How does your redshirted kid feel now that she/he is older?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The discussion is about how the kids feel? You all are making it about how you feel and justifying your choices by attacking those who do not have the same viewpoint as you. No one is talking about the impact on the kids. Sure, it may make academics easier. Easier is not always better. For the parent whose 8th grader struggled that makes sense if they got tutors and provided lots of support as things really start to ramp up. But, for a child doing well in school, with no academic issues or on the advanced track, how do they, not you feel about it? Do you stop and think about the other long term impacts? If a school, mainly privates don’t offer accelerated math, what if your kid needs it if they are older and more advanced or younger and more advanced? What if they don’t start algebra until 8th or 9th and your child wants it and can handle it younger? What about the opportunities after calculus and what does the school offer? That was what we faced looking at privates in middle school. For an average kid those things will not matter but for a smarter kid it may.


This is all about your feelings, ironically.

The only people attacking here are the crazed anti-redshirters Jeff had to ban.
Anonymous
I always find redshirting threads fascinating. I have a summer birthday girl that I sent on time. She's the youngest in her grade that I know of (there might be younger kids, I just haven't met them yet) even though she was born 5 weeks before the cut off.

However, what I find interesting is that one of the reasons I sent her, is one of the reasons most seem to hold back. I wanted her to struggle a little. She's very strong in reading, several grades ahead and never has had to work hard at it. I barely had to work with her on teaching her how to read. Now in math, she has to work harder. She's middle of the pack in math. She wants to be better, so she works hard. I think that's a great skill to learn.

I was one of the oldest in my grade (not held back) and academics always came easily to me. I never really had to try... then I went to college and it wasn't as easy, and I had no idea how to study or just even cope with something not coming easily to me. My more average peers struggled less because they'd had to learn how to study and time manage in a way I hadn't.
Anonymous
Redshirting is a gamble. No one knows how things will turn out, so we have to guess about the future by considering current circumstances. When you are gambling, you consider the cost of holding back a year versus the benefits. Aside from daycare costs, the cost of waiting an extra year to start school is small. The repercussions of making adjustments after that are greater.

I have frequently posted about my extremely small, sporty, ADHD, highly emotional son. He has done fine despite his challenges, and some challenges would have existed regardless of when he started school. Sports are by birth year, so his being small would have been an issue regardless of grade. However, when you combine numerous factors - small, immature, ADHD, socially awkward, and the youngest in the grade and on the young side in sports, things can be really tough. I'm still haunted by how discouraged my son was in middle school when he was an outsider on almost every level. He was giving everything he could on all fronts but not getting anywhere. It was painful to watch. We were discussing this the other day, and he said that knowing what he knows now, he wishes I had held him back. Resilience is built through leaning into positive behaviors and connections. If school is hard and you can't keep up in sports, and all of your friends are coupling off in middle school when you are years away from puberty, and you don't fit in anywhere, it's exceedingly difficult to believe in yourself and persist. Kids need to learn to overcome obstacles, but we don't need to throw them into situations where they are unlikely to succeed. I have three kids with summer birthdays, and while there is certainly a disadvantage to being the youngest, that disadvantage is more easily overcome when the child has no other issues to deal with.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:In my DD's friend group (9th grade) there are 4 girls who are redshirted. No one cares.

My observation as a parent of a teenager with ADHD - redshirting your kid will help. After about 3rd grade, my son was 6 - 18 months behind in the executive functioning elements. Middle school through the beginning of 11th grade was really hard as all the conversations were about completing homework and things that were not done in class. Now at the end of 11th grade I have a kid who has survived a lot of challenges - and I wish it did not need to be that hard for him. He is really smart - but our school is not about being smart - it is about delivering assignments the way the teachers want them.


Kids care and talk. Don't kid yourself.


DP - not at all. I have 4 kids - Redshirting is so common these days. Kids don’t care. If a student repeats 4th grade or something, it will be noticed


It's common in families like yours where you have too many kids to meet their individual needs so you take the easy road vs. the best for the child road. Maybe you young kids don't care but it gets pretty obvious when a senior is 19 all of senior year. Or, a 16 year old freshman is driving.


Huh. My redshirted summer boy will be 18 all senior year just like his non redshirted sister with a September birthday. Same thing.


How is this possible???? My non-redshirted Sep birthday kid turned 18 the first week of college.




Might be different cutoffs (September 1 versus September 30)?


Then pp should state her kid went to schools with different cutoffs, otherwise it's not possible.


Sep 1 cutoff is very common. All around the country. Your freshman will know this.


If the cutoff is Sep 1 and her dd has a Sept bday, it wouldn't be common to hold a child back if they were the oldest in the class. So, her comment that her DD "wasn't redshirted" made it sound like she was in DCPS because Sept bdays would more often be held back. Again, if the cutoff is Sep 1 her daughter would be 18 all year. A summer bday, as suggested by her other kid, would be 19.

I'm not arguing either for/against. I'm asking someone to make a claim to make it make sense.


Do you really not understand how it is possible for a redshirted kid to be 18 all of senior year as well as a non-redshirted kid?

+1 why are the anti-redshirters So.Bad.at.math?!

We live in Maryland. The cutoff is September 1st.

My redshirted son is a high school junior. August 30th, 2005. He will turn 18 right around the first day of his senior year. He will turn 19 two months AFTER he graduates. My daughter is a NON-redshirted 8th grader. September 29th, 2008. She will turn 18 about a month into her senior year of high school and thus be 18 for the vast majority of it- just like her brother.

Summer redshirts are not 19 at any point in high school. Unless they're early-mid June birthdays. But I don't think that's very common. My experience is that it's mostly August bdays that are redshirted, sometimes July, and those kids turn 19 AFTER they graduate. A summer birthday who is 19 as a senior would have been "double redshirted."


Idk but it is a constant theme of these threads. People who are opposed to redshirting cannot do even basic math. I’ve wondered before if that is why they are so bizarre: they lack some common capabilities.


Np.

I don’t think the issue is kids born one month before cutoff and holding back summer boy, the generally are more immature and this is better for everyone in the class frankly. Better behavior and focus.

The issue - which NY make strict collars on the 12-15 months allowed per grade, including starting K as a 4 yo technically - is when the redshirting creeps up and up. To June and may bdays. And March and April bdays. And then there is an 18 month span of kids and not 12 within a classroom. Or worse, a gap of no kids from April- august and thus 40% of the class is starting at the age they were supposed to turn during the year at the first day of class. Then the whole social dynamic come middle school with its range of puberty fun and growth spurts is further magnified. High school it might be less so.

And last I read 50% of teens in the dmv don’t get their license even by age 17. It’s crazy driving around here and Uber works fine.

That’s true NY put the kibash on redshirting by disallowing it. That’s what happens when parents get out of hand.


New York as a whole did not put the kibash on it. Only NYC public schools did. All the New York City private schools have a 9/1 cutoff. the NY public schools in the suburbs are generally 12/31, but allow redshirting. The private schools in the suburbs have varying cutoffs.

What this means in NYC is that any parent who wants to redshirt a fall child will go the private school route if they have the means to do so. The data in NYC is exactly the same: kids with birthdays in the last two months before the cut off are diagnosed with learning disabilities at higher rates. https://ny.chalkbeat.org/2020/2/4/21178551/your-child-s-birth-month-matters-nyc-students-born-in-november-and-december-are-classified-with-lear?_amp=true

The youngest kids in the grade will always be more likely to he at a disadvantage. The data clearly shows this, and shows that classrooms don’t accommodate the full 12-14 month range of its students, pariticwlry the younger ones. Some young kids won’t be impacted, and some will. It is fair to let the parents decide what to do with a child who falls into this range.

In my sons current 4s class with a 12/31 cutoff, there are 11 kids- 5 kids are young with fall bd days. 2 have decided to do jr k (including us) and 3 decided to have their kids move on to K because they felt they were ready. In addition, his class also has 2 current redshirts repeating 4s who turned 5 last fall. It’s pretty common, and if redshirting gives some kids the time they need to mature to cooperate better in the classroom that decision should be up to the school and parents.

Infuriating.


It is. It is why NYC is such an outlier in not allowing redshirting, and why very few other districts nationally have taken such a rigid and problematic approach.


Why is it infuriating? If the conclusion is that classrooms can't accommodate the youngest in a room with a 12-14 month range, what does redshirting solve? There will always be kids who are youngest in class. With red shirting, the potential range within the same class is even wider, making it even harder to teach to both ends of the age spectrum represented.

Fwiw my dd has a late November birthday and is thriving in her NYC public elementary school despite turning five several months into kindergarten. She's in older ES now.


Why would that be the case is the private schools in NYC are handling it just fine, and other public districts across the country are handling it just fine as well?


Lol.

You mean private schools with 16 students per lower school class can better differentiate than public schools with 25 students per classroom elementary school?

