Queen Elizabeth Platinum Jubilee

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see how the monarchy will survive after the Queen has died.
Nobody likes Charles and his wife is cringe worthy.
William is bland and boring and has shielded his kids too much from the media. None of them have the kind of celebrity status he and Harry had.

Harry is right to not be a working royal. His branch of the family is not important, but he is of utmost importance in keeping up the interest in royalty. Nobody else is that interesting

His children are 8, 7, and 4. What exactly do you think they should be doing differently. We see pictures of them here and there and they are at this enormous public celebration. They aren't child actors.

DP. Compare the future Queen of Spain to George and you have your answer.

You must have extremely long arms to reach that far.

She is THIRTEEN here and she is also first in line to ascend to the throne when her father passes. She is the equivalent of Prince Charles.

Her being the 'equivalent' to anything doesn't negate the talent it takes to make erudite speeches and the commitment her parents had early to training her for crowd reception and engagement. She didn't suddenly appear at a podium at 13 and with George looking scared of his own shadow I doubt he'll be able to do anything near to what Leonor can do in three languages.

George is third in line to the throne. Which may be a good 50 years away, assuming the monarchy even exists by them. Not an intelligent comparison.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see how the monarchy will survive after the Queen has died.
Nobody likes Charles and his wife is cringe worthy.
William is bland and boring and has shielded his kids too much from the media. None of them have the kind of celebrity status he and Harry had.

Harry is right to not be a working royal. His branch of the family is not important, but he is of utmost importance in keeping up the interest in royalty. Nobody else is that interesting

His children are 8, 7, and 4. What exactly do you think they should be doing differently. We see pictures of them here and there and they are at this enormous public celebration. They aren't child actors.

DP. Compare the future Queen of Spain to George and you have your answer.

Dead wrong. The correct comparison to the Spanish crown princess is William.

No, it’s Charles. He’s he first in line to the British throne, just like Lenore is the first in line in Spain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see how the monarchy will survive after the Queen has died.
Nobody likes Charles and his wife is cringe worthy.
William is bland and boring and has shielded his kids too much from the media. None of them have the kind of celebrity status he and Harry had.

Harry is right to not be a working royal. His branch of the family is not important, but he is of utmost importance in keeping up the interest in royalty. Nobody else is that interesting

His children are 8, 7, and 4. What exactly do you think they should be doing differently. We see pictures of them here and there and they are at this enormous public celebration. They aren't child actors.

DP. Compare the future Queen of Spain to George and you have your answer.

Dead wrong. The correct comparison to the Spanish crown princess is William.

You people do realize a title doesn't automatically make you capable of anything right? Hence the problem with Kate never making a public speech while maintaining the same 'rank' as her husband.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Neither has a waist. Kate is stick thin and uncomfortable to look at while Megan has no curve. I wonder how the Queen was able to keep her figure after having 4 children. She never seemed very sporty and wasn’t a smoker.

all she does is ride horses - and that's not sporty?

I don’t think riding horses can be attributed to keeping a slender figure. Maybe she did a lot hiking. She was outdoorsy.

Probably tightly controlled portions too. Not in a bad way; it's so easy to eat more calories than you need. (God knows I do it all the time).

It’s also easier to eat tightly controlled portions when you know that every day of your life, no matter what it costs, you’ll have access to fresh, healthy, wonderfully prepared food.
I’d also argue that riding horses is, indeed, sporty, and can do great things for your core — although I’d agree that the horse is getting the most exercise.

She doesn't eat. Not like starving herself like Kate but if you watch videos of the Queen's chefs - she doesn't like seasoning or anything to add flavor (garlic, rare spices etc) and both she and her mother drank continuously throughout the day.

I read somewhere that she had never eaten pizza. She's a product of her generation that didn't grow up on the fast food and junk food we see today. My grandparents wouldn't touch that stuff either. She eats food she's familiar with and maybe like many of her generation believes gluttony is a sin and is careful about what she eats.

You make it sound like traditional food, especially British, is healthier than 'fast food' or a wood-fired pizza with eggplant.

The traditional British plate is full of starches, beans, lard, pies (savory and sweet), and pork. That is what a Queen, especially one raised during the war rations period, would have been exposed to.

When she was in Balmoral she did really enjoy a diet heavy in salmon though.

The proof is in the pudding. When people ate more home cooked meals, they were thinner than they are now on a steady diet of processed fast junk food. People ate much less food overall and smaller portions.

No. When people had more outdoor exercise and walkability (whether in town or the city or the countryside) they were much thinner than they are. A lot of Europeans still eat home-cooked food and smaller portions but they're getting fatter because they're relying on private transportation more than their own two legs.

Nearly 14 percent of the French adult population is now obese, compared with 8 percent just 10 years ago.
https://www.npr.org/2011/08/06/139042221/the-french-are-getting-fatter-too

It's not that simple. From your article "However, Catheline says urbanization, immigration and globalization are moving France away from its eating traditions. Many young people are no longer interested in learning how to cook, he says, and the ritual of mealtimes is being forgotten."

and "The un-French habit of eating anywhere, anytime, seems to be catching on in France, especially with young people. It's not uncommon to see teenagers drinking out of liter bottles of soda while hanging out in the street — an unthinkable sight even a few years ago."

and again "The importance of cooking fresh food and avoiding dependence on high-calorie, processed food is at the heart of efforts to reduce obesity in France. It's not complicated, says Catheline."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see how the monarchy will survive after the Queen has died.
Nobody likes Charles and his wife is cringe worthy.
William is bland and boring and has shielded his kids too much from the media. None of them have the kind of celebrity status he and Harry had.

Harry is right to not be a working royal. His branch of the family is not important, but he is of utmost importance in keeping up the interest in royalty. Nobody else is that interesting

His children are 8, 7, and 4. What exactly do you think they should be doing differently. We see pictures of them here and there and they are at this enormous public celebration. They aren't child actors.

DP. Compare the future Queen of Spain to George and you have your answer.

Dead wrong. The correct comparison to the Spanish crown princess is William.

You people do realize a title doesn't automatically make you capable of anything right? Hence the problem with Kate never making a public speech while maintaining the same 'rank' as her husband.

So what?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Neither has a waist. Kate is stick thin and uncomfortable to look at while Megan has no curve. I wonder how the Queen was able to keep her figure after having 4 children. She never seemed very sporty and wasn’t a smoker.

all she does is ride horses - and that's not sporty?

I don’t think riding horses can be attributed to keeping a slender figure. Maybe she did a lot hiking. She was outdoorsy.

Probably tightly controlled portions too. Not in a bad way; it's so easy to eat more calories than you need. (God knows I do it all the time).

It’s also easier to eat tightly controlled portions when you know that every day of your life, no matter what it costs, you’ll have access to fresh, healthy, wonderfully prepared food.
I’d also argue that riding horses is, indeed, sporty, and can do great things for your core — although I’d agree that the horse is getting the most exercise.

She doesn't eat. Not like starving herself like Kate but if you watch videos of the Queen's chefs - she doesn't like seasoning or anything to add flavor (garlic, rare spices etc) and both she and her mother drank continuously throughout the day.

You know that The Crown wasn't a documentary, right?

DP. I wouldn't take anything in The Crown as truth, of course, but I would think something like the Queen's eating habits is the type of "insider-ish" information that good researchers would find that would make The Crown interesting and give the guise of truth, since they have guess/invent all the private conversations and interactions. I think the drinking is pretty well known fact, though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see how the monarchy will survive after the Queen has died.
Nobody likes Charles and his wife is cringe worthy.
William is bland and boring and has shielded his kids too much from the media. None of them have the kind of celebrity status he and Harry had.

Harry is right to not be a working royal. His branch of the family is not important, but he is of utmost importance in keeping up the interest in royalty. Nobody else is that interesting

His children are 8, 7, and 4. What exactly do you think they should be doing differently. We see pictures of them here and there and they are at this enormous public celebration. They aren't child actors.

DP. Compare the future Queen of Spain to George and you have your answer.

Dead wrong. The correct comparison to the Spanish crown princess is William.

No, it’s Charles. He’s he first in line to the British throne, just like Lenore is the first in line in Spain.

Leonor

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see how the monarchy will survive after the Queen has died.
Nobody likes Charles and his wife is cringe worthy.
William is bland and boring and has shielded his kids too much from the media. None of them have the kind of celebrity status he and Harry had.

Harry is right to not be a working royal. His branch of the family is not important, but he is of utmost importance in keeping up the interest in royalty. Nobody else is that interesting

His children are 8, 7, and 4. What exactly do you think they should be doing differently. We see pictures of them here and there and they are at this enormous public celebration. They aren't child actors.

DP. Compare the future Queen of Spain to George and you have your answer.

Dead wrong. The correct comparison to the Spanish crown princess is William.

You people do realize a title doesn't automatically make you capable of anything right? Hence the problem with Kate never making a public speech while maintaining the same 'rank' as her husband.

Why would she make a speech? She's the wife of the grandson of the monarch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see how the monarchy will survive after the Queen has died.
Nobody likes Charles and his wife is cringe worthy.
William is bland and boring and has shielded his kids too much from the media. None of them have the kind of celebrity status he and Harry had.

Harry is right to not be a working royal. His branch of the family is not important, but he is of utmost importance in keeping up the interest in royalty. Nobody else is that interesting

His children are 8, 7, and 4. What exactly do you think they should be doing differently. We see pictures of them here and there and they are at this enormous public celebration. They aren't child actors.

DP. Compare the future Queen of Spain to George and you have your answer.

Dead wrong. The correct comparison to the Spanish crown princess is William.

You people do realize a title doesn't automatically make you capable of anything right? Hence the problem with Kate never making a public speech while maintaining the same 'rank' as her husband.

Why would she make a speech? She's the wife of the grandson of the monarch.

So what? Here's the wife of the 13th in line. Just like the other wife of the grandson of the monarch. Just like her mother-in-law. Your standards are in the basement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see how the monarchy will survive after the Queen has died.
Nobody likes Charles and his wife is cringe worthy.
William is bland and boring and has shielded his kids too much from the media. None of them have the kind of celebrity status he and Harry had.

Harry is right to not be a working royal. His branch of the family is not important, but he is of utmost importance in keeping up the interest in royalty. Nobody else is that interesting

His children are 8, 7, and 4. What exactly do you think they should be doing differently. We see pictures of them here and there and they are at this enormous public celebration. They aren't child actors.

DP. Compare the future Queen of Spain to George and you have your answer.

Dead wrong. The correct comparison to the Spanish crown princess is William.

You people do realize a title doesn't automatically make you capable of anything right? Hence the problem with Kate never making a public speech while maintaining the same 'rank' as her husband.

Why would she make a speech? She's the wife of the grandson of the monarch.

So what? Here's the wife of the 13th in line. Just like the other wife of the grandson of the monarch. Just like her mother-in-law. Your standards are in the basement.

Who are you set the “standards”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see how the monarchy will survive after the Queen has died.
Nobody likes Charles and his wife is cringe worthy.
William is bland and boring and has shielded his kids too much from the media. None of them have the kind of celebrity status he and Harry had.

Harry is right to not be a working royal. His branch of the family is not important, but he is of utmost importance in keeping up the interest in royalty. Nobody else is that interesting

His children are 8, 7, and 4. What exactly do you think they should be doing differently. We see pictures of them here and there and they are at this enormous public celebration. They aren't child actors.

DP. Compare the future Queen of Spain to George and you have your answer.

Dead wrong. The correct comparison to the Spanish crown princess is William.

You people do realize a title doesn't automatically make you capable of anything right? Hence the problem with Kate never making a public speech while maintaining the same 'rank' as her husband.

Here is a link to the Duchess of Cambridge's first public speech - in 2012:

You're really getting your lunch eaten today PP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see how the monarchy will survive after the Queen has died.
Nobody likes Charles and his wife is cringe worthy.
William is bland and boring and has shielded his kids too much from the media. None of them have the kind of celebrity status he and Harry had.

Harry is right to not be a working royal. His branch of the family is not important, but he is of utmost importance in keeping up the interest in royalty. Nobody else is that interesting

His children are 8, 7, and 4. What exactly do you think they should be doing differently. We see pictures of them here and there and they are at this enormous public celebration. They aren't child actors.

DP. Compare the future Queen of Spain to George and you have your answer.

Dead wrong. The correct comparison to the Spanish crown princess is William.

You people do realize a title doesn't automatically make you capable of anything right? Hence the problem with Kate never making a public speech while maintaining the same 'rank' as her husband.

Here is a link to the Duchess of Cambridge's first public speech - in 2012:

You're really getting your lunch eaten today PP.

