Fairfax homicide last night

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy clearly envied the victim’s life. Perhaps he wanted to work with Glyer. My guess is that victim was polite but got weirded out and distanced himself from shooter. That’s likely when the obsessing and anger kicked in. I don’t think victim did anything wrong, just got into the crosshairs of a mentally ill person with a gun. The question is whether the shooter was diagnosed and if any laws could have prevented this. I don’t think so. If there’s no formal diagnosis, any proposed law wouldn’t have stopped this. This is why preventing mentally I’ll from purchasing firearms is difficult. Most are likely undiagnosed even if the average person can see it.

Oh here we go with the mentally ill narrative.

The guy couldn't just be an evil degenerate?

PP here. He’s crazy and evil. You can be both. Mentally I’ll does not mean he’s innocent or should have our sympathy. He was crazy and evil as well.

On a separate note:
I can’t believe the misogyny of some on this board to still insist the wife is somehow involved even after the crazy, evil man is arrested.

There have been countless, countless threads in here about cases where the husband is immediately suspected, and perceived under a veil of suspicion. It’s the natural hypothesis in murder cases - looking at the spouse. This has nothing to do with misogyny, FFS.

Except that everything is misogynistic nowadays...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy clearly envied the victim’s life. Perhaps he wanted to work with Glyer. My guess is that victim was polite but got weirded out and distanced himself from shooter. That’s likely when the obsessing and anger kicked in. I don’t think victim did anything wrong, just got into the crosshairs of a mentally ill person with a gun. The question is whether the shooter was diagnosed and if any laws could have prevented this. I don’t think so. If there’s no formal diagnosis, any proposed law wouldn’t have stopped this. This is why preventing mentally I’ll from purchasing firearms is difficult. Most are likely undiagnosed even if the average person can see it.

Oh here we go with the mentally ill narrative.

The guy couldn't just be an evil degenerate?

PP here. He’s crazy and evil. You can be both. Mentally I’ll does not mean he’s innocent or should have our sympathy. He was crazy and evil as well.

On a separate note:
I can’t believe the misogyny of some on this board to still insist the wife is somehow involved even after the crazy, evil man is arrested.

There have been countless, countless threads in here about cases where the husband is immediately suspected, and perceived under a veil of suspicion. It’s the natural hypothesis in murder cases - looking at the spouse. This has nothing to do with misogyny, FFS.

Except that everything is misogynistic nowadays...

I thought everything was narcissistic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy clearly envied the victim’s life. Perhaps he wanted to work with Glyer. My guess is that victim was polite but got weirded out and distanced himself from shooter. That’s likely when the obsessing and anger kicked in. I don’t think victim did anything wrong, just got into the crosshairs of a mentally ill person with a gun. The question is whether the shooter was diagnosed and if any laws could have prevented this. I don’t think so. If there’s no formal diagnosis, any proposed law wouldn’t have stopped this. This is why preventing mentally I’ll from purchasing firearms is difficult. Most are likely undiagnosed even if the average person can see it.

Oh here we go with the mentally ill narrative.

The guy couldn't just be an evil degenerate?

PP here. He’s crazy and evil. You can be both. Mentally I’ll does not mean he’s innocent or should have our sympathy. He was crazy and evil as well.

On a separate note:
I can’t believe the misogyny of some on this board to still insist the wife is somehow involved even after the crazy, evil man is arrested.

There have been countless, countless threads in here about cases where the husband is immediately suspected, and perceived under a veil of suspicion. It’s the natural hypothesis in murder cases - looking at the spouse. This has nothing to do with misogyny, FFS.

Except that everything is misogynistic nowadays...

I thought everything was narcissistic.

That too...

[Anonymous]

They probably were nice to this weirdo and he got obsessed with them. This is why I keep my distance from individuals who are weird and socially off. So sad!

[Anonymous]

https://twitter.com/RamirezReports/status/1542185653370224641

[Anonymous]

I think it was about money, he had a few posts raging against materialism, hypocrisy, etc. I think he fixated negatively on Donor See or on the deceased.

The wife has issued a statement.

https://twitter.com/RamirezReports/status/1542185653370224641

[Anonymous]

Wow. You never know when your time will come. My heart goes out to his wife and family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think it was about money, he had a few posts raging against materialism, hypocrisy, etc. I think he fixated negatively on Donor See or on the deceased.

The wife has issued a statement.

https://twitter.com/RamirezReports/status/1542185653370224641

Yeah, those caught my eye, as well.

[Anonymous]

Gret was a really good guy. My DH was his last boss. I'm so sorry for his wife Heather and their kids. I'm praying for you.

I will be sure to donate periodically to Donorsee projects in his memory, even if it is only $20 because he said $20 can mean life or death in places like Malawi.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Whew. Glad it's a white guy

?

Go on…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Whew. Glad it's a white guy

?

Go on…

Zero connection to Africa or projects there. I felt same way, although that's no consolation to his poor family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be great if the police would fill us in as to whether we have anything to worry about. A random home invasion homicide in a place where there has literally not been a homicide for almost 15 years seems cause for concern to me.

It was clearly targeted. You don't need to worry.

Again, with the parroting "it was targeted" over and over. Give it a rest. You have no idea whether it was targeted, yet you keep saying it definitively as if you Know The Truth. You just want it to be targeted, either so you can feel like "It's still safe here, that can't happen to me" or because you want to crank up drama around a supposed hit job. Pathetic.

Let's wait for the real investigators to do their real jobs. Not for armchair conspiracy theorists to spout baseless theories.

Well guess we were right. He was targeted. By an acquaintance no less.

He looks rough for only age 33. WTF.

That mug shot makes me really uneasy.

[Anonymous]

https://www.facebook.com/josh.danehower.1

Eric Metaxas books too. Barf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This guy clearly envied the victim’s life. Perhaps he wanted to work with Glyer. My guess is that victim was polite but got weirded out and distanced himself from shooter. That’s likely when the obsessing and anger kicked in. I don’t think victim did anything wrong, just got into the crosshairs of a mentally ill person with a gun. The question is whether the shooter was diagnosed and if any laws could have prevented this. I don’t think so. If there’s no formal diagnosis, any proposed law wouldn’t have stopped this. This is why preventing mentally I’ll from purchasing firearms is difficult. Most are likely undiagnosed even if the average person can see it.

That's not true -- red flag laws generally don't require a formal diagnosis or prior conviction. A family member, employer or health care professional that is concerned can request a red flag and it will trigger further inquiry. In a lot of these cases, the family members are very well aware of the issues, but don't have any real way to control the individual. The purpose of the red flag law is to set a lower bar for removal of firearms than exists for criminal convictions or civil commitments. (Which totally makes sense -- a lower bar to deprive them of firearms than to deprive them of liberty entirely.)
There are also other laws that are under consideration in other states that would make a difference where someone is plainly mentally ill -- things like a training course, an interview, etc., that could reveal that someone is not rational. Geez, to be a GS leader I need two references who will talk on the phone to GS to say I'm not crazy and can be trusted with kids --- but apparently I could get a gun without anyone talking to anyone!

It's tragic on so many levels -- it does seem very likely it was a mental health issue, and there is no world in which this man should have had a gun.

[Anonymous]

Worked for FedEx at Dulles airport.

https://wtop.com/fairfax-county/2022/06/police-fairfax-city-man-shot-dead-lying-in-bed-next-to-wife-family-acquaintance-arrested/