And 30 in middle school classrooms…
And 35 in HS classrooms…


Did you read the rest of the sentence? “And other public districts across the country”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The discussion is about how the kids feel? You all are making it about how you feel and justifying your choices by attacking those who do not have the same viewpoint as you. No one is talking about the impact on the kids. Sure, it may make academics easier. Easier is not always better. For the parent whose 8th grader struggled that makes sense if they got tutors and provided lots of support as things really start to ramp up. But, for a child doing well in school, with no academic issues or on the advanced track, how do they, not you feel about it? Do you stop and think about the other long term impacts? If a school, mainly privates don’t offer accelerated math, what if your kid needs it if they are older and more advanced or younger and more advanced? What if they don’t start algebra until 8th or 9th and your child wants it and can handle it younger? What about the opportunities after calculus and what does the school offer? That was what we faced looking at privates in middle school. For an average kid those things will not matter but for a smarter kid it may.


This is all about your feelings, ironically.

The only people attacking here are the crazed anti-redshirters Jeff had to ban.


Lady, you have been camped in this thread since its beginning and you are as fanatical about redshirting as some are about treating cutoffs as absolute. Redshirting has obvious advantages in the beginning and not-so-obvious drawbacks further down the line. This thread is about whether redshirted children ever regret the decision their parents made, and the answer is of course yes, some do feel set back, just as some feel it was a benefit. Unfortunately, nobody is psychic. OP's kid will probably benefit from it as long as the learning disabilities are managed. If people think redshirting is a substitute for managing other issues, yikes. I have seen that turn out badly.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Love the gaslighting: it’s not competitive to unilaterally hold back a 4 yo so they can be bigger and more developed for all of k-12.

Lol
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’m ok with the June-August redshirting, hopefully in consultation with pediatrician and preschool teacher thoughts.

I’m not ok with it sliding to March, April, may kids.

If a school is allowing that I would hope they are transparent and publish the grade breakdowns so future parents can make informed plans for their children - when starting K or moving to a new district.

It would be a difficult situation to have a good student and move to a district with significant holdbacks and a large composition of older students. I wouldn’t want to be blindsided by that, but it would be a struggle to know what to do with my own children who have summer birthdays. It is not clear how it plays out for girls or boys in grade 6-12.


You can ask the schools. They do tell you, both private and public.

For what it’s worth one of my (non-redshirted) teen’s closest friends was a redshirted February kid. I don’t know why he was redshirted, not my business. But he was clearly in the right grade for him, and is a wonderful kid. I do not think rigidity is a good answer here.


Our new middle school toed the line said they would could not have the data on birth date distribution for our rising grade, and that they do superbly well with a range of ages and maturities!

Anecdotally all the parents we spoke with redshirted and said to redshirt. It is one of those 5A high school public districts — Long Beach Poly
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:In my DD's friend group (9th grade) there are 4 girls who are redshirted. No one cares.

My observation as a parent of a teenager with ADHD - redshirting your kid will help. After about 3rd grade, my son was 6 - 18 months behind in the executive functioning elements. Middle school through the beginning of 11th grade was really hard as all the conversations were about completing homework and things that were not done in class. Now at the end of 11th grade I have a kid who has survived a lot of challenges - and I wish it did not need to be that hard for him. He is really smart - but our school is not about being smart - it is about delivering assignments the way the teachers want them.


Kids care and talk. Don't kid yourself.


DP - not at all. I have 4 kids - Redshirting is so common these days. Kids don’t care. If a student repeats 4th grade or something, it will be noticed


It's common in families like yours where you have too many kids to meet their individual needs so you take the easy road vs. the best for the child road. Maybe you young kids don't care but it gets pretty obvious when a senior is 19 all of senior year. Or, a 16 year old freshman is driving.


Huh. My redshirted summer boy will be 18 all senior year just like his non redshirted sister with a September birthday. Same thing.


How is this possible???? My non-redshirted Sep birthday kid turned 18 the first week of college.




Might be different cutoffs (September 1 versus September 30)?


Then pp should state her kid went to schools with different cutoffs, otherwise it's not possible.


Sep 1 cutoff is very common. All around the country. Your freshman will know this.


If the cutoff is Sep 1 and her dd has a Sept bday, it wouldn't be common to hold a child back if they were the oldest in the class. So, her comment that her DD "wasn't redshirted" made it sound like she was in DCPS because Sept bdays would more often be held back. Again, if the cutoff is Sep 1 her daughter would be 18 all year. A summer bday, as suggested by her other kid, would be 19.

I'm not arguing either for/against. I'm asking someone to make a claim to make it make sense.


Do you really not understand how it is possible for a redshirted kid to be 18 all of senior year as well as a non-redshirted kid?

+1 why are the anti-redshirters So.Bad.at.math?!

We live in Maryland. The cutoff is September 1st.

My redshirted son is a high school junior. August 30th, 2005. He will turn 18 right around the first day of his senior year. He will turn 19 two months AFTER he graduates. My daughter is a NON-redshirted 8th grader. September 29th, 2008. She will turn 18 about a month into her senior year of high school and thus be 18 for the vast majority of it- just like her brother.

Summer redshirts are not 19 at any point in high school. Unless they're early-mid June birthdays. But I don't think that's very common. My experience is that it's mostly August bdays that are redshirted, sometimes July, and those kids turn 19 AFTER they graduate. A summer birthday who is 19 as a senior would have been "double redshirted."


Idk but it is a constant theme of these threads. People who are opposed to redshirting cannot do even basic math. I’ve wondered before if that is why they are so bizarre: they lack some common capabilities.


Np.

I don’t think the issue is kids born one month before cutoff and holding back summer boy, the generally are more immature and this is better for everyone in the class frankly. Better behavior and focus.

The issue - which NY make strict collars on the 12-15 months allowed per grade, including starting K as a 4 yo technically - is when the redshirting creeps up and up. To June and may bdays. And March and April bdays. And then there is an 18 month span of kids and not 12 within a classroom. Or worse, a gap of no kids from April- august and thus 40% of the class is starting at the age they were supposed to turn during the year at the first day of class. Then the whole social dynamic come middle school with its range of puberty fun and growth spurts is further magnified. High school it might be less so.

And last I read 50% of teens in the dmv don’t get their license even by age 17. It’s crazy driving around here and Uber works fine.

That’s true NY put the kibash on redshirting by disallowing it. That’s what happens when parents get out of hand.


New York as a whole did not put the kibash on it. Only NYC public schools did. All the New York City private schools have a 9/1 cutoff. the NY public schools in the suburbs are generally 12/31, but allow redshirting. The private schools in the suburbs have varying cutoffs.

What this means in NYC is that any parent who wants to redshirt a fall child will go the private school route if they have the means to do so. The data in NYC is exactly the same: kids with birthdays in the last two months before the cut off are diagnosed with learning disabilities at higher rates. https://ny.chalkbeat.org/2020/2/4/21178551/your-child-s-birth-month-matters-nyc-students-born-in-november-and-december-are-classified-with-lear?_amp=true

The youngest kids in the grade will always be more likely to he at a disadvantage. The data clearly shows this, and shows that classrooms don’t accommodate the full 12-14 month range of its students, pariticwlry the younger ones. Some young kids won’t be impacted, and some will. It is fair to let the parents decide what to do with a child who falls into this range.

In my sons current 4s class with a 12/31 cutoff, there are 11 kids- 5 kids are young with fall bd days. 2 have decided to do jr k (including us) and 3 decided to have their kids move on to K because they felt they were ready. In addition, his class also has 2 current redshirts repeating 4s who turned 5 last fall. It’s pretty common, and if redshirting gives some kids the time they need to mature to cooperate better in the classroom that decision should be up to the school and parents.

Infuriating.


It is. It is why NYC is such an outlier in not allowing redshirting, and why very few other districts nationally have taken such a rigid and problematic approach.


Why is it infuriating? If the conclusion is that classrooms can't accommodate the youngest in a room with a 12-14 month range, what does redshirting solve? There will always be kids who are youngest in class. With red shirting, the potential range within the same class is even wider, making it even harder to teach to both ends of the age spectrum represented.

Fwiw my dd has a late November birthday and is thriving in her NYC public elementary school despite turning five several months into kindergarten. She's in older ES now.



DP. It's infuriating because it is totally inequitable and frankly unfair to certain kids regardless of where they fall on the social-economic spectrum. Every kid is different, but some kids come to school with challenges, whether that involves coming from poverty or a family that does not speak English or never having had high-quality pre-school, or having ADHD or whatever reason, starting school with those challenges puts kids at a disadvantage and is compounded by being the youngest (especially in NYC where kids are only 4). It is well established that the youngest in the grade are more likely to be diagnosed with learning disabilities or ADHD. Lower-income families have fewer resources to address those issues. A rigid cutoff that includes 4-year-olds in kindergarten is setting way too many kids up to fail. Are you aware that there's a world out there that doesn't just revolve around your superstar elementary schooler with a November birthday? This isn't about gaining an advantage; it's about being realistic about where kids are developmentally and whether they are able to be successful when they start school.



+1. And people like the PP almost always have a daughter they are gloating about being so mature and ahead of the others when they are young when the data clearly shows that boys are at risk.


What are the unique risks for boys? Is it being smaller for sports? Or are there some other issues?


Much more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD, much more likely to drop out.


Sounds like NCLB and Common Core testing really made school worse for everyone.

Tons of testing to get on a certain track and prove to the govt something. Too much material to cover too quickly in k-8. Took away daily gym class and two recessed. Art is only once a week. Math is 90 minutes a day half w screens; same for reading.

Thus worried parents ramp up the redshirting and tutoring and grooming.
Kids aren’t learning, just going through material and tests at breakneck speeds.
Worse is they may never slow down enough to figure out what they really enjoy doing or studying.


There is no common core testing. Common core is a set of guidelines so when kids change schools all schools are doing the similar material per year so the kids can transition well. We found k-7 painfully slow and it skipped a lot of foundation work like teaching spelling, vocabulary, grammar and math facts. We had to do that at home. Math became accelerated for sone starting in 6th.

Was 6th grade when everything hit the fan for you? Or things finally got serious with homework, grades and MAP/state tests for acceleration placement?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The discussion is about how the kids feel? You all are making it about how you feel and justifying your choices by attacking those who do not have the same viewpoint as you. No one is talking about the impact on the kids. Sure, it may make academics easier. Easier is not always better. For the parent whose 8th grader struggled that makes sense if they got tutors and provided lots of support as things really start to ramp up. But, for a child doing well in school, with no academic issues or on the advanced track, how do they, not you feel about it? Do you stop and think about the other long term impacts? If a school, mainly privates don’t offer accelerated math, what if your kid needs it if they are older and more advanced or younger and more advanced? What if they don’t start algebra until 8th or 9th and your child wants it and can handle it younger? What about the opportunities after calculus and what does the school offer? That was what we faced looking at privates in middle school. For an average kid those things will not matter but for a smarter kid it may.


This is all about your feelings, ironically.

The only people attacking here are the crazed anti-redshirters Jeff had to ban.


Stop deflecting and tell us how does your child feel about it? There are lots of things to think about. My comments are not about feelings but opportunities when kids are older.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:In my DD's friend group (9th grade) there are 4 girls who are redshirted. No one cares.

My observation as a parent of a teenager with ADHD - redshirting your kid will help. After about 3rd grade, my son was 6 - 18 months behind in the executive functioning elements. Middle school through the beginning of 11th grade was really hard as all the conversations were about completing homework and things that were not done in class. Now at the end of 11th grade I have a kid who has survived a lot of challenges - and I wish it did not need to be that hard for him. He is really smart - but our school is not about being smart - it is about delivering assignments the way the teachers want them.


Kids care and talk. Don't kid yourself.


DP - not at all. I have 4 kids - Redshirting is so common these days. Kids don’t care. If a student repeats 4th grade or something, it will be noticed


It's common in families like yours where you have too many kids to meet their individual needs so you take the easy road vs. the best for the child road. Maybe you young kids don't care but it gets pretty obvious when a senior is 19 all of senior year. Or, a 16 year old freshman is driving.


Huh. My redshirted summer boy will be 18 all senior year just like his non redshirted sister with a September birthday. Same thing.


How is this possible???? My non-redshirted Sep birthday kid turned 18 the first week of college.




Might be different cutoffs (September 1 versus September 30)?


Then pp should state her kid went to schools with different cutoffs, otherwise it's not possible.


Sep 1 cutoff is very common. All around the country. Your freshman will know this.


If the cutoff is Sep 1 and her dd has a Sept bday, it wouldn't be common to hold a child back if they were the oldest in the class. So, her comment that her DD "wasn't redshirted" made it sound like she was in DCPS because Sept bdays would more often be held back. Again, if the cutoff is Sep 1 her daughter would be 18 all year. A summer bday, as suggested by her other kid, would be 19.

I'm not arguing either for/against. I'm asking someone to make a claim to make it make sense.


Do you really not understand how it is possible for a redshirted kid to be 18 all of senior year as well as a non-redshirted kid?

+1 why are the anti-redshirters So.Bad.at.math?!

We live in Maryland. The cutoff is September 1st.

