Is "sugar" a thing in DMV upper class?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:OP prostitution is known as the oldest profession for a reason.

Calling is “sugaring” or “sex work” doesn’t change this reality.


This. And the transition from wh*re to wife is an unrealistic hope. Pretty Woman was a movie. Of course men with money have more money to spend on all sorts of things.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
NP. When I was in college I totally would've gone for an arrangement like this for ~$2k a month. Different people look at it differently but to me, I don't think there's anything undignified about the casual sex & it's decent money for something I would've found less obnoxious than working a more traditional job. Better/fewer hours and more enjoyable. Definitely not for everyone though.


Maybe if the guy is not married but why go for an old married guy that likely has a wife and kids? Just for a little money?


I have some friends who are sugar daddies. You're probably thinking these are balding guys in their 50s who are sloppy and with a huge beer belly. They aren't like that at all. They are all fit, dress well, and are charming. Remember these are successful people in their career, and you usually need to have those characteristics to do well in your career anyway.

Also I've found that women in their early 20s aren't thinking about marriage or long-term, so being married isn't a big deal to them. I've been out at bars and social events and talking to women that age, and when they ask more probing questions like do I have a girlfriend, I point to the ring on my finger. They don't even think to look at that age. Now, talk to a woman in her late 20's or early 30's and they notice it right away.



You can still have morals even if you talk like a drunken sailor
Christ, the way people are raised these days. My family would be horrified if I were committing adultery by screwing married men. It may not be your marriage, but it is very low morals/character to not respect someone else's marriage. Karma will come bite you in the *ss down the road.

Then again, I'm talking to women selling their p*ssy for $ so morals are obviously not there.


And yet you’re using the Lord’s name to swear and in the context of your vulgar post.
Anonymous
I would never be a sugar daddy, but I can empathize with those who go that route.

In many cultures around the world, including those which are very religious or spiritual, there is a mistress or sugar baby element. Latinos and Japanese men are prime examples. There are unwritten rules of keeping things discreet and everyone is witting.

The problem I see with the U.S. model is that the wife is generally not witting. So the risk is exposure which could lead to divorce. And unlike Ashley Madison (just watched the Netflix documentary), where each party in the affair wishes to keep it secret, a sugar baby is generally not married herself. For that reason alone, sugar daddies are in a high risk business of being blackmailed.

And looking at the pictures and profiles of sugar babies in the DC area, many of them look like players and are not particularly attractive. Can't see the risk as being worth the gain. Dumb idea.



Anonymous
There are plenty of hot sugar babies on Seeking in DC. In NYC the women are outstanding. Just be prepared for a chance of a blow up.

Life is full of risks. If you feel the risk/ reward is worth it, go for it.


Anonymous wrote:I would never be a sugar daddy, but I can empathize with those who go that route.

In many cultures around the world, including those which are very religious or spiritual, there is a mistress or sugar baby element. Latinos and Japanese men are prime examples. There are unwritten rules of keeping things discreet and everyone is witting.

The problem I see with the U.S. model is that the wife is generally not witting. So the risk is exposure which could lead to divorce. And unlike Ashley Madison (just watched the Netflix documentary), where each party in the affair wishes to keep it secret, a sugar baby is generally not married herself. For that reason alone, sugar daddies are in a high risk business of being blackmailed.

And looking at the pictures and profiles of sugar babies in the DC area, many of them look like players and are not particularly attractive. Can't see the risk as being worth the gain. Dumb idea.



Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:To the guys who do this: Do you ever feel like you've lost a bit of dignity knowing a woman who otherwise would have no interest in you is only into you for money and wouldn't give you the time of day except for that fact?

I mean frankly, if my only choices were being wanted for my body vs money, I'd feel less humiliated w/ the former, because it's still me who is desired.



It’s embarrassing to see. Basically prostitution for guys that don’t have the game to get women.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:To the guys who do this: Do you ever feel like you've lost a bit of dignity knowing a woman who otherwise would have no interest in you is only into you for money and wouldn't give you the time of day except for that fact?

I mean frankly, if my only choices were being wanted for my body vs money, I'd feel less humiliated w/ the former, because it's still me who is desired.



It’s embarrassing to see. Basically prostitution for guys that don’t have the game to get women.


I see it as more of an entertainment arrangement. Not an emotional relationship.

I have no intention of getting married again and don’t invite drama in my life.
Anonymous
The men on Seeking are generally gross looking and would not get an attractive woman otherwise. They would have to put out money in real life dating. So money-wise, it’s a wash for them. With sugar babies, they can at least stoke their egos and think they have game.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The men on Seeking are generally gross looking and would not get an attractive woman otherwise. They would have to put out money in real life dating. So money-wise, it’s a wash for them. With sugar babies, they can at least stoke their egos and think they have game.


In the end everyone gets what they want. No issue with this so long as no one gets hurt.
Anonymous
And to add for the women considering this, know that most of the men will try to scam you and give you little or no money. A lot of them have over inflated egos and think making $250K is a lot of money. Chances are, you’re not gonna get the truly wealthy guy.

The ones that do give gifts, after a bit of time, they will tell you that they want to make it real, that they “love” you, and want to evolve the relationship and get the sex for free.

Sure, people are in it and get what they want. Just saying that both parties are playing the game and be careful of STDs.
Anonymous
Use every tool that you have. Some guys look like Tom Brady. Some guys don't but are wealthy. Why else get rich if you can't use it to sleep with beautiful women?


Larry David was asked if it bothers him that all these beautiful young women want to date/sleep with him just because he is rich and famous. His answer was,"Does it bother me, of course it doesn't bother me. That's the whole reason I did this in the 1st place. Why else would they want to be with me. Do they have a propensity to sleep with old bald men?"


Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:To the guys who do this: Do you ever feel like you've lost a bit of dignity knowing a woman who otherwise would have no interest in you is only into you for money and wouldn't give you the time of day except for that fact?

I mean frankly, if my only choices were being wanted for my body vs money, I'd feel less humiliated w/ the former, because it's still me who is desired.



It’s embarrassing to see. Basically prostitution for guys that don’t have the game to get women.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:And to add for the women considering this, know that most of the men will try to scam you and give you little or no money. A lot of them have over inflated egos and think making $250K is a lot of money. Chances are, you’re not gonna get the truly wealthy guy.

The ones that do give gifts, after a bit of time, they will tell you that they want to make it real, that they “love” you, and want to evolve the relationship and get the sex for free.

Sure, people are in it and get what they want. Just saying that both parties are playing the game and be careful of STDs.


Wow that sounds nuts. Definitely not the types of arrangements I’ve had.
Anonymous
sorry for an uninformed question, but what exactly does sugar daddy mean? paying cash directly for sex is called prostitution. paying for expensive meals, hotels, travel, clothes etc. in exchange for sex is called dating.

I assume that sugar daddy's are somewhere in the middle, but what do they pay for?
Anonymous
I’m a middle aged woman. Out of curiosity I went and registered as a man on seeking to see what these women in DC look like. Most are ugly! Very few attractive ones, and I would just classify them as average

Not sure what exactly you are paying for, guys in dmv area.

Ladies in NYC are stunning though
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I’m a middle aged woman. Out of curiosity I went and registered as a man on seeking to see what these women in DC look like. Most are ugly! Very few attractive ones, and I would just classify them as average

Not sure what exactly you are paying for, guys in dmv area.

Ladies in NYC are stunning though


+1. A couple of years ago Seeking was great. I could meet up with multiple hot women per week if I wanted. Recently it’s died up and mostly ugly women. Deleted my account.
Anonymous
NYC women without question blow away DC women--models, fashions girls etc.

To get top talent for DC you need to select slim or athletic for build and under 36 years of age,,,not NYC, but not bad.


Anonymous wrote:I’m a middle aged woman. Out of curiosity I went and registered as a man on seeking to see what these women in DC look like. Most are ugly! Very few attractive ones, and I would just classify them as average

Not sure what exactly you are paying for, guys in dmv area.

Ladies in NYC are stunning though
Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Go to: