The Republican Party of Virginia mails out nude photos of a candidate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Republicans consider it "explicit material" and then proceed to send it to families with young kids.

Republicans think they are explicit.

PP, are you going to let your ES kids read it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She should sue for a copyright violation. Make bank.

Everyone records chaturbate streams, including bots programed by guys who will resell them on archive sites. anytime a streamer logs in, they are recorded. there's certainly more than one of her and her husband’s vids on the internet.

You don't want your sex shows and nude photos all over the internet, don't put your sex shows and nude photos on the Internet, especially one of the most popular porn/sex sites.

We aren't talking about content on the internet; we're talking about Republicans printing and sending out explicit mailers to thousands of unsuspecting people in VA.

The candidate hid the fact she and her husband had sex online for tips.

Husband is an attorney and they have 2 kids.

Republicans mailed out this information in envelopes marked appropriately to warn the receiver that the contents of the envelope contained information about a candidate for public office producing pornography on live stream at one of the most popular porn sites in the world.

So you don’t like the fact that voters now know a porn actress is running for office? You wanted that hidden from voters?

Cry me a river. I am waiting for some democrat shill maniacally wailing to cameras that their child opened the envelope and saw a screen shot of a woman’s face that was printed out. Anything to avoid responsibility for a married couple that rutted like pigs online for money.

She should be elected easily; DC is the home of rutting pigs. She will fit right in.
Think of how much she and her husband can charge after she gets elected? Ka-ching.

No, it shouldn’t be hidden from voters but Republicans have a revolting way to “inform” people. Bottom line - they shouldn’t have sent explicit mailers to people who didn’t want or expect them.

Republicans have zero concept of consent.

Consent? The woman and her husband engage in porn and livestream it for money. They know people are recording their sex.

It was being hidden from voters and republicans actually informed voters in a responsible way.

If this woman and her husband have live sex online, they should have informed voters.

How about voters should know if they are voting for a porn actress?

Consent is an agreement between people to have sex. What the candidate was doing was hiding her porn career. She already consented to having sex and being watched and recorded.

Nobody gets to consent to having the truth told about them when the are asking for people to vote for them and gaining public office.

So if a man who is a candidate is having sex with his secretary, is their sex life of no matter because he won’t consent to people finding out? Everyone who gets caught doing sleazy sexual stuff can just clutch their pearls and say oh no I didn’t consent to people finding out. lol yeah right.

Voters didn’t give consent to send EXPLICIT mailers to their homes.

Zero concept of consent.

Wait, I need to give consent to receive mail? Has someone told the USPO about this?

Explicit mail - yes.

Republicans need to stop forcing themselves onto everyone else.

DP. Exactly what was explicit in the mailing you're clutching your pearls about? We'll wait.

You think it’s perfectly fine to send that out to thousands of families in VA?

To send non-nude pictures of someone running for office? Yes, of course. Why are you lying that the pictures showed her nude?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She should sue for a copyright violation. Make bank.

Everyone records chaturbate streams, including bots programed by guys who will resell them on archive sites. anytime a streamer logs in, they are recorded. there's certainly more than one of her and her husband’s vids on the internet.

You don't want your sex shows and nude photos all over the internet, don't put your sex shows and nude photos on the Internet, especially one of the most popular porn/sex sites.

We aren't talking about content on the internet; we're talking about Republicans printing and sending out explicit mailers to thousands of unsuspecting people in VA.

The candidate hid the fact she and her husband had sex online for tips.

Husband is an attorney and they have 2 kids.

Republicans mailed out this information in envelopes marked appropriately to warn the receiver that the contents of the envelope contained information about a candidate for public office producing pornography on live stream at one of the most popular porn sites in the world.

So you don’t like the fact that voters now know a porn actress is running for office? You wanted that hidden from voters?

Cry me a river. I am waiting for some democrat shill maniacally wailing to cameras that their child opened the envelope and saw a screen shot of a woman’s face that was printed out. Anything to avoid responsibility for a married couple that rutted like pigs online for money.

She should be elected easily; DC is the home of rutting pigs. She will fit right in.
Think of how much she and her husband can charge after she gets elected? Ka-ching.

No, it shouldn’t be hidden from voters but Republicans have a revolting way to “inform” people. Bottom line - they shouldn’t have sent explicit mailers to people who didn’t want or expect them.

Republicans have zero concept of consent.

Consent? The woman and her husband engage in porn and livestream it for money. They know people are recording their sex.

It was being hidden from voters and republicans actually informed voters in a responsible way.

If this woman and her husband have live sex online, they should have informed voters.

How about voters should know if they are voting for a porn actress?

Consent is an agreement between people to have sex. What the candidate was doing was hiding her porn career. She already consented to having sex and being watched and recorded.

Nobody gets to consent to having the truth told about them when the are asking for people to vote for them and gaining public office.

So if a man who is a candidate is having sex with his secretary, is their sex life of no matter because he won’t consent to people finding out? Everyone who gets caught doing sleazy sexual stuff can just clutch their pearls and say oh no I didn’t consent to people finding out. lol yeah right.

Voters didn’t give consent to send EXPLICIT mailers to their homes.

Zero concept of consent.

Wait, I need to give consent to receive mail? Has someone told the USPO about this?

Seriously. I never consented to receive Democratic political propaganda, yet it's still being sent to my home.

How many explicit mailers have you received from the Ds?

How many explicit mailers have you received from Rs? Zero. Because there was no nudity in the flyer you're so very outraged about. But do continue making an a$$ of yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She should sue for a copyright violation. Make bank.

Everyone records chaturbate streams, including bots programed by guys who will resell them on archive sites. anytime a streamer logs in, they are recorded. there's certainly more than one of her and her husband’s vids on the internet.

You don't want your sex shows and nude photos all over the internet, don't put your sex shows and nude photos on the Internet, especially one of the most popular porn/sex sites.

We aren't talking about content on the internet; we're talking about Republicans printing and sending out explicit mailers to thousands of unsuspecting people in VA.

DP. You're really looking more and more foolish, with every faux outraged post. Spare us all. Had Susanna Gibson been a Republican, her FULLY NUDE pictures would already have been published everywhere, including sent to "unsuspecting people." Your hypocrisy is really quite entertaining.

It’s fantasy deflection time!

Back here in reality, we are talking about how real-life Republicans actually printed out explicit mailers and actually sent them out to thousands of people in VA.

Pretty crappy, huh?

Are you new here? Because it was established many pages back that nothing in the mailer showed Gibson nude - not even a little bit. Do you generally accuse others of "fantasy" while lying yourself?

They don’t show her full body but it’s a screen capture from her (nude) private adult chat.

Regardless, the mailers were EXPLICIT.

If anything, they were explicit because they detailed her very explicit and disgusting words. Oh well. Are you saying that voters should have been kept in the dark about her porn activities?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She should sue for a copyright violation. Make bank.

Everyone records chaturbate streams, including bots programed by guys who will resell them on archive sites. anytime a streamer logs in, they are recorded. there's certainly more than one of her and her husband’s vids on the internet.

You don't want your sex shows and nude photos all over the internet, don't put your sex shows and nude photos on the Internet, especially one of the most popular porn/sex sites.

We aren't talking about content on the internet; we're talking about Republicans printing and sending out explicit mailers to thousands of unsuspecting people in VA.

DP. You're really looking more and more foolish, with every faux outraged post. Spare us all. Had Susanna Gibson been a Republican, her FULLY NUDE pictures would already have been published everywhere, including sent to "unsuspecting people." Your hypocrisy is really quite entertaining.

It’s fantasy deflection time!

Back here in reality, we are talking about how real-life Republicans actually printed out explicit mailers and actually sent them out to thousands of people in VA.

Pretty crappy, huh?

Are you new here? Because it was established many pages back that nothing in the mailer showed Gibson nude - not even a little bit. Do you generally accuse others of "fantasy" while lying yourself?

They don’t show her full body but it’s a screen capture from her (nude) private adult chat.

Regardless, the mailers were EXPLICIT.

If anything, they were explicit because they detailed her very explicit and disgusting words. Oh well. Are you saying that voters should have been kept in the dark about her porn activities?

Not at all. Voters should be aware. Perhaps Republicans could find a way that doesn’t include mailing screenshots and language used from private chat rooms to thousands of homes, many with young kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She should sue for a copyright violation. Make bank.

Everyone records chaturbate streams, including bots programed by guys who will resell them on archive sites. anytime a streamer logs in, they are recorded. there's certainly more than one of her and her husband’s vids on the internet.

You don't want your sex shows and nude photos all over the internet, don't put your sex shows and nude photos on the Internet, especially one of the most popular porn/sex sites.

We aren't talking about content on the internet; we're talking about Republicans printing and sending out explicit mailers to thousands of unsuspecting people in VA.

The candidate hid the fact she and her husband had sex online for tips.

Husband is an attorney and they have 2 kids.

Republicans mailed out this information in envelopes marked appropriately to warn the receiver that the contents of the envelope contained information about a candidate for public office producing pornography on live stream at one of the most popular porn sites in the world.

So you don’t like the fact that voters now know a porn actress is running for office? You wanted that hidden from voters?

Cry me a river. I am waiting for some democrat shill maniacally wailing to cameras that their child opened the envelope and saw a screen shot of a woman’s face that was printed out. Anything to avoid responsibility for a married couple that rutted like pigs online for money.

She should be elected easily; DC is the home of rutting pigs. She will fit right in.
Think of how much she and her husband can charge after she gets elected? Ka-ching.

No, it shouldn’t be hidden from voters but Republicans have a revolting way to “inform” people. Bottom line - they shouldn’t have sent explicit mailers to people who didn’t want or expect them.

Republicans have zero concept of consent.

Consent? The woman and her husband engage in porn and livestream it for money. They know people are recording their sex.

It was being hidden from voters and republicans actually informed voters in a responsible way.

If this woman and her husband have live sex online, they should have informed voters.

How about voters should know if they are voting for a porn actress?

Consent is an agreement between people to have sex. What the candidate was doing was hiding her porn career. She already consented to having sex and being watched and recorded.

Nobody gets to consent to having the truth told about them when the are asking for people to vote for them and gaining public office.

So if a man who is a candidate is having sex with his secretary, is their sex life of no matter because he won’t consent to people finding out? Everyone who gets caught doing sleazy sexual stuff can just clutch their pearls and say oh no I didn’t consent to people finding out. lol yeah right.

Voters didn’t give consent to send EXPLICIT mailers to their homes.

Zero concept of consent.

Wait, I need to give consent to receive mail? Has someone told the USPO about this?

Seriously. I never consented to receive Democratic political propaganda, yet it's still being sent to my home.

How many explicit mailers have you received from the Ds?

How many explicit mailers have you received from Rs? Zero. Because there was no nudity in the flyer you're so very outraged about. But do continue making an a$$ of yourself.

So you’ll let your elementary school kids read it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She should sue for a copyright violation. Make bank.

Everyone records chaturbate streams, including bots programed by guys who will resell them on archive sites. anytime a streamer logs in, they are recorded. there's certainly more than one of her and her husband’s vids on the internet.

You don't want your sex shows and nude photos all over the internet, don't put your sex shows and nude photos on the Internet, especially one of the most popular porn/sex sites.

We aren't talking about content on the internet; we're talking about Republicans printing and sending out explicit mailers to thousands of unsuspecting people in VA.

DP. You're really looking more and more foolish, with every faux outraged post. Spare us all. Had Susanna Gibson been a Republican, her FULLY NUDE pictures would already have been published everywhere, including sent to "unsuspecting people." Your hypocrisy is really quite entertaining.

It’s fantasy deflection time!

Back here in reality, we are talking about how real-life Republicans actually printed out explicit mailers and actually sent them out to thousands of people in VA.

Pretty crappy, huh?

Are you new here? Because it was established many pages back that nothing in the mailer showed Gibson nude - not even a little bit. Do you generally accuse others of "fantasy" while lying yourself?

They don’t show her full body but it’s a screen capture from her (nude) private adult chat.

Regardless, the mailers were EXPLICIT.

If anything, they were explicit because they detailed her very explicit and disgusting words. Oh well. Are you saying that voters should have been kept in the dark about her porn activities?

Not at all. Voters should be aware. Perhaps Republicans could find a way that doesn’t include mailing screenshots and language used from private chat rooms to thousands of homes, many with young kids.

Spare us all. There was nothing private about their porn - anyone was able to view it. You're just embarrassed (as you should be) that a Dem candidate was outed as being a porn provider.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She should sue for a copyright violation. Make bank.

Everyone records chaturbate streams, including bots programed by guys who will resell them on archive sites. anytime a streamer logs in, they are recorded. there's certainly more than one of her and her husband’s vids on the internet.

You don't want your sex shows and nude photos all over the internet, don't put your sex shows and nude photos on the Internet, especially one of the most popular porn/sex sites.

We aren't talking about content on the internet; we're talking about Republicans printing and sending out explicit mailers to thousands of unsuspecting people in VA.

The candidate hid the fact she and her husband had sex online for tips.

Husband is an attorney and they have 2 kids.

Republicans mailed out this information in envelopes marked appropriately to warn the receiver that the contents of the envelope contained information about a candidate for public office producing pornography on live stream at one of the most popular porn sites in the world.

So you don’t like the fact that voters now know a porn actress is running for office? You wanted that hidden from voters?

Cry me a river. I am waiting for some democrat shill maniacally wailing to cameras that their child opened the envelope and saw a screen shot of a woman’s face that was printed out. Anything to avoid responsibility for a married couple that rutted like pigs online for money.

She should be elected easily; DC is the home of rutting pigs. She will fit right in.
Think of how much she and her husband can charge after she gets elected? Ka-ching.

No, it shouldn’t be hidden from voters but Republicans have a revolting way to “inform” people. Bottom line - they shouldn’t have sent explicit mailers to people who didn’t want or expect them.

Republicans have zero concept of consent.

Consent? The woman and her husband engage in porn and livestream it for money. They know people are recording their sex.

It was being hidden from voters and republicans actually informed voters in a responsible way.

If this woman and her husband have live sex online, they should have informed voters.

How about voters should know if they are voting for a porn actress?

Consent is an agreement between people to have sex. What the candidate was doing was hiding her porn career. She already consented to having sex and being watched and recorded.

Nobody gets to consent to having the truth told about them when the are asking for people to vote for them and gaining public office.

So if a man who is a candidate is having sex with his secretary, is their sex life of no matter because he won’t consent to people finding out? Everyone who gets caught doing sleazy sexual stuff can just clutch their pearls and say oh no I didn’t consent to people finding out. lol yeah right.

Voters didn’t give consent to send EXPLICIT mailers to their homes.

Zero concept of consent.

Wait, I need to give consent to receive mail? Has someone told the USPO about this?

Seriously. I never consented to receive Democratic political propaganda, yet it's still being sent to my home.

How many explicit mailers have you received from the Ds?

How many explicit mailers have you received from Rs? Zero. Because there was no nudity in the flyer you're so very outraged about. But do continue making an a$$ of yourself.

So you’ll let your elementary school kids read it?

No - when something says "18+" then it is very clearly not for elementary school kids. Do keep up this asinine line of questioning though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They don’t show her full body but it’s a screen capture from her (nude) private adult chat.

They don't show her body at all. No one except the Taliban considers a woman face to be nudity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans consider it "explicit material" and then proceed to send it to families with young kids.

Republicans think they are explicit.

PP, are you going to let your ES kids read it?

You suddenly believe the judgment of Republicans?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She should sue for a copyright violation. Make bank.

Everyone records chaturbate streams, including bots programed by guys who will resell them on archive sites. anytime a streamer logs in, they are recorded. there's certainly more than one of her and her husband’s vids on the internet.

You don't want your sex shows and nude photos all over the internet, don't put your sex shows and nude photos on the Internet, especially one of the most popular porn/sex sites.

We aren't talking about content on the internet; we're talking about Republicans printing and sending out explicit mailers to thousands of unsuspecting people in VA.

The candidate hid the fact she and her husband had sex online for tips.

Husband is an attorney and they have 2 kids.

Republicans mailed out this information in envelopes marked appropriately to warn the receiver that the contents of the envelope contained information about a candidate for public office producing pornography on live stream at one of the most popular porn sites in the world.

So you don’t like the fact that voters now know a porn actress is running for office? You wanted that hidden from voters?

Cry me a river. I am waiting for some democrat shill maniacally wailing to cameras that their child opened the envelope and saw a screen shot of a woman’s face that was printed out. Anything to avoid responsibility for a married couple that rutted like pigs online for money.

She should be elected easily; DC is the home of rutting pigs. She will fit right in.
Think of how much she and her husband can charge after she gets elected? Ka-ching.

No, it shouldn’t be hidden from voters but Republicans have a revolting way to “inform” people. Bottom line - they shouldn’t have sent explicit mailers to people who didn’t want or expect them.

Republicans have zero concept of consent.

Consent? The woman and her husband engage in porn and livestream it for money. They know people are recording their sex.

It was being hidden from voters and republicans actually informed voters in a responsible way.

If this woman and her husband have live sex online, they should have informed voters.

How about voters should know if they are voting for a porn actress?

Consent is an agreement between people to have sex. What the candidate was doing was hiding her porn career. She already consented to having sex and being watched and recorded.

Nobody gets to consent to having the truth told about them when the are asking for people to vote for them and gaining public office.

So if a man who is a candidate is having sex with his secretary, is their sex life of no matter because he won’t consent to people finding out? Everyone who gets caught doing sleazy sexual stuff can just clutch their pearls and say oh no I didn’t consent to people finding out. lol yeah right.

Voters didn’t give consent to send EXPLICIT mailers to their homes.

Zero concept of consent.

Wait, I need to give consent to receive mail? Has someone told the USPO about this?

Seriously. I never consented to receive Democratic political propaganda, yet it's still being sent to my home.

How many explicit mailers have you received from the Ds?

How many explicit mailers have you received from Rs? Zero. Because there was no nudity in the flyer you're so very outraged about. But do continue making an a$$ of yourself.

So you’ll let your elementary school kids read it?

No - when something says "18+" then it is very clearly not for elementary school kids. Do keep up this asinine line of questioning though.

Right. It says 18+ because it’s explicit. Got it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She should sue for a copyright violation. Make bank.

Everyone records chaturbate streams, including bots programed by guys who will resell them on archive sites. anytime a streamer logs in, they are recorded. there's certainly more than one of her and her husband’s vids on the internet.

You don't want your sex shows and nude photos all over the internet, don't put your sex shows and nude photos on the Internet, especially one of the most popular porn/sex sites.

We aren't talking about content on the internet; we're talking about Republicans printing and sending out explicit mailers to thousands of unsuspecting people in VA.

DP. You're really looking more and more foolish, with every faux outraged post. Spare us all. Had Susanna Gibson been a Republican, her FULLY NUDE pictures would already have been published everywhere, including sent to "unsuspecting people." Your hypocrisy is really quite entertaining.

It’s fantasy deflection time!

Back here in reality, we are talking about how real-life Republicans actually printed out explicit mailers and actually sent them out to thousands of people in VA.

Pretty crappy, huh?

Are you new here? Because it was established many pages back that nothing in the mailer showed Gibson nude - not even a little bit. Do you generally accuse others of "fantasy" while lying yourself?

They don’t show her full body but it’s a screen capture from her (nude) private adult chat.

Regardless, the mailers were EXPLICIT.

If anything, they were explicit because they detailed her very explicit and disgusting words. Oh well. Are you saying that voters should have been kept in the dark about her porn activities?

Not at all. Voters should be aware. Perhaps Republicans could find a way that doesn’t include mailing screenshots and language used from private chat rooms to thousands of homes, many with young kids.

Spare us all. There was nothing private about their porn - anyone was able to view it. You're just embarrassed (as you should be) that a Dem candidate was outed as being a porn provider.

There is a difference between being available online on porn websites vs showing up unannounced in your mailbox.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you’re a p*rn star you really can’t complain about that becoming an issue by your political opponents, WTH?

She isn’t a star. She is now notorious but in no world is she a “star.”

She starred in pornography ergo “porn star”

The word “Star” in commonly recognized nomenclature is synonymous with celebrity. She is no celebrity. She has some notoriety now due to the campaign. But you are carrying on like some Hollywood celebrity exposed her naughty bits in Playboy in 1989.

You’re really easily titillated too, aren’t you? I mean, wow. The pearl clutching…

DP. Let's all imagine for a second this woman was running as a Republican. There would be hundreds and hundreds of pages of LWNJs calling her a whore and worse. You know it, we all know it. Democrats are utter hypocrites.

Actually that seems like an incredibly unlikely scenario.

You really do lead an active fantasy life, don’t you?

Why do conservatives have such tenuous grips on reality? It’s weird

What seems unlikely? That Democrats would be hurling insults at any Republican woman who behaved as Gibson has? Please. All one has to do is look at the thread about a fully-clothed Lauren Boebert to see her being call all kinds of misogynist slurs. But nice gaslighting!

*checks notes* Boebert, who it is alleged was a prostitute for a time, has been elected to Congress twice. So why is the Republican Party slut-shaming a Democrat for sex work? That seems neither consistent nor strategically wise given outcomes elsewhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans consider it "explicit material" and then proceed to send it to families with young kids.

Republicans think they are explicit.

PP, are you going to let your ES kids read it?

Love it. Republicans hate trigger warnings and the possibility of children being exposed to sexual messages, so much so that they try to ban books.

But they will mail it to your home, trigger warnings at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you’re a p*rn star you really can’t complain about that becoming an issue by your political opponents, WTH?

She isn’t a star. She is now notorious but in no world is she a “star.”

She starred in pornography ergo “porn star”

The word “Star” in commonly recognized nomenclature is synonymous with celebrity. She is no celebrity. She has some notoriety now due to the campaign. But you are carrying on like some Hollywood celebrity exposed her naughty bits in Playboy in 1989.

You’re really easily titillated too, aren’t you? I mean, wow. The pearl clutching…

DP. Let's all imagine for a second this woman was running as a Republican. There would be hundreds and hundreds of pages of LWNJs calling her a whore and worse. You know it, we all know it. Democrats are utter hypocrites.

Actually that seems like an incredibly unlikely scenario.

You really do lead an active fantasy life, don’t you?

Why do conservatives have such tenuous grips on reality? It’s weird

What seems unlikely? That Democrats would be hurling insults at any Republican woman who behaved as Gibson has? Please. All one has to do is look at the thread about a fully-clothed Lauren Boebert to see her being call all kinds of misogynist slurs. But nice gaslighting!

*checks notes* Boebert, who it is alleged was a prostitute for a time, has been elected to Congress twice. So why is the Republican Party slut-shaming a Democrat for sex work? That seems neither consistent nor strategically wise given outcomes elsewhere.

Whataboutism is your actual argument?