling. They have billions at their disposal; why can they not put out one honest, trustworthy piece of communication about what is going on? They are getting doubters because they are putting out dubious information.

But do we have the 'right' to know?

This is such a ridiculous question. I shouldn’t be lied to, and I’m allowed as much speculation as I’d like if I am being lied to.

I get where you’re coming from. No one likes feeling like they are being duped or deceived. At the same time, it’s weird that you (apparently?) think you’re entitled to any information on her health. If she’s lying, she’s lying. It’s her prerogative.

It reminds of the Black Panther actor who kept his cancer diagnosis private. Can you imagine? “How DARE you keep this info from me! You’re a celebrity! You walk a red carpet and do interviews in magazines, you MUST disclose what type of cancer you have, your treatment protocol, whether you’ve lost your hair, how much weight you’ve lost!!!” That’s insane. They’re entitled to privacy and yes, they are even allowed to lie to you.

+1

Black Panther in my mind is a little different. Disney put a fortune in this man to lead a Marvel franchise for Black Panther. Spent a fortune finding the right actor, promoting him, etc. Now they really have nothing to continue this franchise which was also started for the black community to have their super hero.

Huh? Game of Thrones managed to continue after Ned Stark's demise. And the Red Wedding. Harry Potter replaced the Professor Dumbledore actor without explanation when the first actor died. Disney has good writers who can craft a plot twist. Or they can opt for a prequel. Or find a long lost daughter/son.