Mueller does not find Trump campaign knowingly conspired with Russia

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Excellent thread by Kimberley Strassel:

1) On the #NoCollusion findings of Mueller's report. It's worth recognizing that this is more than an exoneration. It's a searing indictment of the FBI.

2) If you are going to investigate a presidential campaign, and on a charge as grave as collusion, and with the heavy-handed tactics the FBI employed--you'd better have a highly convincing reason to act. The Mueller report is a judgment that never was any real evidence.

3) The Papadopoulos conversation was always thin gruel. And the Mueller findings now prove the dossier was a fabrication. The country now deserves a full accounting of how the FBI blew this so badly--so that it doesn't happen again.

4) If Mueller has done his job, he will address some of this. But the real accounting needs to come from a full declassification of FBI/DOJ probe docs. Mueller report is only half the story. Time to go back to the beginning, to how we got a special counsel in first place.

Time to remind people: the FBI operates without a legal charter. It was hatched by Teddy Roosevelt to pursue his agenda. It's time we re-examine the frightening powers we give to law enforcement and the intelligence agencies.

In early 2016, Peter Strozk was just a section chief, and Andy McCabe the head of a FBI field office. The fact that they could start an investigation against a presidential candidate of a major party during an election year, largely based on the opposing party's "research", shows the enormous unchecked power of unelected buracrats.

People will lose faith in our institutions if John Brennan, James Comey, Andy McCabe and Peter Strozk are not investigated. The same rigor from Mueller needs to apply here.

Except the report says that Russia did try and get Trump collude. His only saving Grace was that he (and Jr.) we're too stupid and ignorant of world affairs to pick up on the efforts. This doesn't exonerate Trump it just says he was too.stupid to realize what was going on. How was the FBI supposed to know that the president elect was dumber than a sophmore pol sci undergrad? Without an investigation we'd have never known whether he was stupid or evil. Turns out he's just stupid. Congratulations! Yeah America

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am Russian and a non citizen. I just have this vague hope that maybe Russia will finally be left alone? I am not a fan of trump and I don’t care what happens to him. He is a disgrace to his country. My opinion on Putin is not black and white; in fact I thought there was collusion - I am happy there wasn’t.
Now can everyone leave Russia alone?
The fact that there was no collusion just proves how democrats are completely removed from an average Joe. They lost because they they didn’t care for anything except looking progressive. Now they are at it again: reparations, illegal amnesty/welcoming hordes of unvetted illiterate masses who will be a burden on taxpayer for years; shoving non traditional candidates down peoples throats.
Who needs Russia if dems are so good at digging their own graves?
It is also sad that there is no alternative really. Republicans are so backwards with their pro life views and fascination with religion. Trump at least does not sincerely believe any of that, he just cares about his own good. Who is there to like and vote for?
Please please American people leave my country alone and focus on your own problems.

You are correct in your analysis! It takes a non-citizen to see the truth. (Our educational system is going down the sh*tter.)

lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Excellent thread by Kimberley Strassel:

1) On the #NoCollusion findings of Mueller's report. It's worth recognizing that this is more than an exoneration. It's a searing indictment of the FBI.

2) If you are going to investigate a presidential campaign, and on a charge as grave as collusion, and with the heavy-handed tactics the FBI employed--you'd better have a highly convincing reason to act. The Mueller report is a judgment that never was any real evidence.

3) The Papadopoulos conversation was always thin gruel. And the Mueller findings now prove the dossier was a fabrication. The country now deserves a full accounting of how the FBI blew this so badly--so that it doesn't happen again.

4) If Mueller has done his job, he will address some of this. But the real accounting needs to come from a full declassification of FBI/DOJ probe docs. Mueller report is only half the story. Time to go back to the beginning, to how we got a special counsel in first place.

Time to remind people: the FBI operates without a legal charter. It was hatched by Teddy Roosevelt to pursue his agenda. It's time we re-examine the frightening powers we give to law enforcement and the intelligence agencies.

In early 2016, Peter Strozk was just a section chief, and Andy McCabe the head of a FBI field office. The fact that they could start an investigation against a presidential candidate of a major party during an election year, largely based on the opposing party's "research", shows the enormous unchecked power of unelected buracrats.

People will lose faith in our institutions if John Brennan, James Comey, Andy McCabe and Peter Strozk are not investigated. The same rigor from Mueller needs to apply here.

Both PPs are full of shit. Remember the remarkably political investigation of HRC’s emails? Benghazi? And the dossier was initially fielded by a GOP candidate, you dingbats.

You are proposing retaliatory investigations. Wholly unAmerican.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Excellent thread by Kimberley Strassel:

1) On the #NoCollusion findings of Mueller's report. It's worth recognizing that this is more than an exoneration. It's a searing indictment of the FBI.

2) If you are going to investigate a presidential campaign, and on a charge as grave as collusion, and with the heavy-handed tactics the FBI employed--you'd better have a highly convincing reason to act. The Mueller report is a judgment that never was any real evidence.

3) The Papadopoulos conversation was always thin gruel. And the Mueller findings now prove the dossier was a fabrication. The country now deserves a full accounting of how the FBI blew this so badly--so that it doesn't happen again.

4) If Mueller has done his job, he will address some of this. But the real accounting needs to come from a full declassification of FBI/DOJ probe docs. Mueller report is only half the story. Time to go back to the beginning, to how we got a special counsel in first place.

Time to remind people: the FBI operates without a legal charter. It was hatched by Teddy Roosevelt to pursue his agenda. It's time we re-examine the frightening powers we give to law enforcement and the intelligence agencies.

In early 2016, Peter Strozk was just a section chief, and Andy McCabe the head of a FBI field office. The fact that they could start an investigation against a presidential candidate of a major party during an election year, largely based on the opposing party's "research", shows the enormous unchecked power of unelected buracrats.

People will lose faith in our institutions if John Brennan, James Comey, Andy McCabe and Peter Strozk are not investigated. The same rigor from Mueller needs to apply here.

Except the report says that Russia did try and get Trump collude. His only saving Grace was that he (and Jr.) we're too stupid and ignorant of world affairs to pick up on the efforts. This doesn't exonerate Trump it just says he was too.stupid to realize what was going on. How was the FBI supposed to know that the president elect was dumber than a sophmore pol sci undergrad? Without an investigation we'd have never known whether he was stupid or evil. Turns out he's just stupid. Congratulations! Yeah America

That is NOT what the report says.
Did it ever occur to you that they had no interest in working with Russia?
I know you don't want to admit it....... This report absolutely exonerates Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Excellent thread by Kimberley Strassel:

1) On the #NoCollusion findings of Mueller's report. It's worth recognizing that this is more than an exoneration. It's a searing indictment of the FBI.

2) If you are going to investigate a presidential campaign, and on a charge as grave as collusion, and with the heavy-handed tactics the FBI employed--you'd better have a highly convincing reason to act. The Mueller report is a judgment that never was any real evidence.

3) The Papadopoulos conversation was always thin gruel. And the Mueller findings now prove the dossier was a fabrication. The country now deserves a full accounting of how the FBI blew this so badly--so that it doesn't happen again.

4) If Mueller has done his job, he will address some of this. But the real accounting needs to come from a full declassification of FBI/DOJ probe docs. Mueller report is only half the story. Time to go back to the beginning, to how we got a special counsel in first place.

Time to remind people: the FBI operates without a legal charter. It was hatched by Teddy Roosevelt to pursue his agenda. It's time we re-examine the frightening powers we give to law enforcement and the intelligence agencies.

In early 2016, Peter Strozk was just a section chief, and Andy McCabe the head of a FBI field office. The fact that they could start an investigation against a presidential candidate of a major party during an election year, largely based on the opposing party's "research", shows the enormous unchecked power of unelected buracrats.

People will lose faith in our institutions if John Brennan, James Comey, Andy McCabe and Peter Strozk are not investigated. The same rigor from Mueller needs to apply here.

Both PPs are full of shit. Remember the remarkably political investigation of HRC’s emails? Benghazi? And the dossier was initially fielded by a GOP candidate, you dingbats.

You are proposing retaliatory investigations. Wholly unAmerican.

NO. IT. WASN'T.
That was debunked over a year ago.

[Anonymous]

My favorite tweet of the day - and there have been some really good ones.......

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Excellent thread by Kimberley Strassel:

1) On the #NoCollusion findings of Mueller's report. It's worth recognizing that this is more than an exoneration. It's a searing indictment of the FBI.

2) If you are going to investigate a presidential campaign, and on a charge as grave as collusion, and with the heavy-handed tactics the FBI employed--you'd better have a highly convincing reason to act. The Mueller report is a judgment that never was any real evidence.

3) The Papadopoulos conversation was always thin gruel. And the Mueller findings now prove the dossier was a fabrication. The country now deserves a full accounting of how the FBI blew this so badly--so that it doesn't happen again.

4) If Mueller has done his job, he will address some of this. But the real accounting needs to come from a full declassification of FBI/DOJ probe docs. Mueller report is only half the story. Time to go back to the beginning, to how we got a special counsel in first place.

Time to remind people: the FBI operates without a legal charter. It was hatched by Teddy Roosevelt to pursue his agenda. It's time we re-examine the frightening powers we give to law enforcement and the intelligence agencies.

In early 2016, Peter Strozk was just a section chief, and Andy McCabe the head of a FBI field office. The fact that they could start an investigation against a presidential candidate of a major party during an election year, largely based on the opposing party's "research", shows the enormous unchecked power of unelected buracrats.

People will lose faith in our institutions if John Brennan, James Comey, Andy McCabe and Peter Strozk are not investigated. The same rigor from Mueller needs to apply here.

Both PPs are full of shit. Remember the remarkably political investigation of HRC’s emails? Benghazi? And the dossier was initially fielded by a GOP candidate, you dingbats.

You are proposing retaliatory investigations. Wholly unAmerican.

It is NOT a "retaliatory investigation." It is an investigation to find out who did what so this kind of $hit NEVER happens again.
The idea that a presidential candidate can go through what Trump has for 3 years because of "opposition research" from the other party is mind blowing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Excellent thread by Kimberley Strassel:

1) On the #NoCollusion findings of Mueller's report. It's worth recognizing that this is more than an exoneration. It's a searing indictment of the FBI.

2) If you are going to investigate a presidential campaign, and on a charge as grave as collusion, and with the heavy-handed tactics the FBI employed--you'd better have a highly convincing reason to act. The Mueller report is a judgment that never was any real evidence.

3) The Papadopoulos conversation was always thin gruel. And the Mueller findings now prove the dossier was a fabrication. The country now deserves a full accounting of how the FBI blew this so badly--so that it doesn't happen again.

4) If Mueller has done his job, he will address some of this. But the real accounting needs to come from a full declassification of FBI/DOJ probe docs. Mueller report is only half the story. Time to go back to the beginning, to how we got a special counsel in first place.

Time to remind people: the FBI operates without a legal charter. It was hatched by Teddy Roosevelt to pursue his agenda. It's time we re-examine the frightening powers we give to law enforcement and the intelligence agencies.

In early 2016, Peter Strozk was just a section chief, and Andy McCabe the head of a FBI field office. The fact that they could start an investigation against a presidential candidate of a major party during an election year, largely based on the opposing party's "research", shows the enormous unchecked power of unelected buracrats.

People will lose faith in our institutions if John Brennan, James Comey, Andy McCabe and Peter Strozk are not investigated. The same rigor from Mueller needs to apply here.

Well said.
There are others as well....Glenn Simpson, Samantha Powers, and the H.Clinton campaign

Plus one million

[Anonymous]

Why do people keep saying trump is exonerated when the Barr letter says exactly the opposite with respect to obstruction?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Excellent thread by Kimberley Strassel:

1) On the #NoCollusion findings of Mueller's report. It's worth recognizing that this is more than an exoneration. It's a searing indictment of the FBI.

2) If you are going to investigate a presidential campaign, and on a charge as grave as collusion, and with the heavy-handed tactics the FBI employed--you'd better have a highly convincing reason to act. The Mueller report is a judgment that never was any real evidence.

3) The Papadopoulos conversation was always thin gruel. And the Mueller findings now prove the dossier was a fabrication. The country now deserves a full accounting of how the FBI blew this so badly--so that it doesn't happen again.

4) If Mueller has done his job, he will address some of this. But the real accounting needs to come from a full declassification of FBI/DOJ probe docs. Mueller report is only half the story. Time to go back to the beginning, to how we got a special counsel in first place.

Time to remind people: the FBI operates without a legal charter. It was hatched by Teddy Roosevelt to pursue his agenda. It's time we re-examine the frightening powers we give to law enforcement and the intelligence agencies.

In early 2016, Peter Strozk was just a section chief, and Andy McCabe the head of a FBI field office. The fact that they could start an investigation against a presidential candidate of a major party during an election year, largely based on the opposing party's "research", shows the enormous unchecked power of unelected buracrats.

People will lose faith in our institutions if John Brennan, James Comey, Andy McCabe and Peter Strozk are not investigated. The same rigor from Mueller needs to apply here.

Except the report says that Russia did try and get Trump collude. His only saving Grace was that he (and Jr.) we're too stupid and ignorant of world affairs to pick up on the efforts. This doesn't exonerate Trump it just says he was too.stupid to realize what was going on. How was the FBI supposed to know that the president elect was dumber than a sophmore pol sci undergrad? Without an investigation we'd have never known whether he was stupid or evil. Turns out he's just stupid. Congratulations! Yeah America

That is NOT what the report says.
Did it ever occur to you that they had no interest in working with Russia?
I know you don't want to admit it....... This report absolutely exonerates Trump.

No it doesn't. It says that Russia did try but that Trump did not KNOWINGLY cooperate. It exonerates Trump colluding with Russia but NOT Russia interfering in the election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Excellent thread by Kimberley Strassel:

1) On the #NoCollusion findings of Mueller's report. It's worth recognizing that this is more than an exoneration. It's a searing indictment of the FBI.

2) If you are going to investigate a presidential campaign, and on a charge as grave as collusion, and with the heavy-handed tactics the FBI employed--you'd better have a highly convincing reason to act. The Mueller report is a judgment that never was any real evidence.

3) The Papadopoulos conversation was always thin gruel. And the Mueller findings now prove the dossier was a fabrication. The country now deserves a full accounting of how the FBI blew this so badly--so that it doesn't happen again.

4) If Mueller has done his job, he will address some of this. But the real accounting needs to come from a full declassification of FBI/DOJ probe docs. Mueller report is only half the story. Time to go back to the beginning, to how we got a special counsel in first place.

Time to remind people: the FBI operates without a legal charter. It was hatched by Teddy Roosevelt to pursue his agenda. It's time we re-examine the frightening powers we give to law enforcement and the intelligence agencies.

In early 2016, Peter Strozk was just a section chief, and Andy McCabe the head of a FBI field office. The fact that they could start an investigation against a presidential candidate of a major party during an election year, largely based on the opposing party's "research", shows the enormous unchecked power of unelected buracrats.

People will lose faith in our institutions if John Brennan, James Comey, Andy McCabe and Peter Strozk are not investigated. The same rigor from Mueller needs to apply here.

Except the report says that Russia did try and get Trump collude. His only saving Grace was that he (and Jr.) we're too stupid and ignorant of world affairs to pick up on the efforts. This doesn't exonerate Trump it just says he was too.stupid to realize what was going on. How was the FBI supposed to know that the president elect was dumber than a sophmore pol sci undergrad? Without an investigation we'd have never known whether he was stupid or evil. Turns out he's just stupid. Congratulations! Yeah America

That is NOT what the report says.
Did it ever occur to you that they had no interest in working with Russia?
I know you don't want to admit it....... This report absolutely exonerates Trump.

+1000

Even when confronted with the truth, however, some in DC still cling to fantasy and will remain "Russia truthers." How pathetic!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My favorite tweet of the day - and there have been some really good ones.......

Haha is that real?

FBI/Dems:

[Anonymous]

even if trump did obstruct, since there was no collusion, then there is nothing to obstruct, CASE closed (50 million tax payer dollars saved)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why do people keep saying trump is exonerated when the Barr letter says exactly the opposite with respect to obstruction?

Because they lack reading and critical thinking skills.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:even if trump did obstruct, since there was no collusion, then there is nothing to obstruct, CASE closed (50 million tax payer dollars saved)

Wow, someone with a BRAIN on DCUM.

Thank you.

Zero collusion = Zero collusion.