Cool story bro. Everyone here understands perfectly that you lost the debate. Repeatedly. And your lack of any cogent response other than a dippy "man ur dim" only further makes the case. |
Well said. We aren't blind cultish followers. We don't go everywhere wearing Biden hats, we don't have our lawns filled with Biden flags, we don't turn a blind eye if a Democrat is caught in a crime or corruption scandal, we don't flock to Biden rallies as if it were a revivalist preacher's tent, we don't blindly repeat everything Biden says as if it were gospel, let alone "neon pink skies" - the pp claiming all of this comes across as completely unhinged and leaves me wondering whether they actually do in fact personally know any actual Democrats because there's not a single person in my circle of Democrats who is like that. The whole thing comes off as delusional MAGA projection. |
That pretty much exactly sums up the last 10 or so pages of debate, thank you. Likewise, the only attempt at science I saw was reference to the Cochrane study to try and discredit masks, which the "I won on science" poster now says they didn't post. Truly bizarre to claim "I won on science" without even posting any science. |
Look out man, we got us a stable genius here playing 5-d chess whose arguments on science are so complicated they don't even involve citing any actual science. They are so complex that actual scientists are too dim to understand them /s ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There are reasonable republicans who don't do that stuff. Unfortunately, they allow the magahats to be their voice. That's how they are post-truth. The reasonable republicans aren't willing to openly disagree with the magahat wing of their party. Even when they know it to be lies. I'm still waiting for a republican to explain whether they believe Biden allows open borders. |
+1 Words actually have meanings. To me, open borders means no walls or gates, nobody being stopped as they enter, no cargo being inspected and so on, everyone immediately granted citizenship and so on. And I also want to know why reasonable Republicans still let the climate change deniers, the anti-vaxxers and others speak for them despite the science not being on their side. |
It's a lack of critical thinking and questioning that allows people to be misled. For example "vaccines cause myocarditis!" - science says the reality is that covid itself is significantly more likely to cause myocarditis than the vaccines are. Or, "windmills kill birds" - when the reality is that vastly more birds get killed by being caught by cats, by crashing into buildings, and other things, including fossil fuel industry and climate change than by windmills. For some reason, because a REPUBLICAN said it, they believe it, over what the science actually says about it. |
I agree with you on vax, but climate change debates are much more complicated than whether or not it's happening. There's also the question of the cost of dealing with it and whether we can get people, even liberals, to change their behavior. My AC has already been on this season, for example. |
Now are there anti-math democrats, because they don't believe that endless money creation devalues the dollar and causes inflation?
Does money really grow on trees? |
The cost question is an macroeconomics question, not a science question - I've seen a number of studies and papers showing that regardless of how much industry and officials complain about the cost, the cost of not dealing with it is significantly greater than the cost of dealing with it. https://www.nber.org/papers/w32450 |
Who in this thread posted anything about "endless money creation?" Nobody that I've seen. I guess the strategy is that when you don't actually have an argument, you fabricate a strawman of your own. Democrats do not support endless money creation for the sake of endless money creation. But they do support expansionary monetary policy as needed to keep up with other real-world expansionary factors such as growing GDP, population growth, increase in the numbers of businesses and industries, need for critical infrastructure, and so on. If you had been paying attention, you would have seen that the Biden administration and Federal Reserve have been coordinating to try and drive pandemic-related inflation back down and as a result, our inflation rates are now lower than those of most other countries. Biden administration drove inflation down from 9.1% at the tail end of the pandemic to 3.4% as of the latest report, lower than most other countries and the lowest of any G7 nations. Meanwhile you may have forgotten that it was the Trump administration that pumped the economy full of inflation-driving "stimmy checks" which were phased out by Biden. You may have also forgotten that it was the Trump administration that threw money around with the fraud-riddled PPP loans, which were significantly reformed by Biden to rein in the rampant fraud. So, not only is it a strawman, it's a fail in every other way. And don't even bother coming back at us with a lame retort like "man you didn't even understand the question and you're dim" |
It’s funny cause I was reading an article today in WaPo that asserted the data showed X but actually no, it is Y, because of some people’s personal opinions and beliefs. I think whether we’re in a post truth majority depends on what actual information you prefer to accept as truth. And what you prefer to ignore. This is a problem of people from all stripes. |
Are you referring to the recent article that showed that a large percentage of Americans believe we are in a recession (because Republicans have suggested we are) despite the actual data showing that we are not? I think a lot of people lack the basic literacy or curiosity to actually look at the data as opposed to just believing whatever their "trusted" but wrong sources are telling them. That's the whole problem - opinion versus facts. For some Americans those lines have become completely blurred. Same with how a large percentage of Republicans believe the election was "rigged" and "stolen" from Trump and that there was "massive fraud" despite the Trumpian claims repeatedly being debunked and despite all of the numerous investigations and trials and hearings repeatedly failing to prove this, and showing instead that Trump simply lost the election. They want to believe Trump because they trust him - even though he's wrong, while ignoring and refusing to accept the mountains of evidence showing he's wrong. Perfect examples of the post-truth era we are living in. |
Right wing rule #12: "When you lose the debate on one subject like science, divert attention by trying to shift the debate to some other subject like economics!" (and proceed to immediately lose on that one, too :lol ![]() Truly hilarious. |
Like any rational Democrat, I will double mask and never leave my basement. So, I don't need to get myocarditis from COVID or the vaccine. |