Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Ask the kids a VCU what they think of the Richmond kids.
What does this mean?
It means exactly what you think it means.
DP.
Maybe they're jealous of the wealth and intelligence of the Richmond kids? Jealous that the Richmond kids were selected by a committee out of a large pool of applicants to be a part of an exclusive community while they're stuck at a place with a 90% acceptance rate and a median SAT in the 1100s?
I’d hire the VCU kid. At least they don’t rely on wealth to get in college and then pretend they’re more intelligent. Be honest, UR accepts wealthy kids that can afford to play the selective admission game.
NP. It’s a pointless comparison. The majority of UR students come from the northeast, and of course they’re going to be relatively far more wealthy than the majority of in-state Virginians at VCU. I used to work in Richmond alongside several graduates of both schools. They were all capable and smart and nice. VCU kids tend to be a little scrappier and self-reliant, UR kids a little more sheltered and coddled. But everyone has their place.
This is a fair assessment. Sheltered and coddled isn’t the best impression for the UR boosters to defend.
According to Niche, median 6 year earnings are $44k for VCU, $64k for UR. So obviously some employers hold a more favorable opinion of UR than PP. Those numbers aren't like, Harvard good, but they're good.
The VCU kids don’t have mommy and daddy to employ them or get them an interview with a friend’s firm.
Even if that tells the whole story, which anyone with a functioning brain knows it doesn't, you're still acknowledging that UR alums are more successful and thus its alumni network is more lucrative. It's the same reason Bucknell has so much pull on The Street: because so many alums already work there. If you're a current student looking to get your foot in the door, does it really matter how they got there or just that they're there?
The point is a school doesn’t have to be noteworthy and the students don’t have to be intelligent if mommy and daddy get them a job. If you think wealth makes a college superior that’s fine, acknowledge your privilege and move on. But don’t expect others to be impressed and pretend that coddled kids are more intelligent.
The thread started with an unfair comparison (UR, medium smart rich kid school vs Elon, less-smart rich kid school). It didn't even make sense at that point, because no one would seriously entertain both unless they were applying to Elon as a deep safety. Now it's UR vs VCU mud slinging and the comparison makes even less sense.
Are UR students coddled? Maybe!
Are VCU students scrappier? Probably!
Who's smarter? Defining intelligence outright is probably beyond the scope of this thread!
We've established that UR students earn more.
But what this thread seems to have degenerated into is a pissing match over who is a better person and people are trying to live out their fantasies of moral superiority through it. Touch grass, people!
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}