She picked Tim

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just watched Walz speech at the DNC.

IMO, he epitomizes the All American guy -- military service, teacher, coach (multiple teams that he lead to championships), grew up on a farm, child of teachers; unassuming, yet ready to lend a helping hand.

I have zero in common with him. I'm a child of immigrants, non white, grew up in a city in CA, female, love spicy foods. I could not be more different from him, but little me sees him as a hero.

When I found out that he had called around the school district to pick up extra jobs to pay for kids lunches, I was so touched. I often went hungry at school when I was in ES (I now make six figures and have a HHI NW of $4mil+).

Being a coach, he knows how to energize people, motivate them to be and do their best. He is what the US and the world needs right now - a man of compassion, and true leadership.


This choked me up. I’m going to pay some kids’ lunch balances this year. Thank you for the idea.


I have two children in school. I keep their lunch balanced up-to-date throughout the year. Every year at the end of the school year, I call the company that administers our lunch program and have them transfer the balance of our two accounts (down to $5 which keeps the accounts throughout the summer) to help pay off accounts that are in arrears (e.g. accounts that have negative balances). At the start of the school year, I top the accounts off again. I'm not positive, but I think a few years ago, the cordinator told me that they usually start with accounts have have had a negative balance for the longest time, but it's been a few years, and our school changed lunch account vendors, so not sure whether this is or ever was true or if it was wishful thinking on my part.

Thank you for this!!
Anonymous
Not sure if this has been discussed, but I read that even though he said he wouldn’t have a family if there was no IVF, they didn’t actually conceive using IVF - they used IUI. Totally different.
Anonymous
Great pick. Tim is a gem with lots of experience (on his two-terms as governor with 4-5 terms in the House). His family is wonderful too.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this has been discussed, but I read that even though he said he wouldn’t have a family if there was no IVF, they didn’t actually conceive using IVF - they used IUI. Totally different.


It’s been discussed and it’s a stupid thing to nit pick over. Most people don’t know what IUI is and unless you have zero social skills, you’re not going to explain it every time you discuss it.
Anonymous
Is it true he was just an assistant volunteer coach? Does anyone know what grade level kids he coached?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Is it true he was just an assistant volunteer coach? Does anyone know what grade level kids he coached?


No thinking person cares. It doesn’t matter.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Is it true he was just an assistant volunteer coach? Does anyone know what grade level kids he coached?


No thinking person cares. It doesn’t matter.


Not quite the image that’s trying to be projected though. Of either candidate— kind of like the wizard of Oz-/ “don’t look behind the curtain!”

I hate Trump, but at least you know what you’re getting.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this has been discussed, but I read that even though he said he wouldn’t have a family if there was no IVF, they didn’t actually conceive using IVF - they used IUI. Totally different.


It’s been discussed and it’s a stupid thing to nit pick over. Most people don’t know what IUI is and unless you have zero social skills, you’re not going to explain it every time you discuss it.


Of course if it’s your candidate it’s stupid to nit pick over. The guy lied. He didn’t use IVF, but said he did to score political points. Own it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this has been discussed, but I read that even though he said he wouldn’t have a family if there was no IVF, they didn’t actually conceive using IVF - they used IUI. Totally different.


It’s been discussed and it’s a stupid thing to nit pick over. Most people don’t know what IUI is and unless you have zero social skills, you’re not going to explain it every time you discuss it.


Of course if it’s your candidate it’s stupid to nit pick over. The guy lied. He didn’t use IVF, but said he did to score political points. Own it.


Why are you so bizarre?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this has been discussed, but I read that even though he said he wouldn’t have a family if there was no IVF, they didn’t actually conceive using IVF - they used IUI. Totally different.


It’s been discussed and it’s a stupid thing to nit pick over. Most people don’t know what IUI is and unless you have zero social skills, you’re not going to explain it every time you discuss it.


Of course if it’s your candidate it’s stupid to nit pick over. The guy lied. He didn’t use IVF, but said he did to score political points. Own it.


Why are you so bizarre?


Ooh what a zinger.
But, your guy still lied for political points.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this has been discussed, but I read that even though he said he wouldn’t have a family if there was no IVF, they didn’t actually conceive using IVF - they used IUI. Totally different.


It’s been discussed and it’s a stupid thing to nit pick over. Most people don’t know what IUI is and unless you have zero social skills, you’re not going to explain it every time you discuss it.


Of course if it’s your candidate it’s stupid to nit pick over. The guy lied. He didn’t use IVF, but said he did to score political points. Own it.


Why are you so bizarre?


Ooh what a zinger.
But, your guy still lied for political points.


IRL you must bore people with the level of detail and minutia you add to every conversation. No one with social skills thinks what he did was weird or deceptive.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this has been discussed, but I read that even though he said he wouldn’t have a family if there was no IVF, they didn’t actually conceive using IVF - they used IUI. Totally different.


It’s been discussed and it’s a stupid thing to nit pick over. Most people don’t know what IUI is and unless you have zero social skills, you’re not going to explain it every time you discuss it.


Of course if it’s your candidate it’s stupid to nit pick over. The guy lied. He didn’t use IVF, but said he did to score political points. Own it.


Why are you so bizarre?


Ooh what a zinger.
But, your guy still lied for political points.


IRL you must bore people with the level of detail and minutia you add to every conversation. No one with social skills thinks what he did was weird or deceptive.


No, none of the Dems do because, yiu know, their fellow Dems can do no wrong. It was 100% deceptive to those of us who are familiar with IVF. And, you know, science.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this has been discussed, but I read that even though he said he wouldn’t have a family if there was no IVF, they didn’t actually conceive using IVF - they used IUI. Totally different.


It’s been discussed and it’s a stupid thing to nit pick over. Most people don’t know what IUI is and unless you have zero social skills, you’re not going to explain it every time you discuss it.


Of course if it’s your candidate it’s stupid to nit pick over. The guy lied. He didn’t use IVF, but said he did to score political points. Own it.


Why are you so bizarre?


Ooh what a zinger.
But, your guy still lied for political points.


IRL you must bore people with the level of detail and minutia you add to every conversation. No one with social skills thinks what he did was weird or deceptive.


No, none of the Dems do because, yiu know, their fellow Dems can do no wrong. It was 100% deceptive to those of us who are familiar with IVF. And, you know, science.



Dems kick out the criminals in their party. Republicans elevate them.

If you hold everyone to this odd standard of precision context be damned, you *must* be the life of the party. I for one don’t need to know the details of their insemination. Pretty sure I’m not alone.
Anonymous
Have never, not once, heard anyone say they did IUI. Weird to be fixated on this. The poster joking about the filter nailed it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this has been discussed, but I read that even though he said he wouldn’t have a family if there was no IVF, they didn’t actually conceive using IVF - they used IUI. Totally different.


It’s been discussed and it’s a stupid thing to nit pick over. Most people don’t know what IUI is and unless you have zero social skills, you’re not going to explain it every time you discuss it.


Of course if it’s your candidate it’s stupid to nit pick over. The guy lied. He didn’t use IVF, but said he did to score political points. Own it.


Why are you so bizarre?


Ooh what a zinger.
But, your guy still lied for political points.

You're "that guy" at partys aren't you?
The guy no one wants to be cornered by, and you do, don't you?
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: