Fairfax homicide last night

[Anonymous]

He seems to have seen himself as some kind of avenging figure against materialism.

What church did they all attend?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy clearly envied the victim’s life. Perhaps he wanted to work with Glyer. My guess is that victim was polite but got weirded out and distanced himself from shooter. That’s likely when the obsessing and anger kicked in. I don’t think victim did anything wrong, just got into the crosshairs of a mentally ill person with a gun. The question is whether the shooter was diagnosed and if any laws could have prevented this. I don’t think so. If there’s no formal diagnosis, any proposed law wouldn’t have stopped this. This is why preventing mentally I’ll from purchasing firearms is difficult. Most are likely undiagnosed even if the average person can see it.

You know nothing about this family or the perpetrator and are wildly speculating.

What tipped you off? When I said, “my guess is”.

And what are you accomplishing by speculating on crap you know nothing about?

Are you new here?

Touché

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I read Ana sticker where it said a neighbor called the police. It seems very very odd that the wife didn’t.

You’ve got it wrong. Both the wife and the neighbor called. The neighbor later said in an interview when he was on the phone with the police the ambulance were already showing up.

[Anonymous]

I stand by my assertion that devout religiosity is just mental illness directed at faith.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I read Ana sticker where it said a neighbor called the police. It seems very very odd that the wife didn’t.

You’ve got it wrong. Both the wife and the neighbor called. The neighbor later said in an interview when he was on the phone with the police the ambulance were already showing up.

Got it. Thanks for the clarification.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I stand by my assertion that devout religiosity is just mental illness directed at faith.

Agreed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I stand by my assertion that devout religiosity is just mental illness directed at faith.

I was thinking this too but we will both get flamed. Under his eye and all that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy clearly envied the victim’s life. Perhaps he wanted to work with Glyer. My guess is that victim was polite but got weirded out and distanced himself from shooter. That’s likely when the obsessing and anger kicked in. I don’t think victim did anything wrong, just got into the crosshairs of a mentally ill person with a gun. The question is whether the shooter was diagnosed and if any laws could have prevented this. I don’t think so. If there’s no formal diagnosis, any proposed law wouldn’t have stopped this. This is why preventing mentally I’ll from purchasing firearms is difficult. Most are likely undiagnosed even if the average person can see it.

You know nothing about this family or the perpetrator and are wildly speculating.

What tipped you off? When I said, “my guess is”.

And what are you accomplishing by speculating on crap you know nothing about?

Dp: they are discussing a crime, not solving it for the police. It's a discussion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I read Ana sticker where it said a neighbor called the police. It seems very very odd that the wife didn’t.

You’ve got it wrong. Both the wife and the neighbor called. The neighbor later said in an interview when he was on the phone with the police the ambulance were already showing up.

Got it. Thanks for the clarification.

I think it would be helpful if folks could really stop speculating on the wife's behavior. It's enough now, police have confirmed she is not involved and is an incredibly traumatized, grieving widow who probably won't sleep through the night for years. Whether she jumped up, tended to her husband, called 911 right away, ran to the kids room, whatever she did is none of our business to speculate or to say whether it was odd or right or wrong. This is an incredible tragedy and that seems like the least we can do.

[Anonymous]

Seems like this could be the father of the suspect:

https://www.cedarrun.net/people/tim-danehower/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Seems like this could be the father of the suspect:

https://www.cedarrun.net/people/tim-danehower/

I think that's right. Public records websites show Timothy Danehower (in his 60s) and Joshua Danehower (in his 30s) co-residing at the same address in Chantilly.

[Anonymous]

I assume this was their church

https://twitter.com/jeffreyhwalton/status/1542175875906605057

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy clearly envied the victim’s life. Perhaps he wanted to work with Glyer. My guess is that victim was polite but got weirded out and distanced himself from shooter. That’s likely when the obsessing and anger kicked in. I don’t think victim did anything wrong, just got into the crosshairs of a mentally ill person with a gun. The question is whether the shooter was diagnosed and if any laws could have prevented this. I don’t think so. If there’s no formal diagnosis, any proposed law wouldn’t have stopped this. This is why preventing mentally I’ll from purchasing firearms is difficult. Most are likely undiagnosed even if the average person can see it.

Oh here we go with the mentally ill narrative.

The guy couldn't just be an evil degenerate?

PP here. He’s crazy and evil. You can be both. Mentally I’ll does not mean he’s innocent or should have our sympathy. He was crazy and evil as well.

On a separate note:
I can’t believe the misogyny of some on this board to still insist the wife is somehow involved even after the crazy, evil man is arrested.

There have been countless, countless threads in here about cases where the husband is immediately suspected, and perceived under a veil of suspicion. It’s the natural hypothesis in murder cases - looking at the spouse. This has nothing to do with misogyny, FFS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I read Ana sticker where it said a neighbor called the police. It seems very very odd that the wife didn’t.

You’ve got it wrong. Both the wife and the neighbor called. The neighbor later said in an interview when he was on the phone with the police the ambulance were already showing up.

Got it. Thanks for the clarification.

I think it would be helpful if folks could really stop speculating on the wife's behavior. It's enough now, police have confirmed she is not involved and is an incredibly traumatized, grieving widow who probably won't sleep through the night for years. Whether she jumped up, tended to her husband, called 911 right away, ran to the kids room, whatever she did is none of our business to speculate or to say whether it was odd or right or wrong. This is an incredible tragedy and that seems like the least we can do.

Why are you on this board, and this thread, if you think those things are none of our business? This is a discussion board. It's for discussing various crap. If you don't like that, don't act all holier than thou because YOU ARE HERE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems like this could be the father of the suspect:

https://www.cedarrun.net/people/tim-danehower/

I think that's right. Public records websites show Timothy Danehower (in his 60s) and Joshua Danehower (in his 30s) co-residing at the same address in Chantilly.

Chantilly did it.