Heads should roll on this horrendous issue

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep, a bunch of Marines and foot soldiers and field commanders did not suddenly become."ok"with child rape. This came from.the very top ..just make do. Just get results ..dont rock the boat. Work with the people stuffing dollars into overseas accounts and buying young boys. I'm sorry, but this comes from the TOP. If not, why would this case of the green beret not be overturned already? I feel.so sorry for so many of our military members, up to the generals. It is so hard to be the voice in the wilderness. We see the consequence in this trial.

I think it's more insidious than that. We have a President who is much more sympathetic to Islam - probably due to his upbringing - than he is any other religion.

You mean Rev. Wright?

No, I mean his upbringing in Indonesia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep, a bunch of Marines and foot soldiers and field commanders did not suddenly become."ok"with child rape. This came from.the very top ..just make do. Just get results ..dont rock the boat. Work with the people stuffing dollars into overseas accounts and buying young boys. I'm sorry, but this comes from the TOP. If not, why would this case of the green beret not be overturned already? I feel.so sorry for so many of our military members, up to the generals. It is so hard to be the voice in the wilderness. We see the consequence in this trial.

I think it's more insidious than that. We have a President who is much more sympathetic to Islam - probably due to his upbringing - than he is any other religion.

Lemme fix that for ya, "Obama's a secret Kenyan born Muslim Communist"

Dude, don't go halfway on teabagger moron, just cut to the chase and go for the TRIFECTA! We already know ya wanna!

Obama was taught in Muslim schools for part of his life. His mother, father, and grandparents were communists (see "little red church"). Your childhood does shape your adult views.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep, a bunch of Marines and foot soldiers and field commanders did not suddenly become."ok"with child rape. This came from.the very top ..just make do. Just get results ..dont rock the boat. Work with the people stuffing dollars into overseas accounts and buying young boys. I'm sorry, but this comes from the TOP. If not, why would this case of the green beret not be overturned already? I feel.so sorry for so many of our military members, up to the generals. It is so hard to be the voice in the wilderness. We see the consequence in this trial.

I think it's more insidious than that. We have a President who is much more sympathetic to Islam - probably due to his upbringing - than he is any other religion.

I think that if there were one issue on which we might be able to find broad agreement among all the posters here, it would be child rape. Nobody here condones it. Yet, rather than seeking such agreement, you chose to exploit the issue as one more partisan issue with which to attack Obama. You put partisanship ahead of morality on this issue.

In a conflict with very few good choices and lots of bad ones, our leaders have frequently been forced to choose among various bad options. As a result, we have crossed moral thresholds on things like torture and domestic surveillance that diverge significantly from the values Americans have traditionally held dear. Some, including me, would argue that such moral compromises are reasons to avoid such conflicts in the first place. The situation with child rape in Afghanistan is simply one more instance of morality being sacrificed for expediency. Our leaders have prioritized wining the military and political struggles above the protection of children from sexual abuse.

I think all of us, Republicans, Libertarians, Democrats, Socialists, and none-of-the-aboves, should give thought to the various moral compromises that are made in the name of war. Individuals from different political views have been able to work together to push back on some compromises such as domestic surveillance. We should equally be able to put aside our differences in order to stand united against child rape. But, that can't happen if the goal of attacking Obama is placed above the goal of combatting the sexual abuse of children.

Then push to have him pardon these soldiers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep, a bunch of Marines and foot soldiers and field commanders did not suddenly become."ok"with child rape. This came from.the very top ..just make do. Just get results ..dont rock the boat. Work with the people stuffing dollars into overseas accounts and buying young boys. I'm sorry, but this comes from the TOP. If not, why would this case of the green beret not be overturned already? I feel.so sorry for so many of our military members, up to the generals. It is so hard to be the voice in the wilderness. We see the consequence in this trial.

I think it's more insidious than that. We have a President who is much more sympathetic to Islam - probably due to his upbringing - than he is any other religion.

I think that if there were one issue on which we might be able to find broad agreement among all the posters here, it would be child rape. Nobody here condones it. Yet, rather than seeking such agreement, you chose to exploit the issue as one more partisan issue with which to attack Obama. You put partisanship ahead of morality on this issue.

In a conflict with very few good choices and lots of bad ones, our leaders have frequently been forced to choose among various bad options. As a result, we have crossed moral thresholds on things like torture and domestic surveillance that diverge significantly from the values Americans have traditionally held dear. Some, including me, would argue that such moral compromises are reasons to avoid such conflicts in the first place. The situation with child rape in Afghanistan is simply one more instance of morality being sacrificed for expediency. Our leaders have prioritized wining the military and political struggles above the protection of children from sexual abuse.

I think all of us, Republicans, Libertarians, Democrats, Socialists, and none-of-the-aboves, should give thought to the various moral compromises that are made in the name of war. Individuals from different political views have been able to work together to push back on some compromises such as domestic surveillance. We should equally be able to put aside our differences in order to stand united against child rape. But, that can't happen if the goal of attacking Obama is placed above the goal of combatting the sexual abuse of children.

All the above is true and to think war is prosecuted without some compromise is to put on rose colored glasses. However, just as we would not tolerate prosecuting a whistleblower on Abu Graibh type torture/misconduct why would we tolerate the internal persecution of this green beret who took a stand on child abuse? The question I have for our President is why he isn't picking up the phone on this case and letting his discontent be known to whomever is running the circus trial?

He was VERY quick to defend Bergdahl and was very fast with his tweet to Ahmed Mohamed. Ditto his statements re: the Cambridge officer and the Martin case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep, a bunch of Marines and foot soldiers and field commanders did not suddenly become."ok"with child rape. This came from.the very top ..just make do. Just get results ..dont rock the boat. Work with the people stuffing dollars into overseas accounts and buying young boys. I'm sorry, but this comes from the TOP. If not, why would this case of the green beret not be overturned already? I feel.so sorry for so many of our military members, up to the generals. It is so hard to be the voice in the wilderness. We see the consequence in this trial.

I think it's more insidious than that. We have a President who is much more sympathetic to Islam - probably due to his upbringing - than he is any other religion.

I think that if there were one issue on which we might be able to find broad agreement among all the posters here, it would be child rape. Nobody here condones it. Yet, rather than seeking such agreement, you chose to exploit the issue as one more partisan issue with which to attack Obama. You put partisanship ahead of morality on this issue.

In a conflict with very few good choices and lots of bad ones, our leaders have frequently been forced to choose among various bad options. As a result, we have crossed moral thresholds on things like torture and domestic surveillance that diverge significantly from the values Americans have traditionally held dear. Some, including me, would argue that such moral compromises are reasons to avoid such conflicts in the first place. The situation with child rape in Afghanistan is simply one more instance of morality being sacrificed for expediency. Our leaders have prioritized wining the military and political struggles above the protection of children from sexual abuse.

I think all of us, Republicans, Libertarians, Democrats, Socialists, and none-of-the-aboves, should give thought to the various moral compromises that are made in the name of war. Individuals from different political views have been able to work together to push back on some compromises such as domestic surveillance. We should equally be able to put aside our differences in order to stand united against child rape. But, that can't happen if the goal of attacking Obama is placed above the goal of combatting the sexual abuse of children.

Then push to have him pardon these soldiers.

Pardon? Are they felons now? I didn't think they were.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep, a bunch of Marines and foot soldiers and field commanders did not suddenly become."ok"with child rape. This came from.the very top ..just make do. Just get results ..dont rock the boat. Work with the people stuffing dollars into overseas accounts and buying young boys. I'm sorry, but this comes from the TOP. If not, why would this case of the green beret not be overturned already? I feel.so sorry for so many of our military members, up to the generals. It is so hard to be the voice in the wilderness. We see the consequence in this trial.

I think it's more insidious than that. We have a President who is much more sympathetic to Islam - probably due to his upbringing - than he is any other religion.

I think that if there were one issue on which we might be able to find broad agreement among all the posters here, it would be child rape. Nobody here condones it. Yet, rather than seeking such agreement, you chose to exploit the issue as one more partisan issue with which to attack Obama. You put partisanship ahead of morality on this issue.

