NC medical student brags on Twitter about deliberately harming patient who mocked her pronoun pin

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have read only the first page so my comment may not make sense but if this is real, I am just astonished that an adult can be so incredibly stupid to post something like that (“ I am a doctor/ nurse and I purposely hurt a patient because he pi$$ed me off”) under her name online for the world to see. These young people who grew up attached to their phone and broadcasting any details of their lives and their private conversations don’t really understand that you can’t do that with work ever. I bet she did not hurt anybody, just bragged to sound cool and woke but I would let her go just in view of the sheer stupidity

She didn’t do it intentionally.

That’s what she claims now, faced with expulsion.

The tweet is the tweet. She did not say it was intentional.

+1

Bigots want to read into it.

She didn’t say it was intentional. She didn’t say it was unintentional. Nobody say for sure either way, but the trans activists insist it was unintentional and the conservatives/Fox crowd says it was intentional. Both are crazy, both have no way of knowing.

1) It’s very easy to miss. Even experienced techs can miss.

2) Third party gave character report.

As a future health care professional, she shouldn’t have been advertising and crowing about her two failed attempts, in a gleeful way, whether or not intentional. She should have remained quiet and vowed to do better again, to prevent future patients from the discomfort of multiple attempts. The lack of remorse and apparent lack of motivation to improve, are reasons to reconsider her suitability for a profession that involves caring for patients.

She only failed once.

It was dumb to post but “lack of motivation to improve” is total fiction.

I actually agree with the PP. She’s a liability for a hospital. She’s made it clear she believes patients with opposing views to hers do not deserve the same standard of care. She’s a lawsuit waiting to happen. Why would any hospital hire her?

+1 And what residency program is going to want her after this.

Even if she was raised rich and privileged, she has an URM surname, which is the only reason she was not immediately kicked out and still has a chance at match later this year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have read only the first page so my comment may not make sense but if this is real, I am just astonished that an adult can be so incredibly stupid to post something like that (“ I am a doctor/ nurse and I purposely hurt a patient because he pi$$ed me off”) under her name online for the world to see. These young people who grew up attached to their phone and broadcasting any details of their lives and their private conversations don’t really understand that you can’t do that with work ever. I bet she did not hurt anybody, just bragged to sound cool and woke but I would let her go just in view of the sheer stupidity

She didn’t do it intentionally.

That’s what she claims now, faced with expulsion.

The tweet is the tweet. She did not say it was intentional.

+1

Bigots want to read into it.

She didn’t say it was intentional. She didn’t say it was unintentional. Nobody say for sure either way, but the trans activists insist it was unintentional and the conservatives/Fox crowd says it was intentional. Both are crazy, both have no way of knowing.

1) It’s very easy to miss. Even experienced techs can miss.

2) Third party gave character report.

Do I need to find you a character witness for Trump to prove how truly worthless character witnesses are?

When people show you who they are, believe them.

She showed us that she shouldn’t tweet.

And that many people assume the worst because they themselves would do the worst.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have read only the first page so my comment may not make sense but if this is real, I am just astonished that an adult can be so incredibly stupid to post something like that (“ I am a doctor/ nurse and I purposely hurt a patient because he pi$$ed me off”) under her name online for the world to see. These young people who grew up attached to their phone and broadcasting any details of their lives and their private conversations don’t really understand that you can’t do that with work ever. I bet she did not hurt anybody, just bragged to sound cool and woke but I would let her go just in view of the sheer stupidity

She didn’t do it intentionally.

That’s what she claims now, faced with expulsion.

The tweet is the tweet. She did not say it was intentional.

+1

Bigots want to read into it.

She didn’t say it was intentional. She didn’t say it was unintentional. Nobody say for sure either way, but the trans activists insist it was unintentional and the conservatives/Fox crowd says it was intentional. Both are crazy, both have no way of knowing.

1) It’s very easy to miss. Even experienced techs can miss.

2) Third party gave character report.

As a future health care professional, she shouldn’t have been advertising and crowing about her two failed attempts, in a gleeful way, whether or not intentional. She should have remained quiet and vowed to do better again, to prevent future patients from the discomfort of multiple attempts. The lack of remorse and apparent lack of motivation to improve, are reasons to reconsider her suitability for a profession that involves caring for patients.

She only failed once.

It was dumb to post but “lack of motivation to improve” is total fiction.

I actually agree with the PP. She’s a liability for a hospital. She’s made it clear she believes patients with opposing views to hers do not deserve the same standard of care. She’s a lawsuit waiting to happen. Why would any hospital hire her?

She didn’t alter the level of care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like listing your pronouns under your name, in your email for instance, is simply superfluous for the 99% of people who have gendered names. If your name is Amanda, you are most likely she/her. If you are the very rare man named Amanda, then by all means include "he/him" after your name. Most trans people change their name to a gendered name of the sex they identify with. I dont' understand the need to list pronouns also.

Of course, pronouns might be helpful when corresponding with Sams, Teagans, and Corys.

-1. I corresponds by email at work most of the times. I have not added my preferred pronouns to my signature yet although many colleagues have done it recently. You have a very limited experience if you think you only corresponds with Maries and Amandas. I corresponds with clients, colleagues ( on same side or opposite side), professionals in a gov agency. I cannot count the times I googled somebody’s name to find a photo or something to understand if I had to say Ms or Mr. same names can be either in English but tons of names are not typical Anglo Saxon names. With the pronoun at the end of an email makes a lot easier to respond appropriately. This is even more useful when corresponding with foreigners . A female colleague kept receiving email addresses to Mr because foreign colleagues through her last name (which is a male first name) was her name. It is just easy when you correspond with people you don’t know

LoL!! As an immigrant, I seriously laugh my head off at your first world problems. Let me assure you, it doesn't really matter if someone addresses you by the incorrect pronoun. It maybe a little annoying, but if THIS is what sets you off to the point of hurting a patient/debating for 30 pages, then you are lead an EXTREMELY privileged and entitled life. IMO, its narcissistic and performative.

She didn’t intentionally hurt the patient.

Would you want to see - or employ - a doctor who joked about harming a patient either intentionally or unintentionally? I can tell you, as a very liberal middle aged person, I would not want to SEE that doctor.

^ And just to add: I'm sure doctors have dark jokes about stuff like this, that they share with each other. Maybe with their spouses. Everyone needs to be able to vent and joke, or they will lose their minds. But they have to understand Twitter is not the place for those jokes. They're putting their reputations on the line, when they don't understand the difference between a private audience and a public one.

Yes, this is the actual issue here. Tweeting about it publicly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Imagine spending all that time and money to be out of a career before even starting

I know. That's what gets me. And she doesn't understand how she did it to herself. It is amazing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are doctors/med students wearing pronoun pins, anyway? Is it part of a class on virtue signaling?

This was my question.

Why wouldn't they?

+1

What’s wrong with pronoun pins?

When was the last time you saw a doctor wearing anything on scrubs/lab coat other than a name tag/ID or maybe a stethoscope. What possible purpose does announcing pronouns to someone who didn't ask serve?

Maybe it's different because I'm in Peds, but most doctors and nurses have fun pins on their coats/sweaters/scrubs. Also, at least at my hospital, you can get a new ID badge with your pronouns under your name if you want.

The purpose of everyone stating their pronouns is to make it more mainstream and normalized. That way trans and nonbinary individuals don't have to feel like outsiders when they let someone know that they have preferred pronouns. Using the correct pronouns, IMO, is just a normal level of respect. Kind of like not calling an Amanda 'Mandy' if they ask you not to or not taking someone's (complex to you) ethnic name and saying "I can't say that so I'm going to call you Sunny!"

And this, in a nutshell, is what's wrong with it.

Why? What’s wrong with normalizing preferred pronouns?

Because there is nothing normal about having to state one's "preferred pronouns."

That’s the point. To make it more “normal”.

Why shouldn’t it be “normal”?

Because it's not. If I have to explain that you, well, I'm sorry for you.

You do have to explain it. BC you're being unnecessarily hateful. Why do you think you get to tell someone else what's "normal" for what they prefer to be called? Just b/c it makes you uncomfortable?

+1

PP won’t say it out loud because she knows she’s hateful and wrong.

PP again, and happy to "say it out loud," although I don't know how one does that in writing on a message board.

I'm not hateful and I'm not wrong.

People who feel the need to announce their pronouns, or worse, expect/ ask/ demand that others do so, are either a) woke virtue signalers; b) ostriches with their heads in the sand and simply going along to get along because they don't want to bother speaking up about something that they know is silly at best and damaging at worst, but seems to be the current fad; or c) mentally disturbed.

You pick which one best fits you.

That's right. Be proud of your hatefulness. Show us your true colors.

You are hateful..and crazy, like those homeless racists who push people onto train tracks.

Ok, bigot. You know you’re wrong so you lash out like the hater you are.

You’re the hater and the one who’s been lashing out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have read only the first page so my comment may not make sense but if this is real, I am just astonished that an adult can be so incredibly stupid to post something like that (“ I am a doctor/ nurse and I purposely hurt a patient because he pi$$ed me off”) under her name online for the world to see. These young people who grew up attached to their phone and broadcasting any details of their lives and their private conversations don’t really understand that you can’t do that with work ever. I bet she did not hurt anybody, just bragged to sound cool and woke but I would let her go just in view of the sheer stupidity

She didn’t do it intentionally.

That’s what she claims now, faced with expulsion.

The tweet is the tweet. She did not say it was intentional.

+1

Bigots want to read into it.

She didn’t say it was intentional. She didn’t say it was unintentional. Nobody say for sure either way, but the trans activists insist it was unintentional and the conservatives/Fox crowd says it was intentional. Both are crazy, both have no way of knowing.

1) It’s very easy to miss. Even experienced techs can miss.

2) Third party gave character report.

A character report? You mean her friend on Twitter who is also now facing potential disciplinary action.

Are you very slow? Do you understand that De Santis and Trump have plenty of character reports about what great people they are? Do you blindly believe those too?

You cannot say the stick was unintentional with any certainty. There is no evidence to support that conclusion. There isn’t evidence to support it being intentional either, to be clear. But the nutcase trans activists who insist absent any evidence that it was unintentional are just showing how idiotic they are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“Because there is nothing normal about having to state one's "preferred pronouns."”

“Because it's not. If I have to explain that you, well, I'm sorry for you.”

“People who feel the need to announce their pronouns, or worse, expect/ ask/ demand that others do so, are either a) woke virtue signalers; b) ostriches with their heads in the sand and simply going along to get along because they don't want to bother speaking up about something that they know is silly at best and damaging at worst, but seems to be the current fad; or c) mentally disturbed.

You pick which one best fits you.”

“You are hateful..and crazy, like those homeless racists who push people onto train tracks.”

You’re the hater and the one who’s been lashing out.

Really? It’s easy to see the hateful words.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have read only the first page so my comment may not make sense but if this is real, I am just astonished that an adult can be so incredibly stupid to post something like that (“ I am a doctor/ nurse and I purposely hurt a patient because he pi$$ed me off”) under her name online for the world to see. These young people who grew up attached to their phone and broadcasting any details of their lives and their private conversations don’t really understand that you can’t do that with work ever. I bet she did not hurt anybody, just bragged to sound cool and woke but I would let her go just in view of the sheer stupidity

She didn’t do it intentionally.

That’s what she claims now, faced with expulsion.

The tweet is the tweet. She did not say it was intentional.

+1

Bigots want to read into it.

She didn’t say it was intentional. She didn’t say it was unintentional. Nobody say for sure either way, but the trans activists insist it was unintentional and the conservatives/Fox crowd says it was intentional. Both are crazy, both have no way of knowing.

1) It’s very easy to miss. Even experienced techs can miss.

2) Third party gave character report.

As a future health care professional, she shouldn’t have been advertising and crowing about her two failed attempts, in a gleeful way, whether or not intentional. She should have remained quiet and vowed to do better again, to prevent future patients from the discomfort of multiple attempts. The lack of remorse and apparent lack of motivation to improve, are reasons to reconsider her suitability for a profession that involves caring for patients.

She only failed once.

It was dumb to post but “lack of motivation to improve” is total fiction.

I actually agree with the PP. She’s a liability for a hospital. She’s made it clear she believes patients with opposing views to hers do not deserve the same standard of care. She’s a lawsuit waiting to happen. Why would any hospital hire her?

She didn’t alter the level of care.

That’s not what the PP said. It’s that she doesn’t believe people with opposing views deserve the same level of care. Whether intentional or not, she was happy and gloating to the public that this patient had to have two attempts to draw blood. She should be expelled.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like listing your pronouns under your name, in your email for instance, is simply superfluous for the 99% of people who have gendered names. If your name is Amanda, you are most likely she/her. If you are the very rare man named Amanda, then by all means include "he/him" after your name. Most trans people change their name to a gendered name of the sex they identify with. I dont' understand the need to list pronouns also.

Of course, pronouns might be helpful when corresponding with Sams, Teagans, and Corys.

-1. I corresponds by email at work most of the times. I have not added my preferred pronouns to my signature yet although many colleagues have done it recently. You have a very limited experience if you think you only corresponds with Maries and Amandas. I corresponds with clients, colleagues ( on same side or opposite side), professionals in a gov agency. I cannot count the times I googled somebody’s name to find a photo or something to understand if I had to say Ms or Mr. same names can be either in English but tons of names are not typical Anglo Saxon names. With the pronoun at the end of an email makes a lot easier to respond appropriately. This is even more useful when corresponding with foreigners . A female colleague kept receiving email addresses to Mr because foreign colleagues through her last name (which is a male first name) was her name. It is just easy when you correspond with people you don’t know

LoL!! As an immigrant, I seriously laugh my head off at your first world problems. Let me assure you, it doesn't really matter if someone addresses you by the incorrect pronoun. It maybe a little annoying, but if THIS is what sets you off to the point of hurting a patient/debating for 30 pages, then you are lead an EXTREMELY privileged and entitled life. IMO, its narcissistic and performative.

She didn’t intentionally hurt the patient.

Would you want to see - or employ - a doctor who joked about harming a patient either intentionally or unintentionally? I can tell you, as a very liberal middle aged person, I would not want to SEE that doctor.

^ And just to add: I'm sure doctors have dark jokes about stuff like this, that they share with each other. Maybe with their spouses. Everyone needs to be able to vent and joke, or they will lose their minds. But they have to understand Twitter is not the place for those jokes. They're putting their reputations on the line, when they don't understand the difference between a private audience and a public one.

Yes, this is the actual issue here. Tweeting about it publicly.

It shows a profound lack of judgment and maturity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have read only the first page so my comment may not make sense but if this is real, I am just astonished that an adult can be so incredibly stupid to post something like that (“ I am a doctor/ nurse and I purposely hurt a patient because he pi$$ed me off”) under her name online for the world to see. These young people who grew up attached to their phone and broadcasting any details of their lives and their private conversations don’t really understand that you can’t do that with work ever. I bet she did not hurt anybody, just bragged to sound cool and woke but I would let her go just in view of the sheer stupidity

She didn’t do it intentionally.

That’s what she claims now, faced with expulsion.

The tweet is the tweet. She did not say it was intentional.

+1

Bigots want to read into it.

She didn’t say it was intentional. She didn’t say it was unintentional. Nobody say for sure either way, but the trans activists insist it was unintentional and the conservatives/Fox crowd says it was intentional. Both are crazy, both have no way of knowing.

1) It’s very easy to miss. Even experienced techs can miss.

2) Third party gave character report.

As a future health care professional, she shouldn’t have been advertising and crowing about her two failed attempts, in a gleeful way, whether or not intentional. She should have remained quiet and vowed to do better again, to prevent future patients from the discomfort of multiple attempts. The lack of remorse and apparent lack of motivation to improve, are reasons to reconsider her suitability for a profession that involves caring for patients.

She only failed once.

It was dumb to post but “lack of motivation to improve” is total fiction.

I actually agree with the PP. She’s a liability for a hospital. She’s made it clear she believes patients with opposing views to hers do not deserve the same standard of care. She’s a lawsuit waiting to happen. Why would any hospital hire her?

She didn’t alter the level of care.

That’s not what the PP said. It’s that she doesn’t believe people with opposing views deserve the same level of care. Whether intentional or not, she was happy and gloating to the public that this patient had to have two attempts to draw blood. She should be expelled.

Fiction.

Finding satisfaction in “karma” doesn’t mean anything about who she thinks is “deserving a level of care”.

Haters gonna hate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have read only the first page so my comment may not make sense but if this is real, I am just astonished that an adult can be so incredibly stupid to post something like that (“ I am a doctor/ nurse and I purposely hurt a patient because he pi$$ed me off”) under her name online for the world to see. These young people who grew up attached to their phone and broadcasting any details of their lives and their private conversations don’t really understand that you can’t do that with work ever. I bet she did not hurt anybody, just bragged to sound cool and woke but I would let her go just in view of the sheer stupidity

She didn’t do it intentionally.

That’s what she claims now, faced with expulsion.

The tweet is the tweet. She did not say it was intentional.

+1

Bigots want to read into it.

She didn’t say it was intentional. She didn’t say it was unintentional. Nobody say for sure either way, but the trans activists insist it was unintentional and the conservatives/Fox crowd says it was intentional. Both are crazy, both have no way of knowing.

1) It’s very easy to miss. Even experienced techs can miss.

2) Third party gave character report.

As a future health care professional, she shouldn’t have been advertising and crowing about her two failed attempts, in a gleeful way, whether or not intentional. She should have remained quiet and vowed to do better again, to prevent future patients from the discomfort of multiple attempts. The lack of remorse and apparent lack of motivation to improve, are reasons to reconsider her suitability for a profession that involves caring for patients.

She only failed once.

It was dumb to post but “lack of motivation to improve” is total fiction.

I actually agree with the PP. She’s a liability for a hospital. She’s made it clear she believes patients with opposing views to hers do not deserve the same standard of care. She’s a lawsuit waiting to happen. Why would any hospital hire her?

She didn’t alter the level of care.

That’s not what the PP said. It’s that she doesn’t believe people with opposing views deserve the same level of care. Whether intentional or not, she was happy and gloating to the public that this patient had to have two attempts to draw blood. She should be expelled.

That's taking things to 11 pretty quickly. It's not like she tweeted that she amputated the wrong foot during surgery to get back at someone for being snitty about pronouns. You can discipline and correct without destroying a person's life and career. She should delete the tweet, apologize, explain, take responsibility, and hopefully move on with the understanding that a job that requires a lot of trust and discretion, probably means not tweeting every thought in your head.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like listing your pronouns under your name, in your email for instance, is simply superfluous for the 99% of people who have gendered names. If your name is Amanda, you are most likely she/her. If you are the very rare man named Amanda, then by all means include "he/him" after your name. Most trans people change their name to a gendered name of the sex they identify with. I dont' understand the need to list pronouns also.

Of course, pronouns might be helpful when corresponding with Sams, Teagans, and Corys.

-1. I corresponds by email at work most of the times. I have not added my preferred pronouns to my signature yet although many colleagues have done it recently. You have a very limited experience if you think you only corresponds with Maries and Amandas. I corresponds with clients, colleagues ( on same side or opposite side), professionals in a gov agency. I cannot count the times I googled somebody’s name to find a photo or something to understand if I had to say Ms or Mr. same names can be either in English but tons of names are not typical Anglo Saxon names. With the pronoun at the end of an email makes a lot easier to respond appropriately. This is even more useful when corresponding with foreigners . A female colleague kept receiving email addresses to Mr because foreign colleagues through her last name (which is a male first name) was her name. It is just easy when you correspond with people you don’t know

LoL!! As an immigrant, I seriously laugh my head off at your first world problems. Let me assure you, it doesn't really matter if someone addresses you by the incorrect pronoun. It maybe a little annoying, but if THIS is what sets you off to the point of hurting a patient/debating for 30 pages, then you are lead an EXTREMELY privileged and entitled life. IMO, its narcissistic and performative.

She didn’t intentionally hurt the patient.

Would you want to see - or employ - a doctor who joked about harming a patient either intentionally or unintentionally? I can tell you, as a very liberal middle aged person, I would not want to SEE that doctor.

^ And just to add: I'm sure doctors have dark jokes about stuff like this, that they share with each other. Maybe with their spouses. Everyone needs to be able to vent and joke, or they will lose their minds. But they have to understand Twitter is not the place for those jokes. They're putting their reputations on the line, when they don't understand the difference between a private audience and a public one.

Yes, this is the actual issue here. Tweeting about it publicly.

It shows a profound lack of judgment and maturity.

Totally agree.

But people should focus on the actual issue here instead of manufacturing intent and actions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have read only the first page so my comment may not make sense but if this is real, I am just astonished that an adult can be so incredibly stupid to post something like that (“ I am a doctor/ nurse and I purposely hurt a patient because he pi$$ed me off”) under her name online for the world to see. These young people who grew up attached to their phone and broadcasting any details of their lives and their private conversations don’t really understand that you can’t do that with work ever. I bet she did not hurt anybody, just bragged to sound cool and woke but I would let her go just in view of the sheer stupidity

She didn’t do it intentionally.

That’s what she claims now, faced with expulsion.

The tweet is the tweet. She did not say it was intentional.

+1

Bigots want to read into it.

She didn’t say it was intentional. She didn’t say it was unintentional. Nobody say for sure either way, but the trans activists insist it was unintentional and the conservatives/Fox crowd says it was intentional. Both are crazy, both have no way of knowing.

1) It’s very easy to miss. Even experienced techs can miss.

2) Third party gave character report.

As a future health care professional, she shouldn’t have been advertising and crowing about her two failed attempts, in a gleeful way, whether or not intentional. She should have remained quiet and vowed to do better again, to prevent future patients from the discomfort of multiple attempts. The lack of remorse and apparent lack of motivation to improve, are reasons to reconsider her suitability for a profession that involves caring for patients.

She only failed once.

It was dumb to post but “lack of motivation to improve” is total fiction.

I actually agree with the PP. She’s a liability for a hospital. She’s made it clear she believes patients with opposing views to hers do not deserve the same standard of care. She’s a lawsuit waiting to happen. Why would any hospital hire her?

She didn’t alter the level of care.

That’s not what the PP said. It’s that she doesn’t believe people with opposing views deserve the same level of care. Whether intentional or not, she was happy and gloating to the public that this patient had to have two attempts to draw blood. She should be expelled.

Fiction.

Finding satisfaction in “karma” doesn’t mean anything about who she thinks is “deserving a level of care”.

Haters gonna hate.

Wow, that’s a pretty significant contortion from you to avoid seeing the obvious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have read only the first page so my comment may not make sense but if this is real, I am just astonished that an adult can be so incredibly stupid to post something like that (“ I am a doctor/ nurse and I purposely hurt a patient because he pi$$ed me off”) under her name online for the world to see. These young people who grew up attached to their phone and broadcasting any details of their lives and their private conversations don’t really understand that you can’t do that with work ever. I bet she did not hurt anybody, just bragged to sound cool and woke but I would let her go just in view of the sheer stupidity

She didn’t do it intentionally.

That’s what she claims now, faced with expulsion.

The tweet is the tweet. She did not say it was intentional.

+1

Bigots want to read into it.

She didn’t say it was intentional. She didn’t say it was unintentional. Nobody say for sure either way, but the trans activists insist it was unintentional and the conservatives/Fox crowd says it was intentional. Both are crazy, both have no way of knowing.

1) It’s very easy to miss. Even experienced techs can miss.

2) Third party gave character report.

As a future health care professional, she shouldn’t have been advertising and crowing about her two failed attempts, in a gleeful way, whether or not intentional. She should have remained quiet and vowed to do better again, to prevent future patients from the discomfort of multiple attempts. The lack of remorse and apparent lack of motivation to improve, are reasons to reconsider her suitability for a profession that involves caring for patients.

She only failed once.

It was dumb to post but “lack of motivation to improve” is total fiction.

I actually agree with the PP. She’s a liability for a hospital. She’s made it clear she believes patients with opposing views to hers do not deserve the same standard of care. She’s a lawsuit waiting to happen. Why would any hospital hire her?

She didn’t alter the level of care.

That’s not what the PP said. It’s that she doesn’t believe people with opposing views deserve the same level of care. Whether intentional or not, she was happy and gloating to the public that this patient had to have two attempts to draw blood. She should be expelled.

Fiction.

Finding satisfaction in “karma” doesn’t mean anything about who she thinks is “deserving a level of care”.

Haters gonna hate.

She implied the bolded pretty strongly. You don’t have to read too hard into her tweet to see she thought he deserved to have her “fail” the first time. Unless you also believe he deserved it, in which case you too should not be involved in health care.