Queen Elizabeth Platinum Jubilee

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see how the monarchy will survive after the Queen has died.
Nobody likes Charles and his wife is cringe worthy.
William is bland and boring and has shielded his kids too much from the media. None of them have the kind of celebrity status he and Harry had.

Harry is right to not be a working royal. His branch of the family is not important, but he is of utmost importance in keeping up the interest in royalty. Nobody else is that interesting

His children are 8, 7, and 4. What exactly do you think they should be doing differently. We see pictures of them here and there and they are at this enormous public celebration. They aren't child actors.

DP. Compare the future Queen of Spain to George and you have your answer.

She's a teenager, there no comparison. BTW, the Spanish monarchy is much more interesting. You have a sex addict, a queen who left her H to be with the king while she was pregnant with her 1st husband and then aborted the fetus, and public drama with the MIL. Tie in drama with Monaco.

[Anonymous]

[img]https://then24.com/2022/06/03/prince-william-his-alleged-former-mistress-arrives-at-the-queens-jubilee-photos-shared-on-twitter/

Guess who was at Buckingham Palace yesterday for the Jubilee? Rose Hanbury. THAT Rose.

Poor Kate!

[Anonymous]

The concert and palace projections have been amazing!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The concert and palace projections have been amazing!

Where are you watching?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see how the monarchy will survive after the Queen has died.
Nobody likes Charles and his wife is cringe worthy.
William is bland and boring and has shielded his kids too much from the media. None of them have the kind of celebrity status he and Harry had.

Harry is right to not be a working royal. His branch of the family is not important, but he is of utmost importance in keeping up the interest in royalty. Nobody else is that interesting

His children are 8, 7, and 4. What exactly do you think they should be doing differently. We see pictures of them here and there and they are at this enormous public celebration. They aren't child actors.

DP. Compare the future Queen of Spain to George and you have your answer.

You must have extremely long arms to reach that far.

She is THIRTEEN here and she is also first in line to ascend to the throne when her father passes. She is the equivalent of Prince Charles.

Her being the 'equivalent' to anything doesn't negate the talent it takes to make erudite speeches and the commitment her parents had early to training her for crowd reception and engagement. She didn't suddenly appear at a podium at 13 and with George looking scared of his own shadow I doubt he'll be able to do anything near to what Leonor can do in three languages.

Stop picking on Prince George! You are a bully, pp

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else feel like the Queen has been holding on to meet Harry’s new baby and then… It’s the end?

More likely holding on for this platinum jubilee.


I wonder if she abdicates after this.

Nope. Her job is for LIFE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see how the monarchy will survive after the Queen has died.
Nobody likes Charles and his wife is cringe worthy.
William is bland and boring and has shielded his kids too much from the media. None of them have the kind of celebrity status he and Harry had.

Harry is right to not be a working royal. His branch of the family is not important, but he is of utmost importance in keeping up the interest in royalty. Nobody else is that interesting

His children are 8, 7, and 4. What exactly do you think they should be doing differently. We see pictures of them here and there and they are at this enormous public celebration. They aren't child actors.

DP. Compare the future Queen of Spain to George and you have your answer.

Dead wrong. The correct comparison to the Spanish crown princess is William.

You people do realize a title doesn't automatically make you capable of anything right? Hence the problem with Kate never making a public speech while maintaining the same 'rank' as her husband.

Why would she make a speech? She's the wife of the grandson of the monarch.

So what? Here's the wife of the 13th in line. Just like the other wife of the grandson of the monarch. Just like her mother-in-law. Your standards are in the basement.

Ask yourself why you care about this stuff so much and then maybe consider getting a life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see how the monarchy will survive after the Queen has died.
Nobody likes Charles and his wife is cringe worthy.
William is bland and boring and has shielded his kids too much from the media. None of them have the kind of celebrity status he and Harry had.

Harry is right to not be a working royal. His branch of the family is not important, but he is of utmost importance in keeping up the interest in royalty. Nobody else is that interesting

His children are 8, 7, and 4. What exactly do you think they should be doing differently. We see pictures of them here and there and they are at this enormous public celebration. They aren't child actors.

DP. Compare the future Queen of Spain to George and you have your answer.

She's a teenager, there no comparison. BTW, the Spanish monarchy is much more interesting. You have a sex addict, a queen who left her H to be with the king while she was pregnant with her 1st husband and then aborted the fetus, and public drama with the MIL. Tie in drama with Monaco.

+2 you’re comparing a 7 year old with someone nearly twice his age? What is wrong with you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see how the monarchy will survive after the Queen has died.
Nobody likes Charles and his wife is cringe worthy.
William is bland and boring and has shielded his kids too much from the media. None of them have the kind of celebrity status he and Harry had.

Harry is right to not be a working royal. His branch of the family is not important, but he is of utmost importance in keeping up the interest in royalty. Nobody else is that interesting

His children are 8, 7, and 4. What exactly do you think they should be doing differently. We see pictures of them here and there and they are at this enormous public celebration. They aren't child actors.

DP. Compare the future Queen of Spain to George and you have your answer.

She's a teenager, there no comparison. BTW, the Spanish monarchy is much more interesting. You have a sex addict, a queen who left her H to be with the king while she was pregnant with her 1st husband and then aborted the fetus, and public drama with the MIL. Tie in drama with Monaco.

+2 you’re comparing a 7 year old with someone nearly twice his age? What is wrong with you?

Not to quibble too much, but he’s almost 9 (I am a np here but I have a son born exactly a year later who is a ringer for Prince George so I actually know his bday even though I otherwise don’t know anything about the royals).

[Anonymous]

I have questions about the outfits Kate and Meghan wore to the Friday church service:
1) for Meghan outfit, the coat dress, would she be wearing an outfit underneath, with the intent that at some point she would take off the coat, or is a coat dress like that what you are going to wear for the duration, whether outside or inside?
2) what fabric was Kate’s dress? Her dresses often look to my very untrained eye like some kind of polyester crepe. Is that right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see how the monarchy will survive after the Queen has died.
Nobody likes Charles and his wife is cringe worthy.
William is bland and boring and has shielded his kids too much from the media. None of them have the kind of celebrity status he and Harry had.

Harry is right to not be a working royal. His branch of the family is not important, but he is of utmost importance in keeping up the interest in royalty. Nobody else is that interesting

His children are 8, 7, and 4. What exactly do you think they should be doing differently. We see pictures of them here and there and they are at this enormous public celebration. They aren't child actors.

DP. Compare the future Queen of Spain to George and you have your answer.

She's a teenager, there no comparison. BTW, the Spanish monarchy is much more interesting. You have a sex addict, a queen who left her H to be with the king while she was pregnant with her 1st husband and then aborted the fetus, and public drama with the MIL. Tie in drama with Monaco.

+2 you’re comparing a 7 year old with someone nearly twice his age? What is wrong with you?

Not to quibble too much, but he’s almost 9 (I am a np here but I have a son born exactly a year later who is a ringer for Prince George so I actually know his bday even though I otherwise don’t know anything about the royals).

It's splitting hairs - the Princess Leonor speech was posted to slam George for being supposedly "shielded from the media" by William. The point is that George is 8, almost 9, and not 13, which was the age Leonor was when she made that speech. She's also the first in line to the Spanish throne and thus would be expected to have a higher public profile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see how the monarchy will survive after the Queen has died.
Nobody likes Charles and his wife is cringe worthy.
William is bland and boring and has shielded his kids too much from the media. None of them have the kind of celebrity status he and Harry had.

Harry is right to not be a working royal. His branch of the family is not important, but he is of utmost importance in keeping up the interest in royalty. Nobody else is that interesting

His children are 8, 7, and 4. What exactly do you think they should be doing differently. We see pictures of them here and there and they are at this enormous public celebration. They aren't child actors.

DP. Compare the future Queen of Spain to George and you have your answer.

She's a teenager, there no comparison. BTW, the Spanish monarchy is much more interesting. You have a sex addict, a queen who left her H to be with the king while she was pregnant with her 1st husband and then aborted the fetus, and public drama with the MIL. Tie in drama with Monaco.

+2 you’re comparing a 7 year old with someone nearly twice his age? What is wrong with you?

Not to quibble too much, but he’s almost 9 (I am a np here but I have a son born exactly a year later who is a ringer for Prince George so I actually know his bday even though I otherwise don’t know anything about the royals).

It's splitting hairs - the Princess Leonor speech was posted to slam George for being supposedly "shielded from the media" by William. The point is that George is 8, almost 9, and not 13, which was the age Leonor was when she made that speech. She's also the first in line to the Spanish throne and thus would be expected to have a higher public profile.

Now high profile parents are slammed for shielding their children from the media? Why wouldn't they? I thought that's what good parents were supposed to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have questions about the outfits Kate and Meghan wore to the Friday church service:
1) for Meghan outfit, the coat dress, would she be wearing an outfit underneath, with the intent that at some point she would take off the coat, or is a coat dress like that what you are going to wear for the duration, whether outside or inside?
2) what fabric was Kate’s dress? Her dresses often look to my very untrained eye like some kind of polyester crepe. Is that right?

1) Coat dress for the duration whether inside or out
2) Probably wool crepe. Resists wrinkles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else feel like the Queen has been holding on to meet Harry’s new baby and then… It’s the end?

More likely holding on for this platinum jubilee.


I wonder if she abdicates after this.

Nope. Her job is for LIFE.

Like the Japanese Emperor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Prince William's A level results

A in Geography
B in Art
C in Biology

Both Geography and Art are considered completely soft subjects in the Uk, not serious A levels for universities. Obviously getting a C in Bio is pretty shit too.

Now tell us Harry's A level results.

Harry took A levels and got 2 - a B in Art and a D in Geography.

Princess Diana didn't take A levels, only GCSEs at 16, in which she got a big fat ZERO because she failed them twice then dropped out of school