In a conflict with very few good choices and lots of bad ones, our leaders have frequently been forced to choose among various bad options. As a result, we have crossed moral thresholds on things like torture and domestic surveillance that diverge significantly from the values Americans have traditionally held dear. Some, including me, would argue that such moral compromises are reasons to avoid such conflicts in the first place. The situation with child rape in Afghanistan is simply one more instance of morality being sacrificed for expediency. Our leaders have prioritized wining the military and political struggles above the protection of children from sexual abuse.

I think all of us, Republicans, Libertarians, Democrats, Socialists, and none-of-the-aboves, should give thought to the various moral compromises that are made in the name of war. Individuals from different political views have been able to work together to push back on some compromises such as domestic surveillance. We should equally be able to put aside our differences in order to stand united against child rape. But, that can't happen if the goal of attacking Obama is placed above the goal of combatting the sexual abuse of children.

Then push to have him pardon these soldiers.

Pardon? Are they felons now? I didn't think they were.

Dishonorably discharged. Yes. You can't exercise your second amendment rights, for instance.

http://www.ehow.com/list_6139124_consequences-dishonorable-discharge-military.html

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep, a bunch of Marines and foot soldiers and field commanders did not suddenly become."ok"with child rape. This came from.the very top ..just make do. Just get results ..dont rock the boat. Work with the people stuffing dollars into overseas accounts and buying young boys. I'm sorry, but this comes from the TOP. If not, why would this case of the green beret not be overturned already? I feel.so sorry for so many of our military members, up to the generals. It is so hard to be the voice in the wilderness. We see the consequence in this trial.

I think it's more insidious than that. We have a President who is much more sympathetic to Islam - probably due to his upbringing - than he is any other religion.

I think that if there were one issue on which we might be able to find broad agreement among all the posters here, it would be child rape. Nobody here condones it. Yet, rather than seeking such agreement, you chose to exploit the issue as one more partisan issue with which to attack Obama. You put partisanship ahead of morality on this issue.

In a conflict with very few good choices and lots of bad ones, our leaders have frequently been forced to choose among various bad options. As a result, we have crossed moral thresholds on things like torture and domestic surveillance that diverge significantly from the values Americans have traditionally held dear. Some, including me, would argue that such moral compromises are reasons to avoid such conflicts in the first place. The situation with child rape in Afghanistan is simply one more instance of morality being sacrificed for expediency. Our leaders have prioritized wining the military and political struggles above the protection of children from sexual abuse.

I think all of us, Republicans, Libertarians, Democrats, Socialists, and none-of-the-aboves, should give thought to the various moral compromises that are made in the name of war. Individuals from different political views have been able to work together to push back on some compromises such as domestic surveillance. We should equally be able to put aside our differences in order to stand united against child rape. But, that can't happen if the goal of attacking Obama is placed above the goal of combatting the sexual abuse of children.

All the above is true and to think war is prosecuted without some compromise is to put on rose colored glasses. However, just as we would not tolerate prosecuting a whistleblower on Abu Graibh type torture/misconduct why would we tolerate the internal persecution of this green beret who took a stand on child abuse? The question I have for our President is why he isn't picking up the phone on this case and letting his discontent be known to whomever is running the circus trial?

He was VERY quick to defend Bergdahl and was very fast with his tweet to Ahmed Mohamed. Ditto his statements re: the Cambridge officer and the Martin case.

I should have known that I was pissing into the wind. For some folks, it's all about Obama.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep, a bunch of Marines and foot soldiers and field commanders did not suddenly become."ok"with child rape. This came from.the very top ..just make do. Just get results ..dont rock the boat. Work with the people stuffing dollars into overseas accounts and buying young boys. I'm sorry, but this comes from the TOP. If not, why would this case of the green beret not be overturned already? I feel.so sorry for so many of our military members, up to the generals. It is so hard to be the voice in the wilderness. We see the consequence in this trial.

I think it's more insidious than that. We have a President who is much more sympathetic to Islam - probably due to his upbringing - than he is any other religion.

I think that if there were one issue on which we might be able to find broad agreement among all the posters here, it would be child rape. Nobody here condones it. Yet, rather than seeking such agreement, you chose to exploit the issue as one more partisan issue with which to attack Obama. You put partisanship ahead of morality on this issue.

In a conflict with very few good choices and lots of bad ones, our leaders have frequently been forced to choose among various bad options. As a result, we have crossed moral thresholds on things like torture and domestic surveillance that diverge significantly from the values Americans have traditionally held dear. Some, including me, would argue that such moral compromises are reasons to avoid such conflicts in the first place. The situation with child rape in Afghanistan is simply one more instance of morality being sacrificed for expediency. Our leaders have prioritized wining the military and political struggles above the protection of children from sexual abuse.

I think all of us, Republicans, Libertarians, Democrats, Socialists, and none-of-the-aboves, should give thought to the various moral compromises that are made in the name of war. Individuals from different political views have been able to work together to push back on some compromises such as domestic surveillance. We should equally be able to put aside our differences in order to stand united against child rape. But, that can't happen if the goal of attacking Obama is placed above the goal of combatting the sexual abuse of children.

All the above is true and to think war is prosecuted without some compromise is to put on rose colored glasses. However, just as we would not tolerate prosecuting a whistleblower on Abu Graibh type torture/misconduct why would we tolerate the internal persecution of this green beret who took a stand on child abuse? The question I have for our President is why he isn't picking up the phone on this case and letting his discontent be known to whomever is running the circus trial?

He was VERY quick to defend Bergdahl and was very fast with his tweet to Ahmed Mohamed. Ditto his statements re: the Cambridge officer and the Martin case.

I don't recall the President defending Bergdahl. Could you refer me to a reputable media outlet which reported that his statements were not to the effect of upholding the principal that we don't leave Americans behind. It's similar to exchanging arms for hostages. I find the idea of the President intervening in and thereby politicizing matters of military discipline troubling. There are Rules of Engagement for a reason and we have a UCMJ to ensure due process is a coded to those charged with assault or other wrongdoing. What's next, a Congressional resolution supporting those who have violated the military's standards of conduct?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep, a bunch of Marines and foot soldiers and field commanders did not suddenly become."ok"with child rape. This came from.the very top ..just make do. Just get results ..dont rock the boat. Work with the people stuffing dollars into overseas accounts and buying young boys. I'm sorry, but this comes from the TOP. If not, why would this case of the green beret not be overturned already? I feel.so sorry for so many of our military members, up to the generals. It is so hard to be the voice in the wilderness. We see the consequence in this trial.

I think it's more insidious than that. We have a President who is much more sympathetic to Islam - probably due to his upbringing - than he is any other religion.

Lemme fix that for ya, "Obama's a secret Kenyan born Muslim Communist"

Dude, don't go halfway on teabagger moron, just cut to the chase and go for the TRIFECTA! We already know ya wanna!

Obama was taught in Muslim schools for part of his life. His mother, father, and grandparents were communists (see "little red church"). Your childhood does shape your adult views.

Thanks for confirming your paranoid idiocy for us.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep, a bunch of Marines and foot soldiers and field commanders did not suddenly become."ok"with child rape. This came from.the very top ..just make do. Just get results ..dont rock the boat. Work with the people stuffing dollars into overseas accounts and buying young boys. I'm sorry, but this comes from the TOP. If not, why would this case of the green beret not be overturned already? I feel.so sorry for so many of our military members, up to the generals. It is so hard to be the voice in the wilderness. We see the consequence in this trial.

I think it's more insidious than that. We have a President who is much more sympathetic to Islam - probably due to his upbringing - than he is any other religion.

I think that if there were one issue on which we might be able to find broad agreement among all the posters here, it would be child rape. Nobody here condones it. Yet, rather than seeking such agreement, you chose to exploit the issue as one more partisan issue with which to attack Obama. You put partisanship ahead of morality on this issue.

In a conflict with very few good choices and lots of bad ones, our leaders have frequently been forced to choose among various bad options. As a result, we have crossed moral thresholds on things like torture and domestic surveillance that diverge significantly from the values Americans have traditionally held dear. Some, including me, would argue that such moral compromises are reasons to avoid such conflicts in the first place. The situation with child rape in Afghanistan is simply one more instance of morality being sacrificed for expediency. Our leaders have prioritized wining the military and political struggles above the protection of children from sexual abuse.

I think all of us, Republicans, Libertarians, Democrats, Socialists, and none-of-the-aboves, should give thought to the various moral compromises that are made in the name of war. Individuals from different political views have been able to work together to push back on some compromises such as domestic surveillance. We should equally be able to put aside our differences in order to stand united against child rape. But, that can't happen if the goal of attacking Obama is placed above the goal of combatting the sexual abuse of children.

All the above is true and to think war is prosecuted without some compromise is to put on rose colored glasses. However, just as we would not tolerate prosecuting a whistleblower on Abu Graibh type torture/misconduct why would we tolerate the internal persecution of this green beret who took a stand on child abuse? The question I have for our President is why he isn't picking up the phone on this case and letting his discontent be known to whomever is running the circus trial?

He was VERY quick to defend Bergdahl and was very fast with his tweet to Ahmed Mohamed. Ditto his statements re: the Cambridge officer and the Martin case.

I should have known that I was pissing into the wind. For some folks, it's all about Obama.

He IS the commander-in-chief of the military, is he not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep, a bunch of Marines and foot soldiers and field commanders did not suddenly become."ok"with child rape. This came from.the very top ..just make do. Just get results ..dont rock the boat. Work with the people stuffing dollars into overseas accounts and buying young boys. I'm sorry, but this comes from the TOP. If not, why would this case of the green beret not be overturned already? I feel.so sorry for so many of our military members, up to the generals. It is so hard to be the voice in the wilderness. We see the consequence in this trial.

I think it's more insidious than that. We have a President who is much more sympathetic to Islam - probably due to his upbringing - than he is any other religion.

Lemme fix that for ya, "Obama's a secret Kenyan born Muslim Communist"

Dude, don't go halfway on teabagger moron, just cut to the chase and go for the TRIFECTA! We already know ya wanna!

Obama was taught in Muslim schools for part of his life. His mother, father, and grandparents were communists (see "little red church"). Your childhood does shape your adult views.

Well, which one is it? Muslim or Communist?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep, a bunch of Marines and foot soldiers and field commanders did not suddenly become."ok"with child rape. This came from.the very top ..just make do. Just get results ..dont rock the boat. Work with the people stuffing dollars into overseas accounts and buying young boys. I'm sorry, but this comes from the TOP. If not, why would this case of the green beret not be overturned already? I feel.so sorry for so many of our military members, up to the generals. It is so hard to be the voice in the wilderness. We see the consequence in this trial.

I think it's more insidious than that. We have a President who is much more sympathetic to Islam - probably due to his upbringing - than he is any other religion.

Lemme fix that for ya, "Obama's a secret Kenyan born Muslim Communist"

Dude, don't go halfway on teabagger moron, just cut to the chase and go for the TRIFECTA! We already know ya wanna!

Obama was taught in Muslim schools for part of his life. His mother, father, and grandparents were communists (see "little red church"). Your childhood does shape your adult views.

Thanks for confirming your paranoid idiocy for us.

You can fact-check this:

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2008/07/what_barack_obama_learned_from.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep, a bunch of Marines and foot soldiers and field commanders did not suddenly become."ok"with child rape. This came from.the very top ..just make do. Just get results ..dont rock the boat. Work with the people stuffing dollars into overseas accounts and buying young boys. I'm sorry, but this comes from the TOP. If not, why would this case of the green beret not be overturned already? I feel.so sorry for so many of our military members, up to the generals. It is so hard to be the voice in the wilderness. We see the consequence in this trial.

I think it's more insidious than that. We have a President who is much more sympathetic to Islam - probably due to his upbringing - than he is any other religion.

Lemme fix that for ya, "Obama's a secret Kenyan born Muslim Communist"

Dude, don't go halfway on teabagger moron, just cut to the chase and go for the TRIFECTA! We already know ya wanna!

Obama was taught in Muslim schools for part of his life. His mother, father, and grandparents were communists (see "little red church"). Your childhood does shape your adult views.

Well, which one is it? Muslim or Communist?

I have no clue. Only Obama knows what motivates him to behave the way he does in any given situation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep, a bunch of Marines and foot soldiers and field commanders did not suddenly become."ok"with child rape. This came from.the very top ..just make do. Just get results ..dont rock the boat. Work with the people stuffing dollars into overseas accounts and buying young boys. I'm sorry, but this comes from the TOP. If not, why would this case of the green beret not be overturned already? I feel.so sorry for so many of our military members, up to the generals. It is so hard to be the voice in the wilderness. We see the consequence in this trial.

I think it's more insidious than that. We have a President who is much more sympathetic to Islam - probably due to his upbringing - than he is any other religion.

I think that if there were one issue on which we might be able to find broad agreement among all the posters here, it would be child rape. Nobody here condones it. Yet, rather than seeking such agreement, you chose to exploit the issue as one more partisan issue with which to attack Obama. You put partisanship ahead of morality on this issue.

In a conflict with very few good choices and lots of bad ones, our leaders have frequently been forced to choose among various bad options. As a result, we have crossed moral thresholds on things like torture and domestic surveillance that diverge significantly from the values Americans have traditionally held dear. Some, including me, would argue that such moral compromises are reasons to avoid such conflicts in the first place. The situation with child rape in Afghanistan is simply one more instance of morality being sacrificed for expediency. Our leaders have prioritized wining the military and political struggles above the protection of children from sexual abuse.

I think all of us, Republicans, Libertarians, Democrats, Socialists, and none-of-the-aboves, should give thought to the various moral compromises that are made in the name of war. Individuals from different political views have been able to work together to push back on some compromises such as domestic surveillance. We should equally be able to put aside our differences in order to stand united against child rape. But, that can't happen if the goal of attacking Obama is placed above the goal of combatting the sexual abuse of children.

All the above is true and to think war is prosecuted without some compromise is to put on rose colored glasses. However, just as we would not tolerate prosecuting a whistleblower on Abu Graibh type torture/misconduct why would we tolerate the internal persecution of this green beret who took a stand on child abuse? The question I have for our President is why he isn't picking up the phone on this case and letting his discontent be known to whomever is running the circus trial?

He was VERY quick to defend Bergdahl and was very fast with his tweet to Ahmed Mohamed. Ditto his statements re: the Cambridge officer and the Martin case.

I should have known that I was pissing into the wind. For some folks, it's all about Obama.

He IS the commander-in-chief of the military, is he not?

+1 Obama could speak up and say that we do not condone child rape on military bases, the same way he insists we need religious tolerance in the US. Instead we get a spokesperson skirting around the issue. He could say he commends the bravery of these men.

This expose has been revealed by the NYtimes, hardly a conservative paper. Its really shameful of the military and the administration that this happened under its watch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yep, a bunch of Marines and foot soldiers and field commanders did not suddenly become."ok"with child rape. This came from.the very top ..just make do. Just get results ..dont rock the boat. Work with the people stuffing dollars into overseas accounts and buying young boys. I'm sorry, but this comes from the TOP. If not, why would this case of the green beret not be overturned already? I feel.so sorry for so many of our military members, up to the generals. It is so hard to be the voice in the wilderness. We see the consequence in this trial.

I think it's more insidious than that. We have a President who is much more sympathetic to Islam - probably due to his upbringing - than he is any other religion.

Lemme fix that for ya, "Obama's a secret Kenyan born Muslim Communist"

Dude, don't go halfway on teabagger moron, just cut to the chase and go for the TRIFECTA! We already know ya wanna!

Obama was taught in Muslim schools for part of his life. His mother, father, and grandparents were communists (see "little red church"). Your childhood does shape your adult views.

Obama didn't attend a "Muslim school" while living in Indonesia. For nearly three years, he attended St. Francis of Assisi, which is a Roman Catholic school. He next attended a public school known as State Elementary School Menteng 01 (aka SDN Besuki), which was located in a prestigious district of Jakarta and home to scores of diplomats and high-ranking officials. There were, however, some Muslim students who attended the school, which is what is to be expected in a multicultural society. Despite what you heard on Fox News or read on Drudge, he did not attend a radical Islamic madrassa where he sat on a dirt floor while being indoctrinated by a crazed Imam. You guys need to stop with this divisive, hateful "Muslim" nonsense.