Van Lifer couple camping in Utah national park - two weeks later fiancee arrives in FL alone

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No way his parents would go along with charges for use of their card.

It has to be related Gabby’s or an unknown person.

But if they said they authorized him to use it doesn’t that require them to admit they helped him either evade arrest or that they currently know where he is?

[Anonymous]

I saw online today that Dog the Bounty Hunter has verified information that Brian Laundrie was alive yesterday (Tue.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Rumors are now circulating that Dog captured him!

Now let's wait and see if that is true.

Where’d you see that? I just checked his Twitter page and just see the video of him about to go out in the water.

NP

A sheriff helicopter headed out to the island after Dog.

Then the police asked a news company to pull a story until they update them.

Then the police scanner went quiet. Not staticky, completely quiet.

Now everyone is waiting

Wait...you're telling me Dog showed up a WEEK AGO and suddenly got the guy? Maybe he should be running the state police for three districts and not whoever the idiots are now.

Is there actually a warrant out for Brian? Under what authority would Dog be apprehending him?

Well murder rings a bell…

That’s not a warrant for arrest based on a murder charge. But more to the point - Dog is a private citizen? What authority does he have to effect an arrest?

Do you not know what a bounty hunter is? Oh dear sweet one...

+1 also hasn’t PP heard of a citizen arrest?

To save some thumb searching, here is a link to some info on citizen’s arrest. We all have authority under certain conditions.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen's_arrest

Did you read the link? Despite the practice's name, in most countries, the arresting person is usually designated as a person with arrest powers, who need not be a citizen of the country in which they are acting.

Georgia just repealed the citizen arrest law because of Amaud Aubrey.

Dog is just hunting him, the FBI will arrest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No way his parents would go along with charges for use of their card.

It has to be related Gabby’s or an unknown person.

But if they said they authorized him to use it doesn’t that require them to admit they helped him either evade arrest or that they currently know where he is?

He used the card when he was still out west.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think it is only fair that the officers who handled the August 12th incident are investigated. Even without knowing what we do now, it is very clear to me that a travesty occurred. The bearded officer was totally on Brian’s side. He stressed due to the scratches on his face he was the apparent victim in the scenario. He even pointed out that Gabby had no tangible injuries on her person. After Gabby told him that she never intended to cause harm or injury to Brian, the bearded officer got annoyed/exasperated then told the initial officer it was all his decision because he had another call to attend to and had to get to it. It was obvious when witnessing his demeanor on the video that he thought Brian was a poor victim of a crazy fiancée. He is probably hating himself now.
The motel Brian was driven to is pretty nice. He was driven over to the Bowen Hotel which was about $90 - 100 for a night. It was right in walking distance from everything in Moab plus it offered free WiFi, free laundry services and a multi channel T.V. package along with unlimited air conditioned comfort. Brian got all of that while Gabby slept in the hot van, in the middle of the desert, alone without anyone to check up on her. The only resource she was given was a list of public showers in the area.

The officers should be definitely canned.

If you want to be more objective, do t forget she had the vehicle with the power (obviously not the will) to take off without him. Having the van that was in her name had some power.unfortunately like many DV victims she chose not to use it.

Agree evaluate the cops and the situation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Rumors are now circulating that Dog captured him!

Now let's wait and see if that is true.

Where’d you see that? I just checked his Twitter page and just see the video of him about to go out in the water.

NP

A sheriff helicopter headed out to the island after Dog.

Then the police asked a news company to pull a story until they update them.

Then the police scanner went quiet. Not staticky, completely quiet.

Now everyone is waiting

Wait...you're telling me Dog showed up a WEEK AGO and suddenly got the guy? Maybe he should be running the state police for three districts and not whoever the idiots are now.

Is there actually a warrant out for Brian? Under what authority would Dog be apprehending him?

Well murder rings a bell…

That’s not a warrant for arrest based on a murder charge. But more to the point - Dog is a private citizen? What authority does he have to effect an arrest?

Do you not know what a bounty hunter is? Oh dear sweet one...

+1 also hasn’t PP heard of a citizen arrest?

To save some thumb searching, here is a link to some info on citizen’s arrest. We all have authority under certain conditions.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen's_arrest

Did you read the link? Despite the practice's name, in most countries, the arresting person is usually designated as a person with arrest powers, who need not be a citizen of the country in which they are acting.

Georgia just repealed the citizen arrest law because of Amaud Aubrey.

Dog is just hunting him, the FBI will arrest.

I did read it. It is still applicable in some places. See blurb on CA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Rumors are now circulating that Dog captured him!

Now let's wait and see if that is true.

Where’d you see that? I just checked his Twitter page and just see the video of him about to go out in the water.

NP

A sheriff helicopter headed out to the island after Dog.

Then the police asked a news company to pull a story until they update them.

Then the police scanner went quiet. Not staticky, completely quiet.

Now everyone is waiting

Wait...you're telling me Dog showed up a WEEK AGO and suddenly got the guy? Maybe he should be running the state police for three districts and not whoever the idiots are now.

Is there actually a warrant out for Brian? Under what authority would Dog be apprehending him?

Well murder rings a bell…

That’s not a warrant for arrest based on a murder charge. But more to the point - Dog is a private citizen? What authority does he have to effect an arrest?

Do you not know what a bounty hunter is? Oh dear sweet one...

+1 also hasn’t PP heard of a citizen arrest?

To save some thumb searching, here is a link to some info on citizen’s arrest. We all have authority under certain conditions.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen's_arrest

Did you read the link? Despite the practice's name, in most countries, the arresting person is usually designated as a person with arrest powers, who need not be a citizen of the country in which they are acting.

Georgia just repealed the citizen arrest law because of Amaud Aubrey.

Dog is just hunting him, the FBI will arrest.

I did read it. It is still applicable in some places. See blurb on CA.

Is he in CA? No.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Rumors are now circulating that Dog captured him!

Now let's wait and see if that is true.

Where’d you see that? I just checked his Twitter page and just see the video of him about to go out in the water.

NP

A sheriff helicopter headed out to the island after Dog.

Then the police asked a news company to pull a story until they update them.

Then the police scanner went quiet. Not staticky, completely quiet.

Now everyone is waiting

Wait...you're telling me Dog showed up a WEEK AGO and suddenly got the guy? Maybe he should be running the state police for three districts and not whoever the idiots are now.

Is there actually a warrant out for Brian? Under what authority would Dog be apprehending him?

Well murder rings a bell…

That’s not a warrant for arrest based on a murder charge. But more to the point - Dog is a private citizen? What authority does he have to effect an arrest?

Do you not know what a bounty hunter is? Oh dear sweet one...

+1 also hasn’t PP heard of a citizen arrest?

To save some thumb searching, here is a link to some info on citizen’s arrest. We all have authority under certain conditions.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen's_arrest

Yeah, and don't skip reading this part:

"Anyone who makes a citizen's arrest can find themselves facing possible lawsuits or criminal charges (e.g. charges of false imprisonment, unlawful restraint, kidnapping, or wrongful arrest) if the wrong person is apprehended or a suspect's civil rights are violated.[4] This is especially true when police forces are attempting to determine who an aggressor is. Private citizens do not enjoy the same immunity from civil liability when making arrests on other private citizens as police officers do."

Hence my question. Police operate under certain constraints with regard to evidence. Some guy who decides he can make a citizen's arrest is not necessarily subject to those rules, and I wonder if that screws things up for the cops. And how is one a bounty hunter if there is no bounty? I dealt with someone at work who didn't like my agency's decision-making in his case and threatened to perform a "citizen's arrest" of our judges. Guess what, he was reported for threatening government workers and went to jail.

Personally I have no doubt Brian Laurie killed this woman, though it has yet to be proven of course. But the willingness displayed on here to cede what should be police powers to some person who calls himself Dog, and the figurative baying for blood, disgust me. Let the police or the FBI catch this guy and try him. Private citizens should not be assuming the power of the state.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Rumors are now circulating that Dog captured him!

Now let's wait and see if that is true.

Where’d you see that? I just checked his Twitter page and just see the video of him about to go out in the water.

NP

A sheriff helicopter headed out to the island after Dog.

Then the police asked a news company to pull a story until they update them.

Then the police scanner went quiet. Not staticky, completely quiet.

Now everyone is waiting

Wait...you're telling me Dog showed up a WEEK AGO and suddenly got the guy? Maybe he should be running the state police for three districts and not whoever the idiots are now.

Is there actually a warrant out for Brian? Under what authority would Dog be apprehending him?

Well murder rings a bell…

That’s not a warrant for arrest based on a murder charge. But more to the point - Dog is a private citizen? What authority does he have to effect an arrest?

Do you not know what a bounty hunter is? Oh dear sweet one...

+1 also hasn’t PP heard of a citizen arrest?

To save some thumb searching, here is a link to some info on citizen’s arrest. We all have authority under certain conditions.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen's_arrest

Did you read the link? Despite the practice's name, in most countries, the arresting person is usually designated as a person with arrest powers, who need not be a citizen of the country in which they are acting.

Georgia just repealed the citizen arrest law because of Amaud Aubrey.

Dog is just hunting him, the FBI will arrest.

I did read it. It is still applicable in some places. See blurb on CA.

Is he in CA? No.

Dimwit. That was one example.’

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sun-sentinel.com/news/fl-xpm-2012-02-14-fl-florida-citizens-arrest-20120207-story,amp.html

https://criminaldefenseattorneytampa.com/warrant-for-arrest/citizens-arrest/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Rumors are now circulating that Dog captured him!

Now let's wait and see if that is true.

Where’d you see that? I just checked his Twitter page and just see the video of him about to go out in the water.

NP

A sheriff helicopter headed out to the island after Dog.

Then the police asked a news company to pull a story until they update them.

Then the police scanner went quiet. Not staticky, completely quiet.

Now everyone is waiting

Wait...you're telling me Dog showed up a WEEK AGO and suddenly got the guy? Maybe he should be running the state police for three districts and not whoever the idiots are now.

Is there actually a warrant out for Brian? Under what authority would Dog be apprehending him?

Well murder rings a bell…

That’s not a warrant for arrest based on a murder charge. But more to the point - Dog is a private citizen? What authority does he have to effect an arrest?

Do you not know what a bounty hunter is? Oh dear sweet one...

+1 also hasn’t PP heard of a citizen arrest?

To save some thumb searching, here is a link to some info on citizen’s arrest. We all have authority under certain conditions.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen's_arrest

Yeah, and don't skip reading this part:

"Anyone who makes a citizen's arrest can find themselves facing possible lawsuits or criminal charges (e.g. charges of false imprisonment, unlawful restraint, kidnapping, or wrongful arrest) if the wrong person is apprehended or a suspect's civil rights are violated.[4] This is especially true when police forces are attempting to determine who an aggressor is. Private citizens do not enjoy the same immunity from civil liability when making arrests on other private citizens as police officers do."

Hence my question. Police operate under certain constraints with regard to evidence. Some guy who decides he can make a citizen's arrest is not necessarily subject to those rules, and I wonder if that screws things up for the cops. And how is one a bounty hunter if there is no bounty? I dealt with someone at work who didn't like my agency's decision-making in his case and threatened to perform a "citizen's arrest" of our judges. Guess what, he was reported for threatening government workers and went to jail.

Personally I have no doubt Brian Laurie killed this woman, though it has yet to be proven of course. But the willingness displayed on here to cede what should be police powers to some person who calls himself Dog, and the figurative baying for blood, disgust me. Let the police or the FBI catch this guy and try him. Private citizens should not be assuming the power of the state.

The point is UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS anyone can make a citizen’s arrest. It is just a loophole that MAY apply (or not). Geez.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Rumors are now circulating that Dog captured him!

Now let's wait and see if that is true.

Where’d you see that? I just checked his Twitter page and just see the video of him about to go out in the water.

NP

A sheriff helicopter headed out to the island after Dog.

Then the police asked a news company to pull a story until they update them.

Then the police scanner went quiet. Not staticky, completely quiet.

Now everyone is waiting

Wait...you're telling me Dog showed up a WEEK AGO and suddenly got the guy? Maybe he should be running the state police for three districts and not whoever the idiots are now.

Is there actually a warrant out for Brian? Under what authority would Dog be apprehending him?

Well murder rings a bell…

That’s not a warrant for arrest based on a murder charge. But more to the point - Dog is a private citizen? What authority does he have to effect an arrest?

Do you not know what a bounty hunter is? Oh dear sweet one...

+1 also hasn’t PP heard of a citizen arrest?

To save some thumb searching, here is a link to some info on citizen’s arrest. We all have authority under certain conditions.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen's_arrest

Yeah, and don't skip reading this part:

"Anyone who makes a citizen's arrest can find themselves facing possible lawsuits or criminal charges (e.g. charges of false imprisonment, unlawful restraint, kidnapping, or wrongful arrest) if the wrong person is apprehended or a suspect's civil rights are violated.[4] This is especially true when police forces are attempting to determine who an aggressor is. Private citizens do not enjoy the same immunity from civil liability when making arrests on other private citizens as police officers do."

Hence my question. Police operate under certain constraints with regard to evidence. Some guy who decides he can make a citizen's arrest is not necessarily subject to those rules, and I wonder if that screws things up for the cops. And how is one a bounty hunter if there is no bounty? I dealt with someone at work who didn't like my agency's decision-making in his case and threatened to perform a "citizen's arrest" of our judges. Guess what, he was reported for threatening government workers and went to jail.

Personally I have no doubt Brian Laurie killed this woman, though it has yet to be proven of course. But the willingness displayed on here to cede what should be police powers to some person who calls himself Dog, and the figurative baying for blood, disgust me. Let the police or the FBI catch this guy and try him. Private citizens should not be assuming the power of the state.

The point is UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS anyone can make a citizen’s arrest. It is just a loophole that MAY apply (or not). Geez.

And do those conditions apply? The last 20 pages of this thread are breathless updates on whether Dog is about to apprehend Laurie. Rather loses credibility if Dog has no such authority or would screw up the case for the cops if he tried to exercise it.

[Anonymous]

Dog is not apprehending him, he is hunting him.

Law enforcement will apprehend him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No way his parents would go along with charges for use of their card.

It has to be related Gabby’s or an unknown person.

But if they said they authorized him to use it doesn’t that require them to admit they helped him either evade arrest or that they currently know where he is?

Yeah I’m guessing the FBI twisted the parents’ arms to get that warrant. The parents had to claim that he was not authorized to use it or else they would get some sort of aiding/abetting charge.

[Anonymous]

also, can y'all stop arguing. This is way more interesting when you are taking apart theories and re-posting new details.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I saw online today that Dog the Bounty Hunter has verified information that Brian Laundrie was alive yesterday (Tue.)

Then that means someone has seem him. He's going down.