My redshirted son is a high school junior. August 30th, 2005. He will turn 18 right around the first day of his senior year. He will turn 19 two months AFTER he graduates. My daughter is a NON-redshirted 8th grader. September 29th, 2008. She will turn 18 about a month into her senior year of high school and thus be 18 for the vast majority of it- just like her brother.

Summer redshirts are not 19 at any point in high school. Unless they're early-mid June birthdays. But I don't think that's very common. My experience is that it's mostly August bdays that are redshirted, sometimes July, and those kids turn 19 AFTER they graduate. A summer birthday who is 19 as a senior would have been "double redshirted."


Idk but it is a constant theme of these threads. People who are opposed to redshirting cannot do even basic math. I’ve wondered before if that is why they are so bizarre: they lack some common capabilities.


Np.

I don’t think the issue is kids born one month before cutoff and holding back summer boy, the generally are more immature and this is better for everyone in the class frankly. Better behavior and focus.

The issue - which NY make strict collars on the 12-15 months allowed per grade, including starting K as a 4 yo technically - is when the redshirting creeps up and up. To June and may bdays. And March and April bdays. And then there is an 18 month span of kids and not 12 within a classroom. Or worse, a gap of no kids from April- august and thus 40% of the class is starting at the age they were supposed to turn during the year at the first day of class. Then the whole social dynamic come middle school with its range of puberty fun and growth spurts is further magnified. High school it might be less so.

And last I read 50% of teens in the dmv don’t get their license even by age 17. It’s crazy driving around here and Uber works fine.

That’s true NY put the kibash on redshirting by disallowing it. That’s what happens when parents get out of hand.


New York as a whole did not put the kibash on it. Only NYC public schools did. All the New York City private schools have a 9/1 cutoff. the NY public schools in the suburbs are generally 12/31, but allow redshirting. The private schools in the suburbs have varying cutoffs.

What this means in NYC is that any parent who wants to redshirt a fall child will go the private school route if they have the means to do so. The data in NYC is exactly the same: kids with birthdays in the last two months before the cut off are diagnosed with learning disabilities at higher rates. https://ny.chalkbeat.org/2020/2/4/21178551/your-child-s-birth-month-matters-nyc-students-born-in-november-and-december-are-classified-with-lear?_amp=true

The youngest kids in the grade will always be more likely to he at a disadvantage. The data clearly shows this, and shows that classrooms don’t accommodate the full 12-14 month range of its students, pariticwlry the younger ones. Some young kids won’t be impacted, and some will. It is fair to let the parents decide what to do with a child who falls into this range.

In my sons current 4s class with a 12/31 cutoff, there are 11 kids- 5 kids are young with fall bd days. 2 have decided to do jr k (including us) and 3 decided to have their kids move on to K because they felt they were ready. In addition, his class also has 2 current redshirts repeating 4s who turned 5 last fall. It’s pretty common, and if redshirting gives some kids the time they need to mature to cooperate better in the classroom that decision should be up to the school and parents.

Infuriating.


It is. It is why NYC is such an outlier in not allowing redshirting, and why very few other districts nationally have taken such a rigid and problematic approach.


Why is it infuriating? If the conclusion is that classrooms can't accommodate the youngest in a room with a 12-14 month range, what does redshirting solve? There will always be kids who are youngest in class. With red shirting, the potential range within the same class is even wider, making it even harder to teach to both ends of the age spectrum represented.

Fwiw my dd has a late November birthday and is thriving in her NYC public elementary school despite turning five several months into kindergarten. She's in older ES now.



DP. It's infuriating because it is totally inequitable and frankly unfair to certain kids regardless of where they fall on the social-economic spectrum. Every kid is different, but some kids come to school with challenges, whether that involves coming from poverty or a family that does not speak English or never having had high-quality pre-school, or having ADHD or whatever reason, starting school with those challenges puts kids at a disadvantage and is compounded by being the youngest (especially in NYC where kids are only 4). It is well established that the youngest in the grade are more likely to be diagnosed with learning disabilities or ADHD. Lower-income families have fewer resources to address those issues. A rigid cutoff that includes 4-year-olds in kindergarten is setting way too many kids up to fail. Are you aware that there's a world out there that doesn't just revolve around your superstar elementary schooler with a November birthday? This isn't about gaining an advantage; it's about being realistic about where kids are developmentally and whether they are able to be successful when they start school.



+1. And people like the PP almost always have a daughter they are gloating about being so mature and ahead of the others when they are young when the data clearly shows that boys are at risk.


What are the unique risks for boys? Is it being smaller for sports? Or are there some other issues?


Much more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD, much more likely to drop out.


Sounds like NCLB and Common Core testing really made school worse for everyone.

Tons of testing to get on a certain track and prove to the govt something. Too much material to cover too quickly in k-8. Took away daily gym class and two recessed. Art is only once a week. Math is 90 minutes a day half w screens; same for reading.

Thus worried parents ramp up the redshirting and tutoring and grooming.
Kids aren’t learning, just going through material and tests at breakneck speeds.
Worse is they may never slow down enough to figure out what they really enjoy doing or studying.


There is no common core testing. Common core is a set of guidelines so when kids change schools all schools are doing the similar material per year so the kids can transition well. We found k-7 painfully slow and it skipped a lot of foundation work like teaching spelling, vocabulary, grammar and math facts. We had to do that at home. Math became accelerated for sone starting in 6th.

Was 6th grade when everything hit the fan for you? Or things finally got serious with homework, grades and MAP/state tests for acceleration placement?


6th grade is when the kids are placed on the math track depending on the school system. 8th grade got much harder in terms of expectations, class work and homework. Once you are on the math track the testing does not matter at all as long as you pass the class. So 3-5th grade testing but really the 5th grade testing was the most important.

But things ramped up academically in 8th. I wish there were higher expectations all along so it’s not so much a shock to the kids. So the person posting their child struggled in 8th makes sense. Nothing really hit the fan for us as we knew from other parents and we are very involved and monitor everything. It’s probably child and school specific. I was not going to let mine fall through the cracks. Some of it is also teacher specific as some are amazing, some ok and some meh.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The discussion is about how the kids feel? You all are making it about how you feel and justifying your choices by attacking those who do not have the same viewpoint as you. No one is talking about the impact on the kids. Sure, it may make academics easier. Easier is not always better. For the parent whose 8th grader struggled that makes sense if they got tutors and provided lots of support as things really start to ramp up. But, for a child doing well in school, with no academic issues or on the advanced track, how do they, not you feel about it? Do you stop and think about the other long term impacts? If a school, mainly privates don’t offer accelerated math, what if your kid needs it if they are older and more advanced or younger and more advanced? What if they don’t start algebra until 8th or 9th and your child wants it and can handle it younger? What about the opportunities after calculus and what does the school offer? That was what we faced looking at privates in middle school. For an average kid those things will not matter but for a smarter kid it may.


This is all about your feelings, ironically.

The only people attacking here are the crazed anti-redshirters Jeff had to ban.


Lady, you have been camped in this thread since its beginning and you are as fanatical about redshirting as some are about treating cutoffs as absolute. Redshirting has obvious advantages in the beginning and not-so-obvious drawbacks further down the line. This thread is about whether redshirted children ever regret the decision their parents made, and the answer is of course yes, some do feel set back, just as some feel it was a benefit. Unfortunately, nobody is psychic. OP's kid will probably benefit from it as long as the learning disabilities are managed. If people think redshirting is a substitute for managing other issues, yikes. I have seen that turn out badly.


I have not been here since the beginning. However, I did post some of the only objective academic data provided in this thread. Unlike you, I don’t rely on my feelings alone in these matters.

The data seems to argue in favor of school delay as being a potentially beneficial method of mitigation of ADHD symptoms. The study from Denmark as opposed to other countries with rigid cutoffs is compelling. For OP, who had a child with ADHD, delay seems like a reasonable option.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The discussion is about how the kids feel? You all are making it about how you feel and justifying your choices by attacking those who do not have the same viewpoint as you. No one is talking about the impact on the kids. Sure, it may make academics easier. Easier is not always better. For the parent whose 8th grader struggled that makes sense if they got tutors and provided lots of support as things really start to ramp up. But, for a child doing well in school, with no academic issues or on the advanced track, how do they, not you feel about it? Do you stop and think about the other long term impacts? If a school, mainly privates don’t offer accelerated math, what if your kid needs it if they are older and more advanced or younger and more advanced? What if they don’t start algebra until 8th or 9th and your child wants it and can handle it younger? What about the opportunities after calculus and what does the school offer? That was what we faced looking at privates in middle school. For an average kid those things will not matter but for a smarter kid it may.


This is all about your feelings, ironically.

The only people attacking here are the crazed anti-redshirters Jeff had to ban.


