Grace Hopper Center Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it is unfair to characterize the statements from the AT students as "not wanting those kids in their school." They are rightfully concerned about program changes that may alter their access to courses and administration of the school with separate administrators and pathways being proposed. The county has not been clear on this throughout the short and rushed proposal process. Kids at AT give up a lot when they choose a non-comprehensive program (in areas of arts/music/sports) and it's reasonable for them to want to preserve the benefits they get. They are not asking for restricted access for Langston students (they can already take classes at ACC just like all APS students) but it is fair to want to guarantee continued availability for AT students, especially those who are in the middle of the program.

that's fine but a few pages ago people were claiming no one at AT was opposed at all, or that they would stop their opposition if langston wanted to come.

and that's not what is happening at all.

So the AT kids did not express concern about the Langston kids coming?

Their concerns were about program changes and timing

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure sounds like AT parents are upset about this

https://www.arlnow.com/2025/12/11/change-in-plans-for-new-career-center-facility-angers-arlington-tech-parents/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPx4gxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeMXzm5DuYVGE9hdgUZgH3I3cBS6JzWKwVPxZkKd9HMZyi-4kb-Vs84MsINqk_aem_cyZ5NANVpr4dBJ-zubSppQ

Fake news, pseudologia fantastica practitioner. That was right after the no plan plan was released. read their own words published 1/26.

+1 APS published a plan, has very few details and then immediately backtracked.

are we having fun playing with the fuzzy little troll? I didn't know that their moss covered selves were so soft.

No post has demonstrated recent opposition.

Are you saying I'm a troll because I posted the Arl Now article. I'm trying to understand the opposition to the plan from AT. First someone said no AT parents were opposed. Now we have shown that's clearly not true so I'm a troll?!

No post has demonstrated recent opposition.

Last night’s comments before school board were opposed. Is that recent enough for you?

Not without proof.

It's recorded and you can watch it. How is that not enough proof for you? Also it doesn't really matter if you believe it or not. I heard it. So did everyone else who was there, including the school board who votes. If you want to deny reality, you just look even more insane.

I do not believe a trolls interpretation of what they heard and you are quoting one person...if accuratly, I don't know.

classic troll behavior:
"I'm too lazy to go listen myself so I'll just make up false claims about what those who did say"

The PP is asking for specific evidence, not an interpretation. That's the opposite of trolling.

thank you. Every accusation is an admission.

What evidence do you want? We pointed you to the recording. Even gave you a link. It's right there. In the time you spend on here trolling, you could just go watch it yourself. But then you'd see what I told you - Arl Tech opposing Langston coming and Langston saying they want to come- and you clearly don't want to admit that's real.

The lengths you will go to deny reality!!! You look ridiculous and we can all see it.

So what you told us is untrue. The AT kids did NOT say they were opposed to Langston coming.

That’s why the PPs were asking for evidence. Because they suspected (rightly) that you were full of sht.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it is unfair to characterize the statements from the AT students as "not wanting those kids in their school." They are rightfully concerned about program changes that may alter their access to courses and administration of the school with separate administrators and pathways being proposed. The county has not been clear on this throughout the short and rushed proposal process. Kids at AT give up a lot when they choose a non-comprehensive program (in areas of arts/music/sports) and it's reasonable for them to want to preserve the benefits they get. They are not asking for restricted access for Langston students (they can already take classes at ACC just like all APS students) but it is fair to want to guarantee continued availability for AT students, especially those who are in the middle of the program.

that's fine but a few pages ago people were claiming no one at AT was opposed at all, or that they would stop their opposition if langston wanted to come.

and that's not what is happening at all.

So the AT kids did not express concern about the Langston kids coming?

You think some teenager is going to stand up in public and announce “i don’t want those kids and adults” at our school? Not only social suicide, but paints a target on your back for when schools are merged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it is unfair to characterize the statements from the AT students as "not wanting those kids in their school." They are rightfully concerned about program changes that may alter their access to courses and administration of the school with separate administrators and pathways being proposed. The county has not been clear on this throughout the short and rushed proposal process. Kids at AT give up a lot when they choose a non-comprehensive program (in areas of arts/music/sports) and it's reasonable for them to want to preserve the benefits they get. They are not asking for restricted access for Langston students (they can already take classes at ACC just like all APS students) but it is fair to want to guarantee continued availability for AT students, especially those who are in the middle of the program.

that's fine but a few pages ago people were claiming no one at AT was opposed at all, or that they would stop their opposition if langston wanted to come.

and that's not what is happening at all.

So the AT kids did not express concern about the Langston kids coming?

You think some teenager is going to stand up in public and announce “i don’t want those kids and adults” at our school? Not only social suicide, but paints a target on your back for when schools are merged.

LOL. Stop digging. We know you’re full of shit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it is unfair to characterize the statements from the AT students as "not wanting those kids in their school." They are rightfully concerned about program changes that may alter their access to courses and administration of the school with separate administrators and pathways being proposed. The county has not been clear on this throughout the short and rushed proposal process. Kids at AT give up a lot when they choose a non-comprehensive program (in areas of arts/music/sports) and it's reasonable for them to want to preserve the benefits they get. They are not asking for restricted access for Langston students (they can already take classes at ACC just like all APS students) but it is fair to want to guarantee continued availability for AT students, especially those who are in the middle of the program.

that's fine but a few pages ago people were claiming no one at AT was opposed at all, or that they would stop their opposition if langston wanted to come.

and that's not what is happening at all.

So the AT kids did not express concern about the Langston kids coming?

You think some teenager is going to stand up in public and announce “i don’t want those kids and adults” at our school? Not only social suicide, but paints a target on your back for when schools are merged.

LOL. Stop digging. We know you’re full of shit.

I have no dog in this fight, I just think expecting students to speak up on this issue is a ridiculous bar and not worth discussing.

The Board should be evaluating the impact on potential students, as this drama and fluid changing of the program may depress future enrollment. Those parents are certainly not being engaged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it is unfair to characterize the statements from the AT students as "not wanting those kids in their school." They are rightfully concerned about program changes that may alter their access to courses and administration of the school with separate administrators and pathways being proposed. The county has not been clear on this throughout the short and rushed proposal process. Kids at AT give up a lot when they choose a non-comprehensive program (in areas of arts/music/sports) and it's reasonable for them to want to preserve the benefits they get. They are not asking for restricted access for Langston students (they can already take classes at ACC just like all APS students) but it is fair to want to guarantee continued availability for AT students, especially those who are in the middle of the program.

that's fine but a few pages ago people were claiming no one at AT was opposed at all, or that they would stop their opposition if langston wanted to come.

and that's not what is happening at all.

So the AT kids did not express concern about the Langston kids coming?

You think some teenager is going to stand up in public and announce “i don’t want those kids and adults” at our school? Not only social suicide, but paints a target on your back for when schools are merged.

LOL. Stop digging. We know you’re full of shit.

I have no dog in this fight, I just think expecting students to speak up on this issue is a ridiculous bar and not worth discussing.

The Board should be evaluating the impact on potential students, as this drama and fluid changing of the program may depress future enrollment. Those parents are certainly not being engaged.

DP, but often, those impacted down the line by these decisions aren't really paying attention. I started looking at middle and high school options when DC was in 3rd grade, but in my parent cohort, most families didn't start thinking about it until 5th grade when the lottery opened up, unless they had older siblings. It's hard to engage people when the decision is so far away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure sounds like AT parents are upset about this

https://www.arlnow.com/2025/12/11/change-in-plans-for-new-career-center-facility-angers-arlington-tech-parents/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPx4gxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeMXzm5DuYVGE9hdgUZgH3I3cBS6JzWKwVPxZkKd9HMZyi-4kb-Vs84MsINqk_aem_cyZ5NANVpr4dBJ-zubSppQ

Fake news, pseudologia fantastica practitioner. That was right after the no plan plan was released. read their own words published 1/26.

+1 APS published a plan, has very few details and then immediately backtracked.

are we having fun playing with the fuzzy little troll? I didn't know that their moss covered selves were so soft.

No post has demonstrated recent opposition.

Are you saying I'm a troll because I posted the Arl Now article. I'm trying to understand the opposition to the plan from AT. First someone said no AT parents were opposed. Now we have shown that's clearly not true so I'm a troll?!

No post has demonstrated recent opposition.

Last night’s comments before school board were opposed. Is that recent enough for you?

Not without proof.

It's recorded and you can watch it. How is that not enough proof for you? Also it doesn't really matter if you believe it or not. I heard it. So did everyone else who was there, including the school board who votes. If you want to deny reality, you just look even more insane.

I do not believe a trolls interpretation of what they heard and you are quoting one person...if accuratly, I don't know.

classic troll behavior:
"I'm too lazy to go listen myself so I'll just make up false claims about what those who did say"

The PP is asking for specific evidence, not an interpretation. That's the opposite of trolling.

thank you. Every accusation is an admission.

What evidence do you want? We pointed you to the recording. Even gave you a link. It's right there. In the time you spend on here trolling, you could just go watch it yourself. But then you'd see what I told you - Arl Tech opposing Langston coming and Langston saying they want to come- and you clearly don't want to admit that's real.

The lengths you will go to deny reality!!! You look ridiculous and we can all see it.

So what you told us is untrue. The AT kids did NOT say they were opposed to Langston coming.

That’s why the PPs were asking for evidence. Because they suspected (rightly) that you were full of sht.

Your efforts to deny reality are truly laughable. Anyone can go listen and see for themselves you are wrong. Those of us who already went to the meeting already know. So does the school board. I'm concerned for you, PP. you don't live in reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it is unfair to characterize the statements from the AT students as "not wanting those kids in their school." They are rightfully concerned about program changes that may alter their access to courses and administration of the school with separate administrators and pathways being proposed. The county has not been clear on this throughout the short and rushed proposal process. Kids at AT give up a lot when they choose a non-comprehensive program (in areas of arts/music/sports) and it's reasonable for them to want to preserve the benefits they get. They are not asking for restricted access for Langston students (they can already take classes at ACC just like all APS students) but it is fair to want to guarantee continued availability for AT students, especially those who are in the middle of the program.

that's fine but a few pages ago people were claiming no one at AT was opposed at all, or that they would stop their opposition if langston wanted to come.

and that's not what is happening at all.

So the AT kids did not express concern about the Langston kids coming?

You think some teenager is going to stand up in public and announce “i don’t want those kids and adults” at our school? Not only social suicide, but paints a target on your back for when schools are merged.

Well they already did. One from each class at AT did this very thing. The president of each class in fact so it sure sounded like an effort to represent the views of the entire student body.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure sounds like AT parents are upset about this

https://www.arlnow.com/2025/12/11/change-in-plans-for-new-career-center-facility-angers-arlington-tech-parents/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPx4gxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeMXzm5DuYVGE9hdgUZgH3I3cBS6JzWKwVPxZkKd9HMZyi-4kb-Vs84MsINqk_aem_cyZ5NANVpr4dBJ-zubSppQ

Fake news, pseudologia fantastica practitioner. That was right after the no plan plan was released. read their own words published 1/26.

+1 APS published a plan, has very few details and then immediately backtracked.

are we having fun playing with the fuzzy little troll? I didn't know that their moss covered selves were so soft.

No post has demonstrated recent opposition.

Are you saying I'm a troll because I posted the Arl Now article. I'm trying to understand the opposition to the plan from AT. First someone said no AT parents were opposed. Now we have shown that's clearly not true so I'm a troll?!

No post has demonstrated recent opposition.

Last night’s comments before school board were opposed. Is that recent enough for you?

Not without proof.

It's recorded and you can watch it. How is that not enough proof for you? Also it doesn't really matter if you believe it or not. I heard it. So did everyone else who was there, including the school board who votes. If you want to deny reality, you just look even more insane.

I do not believe a trolls interpretation of what they heard and you are quoting one person...if accuratly, I don't know.

classic troll behavior:
"I'm too lazy to go listen myself so I'll just make up false claims about what those who did say"

The PP is asking for specific evidence, not an interpretation. That's the opposite of trolling.

thank you. Every accusation is an admission.

What evidence do you want? We pointed you to the recording. Even gave you a link. It's right there. In the time you spend on here trolling, you could just go watch it yourself. But then you'd see what I told you - Arl Tech opposing Langston coming and Langston saying they want to come- and you clearly don't want to admit that's real.

The lengths you will go to deny reality!!! You look ridiculous and we can all see it.

So what you told us is untrue. The AT kids did NOT say they were opposed to Langston coming.

That’s why the PPs were asking for evidence. Because they suspected (rightly) that you were full of sht.

Your efforts to deny reality are truly laughable. Anyone can go listen and see for themselves you are wrong. Those of us who already went to the meeting already know. So does the school board. I'm concerned for you, PP. you don't live in reality.

This troll is hopeless. But for anyone who wants to listen to the comments, all school board meetings including this one are recorded. https://www.apsva.us/arlington-school-board/school-board-meetings/watch-school-board-meetings/
You can watch for yourself the 4 AT students opposing the move and the 2 Langston commenters supporting it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure sounds like AT parents are upset about this

https://www.arlnow.com/2025/12/11/change-in-plans-for-new-career-center-facility-angers-arlington-tech-parents/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPx4gxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeMXzm5DuYVGE9hdgUZgH3I3cBS6JzWKwVPxZkKd9HMZyi-4kb-Vs84MsINqk_aem_cyZ5NANVpr4dBJ-zubSppQ

Fake news, pseudologia fantastica practitioner. That was right after the no plan plan was released. read their own words published 1/26.

+1 APS published a plan, has very few details and then immediately backtracked.

are we having fun playing with the fuzzy little troll? I didn't know that their moss covered selves were so soft.

No post has demonstrated recent opposition.

Are you saying I'm a troll because I posted the Arl Now article. I'm trying to understand the opposition to the plan from AT. First someone said no AT parents were opposed. Now we have shown that's clearly not true so I'm a troll?!

No post has demonstrated recent opposition.

Last night’s comments before school board were opposed. Is that recent enough for you?

Not without proof.

It's recorded and you can watch it. How is that not enough proof for you? Also it doesn't really matter if you believe it or not. I heard it. So did everyone else who was there, including the school board who votes. If you want to deny reality, you just look even more insane.

I do not believe a trolls interpretation of what they heard and you are quoting one person...if accuratly, I don't know.

classic troll behavior:
"I'm too lazy to go listen myself so I'll just make up false claims about what those who did say"

The PP is asking for specific evidence, not an interpretation. That's the opposite of trolling.

thank you. Every accusation is an admission.

What evidence do you want? We pointed you to the recording. Even gave you a link. It's right there. In the time you spend on here trolling, you could just go watch it yourself. But then you'd see what I told you - Arl Tech opposing Langston coming and Langston saying they want to come- and you clearly don't want to admit that's real.

The lengths you will go to deny reality!!! You look ridiculous and we can all see it.

So what you told us is untrue. The AT kids did NOT say they were opposed to Langston coming.

That’s why the PPs were asking for evidence. Because they suspected (rightly) that you were full of sht.

Your efforts to deny reality are truly laughable. Anyone can go listen and see for themselves you are wrong. Those of us who already went to the meeting already know. So does the school board. I'm concerned for you, PP. you don't live in reality.

This troll is hopeless. But for anyone who wants to listen to the comments, all school board meetings including this one are recorded. https://www.apsva.us/arlington-school-board/school-board-meetings/watch-school-board-meetings/
You can watch for yourself the 4 AT students opposing the move and the 2 Langston commenters supporting it.

Were they against the programming change or against the Langston move?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it is unfair to characterize the statements from the AT students as "not wanting those kids in their school." They are rightfully concerned about program changes that may alter their access to courses and administration of the school with separate administrators and pathways being proposed. The county has not been clear on this throughout the short and rushed proposal process. Kids at AT give up a lot when they choose a non-comprehensive program (in areas of arts/music/sports) and it's reasonable for them to want to preserve the benefits they get. They are not asking for restricted access for Langston students (they can already take classes at ACC just like all APS students) but it is fair to want to guarantee continued availability for AT students, especially those who are in the middle of the program.

that's fine but a few pages ago people were claiming no one at AT was opposed at all, or that they would stop their opposition if langston wanted to come.

and that's not what is happening at all.

No, because ppl are smarter than that. Whenever APS has tried last minute to sneak something past any votes or discussions, it has commonly turned out to be short sighted or ill-advised. Ppl asking questions is a good thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it is unfair to characterize the statements from the AT students as "not wanting those kids in their school." They are rightfully concerned about program changes that may alter their access to courses and administration of the school with separate administrators and pathways being proposed. The county has not been clear on this throughout the short and rushed proposal process. Kids at AT give up a lot when they choose a non-comprehensive program (in areas of arts/music/sports) and it's reasonable for them to want to preserve the benefits they get. They are not asking for restricted access for Langston students (they can already take classes at ACC just like all APS students) but it is fair to want to guarantee continued availability for AT students, especially those who are in the middle of the program.

that's fine but a few pages ago people were claiming no one at AT was opposed at all, or that they would stop their opposition if langston wanted to come.

and that's not what is happening at all.

No, because ppl are smarter than that. Whenever APS has tried last minute to sneak something past any votes or discussions, it has commonly turned out to be short sighted or ill-advised. Ppl asking questions is a good thing.

100% they love trying to sneak half-baked or ill-advised plans under the radar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure sounds like AT parents are upset about this

https://www.arlnow.com/2025/12/11/change-in-plans-for-new-career-center-facility-angers-arlington-tech-parents/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPx4gxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeMXzm5DuYVGE9hdgUZgH3I3cBS6JzWKwVPxZkKd9HMZyi-4kb-Vs84MsINqk_aem_cyZ5NANVpr4dBJ-zubSppQ

Fake news, pseudologia fantastica practitioner. That was right after the no plan plan was released. read their own words published 1/26.

+1 APS published a plan, has very few details and then immediately backtracked.

are we having fun playing with the fuzzy little troll? I didn't know that their moss covered selves were so soft.

No post has demonstrated recent opposition.

Are you saying I'm a troll because I posted the Arl Now article. I'm trying to understand the opposition to the plan from AT. First someone said no AT parents were opposed. Now we have shown that's clearly not true so I'm a troll?!

No post has demonstrated recent opposition.

Last night’s comments before school board were opposed. Is that recent enough for you?

Not without proof.

It's recorded and you can watch it. How is that not enough proof for you? Also it doesn't really matter if you believe it or not. I heard it. So did everyone else who was there, including the school board who votes. If you want to deny reality, you just look even more insane.

I do not believe a trolls interpretation of what they heard and you are quoting one person...if accuratly, I don't know.

classic troll behavior:
"I'm too lazy to go listen myself so I'll just make up false claims about what those who did say"

The PP is asking for specific evidence, not an interpretation. That's the opposite of trolling.

thank you. Every accusation is an admission.

What evidence do you want? We pointed you to the recording. Even gave you a link. It's right there. In the time you spend on here trolling, you could just go watch it yourself. But then you'd see what I told you - Arl Tech opposing Langston coming and Langston saying they want to come- and you clearly don't want to admit that's real.

The lengths you will go to deny reality!!! You look ridiculous and we can all see it.

So what you told us is untrue. The AT kids did NOT say they were opposed to Langston coming.

That’s why the PPs were asking for evidence. Because they suspected (rightly) that you were full of sht.

Your efforts to deny reality are truly laughable. Anyone can go listen and see for themselves you are wrong. Those of us who already went to the meeting already know. So does the school board. I'm concerned for you, PP. you don't live in reality.

You clearly did NOT watch the meeting, liar.

Not one of the AT students was opposed to the move. They clearly said it's "not about opposing it" and the Langston students were "more than welcome" to join them at Grace Hopper. They all asked for more transparency around the details for how the programs will fit in the space and interact and they also asked the board to delay the decision until the planning was better hashed out. None opposed the move.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure sounds like AT parents are upset about this

https://www.arlnow.com/2025/12/11/change-in-plans-for-new-career-center-facility-angers-arlington-tech-parents/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPx4gxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeMXzm5DuYVGE9hdgUZgH3I3cBS6JzWKwVPxZkKd9HMZyi-4kb-Vs84MsINqk_aem_cyZ5NANVpr4dBJ-zubSppQ

Fake news, pseudologia fantastica practitioner. That was right after the no plan plan was released. read their own words published 1/26.

+1 APS published a plan, has very few details and then immediately backtracked.

are we having fun playing with the fuzzy little troll? I didn't know that their moss covered selves were so soft.

No post has demonstrated recent opposition.

Are you saying I'm a troll because I posted the Arl Now article. I'm trying to understand the opposition to the plan from AT. First someone said no AT parents were opposed. Now we have shown that's clearly not true so I'm a troll?!

No post has demonstrated recent opposition.

Last night’s comments before school board were opposed. Is that recent enough for you?

Not without proof.

It's recorded and you can watch it. How is that not enough proof for you? Also it doesn't really matter if you believe it or not. I heard it. So did everyone else who was there, including the school board who votes. If you want to deny reality, you just look even more insane.

I do not believe a trolls interpretation of what they heard and you are quoting one person...if accuratly, I don't know.

classic troll behavior:
"I'm too lazy to go listen myself so I'll just make up false claims about what those who did say"

The PP is asking for specific evidence, not an interpretation. That's the opposite of trolling.

thank you. Every accusation is an admission.

What evidence do you want? We pointed you to the recording. Even gave you a link. It's right there. In the time you spend on here trolling, you could just go watch it yourself. But then you'd see what I told you - Arl Tech opposing Langston coming and Langston saying they want to come- and you clearly don't want to admit that's real.

The lengths you will go to deny reality!!! You look ridiculous and we can all see it.

So what you told us is untrue. The AT kids did NOT say they were opposed to Langston coming.

That’s why the PPs were asking for evidence. Because they suspected (rightly) that you were full of sht.

Your efforts to deny reality are truly laughable. Anyone can go listen and see for themselves you are wrong. Those of us who already went to the meeting already know. So does the school board. I'm concerned for you, PP. you don't live in reality.

You clearly did NOT watch the meeting, liar.

Not one of the AT students was opposed to the move. They clearly said it's "not about opposing it" and the Langston students were "more than welcome" to join them at Grace Hopper. They all asked for more transparency around the details for how the programs will fit in the space and interact and they also asked the board to delay the decision until the planning was better hashed out. None opposed the move.

I did, but I do not think you did. Why are you trying to make this into something it's not. We can all see what they actually said. I posted the link. You just look ridiculous keeping trying to deny what.actually.happened. Like your hero Trump!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure sounds like AT parents are upset about this

https://www.arlnow.com/2025/12/11/change-in-plans-for-new-career-center-facility-angers-arlington-tech-parents/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPx4gxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeMXzm5DuYVGE9hdgUZgH3I3cBS6JzWKwVPxZkKd9HMZyi-4kb-Vs84MsINqk_aem_cyZ5NANVpr4dBJ-zubSppQ

Fake news, pseudologia fantastica practitioner. That was right after the no plan plan was released. read their own words published 1/26.

+1 APS published a plan, has very few details and then immediately backtracked.

are we having fun playing with the fuzzy little troll? I didn't know that their moss covered selves were so soft.

No post has demonstrated recent opposition.

Are you saying I'm a troll because I posted the Arl Now article. I'm trying to understand the opposition to the plan from AT. First someone said no AT parents were opposed. Now we have shown that's clearly not true so I'm a troll?!

No post has demonstrated recent opposition.

Last night’s comments before school board were opposed. Is that recent enough for you?

Not without proof.

It's recorded and you can watch it. How is that not enough proof for you? Also it doesn't really matter if you believe it or not. I heard it. So did everyone else who was there, including the school board who votes. If you want to deny reality, you just look even more insane.

I do not believe a trolls interpretation of what they heard and you are quoting one person...if accuratly, I don't know.

classic troll behavior:
"I'm too lazy to go listen myself so I'll just make up false claims about what those who did say"

The PP is asking for specific evidence, not an interpretation. That's the opposite of trolling.

thank you. Every accusation is an admission.

What evidence do you want? We pointed you to the recording. Even gave you a link. It's right there. In the time you spend on here trolling, you could just go watch it yourself. But then you'd see what I told you - Arl Tech opposing Langston coming and Langston saying they want to come- and you clearly don't want to admit that's real.

The lengths you will go to deny reality!!! You look ridiculous and we can all see it.

So what you told us is untrue. The AT kids did NOT say they were opposed to Langston coming.

That’s why the PPs were asking for evidence. Because they suspected (rightly) that you were full of sht.

Your efforts to deny reality are truly laughable. Anyone can go listen and see for themselves you are wrong. Those of us who already went to the meeting already know. So does the school board. I'm concerned for you, PP. you don't live in reality.

You clearly did NOT watch the meeting, liar.

Not one of the AT students was opposed to the move. They clearly said it's "not about opposing it" and the Langston students were "more than welcome" to join them at Grace Hopper. They all asked for more transparency around the details for how the programs will fit in the space and interact and they also asked the board to delay the decision until the planning was better hashed out. None opposed the move.

I did, but I do not think you did. Why are you trying to make this into something it's not. We can all see what they actually said. I posted the link. You just look ridiculous keeping trying to deny what.actually.happened. Like your hero Trump!

I just watched it. You’re lying.

Not one opposed the move. They want the board to increase transparency and delay to better plan.

They said they support the move but want it better planned out.