Billionaire heiress abducted during her Friday morning run in Memphis

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Weird to work at a preschool and have a nanny for your own kids. Like why avoid spending time with your own kids.

You are totally right. Good thing she’s probably dead, eh? She totally deserved to be murdered if she avoided spending time with her own kids.

[Anonymous]

How many rich DC yuppies train for their marathons in SE DC at 4am? That’s what this woman was doing, basically jogging through Deanwood, Anacostia, and Bellevue in skimpy sporty clothes at 4am.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Affidavit is out for the arrest of Cleotha Abston.

For the life of me, I can’t figure out how to post a tweet, but here is the link:

https://twitter.com/ripple1026/status/1566451151880572930?s=21&t=fmpb4nFYUW6-bzOJiWQ2Vg

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh no, I didn't realize that the fact that my husband's tattoos make him a criminal!! Thank you DCUM for letting me know!!!

DCUM hates tattoos. Not “classy.”

It's not just the tattoos and it's not like he has just one inconspicuous tattoo. He has very sketchy sleeve tattoos, tattoos on his knee and calve, on his chest, even on his hands. And he's an admitted substance abuser. And he looks disheveled.

DP. I don’t have any tattoos. Not into them at all. But I rarely see people under the age of 35 who don’t have them these days. Like all over their bodies. In no way is this an indication of propensity for crime.

B.S. Note she has none or at least none visible. I assure you there were plenty of eligible bachelor's at whatever country club she grew up in, private school, Baylor, Belmont, and in her church and marathon orbits who also didn't have their bodies covered in sketchy tattoos.

You all are nuts today. Maybe her husband did it, maybe he didn’t. His tattoos have nothing to do with it - how about skin color, would be having this conversation about him if he was black? Judging him for that?

You're right, they don't suggest he's low class. And letting his solo pretty young wife and mother to two young children jog around a dangerous drug-infested hellhole at 4am also does not suggest he's low class. Whatever you say.

LETTING his wife go running? So from your POV, he should have control over when she goes running?!

It’s like the other posters up thread saying her rich family shouldn’t have “allowed” her to marry him. WT actual F?!

[Anonymous]

The arrested person was simply in the vehicle she was seen be forced into. We don’t know if he’s the kidnapper yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The arrested person was simply in the vehicle she was seen be forced into. We don’t know if he’s the kidnapper yet.

I mean, he’s at least an accomplice.

[Anonymous]

Is it his cell phone or simply the black GMC truck’s OnStar system which tracks the car by GPS?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can we stop talking about the husband now that they've arrested the guy who did it?

Whenever you watch Dateline and you think the case is solved, Keith Morrison drops some bombshell, "and then they discovered something that would turn the case on its head"

(then you have to sit through a other 5 minutes if commercials)

Affidavit says suspect worked for a cleaning service. Where? Maybe their house? Or the boat works her hubs married? Way too soon to tell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, here’s a story about the victim of the perp’s initial kidnapping back in the early 2000s

https://www.lewisthomason.com/remembering-kemper-durand-2/

Wow is right!

"Both men were tried and found guilty. At the sentencing hearing for one of the two men, a well-known lawyer appeared in the courtroom. It was Kemper. He told the judge he wanted to testify. Kemper took the stand, and testified that the man who was about to be sentenced was not the man who accosted him at gun point on that fateful evening. Yes, the man had been there and could certainly be considered an accomplice, but as Kemper saw it, the man was at the wrong place with the wrong person at the wrong time. Kemper then further described how during those hours he spent in the trunk of his car, he heard the two men talking. The man who was now about to be sentenced had pleaded with his friend to “stop the car, let this man out, give him his keys, and go!”

Forever the effective criminal defense lawyer, Kemper portrayed the man before the judge as an unwilling accomplice. He asked that the judge give him the most lenient sentence possible. The judge agreed."

Wonder if one of the "innocent accomplices" from then is the guy they arrested on this case!

https://yale1961.org/kemper-b-durand/

https://lawyers.findlaw.com/profile/view/1709216_1

No, the perpetrator of the current kidnapping served quite a bit of time but not nearly enough. Violent criminals should be kept incarcerated. This woman has paid a huge price for her kidnapper's freedom.

But the Ivy League lawyer got to virtue signal to all of his social circle how compassionate and forgiving he was. Noblesse oblige. Instead of life in prison the perps got to go harm someone else.

It was the friend of the perp who he asked for a more lenient sentence. The lawyer seemed like a really good guy. https://www.lewisthomason.com/remembering-kemper-durand-2/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh no, I didn't realize that the fact that my husband's tattoos make him a criminal!! Thank you DCUM for letting me know!!!

DCUM hates tattoos. Not “classy.”

It's not just the tattoos and it's not like he has just one inconspicuous tattoo. He has very sketchy sleeve tattoos, tattoos on his knee and calve, on his chest, even on his hands. And he's an admitted substance abuser. And he looks disheveled.

DP. I don’t have any tattoos. Not into them at all. But I rarely see people under the age of 35 who don’t have them these days. Like all over their bodies. In no way is this an indication of propensity for crime.

B.S. Note she has none or at least none visible. I assure you there were plenty of eligible bachelor's at whatever country club she grew up in, private school, Baylor, Belmont, and in her church and marathon orbits who also didn't have their bodies covered in sketchy tattoos.

You all are nuts today. Maybe her husband did it, maybe he didn’t. His tattoos have nothing to do with it - how about skin color, would be having this conversation about him if he was black? Judging him for that?

You're right, they don't suggest he's low class. And letting his solo pretty young wife and mother to two young children jog around a dangerous drug-infested hellhole at 4am also does not suggest he's low class. Whatever you say.

LETTING his wife go running? So from your POV, he should have control over when she goes running?!

It’s like the other posters up thread saying her rich family shouldn’t have “allowed” her to marry him. WT actual F?!

Does a wife let a mid-life crisis husband buy a two door sports car or quit his career to become a UFC fighter? Same difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The arrested person was simply in the vehicle she was seen be forced into. We don’t know if he’s the kidnapper yet.

I mean, he’s at least an accomplice.

Maybe. He could’ve borrowed the vehicle or let someone else borrow his vehicle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we stop talking about the husband now that they've arrested the guy who did it?

Whenever you watch Dateline and you think the case is solved, Keith Morrison drops some bombshell, "and then they discovered something that would turn the case on its head"

(then you have to sit through a other 5 minutes if commercials)

Affidavit says suspect worked for a cleaning service. Where? Maybe their house? Or the boat works her hubs married? Way too soon to tell.

My bet is that this guy was hired by the husband.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can we stop talking about the husband now that they've arrested the guy who did it?

No, because the husband was obviously the mastermind. /s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Affidavit is out for the arrest of Cleotha Abston.

For the life of me, I can’t figure out how to post a tweet, but here is the link:

https://twitter.com/ripple1026/status/1566451151880572930?s=21&t=fmpb4nFYUW6-bzOJiWQ2Vg

Sounds like the police expect she is dead. This is so terrible.

Affidavit indicates they have his cell / location data placing him at the site of the abduction. One might guess they also have generated a map from that data of everywhere went (McDonald's?) unless he was smart enough to ditch the phone, which is doubtful.

All General Motors cars and trucks have OnStar GPS as standard equipment. Including that black GMC Terrain crossover.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we stop talking about the husband now that they've arrested the guy who did it?

Whenever you watch Dateline and you think the case is solved, Keith Morrison drops some bombshell, "and then they discovered something that would turn the case on its head"

(then you have to sit through a other 5 minutes if commercials)

Affidavit says suspect worked for a cleaning service. Where? Maybe their house? Or the boat works her hubs married? Way too soon to tell.

My bet is that this guy was hired by the husband.

Or the husband's mistress.