Lady, you have been camped in this thread since its beginning and you are as fanatical about redshirting as some are about treating cutoffs as absolute. Redshirting has obvious advantages in the beginning and not-so-obvious drawbacks further down the line. This thread is about whether redshirted children ever regret the decision their parents made, and the answer is of course yes, some do feel set back, just as some feel it was a benefit. Unfortunately, nobody is psychic. OP's kid will probably benefit from it as long as the learning disabilities are managed. If people think redshirting is a substitute for managing other issues, yikes. I have seen that turn out badly.


I have not been here since the beginning. However, I did post some of the only objective academic data provided in this thread. Unlike you, I don’t rely on my feelings alone in these matters.

The data seems to argue in favor of school delay as being a potentially beneficial method of mitigation of ADHD symptoms. The study from Denmark as opposed to other countries with rigid cutoffs is compelling. For OP, who had a child with ADHD, delay seems like a reasonable option.


You posted one study with data 20 years ago from another country.

Back to the topic, how does your child feel about it? We know you will find a million reasons to justify your choice but the topic is how does your kid feel about it? I’ve talked to mine many times about it. They agree with my decision.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I always find redshirting threads fascinating. I have a summer birthday girl that I sent on time. She's the youngest in her grade that I know of (there might be younger kids, I just haven't met them yet) even though she was born 5 weeks before the cut off.

However, what I find interesting is that one of the reasons I sent her, is one of the reasons most seem to hold back. I wanted her to struggle a little. She's very strong in reading, several grades ahead and never has had to work hard at it. I barely had to work with her on teaching her how to read. Now in math, she has to work harder. She's middle of the pack in math. She wants to be better, so she works hard. I think that's a great skill to learn.

I was one of the oldest in my grade (not held back) and academics always came easily to me. I never really had to try... then I went to college and it wasn't as easy, and I had no idea how to study or just even cope with something not coming easily to me. My more average peers struggled less because they'd had to learn how to study and time manage in a way I hadn't.


Why would you redshirt a child who already knew how to read when starting school? That makes no sense.
Anonymous
Look, I don't know what is up with older kids, but in my child's first grade class (the first grade to start kindergarten after Covid), there are dozens of redshirted children, many of whom absolutely should not have been redshirted, but their parents didn't want them to have virtual K (understandable) and those children are TERRORS. Like multiple teachers at the school (my neighbors) have told me that this is by the worst first grade class ever. They've never seen classes with so many older, bored children (boys and girls) before, and that it's a nightmare. Just think about if your child is going to be bored and don't redshirt them if you just don't want them to the smallest kid in the class, that's an awful, selfish, mom-centered approach, and I will 100% judge anyone who does this.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The discussion is about how the kids feel? You all are making it about how you feel and justifying your choices by attacking those who do not have the same viewpoint as you. No one is talking about the impact on the kids. Sure, it may make academics easier. Easier is not always better. For the parent whose 8th grader struggled that makes sense if they got tutors and provided lots of support as things really start to ramp up. But, for a child doing well in school, with no academic issues or on the advanced track, how do they, not you feel about it? Do you stop and think about the other long term impacts? If a school, mainly privates don’t offer accelerated math, what if your kid needs it if they are older and more advanced or younger and more advanced? What if they don’t start algebra until 8th or 9th and your child wants it and can handle it younger? What about the opportunities after calculus and what does the school offer? That was what we faced looking at privates in middle school. For an average kid those things will not matter but for a smarter kid it may.


This is all about your feelings, ironically.

The only people attacking here are the crazed anti-redshirters Jeff had to ban.


Lady, you have been camped in this thread since its beginning and you are as fanatical about redshirting as some are about treating cutoffs as absolute. Redshirting has obvious advantages in the beginning and not-so-obvious drawbacks further down the line. This thread is about whether redshirted children ever regret the decision their parents made, and the answer is of course yes, some do feel set back, just as some feel it was a benefit. Unfortunately, nobody is psychic. OP's kid will probably benefit from it as long as the learning disabilities are managed. If people think redshirting is a substitute for managing other issues, yikes. I have seen that turn out badly.


I have not been here since the beginning. However, I did post some of the only objective academic data provided in this thread. Unlike you, I don’t rely on my feelings alone in these matters.

The data seems to argue in favor of school delay as being a potentially beneficial method of mitigation of ADHD symptoms. The study from Denmark as opposed to other countries with rigid cutoffs is compelling. For OP, who had a child with ADHD, delay seems like a reasonable option.


What about delay because so many others are redshirted (30-40% or a grade), adhd status unknown of them or your kid?
Forum Index » General Parenting Discussion
Go to: