Help me understand Republican women in their 30s and 40s

Anonymous
You can’t have it both ways Kamala. Either Dems are the party of WOMEN because they will always protect a WOMAN’S right to abort her own child up until the moment of birth- but then they aren’t exactly the party of WOMEN because if your daughter happens to survive her abortion, she’s no longer a WOMAN on the sports field, or if she’d prefer not to share a public bathroom with men.


You are utterly unhinged, like MTG unhinged.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
You can’t have it both ways Kamala. Either Dems are the party of WOMEN because they will always protect a WOMAN’S right to abort her own child up until the moment of birth- but then they aren’t exactly the party of WOMEN because if your daughter happens to survive her abortion, she’s no longer a WOMAN on the sports field, or if she’d prefer not to share a public bathroom with men.


You are utterly unhinged, like MTG unhinged.


But correct.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Republican woman. The Republican Party speaks to a much broader range of my concerns. The democratic Party has less to offer. I'm interested in lower taxes, lower crime, a secure border, girls being able to have sports on an equal playing field, and things like respect for the American flag and military service. I'm very against terrorism, including Hamas, and I'm in favor of Israel being able to exist. The democrats offer me abortions. Lots of abortions, with greater access to abortions. It's a grim vision for the women of America.


Well said. This sums it up for me too. Democrats thinking that all I care about is abortion is insulting. Especially when they actively deny my existence as a woman in so many other cases.


They asked what you care about and you answered. Trump will likely lose and the abortion ban issue will be a large contribution to his loss. But abortion bans and all the related problems they cause is not important to you for some reason and that is that.


No Trump will not likely lose. Unless you’re trying to tell us the fix is in and you know something we don’t?


He lost the EC last time around and the popular vote by almost 10 percent. He has done more to drive away voters than attract new voters. Many elections since 2020 have seen his endorsed candidates fail and his anti roe policies fail as well. But if your analysis of that that leads you to see him winning then ok I guess.


Oh right. Joe Biden got 81 million votes.


81 million fools for Biden and 74 million fools for trump. That is how we settle our differences in this country in spite of trump wanting it to be by coup.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
You can’t have it both ways Kamala. Either Dems are the party of WOMEN because they will always protect a WOMAN’S right to abort her own child up until the moment of birth- but then they aren’t exactly the party of WOMEN because if your daughter happens to survive her abortion, she’s no longer a WOMAN on the sports field, or if she’d prefer not to share a public bathroom with men.


You are utterly unhinged, like MTG unhinged.


But correct.

Nobody is aborting their child up until the moment of birth. Late-term abortions are tragic cases where a woman intended to have a baby, only to learn it would not be viable. I would recommend you read some of their stories - they are heartbreaking.
Anonymous
I don't like ad hominem attacks either, but if the ability to make your own health care decisions is something someone values at all, then how does that person vote in favor of a person and a party that are actively working to take that away? I do not get that.


To be blunt? Some of us don’t sleep around so a need for an abortion is not the driving force in our lives.

And there it is. Wow. Now I understand why Trump loves the poorly educated. Extra rosary for this one.
Anonymous
For the purpose of this thread, in 2020, 55 percent of the Biden fools were women voters and 44 percent of the trump fools were women.

And that was before trump claimed victory for destroying roe. As much as you gop women in here don't care about that, the reality is that most American women are opposed to that action and he is very unlikely to improve his percentages with women voters in 2024.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
You can’t have it both ways Kamala. Either Dems are the party of WOMEN because they will always protect a WOMAN’S right to abort her own child up until the moment of birth- but then they aren’t exactly the party of WOMEN because if your daughter happens to survive her abortion, she’s no longer a WOMAN on the sports field, or if she’d prefer not to share a public bathroom with men.


You are utterly unhinged, like MTG unhinged.

+1
And not correct.

More and more it feels like dark and/or foreign money are being used to sway opinion away from Democrats. The talking points don’t make any sense with the slightest scratch at them.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
You can’t have it both ways Kamala. Either Dems are the party of WOMEN because they will always protect a WOMAN’S right to abort her own child up until the moment of birth- but then they aren’t exactly the party of WOMEN because if your daughter happens to survive her abortion, she’s no longer a WOMAN on the sports field, or if she’d prefer not to share a public bathroom with men.


You are utterly unhinged, like MTG unhinged.

+1
And not correct.

More and more it feels like dark and/or foreign money are being used to sway opinion away from Democrats. The talking points don’t make any sense with the slightest scratch at them.


So true. Here is a tip dark money. If you want to attract opinions and thus votes, try running some candidates with policies that are actually supported by the voters. What a concept
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
You can’t have it both ways Kamala. Either Dems are the party of WOMEN because they will always protect a WOMAN’S right to abort her own child up until the moment of birth- but then they aren’t exactly the party of WOMEN because if your daughter happens to survive her abortion, she’s no longer a WOMAN on the sports field, or if she’d prefer not to share a public bathroom with men.


You are utterly unhinged, like MTG unhinged.

+1
And not correct.

More and more it feels like dark and/or foreign money are being used to sway opinion away from Democrats. The talking points don’t make any sense with the slightest scratch at them.


“Men cannot become women.”

“OMG this must be DaRK MoNEY! How dare someone not agree that 2+2=5! It’s got to be the Russians!”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
You can’t have it both ways Kamala. Either Dems are the party of WOMEN because they will always protect a WOMAN’S right to abort her own child up until the moment of birth- but then they aren’t exactly the party of WOMEN because if your daughter happens to survive her abortion, she’s no longer a WOMAN on the sports field, or if she’d prefer not to share a public bathroom with men.


You are utterly unhinged, like MTG unhinged.

+1
And not correct.

More and more it feels like dark and/or foreign money are being used to sway opinion away from Democrats. The talking points don’t make any sense with the slightest scratch at them.


“Men cannot become women.”

“OMG this must be DaRK MoNEY! How dare someone not agree that 2+2=5! It’s got to be the Russians!”


You mean cannot be trans women?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t see how anyone can call them a feminist and vote for Trump. Because a feminist ought to care for all women’s rights, not just their own. We have a terrible maternal death rate, that is exponentially worse for Black women. Women have lost access to safe health care and voting rights.

I also feel sad for the one trans woman we know who is at least 6’2 or 6’3”. She has an amazing family and is a mother of teens and would never hurt anyone. That she has to deal with this level of hate is incredible.


Democrats always think they own feminism. Nope. Look at the number of disrespectful comments here from liberals insisting GOP women are misled or following their husbands.

- Feminist Republican

Sorry. You’re actively supporting the party that wants to erase women’s rights entirely. You are not a feminist.


And you are supporting the party that wants to erase women entirely. You are not a feminist either.

+100. One party wants to take away my right to decide my fate if I get pregnant. The other party wants to erase me entirely so men can steal my identity. Two awful choices, but erasing me in every aspect of life is worse. Dems can get bent.

This is nonsense. Acknowledging trans people isn’t “erasing” women.


It depends. If we are allowed to acknowledge that trans people have a biological sex that is different from the sex they would prefer, that isn't in conflict. If we are required to say, in polite society, that trans women are women, with no distinction at all from biological women, that is an issue for many people. And of course, if it is taken a step further and claimed that suggesting that sex is an immutable characteristic is criminal hate speech, that is a serious step toward the suppression of free speech, science, and religion in favor of state dogma.

The Democratic Party claims none of the bolded. Referring to trans women as women doesn’t mean you can’t acknowledge that they’re trans. It just means you shouldn’t call them men. I’m sure you understand the difference. And there is no Democratic policy in place to “criminalize” speech about sex as a biological characteristic. Some people have a gender that is different from their sex. That’s all.

NP. I will always refer to a man as a man and a woman as a woman. That’s a statement of fact. However the man and woman in question feel about that is between them and
their therapists. You will not force us to lie and then call it kindness.


Men are men because of their sex, not their gender.

IDGAF about your made-up religious concept. Sex is material reality. Whatever a man claims to believe he is in his head is an unverifiable, unfalsifiable, self-serving claim and, as such,
is entitled to zero deference.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
You can’t have it both ways Kamala. Either Dems are the party of WOMEN because they will always protect a WOMAN’S right to abort her own child up until the moment of birth- but then they aren’t exactly the party of WOMEN because if your daughter happens to survive her abortion, she’s no longer a WOMAN on the sports field, or if she’d prefer not to share a public bathroom with men.


You are utterly unhinged, like MTG unhinged.

+1
And not correct.

More and more it feels like dark and/or foreign money are being used to sway opinion away from Democrats. The talking points don’t make any sense with the slightest scratch at them.


“Men cannot become women.”

“OMG this must be DaRK MoNEY! How dare someone not agree that 2+2=5! It’s got to be the Russians!”

Lmao exactly. Only a god-tier disinformation campaign run by a coalition of Putin, Trump Karl Rove, and the ghost of Atwater could make anyone believe that men are born men and forever remain men. Barq Schmoney rules everything around us!!!!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t see how anyone can call them a feminist and vote for Trump. Because a feminist ought to care for all women’s rights, not just their own. We have a terrible maternal death rate, that is exponentially worse for Black women. Women have lost access to safe health care and voting rights.

I also feel sad for the one trans woman we know who is at least 6’2 or 6’3”. She has an amazing family and is a mother of teens and would never hurt anyone. That she has to deal with this level of hate is incredible.


Democrats always think they own feminism. Nope. Look at the number of disrespectful comments here from liberals insisting GOP women are misled or following their husbands.

- Feminist Republican

Sorry. You’re actively supporting the party that wants to erase women’s rights entirely. You are not a feminist.


And you are supporting the party that wants to erase women entirely. You are not a feminist either.

+100. One party wants to take away my right to decide my fate if I get pregnant. The other party wants to erase me entirely so men can steal my identity. Two awful choices, but erasing me in every aspect of life is worse. Dems can get bent.

This is nonsense. Acknowledging trans people isn’t “erasing” women.


It depends. If we are allowed to acknowledge that trans people have a biological sex that is different from the sex they would prefer, that isn't in conflict. If we are required to say, in polite society, that trans women are women, with no distinction at all from biological women, that is an issue for many people. And of course, if it is taken a step further and claimed that suggesting that sex is an immutable characteristic is criminal hate speech, that is a serious step toward the suppression of free speech, science, and religion in favor of state dogma.

The Democratic Party claims none of the bolded. Referring to trans women as women doesn’t mean you can’t acknowledge that they’re trans. It just means you shouldn’t call them men. I’m sure you understand the difference. And there is no Democratic policy in place to “criminalize” speech about sex as a biological characteristic. Some people have a gender that is different from their sex. That’s all.

NP. I will always refer to a man as a man and a woman as a woman. That’s a statement of fact. However the man and woman in question feel about that is between them and
their therapists. You will not force us to lie and then call it kindness.


Men are men because of their sex, not their gender.

IDGAF about your made-up religious concept. Sex is material reality. Whatever a man claims to believe he is in his head is an unverifiable, unfalsifiable, self-serving claim and, as such,
is entitled to zero deference.


That is one opinion on the matter. Not the only one.
Anonymous
The ones I know are self-declared “mama bears” and “boy moms!” They carry around wooden spoons in their purses to whack their kids and think boys will be boys. Their girls have to be prim and proper and always clean. They are very much in to playing stupid. Rarely work. Sometimes do MLMs. Stanleys and bog bags for the pool.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
You can’t have it both ways Kamala. Either Dems are the party of WOMEN because they will always protect a WOMAN’S right to abort her own child up until the moment of birth- but then they aren’t exactly the party of WOMEN because if your daughter happens to survive her abortion, she’s no longer a WOMAN on the sports field, or if she’d prefer not to share a public bathroom with men.


You are utterly unhinged, like MTG unhinged.

+1
And not correct.

More and more it feels like dark and/or foreign money are being used to sway opinion away from Democrats. The talking points don’t make any sense with the slightest scratch at them.


So true. Here is a tip dark money. If you want to attract opinions and thus votes, try running some candidates with policies that are actually supported by the voters. What a concept


For example abortion bans are incredibly unpopular. Call me crazy but try finding some pro choice candidates to do your bidding GOP dark money. You may have better success.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: