The Republican Party of Virginia mails out nude photos of a candidate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you’re a p*rn star you really can’t complain about that becoming an issue by your political opponents, WTH?

She isn’t a star. She is now notorious but in no world is she a “star.”

She starred in pornography ergo “porn star”

The word “Star” in commonly recognized nomenclature is synonymous with celebrity. She is no celebrity. She has some notoriety now due to the campaign. But you are carrying on like some Hollywood celebrity exposed her naughty bits in Playboy in 1989.

You’re really easily titillated too, aren’t you? I mean, wow. The pearl clutching…

DP. Let's all imagine for a second this woman was running as a Republican. There would be hundreds and hundreds of pages of LWNJs calling her a whore and worse. You know it, we all know it. Democrats are utter hypocrites.

Actually that seems like an incredibly unlikely scenario.

You really do lead an active fantasy life, don’t you?

Why do conservatives have such tenuous grips on reality? It’s weird

What seems unlikely? That Democrats would be hurling insults at any Republican woman who behaved as Gibson has? Please. All one has to do is look at the thread about a fully-clothed Lauren Boebert to see her being call all kinds of misogynist slurs. But nice gaslighting!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol, the party of legalize marijuana, shrooms, virtually all drugs, sex work, prostitution, and unfettered crime all of the sudden is mad someone mails what everyone can easily Google and find online in about 29 seconds?

Hypocrisy is astounding.

You are OK with Republicans mailing EXPLICIT materials to thousands of people, many with young kids, straight to their home?

Your kids already look at porn behind your back. Don’t be dumb. Porn is everywhere.

So that's a yes, you are OK with Republicans mailing explicit content to families with young kids?

She’s the one generating explicit content that your kids can access online. You’re mad that someone is providing the same results as a 10 second google search. Your kids already watched her porn videos on pornhub or some other site their friends told them about.

Parents know that they have options to control access to screens/porn. Parents weren't expecting explicit content to come in the mail from the Republicans.

My kids love halloween and dig through the mail this time of year looking for various halloween costume catalogs.

If your kids are old enough to dig through the mail “looking for Halloween costume catalogs” (if that’s still a thing, since the internet exists ) then they’re also old enough to NOT confuse things like Halloween costume catalogs from political mailers in blank white envelopes. Because the two pieces of mail look exactly nothing alike. And it would be a very … inattentive…. child to confuse the two.

Is your child prone to such confusion? Is that the issue here?

Or are you just making up ridiculous hypotheticals that would never ever occur in real life?

You have kids? And you don’t receive these catalogs? Be thankful - some are crazy expensive.

If Republicans don’t want kids exposed to “explicit” material then maybe they should stop sending to their homes.

My kids are in college. But even in the dying days of mailed catalogs a decade ago, we never got any for Halloween. Lax and field hockey and dressage, absolutely (until they all went to online only) but no Halloween catalogs.

But again, I’ll ask because it’s relevant to this discussion you started: why would your kids mistake a white business sized envelope with nothing on it for a Halloween catalog, which presumably is larger, and plastered with pictures of Halloween stuff for sale on the front and back covers? How is it you think your kids will make that sort of mistake?

This year, we got PBK kids halloween, chasing fireflies, and one other cheapie one.

Why do think my kids would mistake the envelope for anything?

Why should I have to worry about them sorting through the mail and coming across explicit content that the Republicans sent to our home?

You shouldn't! Those who sent out these mailings have judgment that's equal to the porn star's morals (or lack of).

Wow, the two of you bright bulbs are *really* reaching here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you’re a p*rn star you really can’t complain about that becoming an issue by your political opponents, WTH?

She isn’t a star. She is now notorious but in no world is she a “star.”

She starred in pornography ergo “porn star”

The word “Star” in commonly recognized nomenclature is synonymous with celebrity. She is no celebrity. She has some notoriety now due to the campaign. But you are carrying on like some Hollywood celebrity exposed her naughty bits in Playboy in 1989.

You’re really easily titillated too, aren’t you? I mean, wow. The pearl clutching…

DP. Let's all imagine for a second this woman was running as a Republican. There would be hundreds and hundreds of pages of LWNJs calling her a whore and worse. You know it, we all know it. Democrats are utter hypocrites.

Democrats certainly like to talk about Melania Trump taking nude and semi-nude photos and imply she was an escort-even though she has won lawsuits with media outlets that have had to pay her money and publish apologies to her for printing those accusations.

Discussing Melania’s “bolt-ons,” a classy euphemism for breast implants, and comparing her unfavorably to refined and elegant political wives, is a great hobby of democrats.

Remember when Melania had a medical problem with her kidneys and everyone here went nuts discussing that she either had plastic surgery and was hiding, or Don beat her up and she was hiding while she recovered?

Visit the Trump women fashion thread in the Beauty forum. It’s ridiculous. People posting there adore making fun of every woman with the last name of Trump.

Total hypocrisy.

Exactly. I really have to laugh that anyone would deny how Democrats would be coming down on this woman if she was a Republican. The misogyny and disgusting phrases they'd use make anything said about Gibson pale in comparison.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She should sue for a copyright violation. Make bank.

Everyone records chaturbate streams, including bots programed by guys who will resell them on archive sites. anytime a streamer logs in, they are recorded. there's certainly more than one of her and her husband’s vids on the internet.

You don't want your sex shows and nude photos all over the internet, don't put your sex shows and nude photos on the Internet, especially one of the most popular porn/sex sites.

We aren't talking about content on the internet; we're talking about Republicans printing and sending out explicit mailers to thousands of unsuspecting people in VA.

DP. You're really looking more and more foolish, with every faux outraged post. Spare us all. Had Susanna Gibson been a Republican, her FULLY NUDE pictures would already have been published everywhere, including sent to "unsuspecting people." Your hypocrisy is really quite entertaining.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Spare us your phony indignation and outage. If this were a Republican candidate, Dems would be projecting the video on the statehouse building at night and hiring trucks with monitors on the sides to park next to I 95 so commuters could see it.


I’m old enough to remember all the laughs about the porno movie from 2008 where an actress pretended to be Sarah Palin. Everyone thought that was soooooo funny.

Now that it’s a Dem who is an ACTUAL pornographer, suddenly it’s all outrage and pearl clutching.

Get bent.

+100
I do regret clicking on the link posted several pages back, which actually detailed real pictures and all the disgusting things she was saying. So, so gross. Mental issues have got to be at play here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She should sue for a copyright violation. Make bank.

Everyone records chaturbate streams, including bots programed by guys who will resell them on archive sites. anytime a streamer logs in, they are recorded. there's certainly more than one of her and her husband’s vids on the internet.

You don't want your sex shows and nude photos all over the internet, don't put your sex shows and nude photos on the Internet, especially one of the most popular porn/sex sites.

We aren't talking about content on the internet; we're talking about Republicans printing and sending out explicit mailers to thousands of unsuspecting people in VA.

DP. You're really looking more and more foolish, with every faux outraged post. Spare us all. Had Susanna Gibson been a Republican, her FULLY NUDE pictures would already have been published everywhere, including sent to "unsuspecting people." Your hypocrisy is really quite entertaining.

It’s fantasy deflection time!

Back here in reality, we are talking about how real-life Republicans actually printed out explicit mailers and actually sent them out to thousands of people in VA.

Pretty crappy, huh?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She should sue for a copyright violation. Make bank.

Everyone records chaturbate streams, including bots programed by guys who will resell them on archive sites. anytime a streamer logs in, they are recorded. there's certainly more than one of her and her husband’s vids on the internet.

You don't want your sex shows and nude photos all over the internet, don't put your sex shows and nude photos on the Internet, especially one of the most popular porn/sex sites.

We aren't talking about content on the internet; we're talking about Republicans printing and sending out explicit mailers to thousands of unsuspecting people in VA.

Explicit mailers that show far less nudity than books Dems want in middle school libraries.

Got it.

Which books show nudity? Oh, do you mean a few cartoony pics that don’t actually show anything?