She can't go 2 words without looking down at her paper. Talk about lunch eaten. Now I know why she's been mute for 10 years.

Funnily enough it seems like Kate had more confidence before her pregnancies and into the mid-years of her marriage. I wonder what happened?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see how the monarchy will survive after the Queen has died.
Nobody likes Charles and his wife is cringe worthy.
William is bland and boring and has shielded his kids too much from the media. None of them have the kind of celebrity status he and Harry had.

Harry is right to not be a working royal. His branch of the family is not important, but he is of utmost importance in keeping up the interest in royalty. Nobody else is that interesting

His children are 8, 7, and 4. What exactly do you think they should be doing differently. We see pictures of them here and there and they are at this enormous public celebration. They aren't child actors.

DP. Compare the future Queen of Spain to George and you have your answer.

Dead wrong. The correct comparison to the Spanish crown princess is William.

You people do realize a title doesn't automatically make you capable of anything right? Hence the problem with Kate never making a public speech while maintaining the same 'rank' as her husband.

Here is a link to the Duchess of Cambridge's first public speech - in 2012:

You're really getting your lunch eaten today PP.

She can't go 2 words without looking down at her paper. Talk about lunch eaten. Now I know why she's been mute for 10 years.

Funnily enough it seems like Kate had more confidence before her pregnancies and into the mid-years of her marriage. I wonder what happened?

I just want you to know that the intense dislike you have for an 8 year old and his mom are concerning. You should seek help because it is bizarre.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see how the monarchy will survive after the Queen has died.
Nobody likes Charles and his wife is cringe worthy.
William is bland and boring and has shielded his kids too much from the media. None of them have the kind of celebrity status he and Harry had.

Harry is right to not be a working royal. His branch of the family is not important, but he is of utmost importance in keeping up the interest in royalty. Nobody else is that interesting

His children are 8, 7, and 4. What exactly do you think they should be doing differently. We see pictures of them here and there and they are at this enormous public celebration. They aren't child actors.

DP. Compare the future Queen of Spain to George and you have your answer.

Dead wrong. The correct comparison to the Spanish crown princess is William.

You people do realize a title doesn't automatically make you capable of anything right? Hence the problem with Kate never making a public speech while maintaining the same 'rank' as her husband.

Here is a link to the Duchess of Cambridge's first public speech - in 2012:

You're really getting your lunch eaten today PP.

She can't go 2 words without looking down at her paper. Talk about lunch eaten. Now I know why she's been mute for 10 years.

Funnily enough it seems like Kate had more confidence before her pregnancies and into the mid-years of her marriage. I wonder what happened?

I just want you to know that the intense dislike you have for an 8 year old and his mom are concerning. You should seek help because it is bizarre.

Oh come on, questioning their ability to do what will be required for a lifetime is not 'dislike'. Royals are like faux-politician celebrities, comes with the territory.

BTW I absolutely love this picture of the two Cambridge siblings. Charlotte looks AMAZING. Vivacious, appropriately dressed for her age but not like a Victorian doll.

George looks like an investment banker who just got called in front of the CEO for a $1 billion loss.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will be interesting to see how the monarchy will survive after the Queen has died.
Nobody likes Charles and his wife is cringe worthy.
William is bland and boring and has shielded his kids too much from the media. None of them have the kind of celebrity status he and Harry had.

Harry is right to not be a working royal. His branch of the family is not important, but he is of utmost importance in keeping up the interest in royalty. Nobody else is that interesting

His children are 8, 7, and 4. What exactly do you think they should be doing differently. We see pictures of them here and there and they are at this enormous public celebration. They aren't child actors.

DP. Compare the future Queen of Spain to George and you have your answer.

Dead wrong. The correct comparison to the Spanish crown princess is William.

You people do realize a title doesn't automatically make you capable of anything right? Hence the problem with Kate never making a public speech while maintaining the same 'rank' as her husband.

Here is a link to the Duchess of Cambridge's first public speech - in 2012:

You're really getting your lunch eaten today PP.

She can't go 2 words without looking down at her paper. Talk about lunch eaten. Now I know why she's been mute for 10 years.

Funnily enough it seems like Kate had more confidence before her pregnancies and into the mid-years of her marriage. I wonder what happened?

Talk about obnoxious supporters Maybe these kinds of statements undermine your cause?