+1. If this is how you think, it's unlikely you'll be able to suppress these feeling and resentment will grow. The little things before marriage become the big things after marriage. Trust me. |
| I considered whether he was financially responsible. He had a solid work history, he owned his own condo, he saved money, and he was a reasonable spender. He had some professional ambition but wasn't a workaholic. I did not consider his salary. I wanted someone who was a grownup and would contribute. I expected to work, too. |
Probably a happy life, lol. Men marry for sex and often for youth. If it works for the couple that's a good marriage. |
| I didn't marry for money though I knew he had ambition and potential. His parents were comfortable but we never benefited directly from that until we had been married 35 years. While love was the driver along with feeling he'd be a good husband and father there is no doubt that his long term earning potential was good. Frankly, he's done far better than I could have ever hoped plus been a great husband and father. If he has ambition and potential then you should be fine! |
| Yes a big factor. Also, being responsible with money management and being ok with a wife that stayed home. It's worked out well. |
Oh, let's be serious. OP will marry some un-sexy mediocre-personality guy with tons of money. Then pop out three babies. Then he'll be posting here about his sexless marriage, and she'll be posting about how she hates him for never helping out around the house. |
You'd be surprised at some of those you think are doing well. Honestly, managing your money and wisely investing makes a big difference. With both of you it shouldn't be a problem. Helping parents is ok, NOT supporting them. |
Women marry appreciating assets. Men marry depreciating assets. Men are stupid. They should lease. |
Hate to be rude, but you're kind of hijacking OP's question and turning into what your marriage is/isn't. I just don't see how this will be helpful for OP. |
| It wasn't for me because I had much higher earning potential and was fine with that. I continue to earn a healthy income. After 20 years DH left the govt and now does very well. So it turned out well financially but definitely not the reason for getting married. |
OP, how do you know who has what? You people actually talk about this stuff? If someone asked me or DH, we would either not answer you or give you the wrong information, so you would back off. Then, I would question your motives, then I would probably not bother with you. Most people marry young and poor. For better, worse, richer, poorer, all that. That, and the rich people I know want their own kind (like PP stated). They know who is sniffing around for what (even if they try to hide it, which they can not) - what part of that is appealing? |
| It was a factor in who I decided to date. But I can't imagine getting to the point you are talking about marriage and then breaking up over it. |
| OP, it's ok to have a bottom line for earning and potential. We all have our dealbreakers. But, if you are holding out for a man who make $300k plus, and it handsome and kind, you are shooting for a 1%. Are you a 1% for women? Fun, young, super attractive, great in bed? If not, you aren't being realistic about what you can land. |
+1. And I think it's a big factor for those of us dating for the second time around. The first time I met a man and fell in love we were in our early 20s. He was driven but certainly not rolling in it and with a HS diploma, the odds of him making it big financially were stacked against him. Then again at that time I was making $18K/yr so really I had no room to talk. We both grew and developed. He now makes $500K and I make $200K. We divorced and now I'm dating again. It would be very hard for me to date a man that made less than I do. |
|
Not at all.
But intellect, degrees and diploma did, even though I knew, since he was doing research, that they would not translate to a high HHI. |