The PP is asking for specific evidence, not an interpretation. That's the opposite of trolling. |
And the PP was pointed to the recording of the school board meeting. That's where the specific evidence is. But if they are too lazy to go listen to the evidence, then they are clearly just a troll. you are too for defending this. |
It’s relevant to question whether people speaking on behalf of a group are doing so at their request, that’s what you’ve done on this thread |
thank you. Every accusation is an admission. |
No dear. We are rubber. You are glue. What bounces off of us, sticks on you. We have repeatedly called out your laziness and this is your defense. |
Are you 10? I watched the recording. What's stopping YOU from watching it? |
How am I lazy because YOU are too lazy to watch the meeting? |
What evidence do you want? We pointed you to the recording. Even gave you a link. It's right there. In the time you spend on here trolling, you could just go watch it yourself. But then you'd see what I told you - Arl Tech opposing Langston coming and Langston saying they want to come- and you clearly don't want to admit that's real. The lengths you will go to deny reality!!! You look ridiculous and we can all see it. |
I'm so sorry that your kid couldn't keep up. Ta! |
So now you're trying to insult my kid in your effort to deflect from Arlington Tech's ugly opposition to keeping out "those kids" from Langston. Trying to hoard opportunity and not share the nice new building. Not nice, AT, not nice. And we can all see it. |
you're not even making sense PP. Weird that you say you want evidence but then refuse to watch it. |
DP. I think there is confusion. There are two different groups of kids at Langston (very nice building btw). The vulnerable ones are about 100 kids. I don’t know how many of them want to move or not, but a handful of moms (and a teacher?) posted on Fb that they do not want to move into a big building or be integrated into a bigger setting/program, because many kids have had bad experiences, and the whole reason this program exists was to move them OUT of these environments and influences. I don’t think anyone would oppose having them? The criminal kids otoh, about a dozen, only moved into that location in 2022, and they merged with the vulnerable kids in 2024. Per APS they all have convictions for serious crimes (drugs, gangs, assault), and they had 2:1 staff before the merge. Now APS wants to move them all again - it’s all part of a big consolidation plan they have. I think you cannot fault any parent who does not want “those kids” anywhere near. Why did APS merge them with a vulnerable group? How has that been going? Why are they not concerned about moving that population into a large mainstream setting? Only APS knows, and it doesn’t seem like they want to share that information. |
DP. I don’t have access to my computer this weekend. What are the key points the students make? |
If you can post here why can’t you watch? |
Where were the criminal kids before Langston? |