DP. You can't be serious... see, the gaslighting is what makes Democrats so repulsive. Just own your hypocrisy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She should sue for a copyright violation. Make bank.

Everyone records chaturbate streams, including bots programed by guys who will resell them on archive sites. anytime a streamer logs in, they are recorded. there's certainly more than one of her and her husband’s vids on the internet.

You don't want your sex shows and nude photos all over the internet, don't put your sex shows and nude photos on the Internet, especially one of the most popular porn/sex sites.

We aren't talking about content on the internet; we're talking about Republicans printing and sending out explicit mailers to thousands of unsuspecting people in VA.

The candidate hid the fact she and her husband had sex online for tips.

Husband is an attorney and they have 2 kids.

Republicans mailed out this information in envelopes marked appropriately to warn the receiver that the contents of the envelope contained information about a candidate for public office producing pornography on live stream at one of the most popular porn sites in the world.

So you don’t like the fact that voters now know a porn actress is running for office? You wanted that hidden from voters?

Cry me a river. I am waiting for some democrat shill maniacally wailing to cameras that their child opened the envelope and saw a screen shot of a woman’s face that was printed out. Anything to avoid responsibility for a married couple that rutted like pigs online for money.

She should be elected easily; DC is the home of rutting pigs. She will fit right in.
Think of how much she and her husband can charge after she gets elected? Ka-ching.

No, it shouldn’t be hidden from voters but Republicans have a revolting way to “inform” people. Bottom line - they shouldn’t have sent explicit mailers to people who didn’t want or expect them.

Republicans have zero concept of consent.

Consent? The woman and her husband engage in porn and livestream it for money. They know people are recording their sex.

It was being hidden from voters and republicans actually informed voters in a responsible way.

If this woman and her husband have live sex online, they should have informed voters.

How about voters should know if they are voting for a porn actress?

Consent is an agreement between people to have sex. What the candidate was doing was hiding her porn career. She already consented to having sex and being watched and recorded.

Nobody gets to consent to having the truth told about them when the are asking for people to vote for them and gaining public office.

So if a man who is a candidate is having sex with his secretary, is their sex life of no matter because he won’t consent to people finding out? Everyone who gets caught doing sleazy sexual stuff can just clutch their pearls and say oh no I didn’t consent to people finding out. lol yeah right.

THIS ^^. The fact that these morons are actually trying to argue "consent" is just too funny. Anyone who votes for this disturbed individual has a screw loose.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She should sue for a copyright violation. Make bank.

Everyone records chaturbate streams, including bots programed by guys who will resell them on archive sites. anytime a streamer logs in, they are recorded. there's certainly more than one of her and her husband’s vids on the internet.

You don't want your sex shows and nude photos all over the internet, don't put your sex shows and nude photos on the Internet, especially one of the most popular porn/sex sites.

We aren't talking about content on the internet; we're talking about Republicans printing and sending out explicit mailers to thousands of unsuspecting people in VA.

The candidate hid the fact she and her husband had sex online for tips.

Husband is an attorney and they have 2 kids.

Republicans mailed out this information in envelopes marked appropriately to warn the receiver that the contents of the envelope contained information about a candidate for public office producing pornography on live stream at one of the most popular porn sites in the world.

So you don’t like the fact that voters now know a porn actress is running for office? You wanted that hidden from voters?

Cry me a river. I am waiting for some democrat shill maniacally wailing to cameras that their child opened the envelope and saw a screen shot of a woman’s face that was printed out. Anything to avoid responsibility for a married couple that rutted like pigs online for money.

She should be elected easily; DC is the home of rutting pigs. She will fit right in.
Think of how much she and her husband can charge after she gets elected? Ka-ching.

No, it shouldn’t be hidden from voters but Republicans have a revolting way to “inform” people. Bottom line - they shouldn’t have sent explicit mailers to people who didn’t want or expect them.

Republicans have zero concept of consent.

Consent? The woman and her husband engage in porn and livestream it for money. They know people are recording their sex.

It was being hidden from voters and republicans actually informed voters in a responsible way.

If this woman and her husband have live sex online, they should have informed voters.

How about voters should know if they are voting for a porn actress?

Consent is an agreement between people to have sex. What the candidate was doing was hiding her porn career. She already consented to having sex and being watched and recorded.

Nobody gets to consent to having the truth told about them when the are asking for people to vote for them and gaining public office.

So if a man who is a candidate is having sex with his secretary, is their sex life of no matter because he won’t consent to people finding out? Everyone who gets caught doing sleazy sexual stuff can just clutch their pearls and say oh no I didn’t consent to people finding out. lol yeah right.

Voters didn’t give consent to send EXPLICIT mailers to their homes.

Zero concept of consent.

Wait, I need to give consent to receive mail? Has someone told the USPO about this?

Seriously. I never consented to receive Democratic political propaganda, yet it's still being sent to my home.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She should sue for a copyright violation. Make bank.

Everyone records chaturbate streams, including bots programed by guys who will resell them on archive sites. anytime a streamer logs in, they are recorded. there's certainly more than one of her and her husband’s vids on the internet.

You don't want your sex shows and nude photos all over the internet, don't put your sex shows and nude photos on the Internet, especially one of the most popular porn/sex sites.

We aren't talking about content on the internet; we're talking about Republicans printing and sending out explicit mailers to thousands of unsuspecting people in VA.

The candidate hid the fact she and her husband had sex online for tips.

Husband is an attorney and they have 2 kids.

Republicans mailed out this information in envelopes marked appropriately to warn the receiver that the contents of the envelope contained information about a candidate for public office producing pornography on live stream at one of the most popular porn sites in the world.

So you don’t like the fact that voters now know a porn actress is running for office? You wanted that hidden from voters?

Cry me a river. I am waiting for some democrat shill maniacally wailing to cameras that their child opened the envelope and saw a screen shot of a woman’s face that was printed out. Anything to avoid responsibility for a married couple that rutted like pigs online for money.

She should be elected easily; DC is the home of rutting pigs. She will fit right in.
Think of how much she and her husband can charge after she gets elected? Ka-ching.

No, it shouldn’t be hidden from voters but Republicans have a revolting way to “inform” people. Bottom line - they shouldn’t have sent explicit mailers to people who didn’t want or expect them.

Republicans have zero concept of consent.

Consent? The woman and her husband engage in porn and livestream it for money. They know people are recording their sex.

It was being hidden from voters and republicans actually informed voters in a responsible way.

If this woman and her husband have live sex online, they should have informed voters.

How about voters should know if they are voting for a porn actress?

Consent is an agreement between people to have sex. What the candidate was doing was hiding her porn career. She already consented to having sex and being watched and recorded.

Nobody gets to consent to having the truth told about them when the are asking for people to vote for them and gaining public office.

So if a man who is a candidate is having sex with his secretary, is their sex life of no matter because he won’t consent to people finding out? Everyone who gets caught doing sleazy sexual stuff can just clutch their pearls and say oh no I didn’t consent to people finding out. lol yeah right.

Voters didn’t give consent to send EXPLICIT mailers to their homes.

Zero concept of consent.

Wait, I need to give consent to receive mail? Has someone told the USPO about this?

Explicit mail - yes.

Republicans need to stop forcing themselves onto everyone else.

DP. Exactly what was explicit in the mailing you're clutching your pearls about? We'll wait.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol, the party of legalize marijuana, shrooms, virtually all drugs, sex work, prostitution, and unfettered crime all of the sudden is mad someone mails what everyone can easily Google and find online in about 29 seconds?

Hypocrisy is astounding.

EXACTLY. And don't forget, they have insisted that kids have access to graphically sexual images in school libraries. Dems and their faux outrage... so predictable.

Kids didn’t have explicit material sent directly to their homes until the Republicans sent it.

And the goalposts have moved all the way back from Youngkin sent nude pictures, to the GOP sent nude pictures, to the GOP mailed explicit material. If those goalposts didn't have wheels, you wouldn't have an argument.

+1
Every thread Democrats start follows that pattern. Salacious accusation, slowly walked back in light of actual facts. But never any apology or acknowledgement that they were misrepresenting facts, at best - lying at worst.

I’m op and I asked Jeff to change the title. And it’s a screenshot of her, nude, from her private adult chat.

Still waiting on Republicans to say that sending explicit mailers to thousands of homes, many with young kids, is not acceptable.

Or maybe you’ll go on defending the indefensible.

A headshot of a woman is not a nude picture. Sorry, there is no way you're winning this argument. The pictures sent out were not nude. Do you have any idea how ridiculous you look?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She should sue for a copyright violation. Make bank.

Everyone records chaturbate streams, including bots programed by guys who will resell them on archive sites. anytime a streamer logs in, they are recorded. there's certainly more than one of her and her husband’s vids on the internet.

You don't want your sex shows and nude photos all over the internet, don't put your sex shows and nude photos on the Internet, especially one of the most popular porn/sex sites.

We aren't talking about content on the internet; we're talking about Republicans printing and sending out explicit mailers to thousands of unsuspecting people in VA.

DP. You're really looking more and more foolish, with every faux outraged post. Spare us all. Had Susanna Gibson been a Republican, her FULLY NUDE pictures would already have been published everywhere, including sent to "unsuspecting people." Your hypocrisy is really quite entertaining.

It’s fantasy deflection time!

Back here in reality, we are talking about how real-life Republicans actually printed out explicit mailers and actually sent them out to thousands of people in VA.

Pretty crappy, huh?

Are you new here? Because it was established many pages back that nothing in the mailer showed Gibson nude - not even a little bit. Do you generally accuse others of "fantasy" while lying yourself?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She should sue for a copyright violation. Make bank.

Everyone records chaturbate streams, including bots programed by guys who will resell them on archive sites. anytime a streamer logs in, they are recorded. there's certainly more than one of her and her husband’s vids on the internet.

You don't want your sex shows and nude photos all over the internet, don't put your sex shows and nude photos on the Internet, especially one of the most popular porn/sex sites.

We aren't talking about content on the internet; we're talking about Republicans printing and sending out explicit mailers to thousands of unsuspecting people in VA.

The candidate hid the fact she and her husband had sex online for tips.

Husband is an attorney and they have 2 kids.

Republicans mailed out this information in envelopes marked appropriately to warn the receiver that the contents of the envelope contained information about a candidate for public office producing pornography on live stream at one of the most popular porn sites in the world.

So you don’t like the fact that voters now know a porn actress is running for office? You wanted that hidden from voters?

Cry me a river. I am waiting for some democrat shill maniacally wailing to cameras that their child opened the envelope and saw a screen shot of a woman’s face that was printed out. Anything to avoid responsibility for a married couple that rutted like pigs online for money.

She should be elected easily; DC is the home of rutting pigs. She will fit right in.
Think of how much she and her husband can charge after she gets elected? Ka-ching.

No, it shouldn’t be hidden from voters but Republicans have a revolting way to “inform” people. Bottom line - they shouldn’t have sent explicit mailers to people who didn’t want or expect them.

Republicans have zero concept of consent.

Consent? The woman and her husband engage in porn and livestream it for money. They know people are recording their sex.

It was being hidden from voters and republicans actually informed voters in a responsible way.

If this woman and her husband have live sex online, they should have informed voters.

How about voters should know if they are voting for a porn actress?

Consent is an agreement between people to have sex. What the candidate was doing was hiding her porn career. She already consented to having sex and being watched and recorded.

Nobody gets to consent to having the truth told about them when the are asking for people to vote for them and gaining public office.

So if a man who is a candidate is having sex with his secretary, is their sex life of no matter because he won’t consent to people finding out? Everyone who gets caught doing sleazy sexual stuff can just clutch their pearls and say oh no I didn’t consent to people finding out. lol yeah right.

Voters didn’t give consent to send EXPLICIT mailers to their homes.

Zero concept of consent.

Wait, I need to give consent to receive mail? Has someone told the USPO about this?

Seriously. I never consented to receive Democratic political propaganda, yet it's still being sent to my home.

How many explicit mailers have you received from the Ds?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She should sue for a copyright violation. Make bank.

Everyone records chaturbate streams, including bots programed by guys who will resell them on archive sites. anytime a streamer logs in, they are recorded. there's certainly more than one of her and her husband’s vids on the internet.

You don't want your sex shows and nude photos all over the internet, don't put your sex shows and nude photos on the Internet, especially one of the most popular porn/sex sites.

We aren't talking about content on the internet; we're talking about Republicans printing and sending out explicit mailers to thousands of unsuspecting people in VA.

DP. You're really looking more and more foolish, with every faux outraged post. Spare us all. Had Susanna Gibson been a Republican, her FULLY NUDE pictures would already have been published everywhere, including sent to "unsuspecting people." Your hypocrisy is really quite entertaining.

It’s fantasy deflection time!

Back here in reality, we are talking about how real-life Republicans actually printed out explicit mailers and actually sent them out to thousands of people in VA.

Pretty crappy, huh?

Are you new here? Because it was established many pages back that nothing in the mailer showed Gibson nude - not even a little bit. Do you generally accuse others of "fantasy" while lying yourself?

They don’t show her full body but it’s a screen capture from her (nude) private adult chat.

Regardless, the mailers were EXPLICIT.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She should sue for a copyright violation. Make bank.

Everyone records chaturbate streams, including bots programed by guys who will resell them on archive sites. anytime a streamer logs in, they are recorded. there's certainly more than one of her and her husband’s vids on the internet.

You don't want your sex shows and nude photos all over the internet, don't put your sex shows and nude photos on the Internet, especially one of the most popular porn/sex sites.

We aren't talking about content on the internet; we're talking about Republicans printing and sending out explicit mailers to thousands of unsuspecting people in VA.

The candidate hid the fact she and her husband had sex online for tips.

Husband is an attorney and they have 2 kids.

Republicans mailed out this information in envelopes marked appropriately to warn the receiver that the contents of the envelope contained information about a candidate for public office producing pornography on live stream at one of the most popular porn sites in the world.

So you don’t like the fact that voters now know a porn actress is running for office? You wanted that hidden from voters?

Cry me a river. I am waiting for some democrat shill maniacally wailing to cameras that their child opened the envelope and saw a screen shot of a woman’s face that was printed out. Anything to avoid responsibility for a married couple that rutted like pigs online for money.

She should be elected easily; DC is the home of rutting pigs. She will fit right in.
Think of how much she and her husband can charge after she gets elected? Ka-ching.

No, it shouldn’t be hidden from voters but Republicans have a revolting way to “inform” people. Bottom line - they shouldn’t have sent explicit mailers to people who didn’t want or expect them.

Republicans have zero concept of consent.

Consent? The woman and her husband engage in porn and livestream it for money. They know people are recording their sex.

It was being hidden from voters and republicans actually informed voters in a responsible way.

If this woman and her husband have live sex online, they should have informed voters.

How about voters should know if they are voting for a porn actress?

Consent is an agreement between people to have sex. What the candidate was doing was hiding her porn career. She already consented to having sex and being watched and recorded.

Nobody gets to consent to having the truth told about them when the are asking for people to vote for them and gaining public office.

So if a man who is a candidate is having sex with his secretary, is their sex life of no matter because he won’t consent to people finding out? Everyone who gets caught doing sleazy sexual stuff can just clutch their pearls and say oh no I didn’t consent to people finding out. lol yeah right.

Voters didn’t give consent to send EXPLICIT mailers to their homes.

Zero concept of consent.

Wait, I need to give consent to receive mail? Has someone told the USPO about this?

Explicit mail - yes.

Republicans need to stop forcing themselves onto everyone else.

DP. Exactly what was explicit in the mailing you're clutching your pearls about? We'll wait.

You think it’s perfectly fine to send that out to thousands of families in VA?