
It is very concerning that she was last seen during Christmas and now they’re saying she will be gone for the rest of the year .
All of the appearances of Kate from 2024 have the markings of either body double or AI. The farm stand pap appearance where her face seemingly became slender again after the TMZ car appearance with her mother where the car has five tires. The Prince William double somehow grew more hair back and became 20 years younger as did Kate. Those were obviously young stunt doubles on a paid gig Then, there’s the BBC video with a jacketless Kate in the cold with a bird chirp soundtrack and greenery in the midst of a wintry March. BBC admits editing was done and is adamant William was not present during the filming of the statement. He wasn’t there to provide Kate moral support while she had to address the world with such devastatingly emotional news. |
Me too. |
My guess is ovarian cancer. |
I agree with all of this 100%. Every single piece of messaging about this situation has been shady. Honestly, it's mind boggling. They have billions at their disposal; why can they not put out one honest, trustworthy piece of communication about what is going on? They are getting doubters because they are putting out dubious information. |
People who have gone through cancer or who have had loved ones ill with cancer likely understand what might be happening in the background. What can look standoffish or secretive from the outside is often about survival and recovery. And this isn’t just regarding cancer: serious illness is hard.
They’re royals but also human beings. Kate and the children in particular are entitled to privacy on this matter. Her video explained everything and while calm, was heartbreaking. They hadn’t realized until recently the seriousness of her condition and they were working to protect the kids, while coming to terms with the diagnosis and shifting gears so she could focus on recovery. As far as “preventative chemo,” the term seems to be used more commonly in the UK, and may indicate adjuvant chemotherapy. https://news.sky.com/story/what-is-preventative-chemotherapy-experts-explain-treatment-and-when-its-used-13100076 https://healthcare.utah.edu/the-scope/health-library/all/2024/05/misconception-of-preventative-chemotherapy |
But do we have the 'right' to know? |
This is such a ridiculous question. I shouldn’t be lied to, and I’m allowed as much speculation as I’d like if I am being lied to. |
I would argue that's the wrong question. It's not an issue of "having a right to know" or not. They aren't being trustworthy. They are putting out information that lacks credibility. People aren't trusting that what they are saying is going on, is going on, because all of their communication about it has been shady. |
Exactly! |
Do they have the “right” to lie? Silence is also an option |
Rubbish. Did you watch the game? Go look at multiple photos. He frowned, he grinned, he beamed, he yelled out support, he looked excited as he shook the hand of multiple superstars. Do you smile deliriously for two hours straight? |
Are you a British subject or an American reading about this in an "entertainment" forum. They don't have to tell you anything just like I don't have to tell friends or coworkers anything about my health status. |
I’m not sure of any little boy that frowns at a ball game. I’m also not sure that any little boy would want to wear a damn suit to said ball game. Poor kid. I really feel for him living in this prison. |
You can speculate all you want, but they absolutely can lie to you if they wish to do so. Or so nothing. Or tell the truth. They are not bound to you in any way and owe you nothing. |
Silence isn't an option because then people start with the proof of life crap. The best way to proceed is by giving the minimum necessary information. That is what I would do if I had to take leave from my job, let them know generally that I am sick and when I expect to be back (which of course can be extended) without giving my coworkers details and photos. |